上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]Wertsir 443 ポイント444 ポイント  (10子コメント)

I hate to break it to you, but what people call "politics" is just a societal reaction derived from one group of animal asserting dominance over another. It feels really important Morty then it slowly fades leaving you stranded in a crumbling civilization founded on lies. I did it. Your parents are going to do it. Break the cycle Morty, rise above, focus on science.

[–]ThandiGhandi 88 ポイント89 ポイント  (7子コメント)

can't focus on science if said society keeps trying to stop you

[–]Wertsir 71 ポイント72 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You've got what the intergalactic call a very planetary mindset.

[–]Kal_AkodaThis was to promote a movie? 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Schools are for idiots Morty." ~Rick Episode 1 Season 1

[–]TybrosionMohito 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is...

Holy shit I need to go evaluate my world view

[–]HardAsBluntNailsI just love killing 1950 ポイント1951 ポイント  (491子コメント)

Rick hates politics and government, and that would include democrats and republicans. He wouldn't care about the administration because he doesn't give a shit. If you think he'd prefer one political party over the other you should think again.

[–]BraunTheCrusher 1027 ポイント1028 ポイント  (404子コメント)

Exactly! And this is a March for science. Not a March against Trump. Everyone likes to politicize everything nowadays

[–]cplusequals 443 ポイント444 ポイント  (201子コメント)

I've seen about half the comments declare that this march is absolutely political and the other half say not at all. Which one is it because I'm inclined to the first based on the opinions of the organizers.

"Science" is apolitical. This march doesn't seem to be for the majority of participants though.

[–]ItzTehMattIs this what bleedin' out is? 314 ポイント315 ポイント  (105子コメント)

I would argue it is political. If it wasn't, there would be no reason for the March in the first place. People in politics deny science and set us back from progressing through these hard times (climate change, war on drugs, anti-vaccinoters, etc.). However, through the march, it must also be demonstrated that science itself isn't and shouldn't be political. It's to bring back science to the attention of the people. To make people aware of the importance of science. But to do that, we need people in politics to be scientifically literate and to care.

[–]jaddaprog 87 ポイント88 ポイント  (22子コメント)

My view is that science is political but not partisan.

[–]AliveByLovesGlory 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (16子コメント)

Science should be neither.

[–]Azurenightsky 72 ポイント73 ポイント  (6子コメント)

It is. Scientists, are not. The money that funds science, is not. Politics are innately human, the human element inevitably leads to politics.

The ideal would be to have objectively neutral financing. Let the truth come out. But good luck with getting that kind of pipe dream through. :/

[–]ePaperWeight 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Reminder, in the same breath Eisenhower wanted us about the Military Industrial Complex, he warned us about government science.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central, it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

...

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocation, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet in holding scientific discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

[–]Konraden 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

We appear to have the opposite problem: Public policy being driven with total disregard for evidence and the scientific method.

[–]jaddaprog 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Well science can't not have some political effects. Knowledge gained from science can be crucial to policy doecisions and policy decisions are crucial to funding further scientific research for the common good.

[–]Fjells 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd like to agree. But finding out that a catastrophe might hit us kind of makes people not want that to happen.

The movement is definitely political, but we have to distinguish between politics and partisanship. The march for science is definitely not partisan, because they don't give a fuck WHO fixes everything, just that there is an effort to fix it. Regardless of political affiliation.

[–]NetSage 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Science literally effects everything. Even shit like poetry because it gives them new things.

[–]dudesweetman 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Intresting sidenote: It is sometimes claimed that the russian mathematican Andrey Markov came up with Markov-chains because he wanted to understand the beuty of a certain poem.

I will se if i can come back with a source for this claim as it was something that came up from the top of my head.

Edit: Acording to the gray area in this book.google.com (link) it is with regards of vowels and consonants in this novel (link).

[–]princess--flowers 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Of course it's political. I'm a scientist, I've been a scientist for almost 10 years. In 2012, under the Obama administration, I was building a particle detector under contract and was looking forward to a job helping run it after it was built. In 2013 we finished it and Obama cut funding to Jefferson Labs, I was not offered the job and many scientists there worked 9 months to a year without seeing a paycheck. Under the Obama administration, I was on two more projects that lost DoE grants. Not a one of us took to the streets to march for science. Nor in my 10 years of being a scientist, under Bush Jr and Obama, did we feel.it was necessary.

