全 69 件のコメント

[–]lunitabonitaBlood Coming Out of Her Whatever 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (2子コメント)

When I first outed myself on FB, one of my MtT "friends" posted on my wall saying that I was a bigot, my views were "problematic," and I needed to educate myself, and that he was going to unfriend me.

Yahtzee!

[–]vauquelinevulvalini 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Try this!

[–]lunitabonitaBlood Coming Out of Her Whatever 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Spell it "folx," and then it would be perfect. LOL

[–]zpret 35 ポイント36 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Ironically the more I've educated myself the more I see through the lib-fem arguments. I don't think that's what they mean though!

[–]BimblebyGiant bipedal vagina. 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Same! I always want to know what counts as educating yourself.

OK, going to be massively pompous, sorry, but... I did months of research and wrote essays about these topics for my political philosophy papers at one of the best unis in the world, and have continued to read about it for the five years following that. I've had conversations about feminism and gender with a varied group of people including people like Rae Langton and Juliet Jaques (who interestingly denied in person that she'd ever encountered a TERF, despite writing about it online - I presume she just didn't want to talk about it). I've been reading feminist literature for a decade, pretty heavily. So... am I sufficiently educated yet?

Does academic education not count? Does having had multiple trans friends that I've discussed this with, having read countless books, article, and blogs by trans people count? Discussing this with smart friends who are neutral on the issue and willing to challenge me (while still being rational about it) - does that count? Or does that word not mean what they think it means.

Ugh sorry I feel a bit sick for being all dickish about it but hopefully my point is clear haha.

ETA: oh yeah, and worth being clear that I went into all that reading completely pro trans/genderism. It was reading everything I read about it that 'turned' me GC, so maybe they want to be careful about telling people to educate themselves!

[–]zpret 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (3子コメント)

The the more I've progressed in education and gained critical reading skills the more I see through their bullshit! They could do with actually reading the second wave stuff they claim is all hideous imho. Even if they still disagree, but they seem to pride themselves on not even engaging with it, how is that educating yourself?

[–]BimblebyGiant bipedal vagina. 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Exactly! But oh, that doesn't count as education because it's not the right kind of education. -_-

[–]cantaveritas 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

How is it different to the Nazis and Khmer Rouge and other such? They repeat slogans til they have no minds left. And its also like a religion....but then, so were Nazism and Soviet Communism.

They want the end result. They want to be part of what's trendy...and I strongly believe a lot of the handmaiden types want to be submissive to a male...if thats their socialization, they arent doing a damn thing to recognize that. They want to be part of the 'woke': to belong and it seems to use up a lot of their time. Why arent they into anything more productive? (says me, complaining on redditt!).

And like any religion, to go to heaven you have to swallow the bullshit and pretend even to ourself you believe it.

[–]11strangecharmlogica tolerantia fortitudine 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That was what prompted me to find out what Jeffreys and other radfems were saying even though up until then I had not been interested in feminism (I found it important and relevant, but I've always been more science-oriented - I read a lot of philosophy when I was a kid, but by 18 I felt like I was getting too navel-gazy). Simply being told not to read from them made me want to read what they wrote. Attempts to censor people prompt me to see what they're saying. Doesn't mean I'll automatically endorse it, and indeed, I did not endorse radical feminist ideas for years, but I recognized that they weren't all coming from some kind of blind hatred of trans people, and it forced me to question why I thought what I thought - initially prompting me to come up with some lame "gotchas" like "if FTMs are just trying to escape misogyny, how come there are three times as many MTFs?" (this was about twelve years ago and I also didn't know about autogynephilia yet) to resolve my cognitive dissonance without actually considering uncomfortable ideas for too long.

What first got me questioning them was when trans activists vehemently decried gatekeeping, which included any form of psychological screening (seriously, my suggestion was at least a written questionnaire where you confirm you aren't hallucinating or anything like that), even though I had just read a paper about people with psychotic disorders identifying as trans while delusional and ceasing to want to transition when antipsychotics clear up their delusional and hallucinatory symptoms since an acquaintance of mine was struggling with a delusional disorder and had about a week earlier come out as trans (FTM), but I seriously believed the trans identity was secondary to the delusional disorder, and with good reason, as she was floridly delusional and struggling with other things like suicidal depression. I mean, it's such a blatant lack of logic: "Regret rates are very low, so we should remove everything that's put in place to make sure that people who would regret it don't go through with it." This is the kind of reasoning of someone looking to confirm their own beliefs, because just about any four-year-old could see what's wrong with that logic.

