上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 432

[–]BarrettBuckeyeConstitutional Conservative[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (6子コメント)

I guess we should have issued a trigger warning. lol. Here are the reports for this post:

3: Threatens, harasses, or bullies

2: Shitpost

1: Concern Troll

1: Spam

1: Civility

1: strawman. actual story was a girl becoming a boy, who wantd to wrestle other boys, but wasnt allowd

1: I think the author of this comic skimmed a story without actually reading it... embarrassing.

1: Racism

1: Lol. You realize men and women interact like this everyday and nothing happens. May as well join IS.

1: Thats a proofter in a wig, not a girl

1: You're all terrible, hateful people.

1: <no reason>

1: "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!" Fuck off

[–]grosslyambiguous 544 ポイント545 ポイント  (76子コメント)

Someone needs to introduce a bill calling for all youth sports to be unisex so transgendered and gender-fluid kids can feel more comfortable competing. Then watch the transgendered rights activists clash with the feminists.

[–]johndeer89Moderate Conservative 127 ポイント128 ポイント  (21子コメント)

Then there would be about three girls for every hundred boys in sports.

[–]Yamez 135 ポイント136 ポイント  (20子コメント)

But gender roles are social constructs and there are no biological differences determining sex. We just need to relabel 47 of the boys appropriately.

[–]128997493 41 ポイント42 ポイント  (17子コメント)

I've really never heard someone argue that there are is no sexual dimorphism in humans. That seems like a silly strawman, even the craziest SJW knows that there is a difference between a penis and a vagina.

[–]K3TtLek0Rn 45 ポイント46 ポイント  (13子コメント)

Because it's all a strawman. Social activists argue that gender is a social construct, not sex. You're born as a certain sex, male or female. But the whole boys like blue and trucks and girls like pink and dolls and wear dresses is what they say society has influenced.

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (12子コメント)

If gender identity is a social construct, unattached to the reality of the physical body, how can the gender identity and body be said to be misaligned? How can an identity be trapped in the wrong body if the identity is just a product of social conditioning?

Can you be born with an innate social construct in your head? If the answer is anything but "No", it is total incoherence.

[–]Xujhan 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (11子コメント)

If the answer is anything but "No", it is total incoherence.

Or the answer just isn't as black-and-white as you're expecting it to be. It's possible for there to be a statistical predisposition for certain things based on sex and for gender to be influenced by culture, and from all the evidence we have that does seem to be the case.

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Ah, yes, the appeal to nuance, the last refuge of the sophists. "It's everything, and nothing, and both all at once! And if you disagree, you're just one of those intransigent black-and-white types."

If we're going to have a debate about wrong brains in wrong bodies, it would be helpful if somebody could define what a male mind is, what a female mind is, what a male body is, and what a female body is. No argument can begin without proper definitions, and I've noticed that trans activists stumble out of the gate with this because their game is contorting the language, not standardizing it.

[–]Xujhan 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Ah, yes, the appeal to nuance

"If we're going to have a debate", you're probably going to have to accept that life generally is nuanced. To be clear, do you actually believe that everyone suffering from gender dysphoria is faking it?

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (1子コメント)

To be clear, I see no reason why physical sex change should be the solution, where the problem legitimately exists.

https://www.firstthings.com/article/2004/11/surgical-sex (This is where you say that you loathe Dr. McHugh because he's a regressive bigot and drop some form of the "No True Psychologist" fallacy because he holds a contrary opinion. I don't care. He makes sound arguments.)

And, to be clear, I add the qualifier "where it legitimately exists" because an overwhelming majority of childhood dysphoria cases resolve on their own without reinforcement of the delusion. If people can, as you seem to imply, be at least partially socialized into their gender identity, it stands to reason that they can and should be socialized into their proper gender identity.

And, to be clear, while I don't agree with the choice to mutilate one's body, I have no other concern with it as long as they do it on their own dime and acknowledge that they are not entitled to everything a biological woman (or man) would be entitled to, including, but far from limited to, bathrooms (it's always bathrooms in the news these days, but far more societal institutions are based on the sex binary than the low-hanging fruit of bathrooms).