Trump takes office and within 3 months, he has pushed such ridiculous policy and appointed such ridiculous anti-science advisors that Republican AND Democratic scientists started planning a march almost immeduately. The current administration are catering to idiots, I don't care what your political leaning is.

[–]fredlieblings 392 ポイント393 ポイント  (55子コメント)

Did we have a march for science under the Obama or Bush administrations? Nope.

A big part of this protest is fear of the people this administration has put into power:

  • A climate change denier as the head of the EPA.

  • Someone who wanted to disband the Department of Energy in charge of... the Department of Energy.

  • Someone who is unfamiliar with some of the most basic measures of student testing in charge of the Department of Education.

These are all harrowing developments, and all directly assaulting the sciences.

The events going on across country today are in favor of science, and we're triggered due to exceedingly bad choices by this administration, both in the election campaign and once office was taken.

It's not inherently against one political party or government official, but there is one government official and political party who are exceedingly against scientific realities.

[–]Prefects 144 ポイント145 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Don't forget proposals to defund NIH and other critical science finding groups

[–]fist_tacopaco taco 70 ポイント71 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Also, Nasa climate change research.

[–]fishbiscuit13 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Basically any NASA activity this side of the atmosphere.

[–]rampant_tycho 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Exactly. If an administration is anti-science, the a pro-science rally would be anti-administration.

I'm not saying it's a bad thing, but the march is obviously politically motivated.

[–]phoenixsuperman 71 ポイント72 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Exactly. If people march in support of something and you feel it's an affront to you, chances are they aren't antiYOU, you are anti-THEM.

[–]Forest-G-Nome 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I think he may have meant partisan, not political. It's definitely 100% political, but the whole point is that evidence isn't partisan, it's evidence.

[–]Aquamaniac7 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (3子コメント)

"Science" is definitely a partisan issue on some fronts. But to pretend like one side or the other is 100% gung-ho in favor of science is blind naivete. No party likes funding NASA unless we're trying to beat the Soviets.

[–]randomcoincidences 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because people are idiots. NASA has done more to improve the life of every American than pretty much any agency per dollar. They dont juzt explore space, they invent a lot of shit.

[–]FatStig 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The definition of evidence is pretty partisan.

[–]epraider 36 ポイント37 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Best description really. This march is against the politicalization of Science, and accepting the facts as they are. It's the Trump administration that has politicized science, and that is what the march protests. So the March itself is political, but the science is not and March wants to keep it that way.

[–]Aquamaniac7 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Trump administration that has politicized science

If you think this is the first administration to politicize science, you must not be familiar with US political history.

[–]entexit 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (2子コメント)

If you think this is the first administration to politicize science

I don't remember him/her/it/Apache attack helicopter saying anything about it being the first, just that it has

[–]Promethei2 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (1子コメント)

There's a pretty simple answer to whether or not it's political. Ask yourself, "would this march be happening if Hillary was elected?" The answer is almost certainly no. Therefore, it is political. I'm not arguing for one person or the other, just stating the obvious that it's political.

[–]debaser11 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, essentially if the president hadn't tweeted that global warming is a hoax created by the Chinese then I doubt the march would be necesarry.

[–]GenericPCUser 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Literally anything can be political if politicians disagree about it. Currently, one of America's political parties runs on a platform which opposes with no evidence many of the conclusions scientists have made. Therefore, the march is in support of science, and against those who would disregard it without having a good reason.

[–]n0tl0c 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Science may be apolitical in nature but that doesn't mean politics wont hijack it and make it political.

[–]kylesnooze 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I thought the whole point was that it was political... Every speaker at the DC March stated the need for science in politics and lawmaking. Likely most are anti-trump given that demographic, but the criticism wasn't directed towards the Trump administration (for the most part)

[–]TypicalLibertarian 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (8子コメント)

[–]rbutrBot 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Hi there! I'm a bot.

If you're interested in further exploring the topic linked in the previous comment, you might want to check out this response: NeuroLogica Blog » Science Is Not Colonialism

You can visit rbutr's nexus page to see the full list of known responses to that specific link.

I post whenever I find a link which has been disputed and entered into rbutr's crowdsourced database. The rbutr system accepts responses by all users in order to provide a diverse set of resources for research and discussion. Click here to see how it works.