[–]vauquelinevulvalini 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Likewise. Way back when LiveJournal was much more popular, almost 20 years ago, I was a GNC teen innocently commenting on a post about trans difficulties that I thought it was awful society pressured people to fit into gender roles so much that they actually felt like they had to get surgery, take meds, and hide their history so they could just express their personality without getting shat on. Well...

You can tell I'd never encountered that particular brand of trans crazy before just from the fact that I actually said my opinion openly (which actually hasn't changed since then). Needless to say, I definitely triggered something then, and very memorably, "educate yourself" was deployed when I asked what resources I should start looking up to understand where this woman was coming from. I replied that I was trying to, and that's why I was asking for recommendations since she obviously wouldn't want me to go look up a fundie site to explain her point of view. She never did get back to me.

[–]zpret 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I've read somewhere (sadly can't remember where!) that the change in platform is responsible for a change in discourse style. Livejournal's comment system allowed for and encouraged in depth conversation, whereas tumblr & twitter don't, and arguably lead to more public shaming type things. I thought it was an interesting theory. I miss livejournal.

[–]11strangecharmlogica tolerantia fortitudine 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Livejournal was (in part) a blogging platform. Tumblr is a social media site like Facebook. I think that hypothesis is quite plausible.

[–]mna_mna 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Livejournal also wasn't really anonymous which made a huge difference. I miss it too!

[–]purple_radish 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

They missed a good opportunity. Most of the time when people ask for links they are demanding arguments so they can tear them apart. That is the appropriate time to refuse expending your own energy to entertain them, and you say, "educate yourself."

When someone is earnestly asking for resources to explore a topic, and there isn't a lot of easily available info on it, that's when it becomes worth spending a little time to give them something, even if it's only some bookmarked pages, if you're interested in actually changing people's minds and advancing your cause, and not just taking a little smug potshot.

[–]vauquelinevulvalini 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I was a good little libfem and spend years trying to see things from the side of people like her. It would have stuck, too, if I hadn't hit my breaking point from narcissistic abuse a few years ago, and, during my recovery, been unable to not see the similarities between what I'd survived and what popular trans activism has always looked like.

[–]qwertypoiuytre 37 ポイント38 ポイント  (2子コメント)

When I first started hearing the "it's not my job to educate you" it was generally a legitimate rational response to dealing with concern trolling and entitled behavior from people hostile to your cause. It's pretty obvious if a guy comes onto a feminist's blog and starts demanding 101 justifications with citations for claiming misogyny exists. Anyone who's dealt with misogyny, racism, ableism, etc knows how it feels to be manipulated for emotional labor in that particular way. It used to be used when someone argues or asks about something for which there's such an overwhelming amount of evidence at their fingertips if they were genuinely interested in learning about it that you don't even know where to start, that it makes their sincerity questionable.

But now it's been largely transformed into a silencing tactic form of response for when there is zero evidence or logic to respond to someone's question with.

[–]earthgardenNo prefix needed 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree with this completely. That is what it used to mean.

But now it's been largely transformed into a silencing tactic form of response for when there is zero evidence or logic to respond to someone's question with.

It's also a way to get out of answering or giving their own opinion, especially if they are unsure if what they think actually aligns with the party line.

[–]11strangecharmlogica tolerantia fortitudine 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's what a FAQ is for, with answers to short questions and links to other resources. That way, you can say, "read the FAQ" and if they're genuinely looking for answers, they'll be enlightened to your perspective, and if they're just looking to stir shit up, they don't waste your time. If you're running an activist site, you need to engage with this basic level for the sake of those genuinely open and curious. If they're hounding you on your train blog or something, you owe them nothing.