And, to be clear, I unreservedly oppose medical interventions on minors both because they are often confused and do not have the capacity to make such potentially harmful decisions. I believe there is an agenda at play to push these interventions and encourage unnecessary exploration of transgendered feelings, even to the extent that progressive gender pyschologists have been silenced or pushed out. The politics of this issue are highly charged and have crept into the science. If this is about free will, pro-choice whatever, then keep it to adults.

Is there anything else you'd like me to be clear about? I get the sense that you're only asking to pin me down to saying something you find "offensive!" so that I may be properly disposed of as a knuckle-dragging bigot.

If I sound cynical, it's because I am. I've been down this road before. Shouted down, brigaded, all that. But every once in a while, I manage to have a reasonable conversation out of love and concern, so I suppose I continue to tilt at these windmills. The world will go the direction it will regardless of my contribution, but I only caution that progressivism, despite its almost infallible claim to always being "on the right side of history" does take us down the wrong path from time to time.

We have to pump the brakes on this transgender stuff and call out its incoherence because you really don't want to live in a world where such logical messes go unchallenged.

[–]K3TtLek0Rn 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (6子コメント)

What do you think? Transgender people are just making this shit up?

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (4子コメント)

That's it? After everything I've written (and it's probably been too much, so I'll shut up now), this is what I get as a rebuttal?

EDIT: But, you know, I do owe you an answer to the "Are they making this up?" question. Fair enough:

  • Some people, the activists, are being dishonest about some aspects of the movement and are, unfortunately, preying on confused children. I have seen transgenderism encouraged in children as young as two. That is irresponsible and politically motivated.

  • Some are genuinely confused, particularly in children where most dysphoria cases resolve on their own with no intervention.

  • Some are misdiagnosed homosexuals, and this is backed up by even progressive psychologists.

  • Some are autogynephiles. This is controversial and I am aware of that.

  • Some have a legitimate mental illness that causes their mind not to correspond to physical reality. I believe it is often best to pursue measures that help them become comfortable in their body, such as counseling, rather than putting them in the "right" body, which I've explained elsewhere as being a nonsensical concept in a world where we don't even have the frame of reference to define such things as "male brain" or "female brain" or "male body" or "female body".

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (2子コメント)

They argue that the objective reality of sexual dimorphism is a meaningless impediment to whatever they subjectively will their gender identity to be - an identity which, curiously enough, they cannot define without reference to so-called gender constructs and that meaningless sex binary.

[–]HDOOM16 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This. They say they feel like they aren't the sex they're supposed to be, yet when asked why, they refer to their preference towards certain behaviors and things that both their supporters and themselves say are gender constructs perpetuated by society. It makes no sense whatsoever. Either they must admit that men and women act differently because of biology, which would go against An idea feminists have been pushing for 40 years, or they continue to say that any behavioral differences between men and women are purely a result of societal conditioning and thus those considering themselves transgendered are simply confused or mentally ill.

[–]PubliusVA 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Genius! Now inequality will be a thing of the past.

[–]Unstable_Scarlet 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Can't tell if sarcastic please add /s if so

[–]bachelorpartydude 119 ポイント120 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I want so badly for this to happen if for no other reason than the game of chicken with title IX.

[–]WolfeBane84 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (4子コメント)

My college had a football program that was raking in cash left and right for the college.

Then some cunt cried Title IX and demanded an equally funded female football team. Even though there weren't even enough "players" to form a full team.

College had to comply, so instead of complying, they shutdown the football program.

Thanks, Title IX

[–]squeel 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Bullshit. Which school?

[–]EncyclopaediaBrown 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Something tells me you're not going to get a response here...

[–]Bibliolicious 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, that's not how title IX works.

[–]nimsu 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

R/thathappened

[–]mista0sparkle 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Most feminists are in favor of trans rights, and I'm sure there would be more division in feminism because of this. There are already trans-exclusionary feminists, which are very different from the 3rd/4th wave (read: Marxist) feminists.

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

r/GenderCritical if you want to see SJW infighting.

[–]128997493 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You can see plenty of "SJW infighting" just about anywhere there are SJWs. They are always infighting.