[–]Alcnaeon 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Bots are getting pretty cool these days.

[–]Galle_ 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

In a time of universal deception, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

(or to put it another way - it's political, but that's not the marchers' fault)

[–]GastonBastardo 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm pretty sure that if people care enough about something enough to march for it, then it becomes political.

[–]AnoK760 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Honestly i couldnt care less. As long as they arent destroying shit and hurting people, the can be as political as they want.

[–]crystalistwo 61 ポイント62 ポイント  (56子コメント)

It's not a march against one side, but one side denies science, so here we are.

[–]Hard_boiled_Badger 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (4子コメント)

this march's inception was political. Just look at the controversy surrounding having too many white male speakers. Anyone who says this isn't political is supporting the facade.

[–]CaptainObvious_1 31 ポイント32 ポイント  (7子コメント)

If you think the trump administration didn't precipitate this march you're delusional.

[–]Literally_A_Shill 51 ポイント52 ポイント  (5子コメント)

It's kind of hard to separate politics from science. Especially when those in power are actively working against scientific reasoning.

For example, you can't March for things like climate change and vaccines without upsetting someone who thinks the former is a hoax and the latter causes autism. And if that person holds the highest office in the land it tends to create problems. It'd be nice if science wasn't politicized, but it is. That's what a lot of people are starting to realize and why it's important to have people in government who understand.

[–]moosic 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (3子コメント)

It absolutely is a march against Trump. Trump wants to defund the NIH, climate science, etc. Fuck off.

[–]UUtch 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's a March for the Trump administration to accept science in out government... Honestly your comment fucking infuriates me.

[–]Dirty_Rapscallion 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Think of the context that this march is taking place in though.

[–]Theniallmc 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Look at the all time top posts on the subreddit and tell me its not about Trump

[–]The_Hood_Wizard 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If Trump is what is standing in the way of science, isn't it a march against him?

[–]HardAsBluntNailsI just love killing 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (70子コメント)

Then why does the sign mention the administration. I know it's mainly about science but it's also about Trump too.

Edit: I'd be ok with it if it was just a march for science, but some (not all) people are politicizing it and making it into an anti-Trump march and it takes away from the whole thing.

[–]Logan117 44 ポイント45 ポイント  (54子コメント)

Because they are anti-science. Global-warming, evolution deniers.

[–]JLake4 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's people like Trump and his ilk who make marches for science necessary. Such a march must necessarily be anti-Trump as a result. It'd be anti-Cruz or anti-bionic Reagan in the universes where Cruz or the reanimated corpse of Reagan won, too. The point is its a march against climate change denial! If a certain politician denies the climate science consensus they're on the receiving end of this.

[–]powermad80 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Because with his denial of climate science and anti-vaxxer opinions, a march for science is also inherently a march against Trump.

[–]BraunTheCrusher 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (9子コメント)

I'm sorry, but you're wrong.

This march is going on around the world. This march is for and about the science community being heard in an ever icreasingly ignorant world.

Edit: had to say why you were wrong

[–]Koenig17 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I agree. It just so happens to coincide at a time where the administration is pushing an anti science agenda. But that's another issue, it's not meant to be political

[–]soofreshnsocleanHow to make a plumbus 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I LIKE WHAT YOU GOT

[–]freakinunoriginal 39 ポイント40 ポイント  (5子コメント)

"I can't even tell the two of you apart half the time because I don't go by liberal or conservative, I go by amount of pain in my ass. Which makes you both identical."

Although he seems to get along with President Keith David.

[–]Altherionftw 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Keith David would make a great President. He would win every debate, and people would happily listen to his ads. What a voice.

[–]comebackjoeyjojo 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

He'd also flamboyantly compliment the moderator and his opponent for asking/answering questions so well during a debate, assuming both were white.

[–]Cannon1 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's a bit of an addiction he has.

[–]Aegist 54 ポイント55 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Rick doesn't give a shit about anything. But he is a fan of science - which this administration is clearly against. And so this quote is not at all out of line with his character, who also doesn't give a shit about his grandchildren, but said this about them, and so equally could say this about a fucked up administration ruining scientific advancement (see also: Where he was on 911 in Rickshank Redemption)

[–]Marlinsoverdolphins 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I feel like he wouldn't care about science as a whole though. He would only care specifically about his science since he views it at as almost the be all end all. All other science besides him would be elementary and a waste of time

[–]Literally_A_Shill 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (16子コメント)

He doesn't have to openly prefer one party over the other.