When you say "emotional labor" (I've seen a lot of people here use the term), what do you mean by that? I tried googling and the best I could get was managing one's emotional expressions in the context of a job, which is what by dint of being autistic I have to do every single second I interact with someone (I don't spontaneously express my emotions on my face and in body language and such - I feel emotions like anyone else, but I have to consciously manipulate my face to the expression appropriate to what I'm feeling as an explicit strategy to communicate, so it's basically like I'm acting all the time, but I'm acting to convey my true emotions - it's not how every autistic person is, but it is the way I am).

[–]Eclectic58Resistance is NOT futile 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Someone telling a person to "educate themselves", especially someone whom they don't personally know, either online or in person, is the height of arrogance.

The person saying that has no idea as to the background of the other person; what they've read, what they've done, and so on. They don't get that another person could have done a lot of research and be well informed on the topic, yet have come to a different conclusion about it. Just "educating oneself" on a topic doesn't guarantee that someone will reach the same conclusions.

My main focus in feminism for the last 40+ years has been studying stereotyped sex roles and how they reinforce sexism, with the goal being the deconstruction of these stereotypes. Yet I've had arrogant know-it-alls, younger than my son, tell me to "educate myself", when I've been educating myself since they were even born. They just can't conceive that someone could possibly come to a different conclusion, thus anyone who doesn't agree with them can't possibly be knowledgeable or educated.

[–]vauquelinevulvalini 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (4子コメント)

The person saying that has no idea as to the background of the other person; what they've read, what they've done, and so on.

I cannot count the number of times I've had "educate yourself" directed to me from long-time associates who either should have known me better, or should have understood that when you know someone for a long time, it's appropriate to discuss the nuances of a given topic, or decide that you don't have the energy to engage, instead of condescendingly lecturing your educated, thoughtful, actually adult friend like they're a disobedient preteen.

[–]Eclectic58Resistance is NOT futile 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Oh, my, that's a lot of nerve, not to mention patronizing.

[–]vauquelinevulvalini 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I've had to cut some of them off because they started stalking my social media activity and invading women's forums to derail the conversation in favour of their propaganda. These were things they decried as awful, inappropriate tactics for others to do, but were just fine with using them in favour of their own cause. The "right side of history," don't you know...

[–]Eclectic58Resistance is NOT futile 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

100 years ago, eugenicists thought they were on the "right side of history".

[–]vauquelinevulvalini 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It terrifies me that people don't see how this trans craze encompasses anti-homosexuality (as well as anti-autism) eugenics in disguise. Or maybe they do, which is even more terrifying.

[–]BimblebyGiant bipedal vagina. 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's such a dystopian use of the word 'educate'.

'Educate yourself' means 'start believing the "right" things'.

[–]endofthelinerXX-Marks-My-Sex=Female 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wisdom!

[–]11strangecharmlogica tolerantia fortitudine 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They say, "educate".

What they mean is "re-educate".

[–]Veneficca 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I've noticed the trans version often includes, "Read a biology textbook!" As if 10th grade science class should have covered the 900 gender feelings, and how many of us are intersex and just don't know it!

[–]ZardozSpeakstoYou1[S] 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They aren't genders they're personality traits that they've named and called genders so they can be "queer".

[–]NoLadyBrainBiology is not a radfem conspiracy 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've noticed the trans version often includes, "Read a biology textbook!"

And that's particularly funny because biology textbooks completely debunk their nonsense. However, it's a pretty brilliant tactic because they know that the vast majority of people will not actually go pick up a biology textbook. And by suggesting this, they can imply that the trans stuff is so completely and thoroughly proven that they had to rewrite the biology textbooks. After all, they wouldn't tell an opponent to pick up a biology textbook if it didn't support their claim, would they?

Now, the average trans activist that throws this out isn't thinking about this this deeply because they probably believe that the biology books do support trans nonsense. But the higher ups in trans activism know that it's a shell game. This is just one of their shells.

[–]lefterfield 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (6子コメント)

A friend of mine(who is not right-wing) called it liberalsplaining. The belief that they know what's best for everyone and endowed with perfect knowledge. It's infuriating, because this attitude is why people are being driven away from the democrats, and a huge part of why Trump won, imo. No one wants to be called stupid, or lectured about what's best for them, even if the other guy is 100% correct.

