Lew Rockwell on "Equality"

romandrakeisretarded · 14時間前

that blog says he served during 68-71, are you telling me there's a guy that's at least 67 years old that sits at home, making images of anime girls and libertarian quotes with a shitty font?

praisesnek · 6時間前

libertarian + anime girls = 💕💕💕💕💕💕💕

http://i.imgur.com/PipJojc.png

http://i.imgur.com/BJl689D.png

ExPwner · 5時間前

This is actually quite an important issue for debates with statists. It's not even worth engaging in the "equality" issue.

Statist: "The state makes people equal."

Wrong response: "I don't think it does because...."

Correct response: "I don't give a fuck. Making people equal isn't a virtuous end in the first place. People aren't equal, and trying to make them equal necessarily involves unnecessary harm/expense to some that have done nothing wrong to deserve it."

SpanishDuke · 12時間前

I'm confused right now.

Krateng · 12時間前

Marginally related, but this makes me wonder if Ancaps have an anime girl representation? Like Christ-chan for TradCaths and Rachel Purity for the fascists. Market-chan? :D

TheFourthAttempt · 3時間前

Equality is best considered a principle of justice (by which I mean the proper aplication of morality/legality), not of morality/legality themselves. Take any specific example of an equality being advocated for and what you will find is that there is another representation of equality made impossible by its implementation. Giving women the vote represented equality but taking the vote away from men would have too, forcibly re-distributing incomes to make everyone financially equal refuses to take as equal the choices of people and their implications juxtaposed against reality.

Equality is not fit as a principle to differentiate between different equalities ergo it is completely insufficient to claim legality/morality should be/be considered a certain way because of equality.

It's an important tool in the application of any moral/legal precedents but that is it.

dissidentrhetoric · 41分前

http://philosopherkin.blogspot.com/2016/10/political-implications-of-evolutionary.html

Western governments, it would seem, are deliberately (but not necessarily consciously) provoking xenophobia in their native populations, in order to condemn it and claim a spurious moral authority for themselves, and the power that goes with it. It is, I have come to realise, a modern, secular incarnation of the state’s age-old strategy of “divide and rule”, dividing society into a morally superior, now supposedly unprejudiced, ”colour-blind” and xenophilic elite, on the one hand, and the morally inferior, naturally (evolved human nature being what it is) prejudiced, not colour-blind, but xenophobically-inclined masses, on the other, who must submit to the authority of and domination by their "moral superiors”.

hansoku-make · 13分前

"Egalitarianism, in every form and shape, is incompatible with the idea of private property. Private property implies exclusivity, inequality, and difference."

- Hoppe

"The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither. The society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great measure of both."

- Milton Friedman

"[T]he justice of equality of treatment depends first of all on the justice of the treatment itself. Suppose, for example, that Jones, with his retinue, proposes to enslave a group of people. Are we to maintain that "justice" requires that each be enslaved equally? And suppose that someone has the good fortune to escape. Are we to condemn him for evading the equality of justice meted out to his fellows?"

-Rothbard

Washington_vape · 12時間前

Fucking weeaboos need to die

Htothedawg · 6時間前

HAIL TRUMP

HAIL OUR PEOPLE

HAIL VICTORY

Anarcho_Capitalism

調停者