He could just believe in science and think that those who don't are stupid. It's really that simple. It just so happens that there's one party in charge whose leadership actively denies scientific consensus on things like Climate Change, asbestos and vaccines.

[–]americangame 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But rick wouldn't ever pass up the opportunity to tell someone, or a group of someone's, why they're pieces of shit.

[–]storryeater 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ummm... he would hate this administration a lot though, and this poster says nothing about dems. "Being against Trump" =/= "agreeing that the dems are good guys" .

[–]Bichael_Madley 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't know if you know this but Rick is a fictional character.

[–]Logan117 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Considering that Rick hates stupidity and gullibility above all else, I doubt he sees them as the same. Sure, there is likely just as much corruption on either side, but the level of bumblefuckery and bafoonery is not even a contest when comparing.

[–]gbstills 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

There is nothing about democrats on this poster.

Stop making everything political.

[–]redditbanditking 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think Rick would just teleport to a better alternate reality somewhere.

[–]wingnut32 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ooh-la-la, someone's gonna get laid in college

[–]Superkroot 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Exactly. He would say this about this administration, and he would also say this about any other administration.

[–]Hamakua 93 ポイント94 ポイント  (16子コメント)

We are talking about the guy who created and enslaved a sentient species. Whatever your opinion on the world of politics today - Rick is the antithesis of morality. His debut involves the idea of just glassing the planet and starting over. Hiring homeless bums to be living amusement park real-estate.

This is analogous to Julia Child being portrayed as giving an opinion on the viability and necessity of deep sea exploration. - "what?"

[–]4inR 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's not slavery, it's society. They work for each other, they pay each other. They buy houses. They get married and make children that replace them when they get too old to make power.

[–]OptFire 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

That's just slavery with extra steps.

[–]4inR 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ooo, someone's gonna get laid in college.

[–]Thibbledorf_Pwent 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I don't know man. Maybe in their universe he's a good guy?

[–]FatStig 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Their echo chamber where everyone agrees with them and 'the science is settled'.

[–]FTHappy 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (5子コメント)

This is the most vile thread I have seen in /r/rickandmorty

Leave politics out of this, it turns everyone into apes

[–]KingOfCinder 354 ポイント355 ポイント  (58子コメント)

I think everyone is missing the point that despite your different political views, Rick would never do or say anything like this.

[–]WillTheGreat 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Strike out "this administration" and change it to government, and that's definitely something Rick would say.

[–]tealoctober 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Criticizing one is not being sided with the other.

[–]unusedwingsWUBBA LUBBA DUB DUB 125 ポイント126 ポイント  (38子コメント)

Do you know the character you're talking about? He is against governments in general. I could definitely see this being something he would say.

[–]MuricaLite 148 ポイント149 ポイント  (35子コメント)

He is anti government in general.

He would not get in to one party vs. another.

[–]Literally_A_Shill 115 ポイント116 ポイント  (10子コメント)

It's not about being for one party or another. It's about being against people who deny science. It just so happens that one party's leadership currently holds a monopoly in that area.

[–]HomemEmChamas 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I think everyone in this thread is missing the point. Rick is not naturally against or pro anything. The only thing he cares about is himself and the only reason he cares about science is because he is a scientist himself.

I like to think that if he thought he could benefit from a politician being elected or impeached, he would definitely get involved in politics. It just happens so far he never crossed a situation where this is not just a way less effective way of getting something done.

[–]Felaa 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If the President got on Rick's nerves I could easily see Rick saying and doing something exactly like this just to embarrass him. He doesn't have to be driven by politics to do it, only his ego.

[–]Manticx 134 ポイント135 ポイント  (14子コメント)

Maybe one day you'll realize being anti Trump doesn't mean you're pro Hillary.

[–]unusedwingsWUBBA LUBBA DUB DUB 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He wouldn't have to pick one side or the other. You could say this about whatever administration happens to be in charge at the time.

[–]DeprestedDevelopment 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Good thing the quote itself doesn't specify a party. So it's quite possible he would "ever say anything like this".