One personal example, I said on facebook that economy was what drove some people to vote for Trump, not "hate". IE, people who saw that their personal lives weren't any better, or were worse than they were 8 years ago for various social reasons- and that it was an attitude I sympathized with, because I felt the same way(though I didn't vote for Trump). One of my liberal relatives came back with, "well, that's just wrong, statistically things are better, blah blah..." I mean, how nice for the statistics, but people are not wrong about THEIR OWN LIVES. Pissed me off, and it seemed like a tiny reflection of 'the problem with the left' these days.

[–]ZardozSpeakstoYou1[S] 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Exactly. People want change they can feel, not change in some abstract numbers. One powerful thing Trump did was promise a big giant wall. It's a dumb as hell idea but if feels real at least. They would have something to show for it.

[–]qwertypoiuytre 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

In my state we didn't get any presidential campaign ads til the last few days before the election. I can vividly remember the ones that were played at that point:

Trump's: on a dark screen, in big caps white letters, dramatically wrote out the sentence "THE AMERICAN DREAM IS DEAD", as a voiceover of him said the words. Went on to talk about trade and jobs.

Clinton's: a montage of clips of Trump being obnoxious, crude or sexist.

I was gobsmacked that Clinton's campaign could not even figure out at least to engage in pretend populism as Trump's did. I encountered the same denial of the state of things from Clinton supporters - the ACA was a big one. People's premiums going up 5-fold, 10-fold since it passed, the thing having been written by a right wing think tank in the first place for gods sake, and still there were liberals who absolutely refused to entertain any criticism of it. "I'm going underwater because I can't afford my premiums anymore. I'm worse off than I was before it". "No you're not!". Okay then...

I remember one of the clips of Trump in that Clinton campaign commercial was him saying "...tell them to go F*** themselves!" - I thought it was so funny, how does her campaign think a clip of him expressing anger (at someone, at anyone) is going to turn people away from him? It's exactly what people were drawn to. That he was at least admitting that someone was fucking them over (even if he didn't blame the right people or was going to do anything productive about it).

Someone did a study - her commercials had the least coverage of actual issues (as opposed to personal attacks) in the last several elections, and dramatically so. Something like 90% of her commercials were personal attacks and 10% policy-based critiques of Trump. Trump's were almost inverted, something like 70% being policy-based critiques. Her overall campaign message appeared to be things are fine, and if you disagree, then you're a racist sexist!

(I say all this as a left-winger/non-Trump supporter just to be clear)

[–]lefterfield 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes. And rather than calling him stupid(although I think he absolutely is), we need to be learning from that, and learn how to message to his supporters. Most people don't connect to abstract philosophy, they want a symbol(meaning a real object) to rally behind.

[–]endofthelinerXX-Marks-My-Sex=Female 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Statistically, the better off you are, the better off you'll be. Income is still mainly going to the top. The bottom 50% is lucky to just be in the same place they were, because companies aren't raising wages for them, not at increases of 10 cents an hr and no real benefits.

[–]lefterfield 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Right :( We have a huge problem with classicism, and it's only getting worse. It's not going to get better in the next four years, under our current president, but it's still a real issue.

[–]Eclectic58Resistance is NOT futile 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, a lot of Trump voters were naive and gullible, though not necessarily "hateful".

[–]BigBoud 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (1子コメント)

LOLOLOL Sorry brb - having hysterics at the "educate yourself" stupidity.

I've had that from someone who thought I ought to go and read Everyday Feminism, because having read Simone de Beauvoir and Germaine Greer clearly hadn't educated me "correctly" - ie I was actually able to argue from a feminist perspective instead of whatever tripe Everyday Oppression spouts.

Educate myself - as if I wasn't already very expensively educated and fully able to think critically.

[–]flibblebibbledibble 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Educate as in re-education camps, not as in research, learn, digest and come to your own conclusion.

Silly Rabbit /s

[–]50ShadesOfDunexx intj queer 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Apparently "education" is the simple, obvious answer to ALL problems. That's how the world works in libfem, sjw fairyland.

[–]the_puppiestSmurf 'n' Terf 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Good rant.