[–]mista0sparkle 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks, but I'd rather sit on a stalagmite covered in szechuan sauce.

[–]fucks_with_dolphins 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (18子コメント)

Holy crap. This is gonna have to happen. It's weird to think how sports will be played in the future. I have a feeling men's sports will have to be unisex while women will have their own segregated league. Yanno, because equality. And you'll be considered a misogynistic asshole if you question it or bring up that it's because men are usually physically stronger.

[–]Btk258 50 ポイント51 ポイント  (17子コメント)

That's exactly what it is now, the men's team has to accept women and the women's team doesn't have to. At least in the United states. All the professional teams too don't ban women. But men can't play on the women's team.

[–]KittiesHavingSex 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Is this actually true, or just conjecture? Because it seems true, but I've never seen regulations about it. Do you have any source I could read?

[–]Btk258 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (4子コメント)

I'm pretty sure only the MLB has explicit rules that women cannot play. But NHL NFL and NBA have no rules baring women, they just aren't big/strong enough.

[–]KJsquare 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I believe there have been a few women who almost got the nod to be NHL goalies. Again can't remember where I read that but it's a pretty open position for either gender and added flexibility would be an advantage, as well as a lower center of gravity.

[–]bcastronomer 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Manon Rhéaume was signed to Tampa Bay as a free agent in 1992!

[–]dillpickles007 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Women can play in the MLB, in fact there was once a woman player who played in an MLB sanctioned winter league. She never could have sniffed the bigs but there's not a rule against it.

[–]LawlosaurusTea Party Conservative 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

MLB lifted its ban on women in 1993. No one woman has ever been drafted though, because they can't compete at that level.

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You have to remember that there really isn't a men's event and a women's event in most sports. There's the event and a separate female division that ensures they'll still be able to participate.

If we just had "the event" and eliminated women's categories, we would basically just have men-only Olympics or whatever. At the highest levels, there is almost no place where the playing field is close to even.

The strangest thing about all this gender-bending stuff is that it undercuts the gains feminism has made. Original feminists didn't see their identity as just some androgynous blob that was entitled to equal rights because we are all exactly the same. They wanted equal rights because, while we are all biologically different, we are all innately granted rights on account of our humanity.

The trans activists seek equality in total conformity, whereas traditional feminists activists sought equality in diversity.

[–]fucks_with_dolphins 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Oh wow. I've been conditioned to the point that I didn't even notice. What a fucking shit show

[–]theghostecho 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It should be like that though because if it wasn't the case, "girl teams" would be populated with just boys

[–]fucks_with_dolphins 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Or, yanno, we could just realize the fact that there's only two sexes despite what someone is wearing or how they've mutilated their genitals.

[–]realvmouse 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (6子コメント)

I think what would happen in this case is schools would have to consider, under title IX, whether the sports they chose to fund/participate in were creating equal opportunities for participation. So while you're thinking "hahaha let's see girls participating in unisex football, basketball, wrestling, track and field, and baseball," what would actually happen is schools will start dropping some of those sports and you'll see more synchronized swimming, gymnastics, ballet, and so on.

[–]LUClEN 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Some schools would do this. There would probably be war if they tried to get rid of football at some of those Southern High schools, though

[–]Geasymoney 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Equal opportunity for what? You may still thinking with the mindset that they would differentiate the athletes as male and female athletes. They may add sports such as gymnastics and ballet but then they would also only have to field one basketball team, soccer team, ect. so they may have the extra funds to allow for more teams.

[–]realvmouse 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

they would also only have to field one basketball team, soccer team, ect

True, but for every "women's only" team they eliminate in most of these sports, they effectively create a "men's only" team instead when they make it unisex, if it is a sport that prioritizes male strengths to succeed (eg strenth/speed) instead of female strengths (flexibility/isometric strength).

Remember, to be prosecuted under title IX or similar civil rights laws, the policy doesn't have to be explicitly sexist/racist/etc. Even if the law treats everyone equally, they face legal action if the actual result of the law ends up creating a bias. So if all the sports that a school currently has are male-dominated, schools would need to look for sports where women tend to excel.