[–]farthingescape 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

In this context, he would never say that. He wouldn't care about a government's attitude toward science, especially the kind of science that we consider science. This is essentially like those annoying decals that show Calvin pissing on a Ford or Chevy badge.

[–]pianodude4 34 ポイント35 ポイント  (13子コメント)

I just wish politics would stay out of this sub in general. There's not a subreddit on here that isn't about American politics now, mostly anti-Trump.

[–]Sargon_the_Greatest 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Amen. This is a subreddit for a cartoon, let's keep it that way. Politicboys can go back to their ideologyholes if they wanna get political.

[–]pianodude4 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Exactly. I've always been told that you should never discuss politics with friends. In this case, we're all united as Rick and Morty fans, so let's keep it that way. How 'bout that szechuan sauce?

[–]KorianHUNComedy comes in threes! 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree with this.

[–]ebeilgidruwkrem 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yup. Rick would never say or do anything anti-government or pro-science

[–]The_Fox_Cant_Talk 31 ポイント32 ポイント  (6子コメント)

This thread: "Rick isn't political

Yet in the last episode he literally says the government is going to use 9/11 to take away peoples freedom

[–]Roy_Atticus_Lee 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I suppose the people here were basing it off his overall character as someone who doesn't give two shits about anything. The 9/11 scene may just be an example of Rick's spiteful view of government.

[–]Felaa 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (1子コメント)

For a sub dedicated to a comedy show, there's sure a lot of people here who can't take a joke.

[–]Thompson5893 102 ポイント103 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Is this an actual quote from the show? Cause I feel like Rick wouldn't give a rats ass about Trump or this current administration. If anything, I'd think the chaos of it all would just slightly amuse him.

[–]ZarqxKombat 152 ポイント153 ポイント  (7子コメント)

He said something along the lines "I can't tell the difference between the two of you sometimes because I don't go by height or age I go by pain in my ass. you're both pieces of shit and I can prove it mathematically" to summer and Morty

[–]HalloBruce 87 ポイント88 ポイント  (6子コメント)

"Something along the lines..." provides full quote verbatim

[–]ZarqxKombat 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Was I right?

[–]Explozivo12176 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Yep, season 2 episode 1 I believe.

[–]TheLiberalLover 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Well can't get mad at him for remembering it better than he thought he would

[–]dodekerekteven dumber than regular planning 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Of course we can. This is Reddit. Burn him!

[–]PsychedelicDentist 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You don't know the entire show of by heart?

Bet you're just another Tammy in disguise!

[–]JohnnyMalo 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hey, let's not say things we can't take back.

[–]bryanrobh 149 ポイント150 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Another shit political post

[–]camdoodlebop 64 ポイント65 ポイント  (5子コメント)

It's weird how people distort fictional characters to make it seem like they're on their side as if it even mattered

[–]uniqueguy263 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Srsly, Rick is a mass murderer, if he was real he wouldn't be a good authority on political issues

[–]Zannyth 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

He'd say who the fuck cares they're all the same and go off on a tangent.

[–]uniqueguy263 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Then randomly rant about McDonald's sauce

[–]Zannyth 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

THAT'S MY ARC MORTY

[–]Fagocaust 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I guess mods went back on their word about making this sub apolitical. Unsubbed.

[–]Muntberg 186 ポイント187 ポイント  (80子コメント)

Yes, this is exactly what will convince people of your position. Quotes from cartoons.

[–]Sammyhain 200 ポイント201 ポイント  (16子コメント)

Humor is surprisingly effective. Watch the highlights of any debate ever

[–]thratty 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (8子コメント)

That's why so many people get their news from Colbert and Trevor Noah and Samantha Bee and the like

[–]Zannyth 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Oh God, some of you consider that news?

[–]vegasbaby387 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If it fits the liberal narrative, it's news. If it doesn't, it's fake news. Same goes for others... if it fits the conservative narrative, it's news. Doesn't? Fake news.

[–]Kizmmit 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Getting news from Colbert :S

[–]what_up_im_topher 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

People actually watch Trevor Noah?

[–]Literally_A_Shill 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (1子コメント)

To be fair, "Giant Douche and Turd Sandwich" did seem to convince a lot of gullible people into thinking both parties are exactly the same.

Just today I saw an upvoted comment stating, "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos."

