全 4 件のコメント

[–]yousaydumbthings 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Because why would it be? The Nazis were using the Marshaling Yards in Dresden to set up the Ardennes Offensive which was a pretty brutal battle. So we bombed out the railroads and industry supporting that battle. It's not the allies fault that the Nazis put that industry in the middle of big cities.

War Crimes have specific definitions in the geneva conventions and other conventions. So Pearl Harbor was a war crime but Dresden was not.

[–]Epicsharkduck[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sorry, I'm very uninformed on the subject

[–]captainthirsty [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

There was no international agreement that comprehensively covered how the laws of war such as the Hague Convention of 1907 and the First Geneva Convention would apply to the use of Air Power in war. The use of air power in strategic bombing campagins and in deploying the atomic bombs was very new, and as such there weren't comprehensive laws against their use.

A good analogy would be the use of gas weapons in WW1. Since it was the first instance of widespread use in combat, it would be impossible to ban its use before deployment. After the war, however, people had seen it's effect and were able to draft and ratify international laws and conventions regulating its use.

TL DR; you can't have laws regulating things and activities before they exist.