[–]necktits_[🍰] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Then watch biological women never win anything again

[–]Steadman 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It'll backfire quickly as young women get hurt badly on football fields across America, when having to block 250-300lb defensive lineman.

And it won't be "we understand why these are separated", it'll be "change how football is played or get rid of it".

Remember, this isn't actually about equality, it's about a change in power structure. These vocal minorities just want every to suffer like they've suffered. It's not a compromise in the slightest.

[–]GodGunsGutsGlory 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

...defensive lineman lineperson.

FTFY.

[–]iSunMonkey 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (3子コメント)

The SJW crowd has a term for exactly what you're talking about: "TERFS"

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (2子コメント)

The transexual vs. TERF war is going to be epic as feminists realize their work is completely undermined by people who think "female" is an artificially constructed concept.

There is no feminism without the sex binary.

EDIT: To paraphrase Matt Walsh, the left has said, "You can't talk about this women's issue if you don't have a vagina!" And now they say you don't actually need a vagina to be a woman.

The concept of gender identity has become detached from the physical body and biological reality. It's just whatever your mind wills. So, what does this do to feminism, which makes claims to exclusive rights and privileges specifically based on the idea that they are innately women with innately feminine needs?

"We need gender balance in politics/STEM/the trades!" But why? And how do you know we don't have gender balance in these fields already? DID YOU JUST ASSUME ALL TRADESPEOPLE'S GENDERS??!!

Taken to its most extreme, why doesn't Trump simply declare he has the first gender balanced cabinet in the history of the United States and tell feminists to quit complaining about it? This example, while seemingly absurd, illustrates how the classical feminists vs. gender-bending ideologues work against each other.

[–]iSunMonkey 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Eh... really depends on what you mean by 'feminism'. Everybody has a different meaning.

[–]Xujhan 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

the left has said

"The left" isn't represented by a niche group of activists, in the same way that Trump fans don't speak for all conservatives.

The concept of gender identity has become detached from the physical body and biological reality. It's just whatever your mind wills.

It's distinct, not detached. The mind and body very much relate to each other, but it's important to be able to distinguish between the two.

what does this do to feminism, which makes claims to exclusive rights and privileges

Again, loud minority. Most feminists don't want special treatment any more than most conservatives want a wall and a Muslim ban.

"We need gender balance in politics/STEM/the trades!" But why?

Because as a whole we want more qualified people in those professions. If there's a strong gender skew (in either direction) in a job, it's reasonable to think there might be some factors causing the less represented gender to avoid that career path. It goes both ways; we want more male elementary teachers as well as more female engineers.

[–]zombiemakemelol 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Would be hilarious if it worked. Except feminists probably don't play sports and probably don't like the jock girls. So might just fuck over a lot of young female athletes and no change

[–]ElfBingley 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, they'd say that competitive sport is a violent construct of the patriarchy. Participation in sports is a validation of the perpetuation of the dominant paadigm.

[–]voksul 274 ポイント275 ポイント  (73子コメント)

I'd just like to point out that liberals aren't actually campaigning for the female-to-male transgender kid in the story to be able to compete against females. They attempted to get him to be able to compete against boys. This isn't a story of out-of-control liberalism and some of the trans-bashing here is uncalled for.

Texan teenager says law should change so he can wrestle boys

‘You hating ain’t going to get me and you nowhere’

Beggs’ family had attempted to get permission to allow him to compete in the boys’ division, challenging a state law that requires athletes in public schools to compete against the gender listed on their birth certificates.

The Guardian

Edit: appending my reply to a comment to this post to address the disturbing amount of transphobia going on in these comments


Gender dysphoria is an actual condition. Those affected by it are legitimately and fundamentally uncomfortable in their own body. Directly treating the brain is not possible at this point in time and direct therapy sessions don't massively help the person feel more okay in their body. Reassignment surgery, on the other hand, helps transgender individuals feel a lot better in their own bodies. If we could solve this discomfort without body modification that'd be obviously preferable but we can't.

Being transgender can be proven, through neurological and physiological analysis, to be something that is an inherent part of those who identify with it. It's not like everyone who feels a little feminine is getting hormone injections.