[–]billycooljim tiny rick 31 ポイント32 ポイント  (51子コメント)

Yeah, and facts will, right? That's why we're having this historic march on National Earth day, because this administration utilizes/responds sooooo well to facts, right?

[–]CptRoflhard 50 ポイント51 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Considering that the current president got to where he is by being a reallife cartoon character, it's likely they actually do.

[–]StaticBeat 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Pepe did wonders for trump.

[–]Forest-G-Nome 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (1子コメント)

yeahhh i'd still wager that 80% of americans have no idea what pepe is.

[–]ULN515 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You don't have to believe in or be aware of Meme Magic for it to work.

[–]Aegist 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Facts clearly don't work on the average Trump supporter, while "zingers" do. So yeah, I'm going to side with the cartoon quote here.

[–]morerokkI eat, John. It's what I do. 152 ポイント153 ポイント  (50子コメント)

Haha DAE Drumpf bad??

[–]Sandwich247 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Other than Dial An Exchange, what does DAE mean? I've seen it a few times on political-type posts.

[–]stalkinplatypus 53 ポイント54 ポイント  (2子コメント)

DAE = "does anyone else"...usually with an implied "think" on the end: "Does anyone else [think] Drumpf [is] bad?". Most commonly it is used sarcastically, as in this case, to ridicule people who parrot popular opinions as if they are unique and profound.

[–]Sandwich247 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Cool. That makes things make a whole much more sense.

[–]BlitzBasic 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Does anyone else [think...]"

[–]themotivatedgrapes 95 ポイント96 ポイント  (34子コメント)

Hes finished how will he ever recover! Bernie can still win if you match my donation.

[–]EJables96 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ah yes the point in which one arm gets tired of circle jerking and the direction reverses

[–]EvilisZero 61 ポイント62 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Mixing science and politics is the worst idea ever. Stay above it folks.

[–]langis_on 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Science should influence politics, not the other way around. Saying you shouldn't mix this is asanine

[–]thithiths 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're right. We should make policy choices regarding global warming without consulting scientists.

[–]njuilogvhnbuilo 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (2子コメント)

You're the one mixing politics and science by arguing against the march for science. The rest of us are just arguing for science.

[–]KING-UL 55 ポイント56 ポイント  (9子コメント)

What does March for science has anything to do with Trump? Democrats probably pandering to "I love Science lol such a nurd" type Redditors who browse /r/askscience once a month and think they're geniuses for being atheists.

[–]TybrosionMohito 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

resists urge to go on a rant about r/atheism

[–]Forest-G-Nome 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'm working on the same block as the march in san francisco. You're so spot on it hurts, although that's only half the crowd. The other half are your generic resist trump types forcing their kids to march with them for hours holding signs they probably can't even read.

[–]i_fucked_OPs_Mum 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm sure we're going to see a 50k votes post on r/pics of a 3 day old holding a sign.

[–]SmellyPeen 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's politically mature for his age.

[–]SosolidclawsMETAPHYSICS 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What does March for science has anything to do with politicians who deny science?

Err... yeah. I'll let you work that one out yourself!

[–]oddisay 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

In this moment, I am euphoric. Not by the blessing of some phony God but by the enlightenment of my own intellect.

[–]KorianHUNComedy comes in threes! 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What does March for science has anything to do with Trump? Democrats probably pandering to "I love Science lol such a nurd" type Redditors who browse /r/askscience once a month and think they're geniuses for being atheists. and being experts in QUANTUM PHYSICS

Don't forget quantum physics(tm)! You have to know them to qualify for being verysmart.

[–]JustWoozy 41 ポイント42 ポイント  (15子コメント)

[–]loli_esports 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (10子コメント)

I prefer the one where they say a bomb is racist or whatever

[–]JustWoozy 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (6子コメント)

These people claim everyone who isn't them rejects science while touting there are more than 2 genders..... a lot more, and that gender is a "social construct" and not just a synonym for "Sex"

Also calling everyone who doesn't agree with them 'bigots'

Think, act, do, speak like we do, or you are a homophobic, sexist, xenophobic, racist, Islamophobic(not a real thing, people RATIONALLY dislike islam, not irrationally. People like equal rights for all.) [insert nextweeks new buzzword attack insult on people here]

Also this.

big·ot·ry ˈbiɡətrē/ noun noun: bigotry; plural noun: bigotries

intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

Bigots projecting bigotry who are not even self aware enough to realize they are bigots.

