that isn't quite what the Incompleteness Theorems proved.
Proof itself, of any sort, is impossible, without an axiom (as Godel proved). Thus faith in God is a prerequisite for all proof.
-
Cool, now I know to write "therefore God" for the questions I dont know in my double advanced biomolecular trigonometry test I hv this week.
-
-
I really respect your work, but this is nonsense. You are better than that.
-
It would be hard to be worse.
-
-
-
This is absolute nonsense as I can have an axiom that includes no god, two straight lines never cross, etc.
-
Shoulda said parallel but you get the point
-
-
Is this a joke of some sort? this isn't even nearly true
-
-
I'm sure he couldn't fully explain his reasoning in a 140 character tweet
-
Hm? All I did was retweet a tweet I was shown. He goes into more detail here: https://www.facebook.com/dr.jordan.b.peterson/posts/10151719716947657 …
-
Oh I see. My bad
-
-
-
If you believe the only axiom that can exist is "god exists" then you are purposefully not understanding logic,axioms, and reason.
-
but if you say his tweet in his voice, then it makes sense
-
I don't know who this guy is or how his voice sounds, is he well known?
-
He's a hit w the anti-SWJ crowd regarding 4 refusing to use the million gender pronouns...but then many jumped ship when they heard the rest
-
-
i'm so glad no-one with a brain takes you seriously
-
If your axiom is a sky warlock who keeps a torture dungeon for people who make him mad, you're as idiotic as I thought. That's my axiom
-
Godel is a world famous mathematician - he wouldn't be famous for such a trivial statement of the obvious.
pic.twitter.com/Ua0FoJj5AN
-
You need axioms - basic, indivisible truths. Yes. God? No.
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。