They're still people. Calling them "it" and obsessing over the fucking bathroom shit dehumanizes them and helps breed the kind of societal attitude that produces anti-transgender hate crimes. Just treat them like people. They're not going into their identified gender's bathroom to creep on or rape people. They're there to piss or take a shit.


[–]SparklingGenitals 69 ポイント70 ポイント  (1子コメント)

If I'm not mistaken the kid in question didn't push to wrestle with the girls, either. That was a parent thing. Kids don't care about politics and just want to be kids.

Definitely agreed with the "it" thing. That's intentionally insulting. There has to be a modicum of civility and kindness dealing with people even if you have political disagreements. It's about respecting the individual even if you disagree with the politics of it.

[–]realvmouse 69 ポイント70 ポイント  (10子コメント)

I subscribe to a lot of subs I don't agree with. One thing I always find in r/conservative that is missing on most other right-leaning subs is a popular/upvoted comment voicing moderation and reason.

[–]deaglebro 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"reason" and "moderation" being liberal things? Transgenders should not be able to play with women, no matter their biological sex, and if they are too be allowed to play versus men, they they will be demolished, and will thankfully be incentivized not to play. Because no one who watches sports wants to watch a she-man beat up women or get beat up by men.

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (6子コメント)

First off, you are absolutely right that these are people who deserve our compassion and should not be subject to abuse.

However, having compassion for somebody does not mean bending to their will. They are confused and in need of help, and I believe they should seek it first by means that don't mutilate or chemically distort the body at great risk (and any procedure on a legal minor should be unequivocally rejected).

Once again, we're back to this idea of a "mind in the wrong body". However, as I've said before, this idea is nonsensical, and doubly so if you accept modern transgender ideology. Consider the following questions:

  • What is a male mind?

  • What is a female mind?

  • If gender identity is a fake construct, how do we know what a female or male mind innately likes to do? Or how it acts? Or what it thinks?

  • What is a male body?

  • What is a female body?

  • Is a body with non-functional female sex organs, but XY genetics a female's body? A man's? A man's made to appear as a woman's?

  • Can a transitioned man or woman ever have a fully transitioned body, or is it just a cosmetic change to match some pre-determined idea of what a man or woman "should" look like? How do we know what men or women should look like if gender identity is a social construct?

And, most importantly, if any mind can inhabit any body, why does it matter to the mind which body it's in? And how does it know? If gender identity is an artificial construct and the sex binary is rejected, it seems we have no frame of reference to talk about "misaligned" minds and bodies.

Transgender ideology nullifies the very thing it claims by suggesting that there is no innate masculinity or femininity.

Put most simply, if gender identity has nothing to do with the physical body, how can the gender identity and body be mismatched? How can you know what it's like to be in the "wrong body" unless you know the experience of being in the right body - unless the experience of having a girl's mind with a female body or a boy's mind with a male body is a universally felt thing?

For transgender ideology to work, it must admit that gender identity is innate and that it is innately attached to the body... The very thing they reject.

If no definition of male or female relies on the physical reality, then it really shouldn't matter what body one is in. By denying that this sex binary frame of reference matters, the transgender lobby undercuts their own reason for supposedly needing to change the body in the first place. It is logical incoherence.

Regardless of what one thinks about how coherent this is, what concerns me most is the speed at which we are tearing down social institutions built around the sex binary (and it's more than bathrooms) as the language itself is becoming de-standardized and more meaningless. For whatever reason, children have seemed to become the front line in this cultural battle and it isn't right to be pumping them full of drugs or taking away their security or removing opportunities for athletic achievement.


And, just as an aside, there are many documented cases of biological males identifying as females competing in female divisions in sports and unfairly tilting the playing field. Though, I haven't seen anything like this in the wresting world yet.

[–]realvmouse 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I have a feeling you've spent a lot more time constructing your own arguments and putting them up in echo chambers than you have spent learning about this issue and finding out what the other side has to say.