Does anyone have thoughts on countering this attitude? Not the extreme 'educate yourself or die in a fire' version, but people who can't conceive that someone could read an article they found convincing, or educate themselves on their own, and not be persuaded or draw different conclusions.

[–]thrwpllwI saw Goody Throwpillow TERFing with the devil! 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Your mileage may vary, but of all the people who have told me to "educate myself," I found that not a single one could name a book of Dworkin's or Steinem's that they had actually read for themselves. The ones who quote de Beauvoir have never been able to tell me which chapter of her book contains the famous quote about women being made rather than born.

Most have had the good grace to be embarrassed when I thus highlight which one of us actually lacks education in feminist theory.

[–]lunitabonitaBlood Coming Out of Her Whatever 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

To be fair, not knowing which chapter something is in a book isn't really a gotcha moment. I can't remember what chapter things are in the books I've read.

[–]thrwpllwI saw Goody Throwpillow TERFing with the devil! 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not talking about chapter number, I'm talking about remembering what context the quote is in. What is being discussed? What is that part of the book discussing when she says that?

Not knowing these answers is a major reason why they tend to interpret her quote to mean exactly the opposite of what she was actually saying.

[–]BimblebyGiant bipedal vagina. 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've found this is something that only occurs online, and I don't think it's really possible to combat it with most of the people who trot that line out online.

In real life it's much harder for people to maintain that position. If people know you and know that you're a generally thoughtful and interested person, with views they agree with on other things, I've found people tend to be curious rather than dismissive. They might still be uncomfortable with the view after a conversation, but I've found that people do listen and have tended to agree much more than I'd have expected.

[–]-backdrifter 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, it's funny how their first assumption is always that you must be uneducated, ignorant, and unaware (and/or that you're just evil, mean, and hateful). What they don't seem to realize is that so many of us traveled through liberal feminism first before getting to where we are now with radical feminism, gender criticism/abolition, etc. Many of us used to be liberal feminists. Many of us used to be supportive of trans activism. Many of us used to wring our hands over the "TERF" panic as well. We don't really need to read their articles and blog posts - we've often already read them! We have reasons for why we disagree. We aren't doing this just for the hell of it. Frankly I've done more reading as a radical feminist than I ever did as a liberal feminist. My time spent as a liberal feminist was primarily wrapped up in regurgitating what I was hearing from others and trying to force myself to be okay with things that I wasn't actually okay with (like porn). I've learned a hell of a lot more as a radical feminist.

Sometimes they honestly remind me of my Republican father who assumes that I'm dumb and ignorant and thinks that if I'd just read the "right" articles (meaning his biased conservative news), I'd come around to his point of view. Both my father and these liberals seem to operate under the assumption that everyone who doesn't agree with them 100% must just be so stupid. It's honestly really insulting and simplistic.

[–]hasgirlbits 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (4子コメント)

I get the "educate yourself" position when it's like ... okay, women don't have to constantly explain politely and gently to all the men in their lives who are being sexist assholes and won't crack a book. Likewise, PoC don't have to spend their lives teaching racists, disabled people don't have to spend their lives teaching ableists, etc.

It's just that, like so many things, the modern left has turned it up to 9011 so now you can't even disagree with them without them screeching "educate yourself!!" I think a lot of us here, for instance, have done the fucking reading on feminism and trans; we've lived it. We've just reached (or been pushed) to different conclusions, so of course we're stupid and unlearned. Their way is the only true way, there can't be disagreement between people of knowledge and good faith.

[–]ZardozSpeakstoYou1[S] 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They think being radical means "liberal but over the top" they aren't even really leftist just centrists that believe really weird shit and are extreme about it.

[–]zpret 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree! It's why it took me so long to get to peak lib fem - it started out reasonable but over the years it's, as you say, turned up to 9011 (and counting...)

[–]purple_radish 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I think that liberals tend to be black and white thinkers because once they find a framework of belief that works for them they stop thinking critically and begin thinking in terms of morality, and morality is an absolute. It's much harder to get someone to question their morality than it is their reasoning. Rhetoric becomes dogma. Everyone wants to be on the side of Right/Good.

