One of the BIGGEST lie society would have us believe is that women are to be fought for, coddled, protected and esteemed, for merely being only what they are: women. Society has achieved this by having low esteem, low confidence men (which society, again, shares a part of the cause) believe that the ultimate, masculine achievement in life is to be validated by a woman; and to have unlimited access to sex; that you're "lucky" when you find a woman to settle with; that your happiness and worth is defined by a woman's; that you're always to be blamed for HER unhappiness and failure; etc.

ALL over the media, there's an overemphasis on the "need to get laid" and why "there's something existentially wrong with you" if you fail to; so much that now the "state of virginity" is used as some form of shaming term and an insult meant to be "morally felt" (which should even rather be extolled as a virtue). It's evidently clear here that, it's this constant, banal glorification of "getting laid" which directly places an ultra importance on the "golden p***y", which, in turn, over raises the value of a woman, thereby deeply psychologically distorting the man's view of her, and blinding him to her true nature, so that he sees and regards her as some otherworldly creature with godly refinement of beauty and character perfection, worthy to be worshipped and served.

Think about this:

Men built and created all civilizations and nearly all social constructs and conventions.

Men created technology, science, and pretty much EVERYTHING artificial there is that eases living.

Men do ALL the dangerous jobs.

Men do the fighting during wars.

Men stabilize and civilise society, by enacting rules and laws with their rational sense of justice and fairness (sadly, it isn't so anymore in our time).

How about women?

They depend on men.

They manipulate men to attain their means to success (except inconsiderably few who would counter-live this natural aspect of them—even I doubt this, just that logical fairness permit this.)

They essentially live and exist through men.

Even the "best" of women use and depend on what men have already started and built, to innovate: originality is rarity of the female kind.

Consider this: Who would suffer the MORE without the other? Men? Or women? Whatever your answer is, how would the world be like without civilisations creation? "Beautiful", huh? How was life like before the minds of men began work? What would happen if ALL men abruptly quit any form of societal contributions? Sure, society falls; civilisations crumble; everything which is man-built reduces to nothing; we revert to the jungle-style of living (which isn't favourable at all, especially to them: women).

Now I ask: Who deserves MORE honour and respect in society? Who is truly "special" in society? Who is to be chased after in the dating world? Who owes who what? Who is society SO DEPENDENT on for its successful perpetuation?

Logic dictates that men are the ones to be respected and honoured; men should rather be chased after by women. They have to humble themselves to receive the man's care. They have to coddle the man and appease him to maintain society and keep on creating new things.

The problem of this whole "men should chase after them" is the insane value which has been placed on their p**y, which drives men to risk their lives for *them, struggle for their happiness, kneel down (how silly this is) to propose love to them, beg (this one is even utter madness beyond any possible clinical repair) for their phone numbers or to buy them drinks, etc.

Now I know many will argue that "it's mainly due to men's biological nature", but to those with this argument in mind, I ask why is the status quo not so in the past then? Why were men not over valuing women and dying silly kinds of death just to kneel and ask for her hand in marriage? Why was the culture in the past far less sexualized, and molded to serve their interests?

WHO IS THE PRIZE?