I am not going to do a long back-and-forth; this comment is it, and then feel free to have the last word. A couple of points though:

-Arguing that gender is a construct doesn't mean that it's arbitrarily created. Saying that we should abolish gender norms or that gender is a social construct and we should change those constructs where they are harmful is not the same as arguing that all minds are blank slates. A male in one culture may express masculinity through hand-to-hand combat and find this very masculine; a male in another culture may purchase a very expensive gold watch and find this to be masculine. The way in which a male expresses his masculinity is a construct, but that is not to say his basic male identity is flexible/arbitrary. When those on the left seek to end gender norms or abolish gender expressions, they're primarily talking about things that they feel harm society-- the need for the man to work long hours and the women to raise the children, as one example.

-There is little debate that a male and female brain have important structural and chemical differences. However, these differences are dictated by hormonal signals during development. Development is a very complicated process. As you may know, all humans neonates develop into females by default unless exposed to hormones during development that reprogram them. There is no reason to assume that there must be a nice, clear-cut 100% change; receptors on cells predistined to become grey and white matter in the brain may be more or less sensitive to hormones, for example. It is quite reasonable to consider the possibility that some individuals quite literally have a brain that developed, in key ways, as a male brain despite the body developing into a female body, and vice versa. There is no reasonable biological argument for how someone could develop a mind biologically similar to that of an attack helicoptor or pony.

How can you know what it's like to be in the "wrong body" unless you know the experience of being in the right body - unless the experience of having a girl's mind with a female body or a boy's mind with a male body is a universally felt thing?

This is just sophistry. How can you know you're straight if you've never had gay sex? How can you know you're optimally happy as a male if you've never tried being female? Etc.

For whatever reason, children have seemed to become the front line in this cultural battle and it isn't right to be pumping them full of drugs or taking away their security

You are ignoring the fact that their "security" is often already gone. I'm sure you have this picture of children being "normal" until their liberal parents convince or coddle them into believing they are the opposite sex, reinforcing this broken notion. Or perhaps you simply feel all of them can be "reprogrammed" through therapy out of their gender dysphoria. These things have been tried, and suicide and abuse is a very common result. Their security is already gone, and all of these therapies-- from talk and fashion alterations to hormones and therapy-- are being done for their security.

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (4子コメント)

I have a feeling you've spent a lot more time constructing your own arguments and putting them up in echo chambers than you have spent learning about this issue and finding out what the other side has to say.

I am not going to do a long back-and-forth; this comment is it, and then feel free to have the last word.

With all due respect, drop this act. This is patronizing, insulting, and disrespectful.

You claim to subscribe to subs that you clearly don't agree with to have discussions and "see the other side" of things. You're not the first one who has enjoyed coming to r/conservative for this reason. I don't begrudge you this choice.

But, please, for the love of God, don't come on here and start with this shit. You want a discussion? We'll have a discussion. But I will not be insulted here. Even your little preemptive jab at getting the "last word" was meant to make me look like some sort of meanie for desiring an ongoing dialogue.

You were playing the "I'm going to be the bigger man by leaving this conversation on my terms" card. I'm calling you out on that. That was an asshole move on your part.

Arguing that gender is a construct doesn't mean that it's arbitrarily created.

You're right, it's not arbitrarily created. Gender and all its associated roles and norms are inherently tied to the sexual form. Gender identity without the connection to the sex binary, male and female, is absurd. The concept of identity itself requires a frame of reference or it is nonsensical.

Saying that we should abolish gender norms or that gender is a social construct and we should change those constructs where they are harmful is not the same as arguing that all minds are blank slates.

I don't see traditional gender roles as being improperly constructed, and I desire that we retain them. Again, I do agree that the transgender movement is about redefining these traditional roles and norms and I do not agree with it.

Males and females have distinct and important roles in culture and society largely based on their innate physiology. Those unique roles and strengths then form the basis for the traditional family, the most stable and important bond in society. Men aren't the primary breadwinners just 'cuz. Women aren't coerced into being the caretakers of the children and the household. These things arose organically in response to how we were created (or how we evolved, if you're really caught up on that word).

It is quite reasonable to consider the possibility that some individuals quite literally have a brain that developed, in key ways, as a male brain despite the body developing into a female body, and vice versa. There is no reasonable biological argument for how someone could develop a mind biologically similar to that of an attack helicopter or pony.