TFW You are so ideologically subverted and too stupid to realize you are the bigot racist.

[–]KING-UL 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah really educational and so much science. Right?

[–]BDJ56 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think they are saying that there aren't enough scientists who aren't white males.

Also they're not saying that while males shouldn't be scientists.

[–]GalacticGrandma 49 ポイント50 ポイント  (11子コメント)

I saw a surprising amount of Rick and Morty stuff at my local march. My favorite was probably "Grandpa Rick is disappointed."

[–]Forest-G-Nome 44 ポイント45 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Grandpa rick wouldn't give a shit.

[–]Thibbledorf_Pwent 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (8子コメント)

What version of the show are these guys watching that he would give a flying fuck about them or their cause? This is Rick we're talking about ffs.

[–]Hard_boiled_Badger 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (2子コメント)

exactly. This is the same rick that would steal the last egg of a critically endangered species if it helped him do his laundry better.

[–]JonsUsername 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's a joke you fucking dork

[–]Thibbledorf_Pwent 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm gonna upvote this because dork as an insult is inherently funny and disarming.

[–]getMeSomeDunkin 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (1子コメント)

People are getting way too uppity in this thread.

[–]dilln 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

People are arguing whether Rick would say this, and I'm just here thinking it's a funny way to make you read it in Rick's voice

[–]ExpAwesome 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But tiny Rick is excited

[–]coloradoforests1701 38 ポイント39 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow that's cringey

[–]binkow 71 ポイント72 ポイント  (61子コメント)

Can politics please be banned from this sub? Shit is so fucking annoying to see spammed everywhere. HURR I HATE TRUMP AM I COOL NOW!?

[–]thetrooper424 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (5子コメント)

100% agree. Would like to go somewhere on reddit without it turning into a political shit show. Just want to come here to see dank maymays about my favorite show, not some bullshit propaganda.

[–]schizokid 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (5子コメント)

this is why people think rick and morty fans are intolerable. its so fucking cringworthy, and no I didn't vote for Trump I voted Clinton

[–]Utopia_Bot 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Nothing will topple the system faster than a sign referencing a mildly obscure cartoon show character

[–]Lots42Eat a ham sandwich! 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (9子コメント)

ITT: People having butt-tantrums that a Rick and Morty fan dislikes Trump.

[–]Fellero 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (12子コメント)

All administrations are shit, why do you think he destroyed both the galactic federation and the rick council?

Fucking reddit democrats, too dumb to understand the spirit of the show.

[–]DeprestedDevelopment 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I love it when someone makes a retarded-ass point and then has the audacity to call others dumb. It's almost galling.

[–]TheLiberalLover 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yes all bad things are equal! There are no differences between any two presidents. Thanks for figuring it out for us.

[–]FaustiasTOG UOY TAHW EM WOHS! 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I hate people using quote like these for that kind of purpose. it's as cringey and stupid as those bernie sanders drawn as rick pics.

[–]stillnoturdayboobybuyer 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well that's just retarded.

[–]Sklushi 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You mean another march against trump?

[–]carpentron 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It was nice to see how many Ricks were out to march today.

[–]blindpone 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Then you should have left it there, OP.

[–]thegreatshredman 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why do we care what Rick would think?

[–]duckandcover 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's just nice to see protest signs with correct spelling for a change.

[–]dumbnotstupid 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No better than Obama lol

[–]KING-UL 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why Aren't I 50 Points ahead you might ask? I can prove it Mathematically.

[–]sloopSD 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Shit. I can't get far enough away from politics...I've just about unsubscribed from nearly every sub that pushes their politics and now it's poisoning this sub too ugh.

[–]Zylvian[M] 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This post is DISQUALIFIED for Breaking Council Rule 6:

Your post has been DISQUALIFIED as you have broken the following rule(s):

Rule 6: Political discussion is banned!

Come on, OP. You should know better.


If you feel this is an error, please contact the moderators.

"Like nothing shady ever happened in a fully furnished office? You ever hear about Wall Street Morty? You know what those guys do in their fancy board rooms? They take their balls and dip 'em in cocaine and wipe 'em all over each other. You know Grandpa goes around and he does his business in public because grandpa isn't shady." -Rick