全 35 件のコメント

[–]BraveStrategy 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Imagine what they have now

[–]PM_ME_FAV_PICS 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

There is no telling. I think they have a drone do it. I have a shirt that has been hanging in my room with this weird ink substance on it that was on the inside of the shirt. It was hanging inside out and the ink is smeared a little on the other side like a tiny dot while the other is in a perfect circle about the size of a quarter. It is dried up so it was a while back but I cannot find any reason why or how this ink got there. This is very possible that I was attacked by a future generation of this gun and it went off wrong. I heard weird launching noises in my closet a while ago so I shut it. It may have bounced back into the closet and hit my shirt. The only thing is that I don't see any kind of hole where it passed through so I cannot determine. I need to get my shirt forensic tested by a trusted source.

[–]pedestrianhomocide [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I must be missing a reference to something else. Is this a joke? Do you really think you're being targeted and shot at by high tech guns like this?

[–]uber1337h4xx0r 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Can someone explain what this has to do with United Airlines?

[–]zbf 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Maybe United is planning on giving the gun to employees?

[–]DavidJA 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

great, another thing to fear

[–]plumber576 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is OP trying to infer that United Airlines should use this to remove passengers?

I mean, this is a United Airlines subreddit.

[–]UncleSpoons 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (26子コメント)

Mythbusters tested the myth that an assassin could kill and leave no trace using an ice bullet twice and both times it was busted. The ice proved far too brittle and it disintegrated before it left the barrel.

I'm sceptical of this video to say the least, what makes it credible?

[–]ssjviscacha 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Myth busters used gunpowder, this looks like it uses compressed air or gas.

[–]ServeChilled 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm surprised they didn't even try doing it with compressed air or gas. Especially after noticing it just melted with gunpowder.

[–]MuchoCilantro 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (5子コメント)

MythBusters budget vs CIA budget

[–]tehdubbs 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Because the government has more power than the mythbusters?

[–]UncleSpoons 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

But you could make that argument for literally any impossible technology. The fact that the government has more resources doesn't prove anything.

[–]tehdubbs 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The government has the power to do that.

[–]3vi1 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The government has actual scientists.

[–]cerhio 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The government has insane backdoors into all types of technology. I think it was leaked last year that they were intercepting hardware and installing backdoors.

[–]theoriginalstarwars 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

One thing that pissed me off with that is that they did not try a shotgun. The wadding would protect the ice from the heat and impact from the ignition and the bullet would have more mass.

[–]Pietat 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Isn't the whole point of the gun to leave an undetectable mark on the victim? Having more mass leaves a bigger mark.

[–]otter111a 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This could be similar to the polonium pellet gun. That used a very small sphere of polonium.

[–]Durtwarrior [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Like if Mythbusters had the same budget as the CIA. Just with Vault 7 we know that they can assassinate a target by hacking their car without leaving any trace. They have a hardware backdoor on phones and tv. So lets be honest they probably have this technology and even better.

[–]rykorotez 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Mythbusters also only used straight water if I remember correctly. Who knows what kind of chemical mix could make it effective?

[–]ironman82 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

i got one of these

[–]uber1337h4xx0r 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dude, I have a heart, too.