From this @jameshohmann articlehttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2017/04/11/daily-202-reflexive-partisanship-drives-polling-lurch-on-syria-strikes/58ec27d4e9b69b3a72331e6e/?utm_term=.5ca031ddc547&wpisrc=nl_daily202&wpmm=1 …
Democrats: 37% support Trump's Syria strikes 38% supported Obama doing it GOP: 86% supported Trump doing it 22% supported Obama doingpic.twitter.com/2tsaYA1SZZ
-
-
I'm actually more amazed by Democratic consistency on this than 60 point GOP swing.
-
almost like Dems have principles and Rs do not.
-
if you call wanting to bomb other countries principles (quite a stretch)
-
Actually shows D's consistently NOT in favor of bombing other countries so um yeah, principles...
-
Alternative hypothesis: Assad gassed his ppl again & now ppl believe negotiated removal chemical weapons won't work anymore.
-
Assad has been using chemical weapons for a long time. It's nothing new
-
This was the first time since the failed agreement to remove the chemical weapons.
-
you honestly think that is the reason for the 60% swing in GOP approval?
- 他2件の返信
-
-
-
attn
@ggreenwald MAYBE ‘both sides do it’ doesn’t quite accurately characterize this type of hypocrisy? maybe? -
The relevant comparison would be if Obama had done the strike: what % of Dems would support it? See also:http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/repulsive_progressive_hypocrisy/ …
-
what? how is what andrew showed not DIRECTLY germane to the question of who actually holds a consistent worldview? no deflection.
-
There is ample evidence of how willing Dems are to completely change position to support their leaders, as I just showed you.
-
Ample evidence was presented, yes, and it was shown ONE PERCENT of Dems do it, while SIXTY PERCENT of Reps do.
-
I'll try this one last time: Obama never changed his position on striking Assad, so of course Dems never changed theirs. Is this hard?
-
but Rs DID change their position, which was the original point, and no, it’s pretty easy, honestly. one wonders how one could be confused
- 他2件の返信
-
-
This is asymmetrical political polarization in a nutshell. You have to understand this concept to understand where we are in 2017.
-
Tribalism replaces clear thinking and adherence to core principles to say nothing of love thy neighbor as thyself.
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。