[–]11strangecharmlogica tolerantia fortitudine 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think that liberals humans tend to be black and white thinkers because once they find a framework of belief that works for them they stop thinking critically and begin thinking in terms of morality, and morality is an absolute. It's much harder to get someone to question their morality than it is their reasoning. Rhetoric becomes dogma. Everyone wants to be on the side of Right/Good.

What you said is spot-on, but it also applies to conservatives very well and could easily have been about them.

[–]lunitabonitaBlood Coming Out of Her Whatever 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That makes so much sense!

[–]endofthelinerXX-Marks-My-Sex=Female 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, I got that at 2 liberal sites almost 2 yrs ago because I said MtT weren't women. And yes, it was "you're ignorant" and "educate yourself". I just left because I knew there was no sense in trying to give them any biological facts or radfem politics.

[–]a1c3e5g7i9Exploratory researcher kid 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm pretty sure they think that their opinion is fact and that if any reasonable person knows the facts and can understand their ideas then they will automatically agree with them. It's annoying as hell to me.

[–]earthgardenNo prefix needed 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (3子コメント)

It has been crazy, for YEARS. It jumped the shark at least 10, 15 years ago when white activists started virtue signaling with that 'all white people are racists' nonsense. When I pointed out that No, that is not actually true I was then told by both black and white 'activists' that I was uneducated on racism (um I am a black person, an actual black person), suffering from internalized racism, and that was likely due to having a white husband i.e sleeping with the 'enemy' had caused me to 'identify' with white racism.

When I pointed out that wasn't true because actually my husband is not a racist (why on earth would I marry a racist, WTF) and also my marriage was irrelevant because there have always been white people in this country against racism, actively living/fighting against it. This is historical fact. But nope for some reason this belief/idea that 'ALL white people are racists no matter what' became something they insisted everyone 'believe', and if you don't well you're just a racist or have internalized racism. Why was this so important, especially to white people? Doesn't it seem odd that white people supposedly 'anti-racist' would push this agenda of all white people, themselves included, being born and bred racist? On the surface yes, it is very strange, but my dad always told me to follow the money trail. Who benefits/has benefited financially from this? White people. Look at all the activists getting paid: Tim Wise, Shaun King, etc. White people, particularly white men, are the new face of black civil rights. Note that these people don't get a tenth of the ire actual black activists get, such as the women who spearheaded Black Lives Matter, even though they posit some very strange and racist things about their fellow whites. Hmmmm

Now this all or nothing view has jumped to feminism regarding transgender people: They insist that you must believe transgender women ARE the same as women, and not only that, have ALWAYS been women and their penises are actual female sex organs. Why is this belief necessary, who actually benefits from pushing the ludicrous idea that a penis is a female sex organ, or that 'womanhood' is merely a thought or a feeling, or that sex has naught to do with biology and merely a 'social construct'? White males will soon become the face of feminism. We are watching it unfold before our very eyes.

[–]refaire 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I certainly don't believe that lived experience trumps everything, but what's funny is that a lot of these people say they do. I've seen so many white people claim that they respect the lived experiences black people, but when they actually talk to a black person who doesn't toe the party line it's like their brains malfunction.

[–]bicycling_elephant 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You see the same thing happen in liberal circles when they come across an ex-prostitute who talks about how horrible it was instead of how empowering it was.

[–]Eclectic58Resistance is NOT futile 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh, yes, Bruce Jenner alllllllllways knew he was a woman. That's why he went out for the male-only decathlon, rather than competing in synchronized swimming!

[–]refaire 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The best article I've ever read about this is The Smug Style in American Liberalism by Emmett Rensin. Y'all should check it out.

[–]newyearnewsn 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Whats truly hilarious is how little those people tend to know themselves.

They have an advanced degree in Tumblr shitposting and thats about it!

[–]TegretolGo home liberalfeminism, you're drunk 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I hate how you can't disagree with leftists or you're branded a conservative, like how GC is considered alt right. It's ridiculous. I'm very left leaning and I get so sick of people thinking I'm a conservative.

[–]cantaveritas 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is brainwashing. The whole 'educate yourself' stuff. They make these wild statements like biological sex is a construct and then refuse to elaborate or justify or explain. Mainly because they can't.

When they say 'educate yourself' should say "does this mean you dont know?"