Posted by: TAThatBoomerang
Posting time: 19 hours ago on 2017/04/12 7:28:04
Last edit time: never edited.
Views: 509
SCP: 53
56 upvotes, 3 downvotes (95% upvoted it)
~89 users here now
The Alt-Right, unlike the dominant ideology of the 20th Century (Liberalism/Conservatism), examines the world through a lens of realism. Rather than continue to look at the world through the ideological blinders that Liberalism imposes in its dogmatic evangelism of the Equalitarian, we prefer to examine social relations & demographics from a perspective of what's real. Thus, racial & sexual realism is a key component of the Alt-Right - perhaps the key component that ties the diverse factions within it together.
Another core principle of the Alt-Right is Identitarianism. Identitarianism is the prioritization of social identity, regardless of political persuasion. Thus, the Alt-Right promotes White Identity and White Nationalism.
Leftist Agitation is strictly forbidden.
Don't argue from the left or punch right. Don't give the left political or moral authority.
No Black Pills. We're a positive community with a bright vision for our future.
No JQ posting until you've read The Culture of Critique or The International Jew.
No calls to violence.
Vetting process required to gain entry, please have a microphone and camera available.
https://discord.gg/hEkYs6f
Jarrod Viljoen - A South African white nationalist
Upcoming: Nathan Damigo - Founder of Identity Evropa, on 4/20/17 at 5:00pm EST
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No
MUSIC VIDEO: JE DOUBLE F - 'JAGGED EDGE'
Want to advertize on Voat?
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Users can earn a percentage of our ad-revenue share for the content they submit.
How do we stop women's maternal instincts from wanting to accept more "refugees"? (Identitarian)
submitted 19 hours ago by TAThatBoomerang
This video highlights the problem pretty well. Women being ridiculously accepting of low IQ, "vulnerable" migrants is a consequence of their maternal instincts.
I'm not content with merely highlighting the problem, but I want to know how to address it. How do we address it?
(Video is about Sweden by the way.)
[–] reeeeeeeeeeeeee 2 points 27 points 29 points (+29|-2) 19 hours ago
For starters: No voting, obviously.
[–] thealtright 1 points 6 points 7 points (+7|-1) 17 hours ago
Definitely no voting or being in major positions of influence in politics.
[–] TAThatBoomerang [S] 2 points 1 points 3 points (+3|-2) 17 hours ago
Why prevent them from entering politics if they are democratically elected by men?
[–] TAThatBoomerang [S] 1 points 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) 19 hours ago
That's a pretty big thing to start with.
[–] reeeeeeeeeeeeee 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) 19 hours ago
Maybe a big thing in terms of practical implementation. But if we're just having a conversation, yes, I think it's the obvious thing. Women shouldn't vote.
Check out this based woman dropping some truth bombs.
[–] reeeeeeeeeeeeee 1 points -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) 18 hours ago
Also, next step is White Sharia.
[–] Artofchoke 0 points 24 points 24 points (+24|-0) 19 hours ago
I struggled with this issue, it is embedded in the majority of females to mother anything helpless, and my initial response was a desire to rescue. The key was coming to understand the truth of these individuals as not orphans, or victims of crisis beyond their ability to control. They should be viewed similarly to feral dogs. We love dogs, we care for dogs, but a wild dog is too dangerous, and does not wish to be saved. Once this is understood, we can begin to detach and untangle the bonds of love that were wrongfully extended toward an improper target.
Another way is for women to perceive the migrants as an imminent threat to their children.
[–] Norm85 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) 17 hours ago
If these women do not already perceive the threat to their own children after the events of the last couple of years, I do not want to think how much worse it must become before they do.
And unfortunately it is not just the childless women who hold these views, but still far too many mothers.
[–] optionalfrank 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) 13 hours ago
If women had children in the first place, their priorities would be just fine.
The childless void is making them grasp at anything that looks helpless.
[–] Tancred 0 points 18 points 18 points (+18|-0) 18 hours ago
How many of those women who are hysterical about refugees are childless? It's farcical to see how they go from "it's children!!!" to "oh, well, they're not children, but I'm still like a mother to them, theehee".
Men are expected to sacrifice their lives in the protection of their people. Cowards are met with disdain. We then need to extend the same disdain to childless spinsters. (Obviously coupled with disdain for miscegenation.)
A mother sees the world differently, she cares about making the world safer for her child. If you find any stats about that topic, surely mothers will be more conservative than childless women.
[–] Knights_of_the_14 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) 18 hours ago
I'd say most women who are childless are like this, married women with children are a strong conservative block due to wanting to preserve resources.
Without structure or male guides, Women follow the crowd, go along to get along. It's a reproductive strategy of theirs because if they are outcasts they won't mate. Add this in with Jews playing on their maternal instincts with dead kids, it'll send them into a frenzy. Also with being childless you are constantly being pushed in your subconscious thought to mate and preserve a child, the thought that maybe your kid could end up on the shore is a major push to remove the possibility. All of this doesn't have to make logical and probable sense to them because its emotion and instinct that drives it.
Looking at evolutionary psychology really helps describe the situation at hand ... also Jews.
[–] Cantilever 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) 18 hours ago
God, this is one compelling argument if the devious subterfuge by the Jews against the paternal (natural) family order. To subvert a society, one must first subvert the organic family structure.
Insidious and very concerning!
[–] Gorillion 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) 15 hours ago
Yep, and a few decades now of celebs "adopting" little foreign babies to great public celebration and doing "tasteful" magazines shoots cradling them and talking about how their lives have been infinitely enriched by the experience.
[–] gazillions 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) 17 hours ago
I've seen too many mothers of real children who are oozing sympathy for strangers. It may just be phony sympathy. They may be really afraid that they don't care as much as they think they should. Like calling everybody else racist; same deal. Pretentious and that much harder to crack.
[–] America-first 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) 14 hours ago
It's from having weak husbands that shields them consequence. We need to let thes cunts experience the full weight of their decisions.
[–] Gorillion 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) 15 hours ago
I've seen too many mothers of real children who are oozing sympathy for strangers.
Ye Olde Vyrtew Sygnalinge.
[–] varialus 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) 13 hours ago
You could restrict voting rights to married parents.
[–] Tancred 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) 13 hours ago
I like it.
[–] ballsaq 2 points 13 points 15 points (+15|-2) 18 hours ago
take away their right vote.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) 17 hours ago (edited 17 hours ago)
[–] ballsaq 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 4 hours ago
def not an easy task.
This is a long term goal.
Need to change mindset first. ==long time.
[–] ViceRoy 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) 14 hours ago
men are stronger than women. its not hard.
[–] America-first 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 14 hours ago
EO
[–] DonkeyOatey 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) 17 hours ago
Keep them pregnant?
[–] eltourist 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) 17 hours ago
mandatory:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw
[–] TAThatBoomerang [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) 17 hours ago
Phenomenal video but imo it has the problem of having too wide of a scope. It just becomes overwhelming. For solely effectiveness, I prefer the lower-production-quality one I linked since it's more comprehensible.
[–] northportage 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) 14 hours ago
Whoa. Good vid.
[–] gazillions 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) 17 hours ago
The worst of this is that when someone isn't operating on logic, you get angry responses from them when you confront them with logic that threatens their irrational beliefs.
I picture old fashioned couples where the kid is being a brat and the mother wants to go coddle him, but the father has to be resolute and refuse to let her pass him to go pick up the crybaby. I guess the answer may be for men to start asserting their own masculinity more and refuse to argue with them. Just tell them they are wrong in simple terms and keep telling them.
Maybe attacking it from a different social angle may help. Pushing rights to have more influence on raising children with more masculine influence. Demanding more masculine influence in the schools. You have to define what that influence is first. This is an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&persist_app=1&noapp=1&v=Jkiij9dJfcw
[–] NonsenseAbounds 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) 15 hours ago
Look up Cognitive Dissonance. Here's an over-simplified version from my other comment: The basic concept of CD is that the person holds a belief. When that belief is challenged they feel uncomfortable (angry / sad / bad / whatever). They then must choose to either change themselves and admit they were wrong (which most people are too egotistical to do) or blame and yell at the logic-tossing maniac (which is easier than admitting to yourself that you've been wrong).
[–] gazillions 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) 15 hours ago
Cognitive dissonance has become a popular term. You can't tell them they're suffering from it or anything with a name. You may as call them insane. They'll take it the same way.
[–] DonkeyOatey 1 points 0 points 1 points (+1|-1) 17 hours ago
I'm fucking saving this. You will read this again, soon.
[–] NonsenseAbounds 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) 15 hours ago
It's called cognitive dissonance. You are forcing the person to confront their own inconsistencies, which feels uncomfortable.
The basic concept of CD is that the person holds a belief. When that belief is challenged they feel uncomfortable (angry / sad / bad / whatever). They then must choose to either change themselves and admit they were wrong (which most people are too egotistical to do) or blame and yell at the logic-tossing maniac (which is easier than admitting to yourself that you've been wrong).
This is a fact of psychology, and all the cults you're ever heard of use it to control their members.
[–] gazillions 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) 17 hours ago
You better not be talking about me!!!
REEEEEEE
[–] AngelInTheWhirlwind 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) 18 hours ago (edited 18 hours ago)
We need to talk more about the acid attacks on women. Cos the rapes fall in with the omnipresent fear of rape women rightfully have. But only one group of people uses acid as a weapon against women: Muslims.
I'm not sure how effective that is. The white women are the biggest problem, and they're extremely rarely the victim of an acid attakc.
[–] AngelInTheWhirlwind 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) 17 hours ago (edited 17 hours ago)
Quite a few white women who've refused or ended relationships with muslims have been horribly disfigured and blinded for life by having acid thrown in their face.
Use that exact sentence. It will sink in.
Sort: Top
[–] reeeeeeeeeeeeee 2 points 27 points 29 points (+29|-2) ago
[–] thealtright 1 points 6 points 7 points (+7|-1) ago
[–] TAThatBoomerang [S] 2 points 1 points 3 points (+3|-2) ago
[–] TAThatBoomerang [S] 1 points 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
[–] reeeeeeeeeeeeee 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
[–] reeeeeeeeeeeeee 1 points -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
[–] Artofchoke 0 points 24 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago
[–] Norm85 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago
[–] optionalfrank 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
[–] Tancred 0 points 18 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago
[–] Knights_of_the_14 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago
[–] Cantilever 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
[–] Gorillion 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
[–] gazillions 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
[–] America-first 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
[–] Gorillion 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
[–] varialus 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] Tancred 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago
[–] ballsaq 2 points 13 points 15 points (+15|-2) ago
[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] ballsaq 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago
[–] ViceRoy 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
[–] America-first 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago
[–] DonkeyOatey 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
[–] eltourist 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
[–] TAThatBoomerang [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] northportage 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago
[–] gazillions 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
[–] NonsenseAbounds 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago
[–] gazillions 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago
[–] DonkeyOatey 1 points 0 points 1 points (+1|-1) ago
[–] NonsenseAbounds 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] gazillions 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] AngelInTheWhirlwind 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] TAThatBoomerang [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] AngelInTheWhirlwind 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)