First of all, if you want to drop terms like "male brain" or "female brain", you're going to have to define them. What is a male brain absent the connection to a male body or innate gender norms? Does a male brain do male stuff? Talk like a man? Like man stuff? What is man stuff anyway? You just said that these things can and should be changed. Do some brains develop in the womb to like football or something?

I'm not trying to be obtuse here. I'm trying to define something that transgender activists have been unable to. Again, if you remove the frame of reference for this concept of "gender identity" you are left with nonsensical definitions.

As for not developing a mind similar to an attack helicopter... well, no, as attack helicopters do not have minds. But there are grown adults who assert themselves to have minds of children. There are people who have developed schizophrenic minds that believe aliens are speaking to them. There are minds of skinny people who believe their bodies to obese. There are many minds out there that do not correspond to reality, but do we necessarily reinforce the delusion?

You are ignoring the fact that their "security" is often already gone. I'm sure you have this picture of children being "normal" until their liberal parents convince or coddle them into believing they are the opposite sex, reinforcing this broken notion.

An overwhelming majority of childhood dysphoria cases resolve on their own so long as the delusion is not actively reinforced. And I have indeed seen the very thing you describe. I have seen it in my own neighbours. You can reject my experience if you want (I suppose we can all say what we want on the Internet), but I know it to be true.

Modern gender philosophy is being pushed at break-neck speed, with no regard for caution or the long term effects. The world of gender studies and gender psychology has been dominated by a determined agenda that actively pushes out dissent, even dissent from some supporters:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/gender-identity-debate-swirls-over-camh-psychologist-transgender-program/article28758828/

[–]tyneeta 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'm pretty in the middle between you and the user you are talking with. And you both make good points.

The article you linked was well written and very impartial to both sides. I'd tend to agree with the psychiatrist who was fired. The whole gender identity issue seems like it comes from most likely homosexual people who are having trouble coping with their sexuality or from children who have been confused by media or their peers.

I stand firmly in the camp that gender dysphoria is a mental illness, but as the article suggests, the course of treatment is unclear. Do you allow them to proceed with gender reassignment or do you use types of talk and cognitive behavior therapy to teach them to be okay with their body. Seems like the science is still out on that one.

On a side note. I will say your comments on traditional gender roles are outdated in the urban first world. The points you make on women being primary care givers and men being breadwinner makes sense in the third world and historically but in a first world society there is no reason why those roles can't be reversed or melded together. A "nuclear family" is not something necessary for a healthy family.

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

On a side note. I will say your comments on traditional gender roles are outdated in the urban first world. The points you make on women being primary care givers and men being breadwinner makes sense in the third world and historically but in a first world society there is no reason why those roles can't be reversed or melded together. A "nuclear family" is not something necessary for a healthy family.

Fair enough. I know I'm more traditional than most, but I do think history is a pendulum, not an arrow. I think we may be in for a socially conservative/traditional turning sooner than some may expect.

Anyway, my predictions about the future are neither here nor there (or even worth the pixels you're reading, lol). What is interesting about your comment about gender roles is that it takes us back to that "male brain" vs. "female brain" problem again.

What does a male brain do or desire to do? Is it a breadwinning brain? What does a female brain do? Is it a caregiving brain? Does it see the world differently and have different ways of thinking? Does a female brain want to be around her kids more than a male brain?

Now, I'm not expecting you to have all the answers here. I don't even think I do. But clearly, there must be some innately masculine or feminine characteristics that are tied to biology if we are to believe this male brain/female brain distinction.

Once all descriptors of male and female are deemed "constructs" how are we to sit here and figure out what as male or female even is? Oddly enough, many parents of trans kids will say something like, "My little Steven liked to play dolls and wear dresses and that's how we knew he was actually Stephanie!"

What? Huh? They're suggesting that their boy was born innately a girl because he was attracted to female "social constructs". How can a brain be innately attracted to a social construct?

[–]dragonfangxl 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (11子コメント)

That case is even simpler: he's taking, what would be considered by pro wrestling, a performance enhancing drug. He should just be barred from wrestling. We shouldn't make everyone else in the wrestling program uncomfortable just to appease one person

Better yet, dont give horomone treatments to kids still in school.

[–]SaffellBot 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (1子コメント)

The issue is that hormone treatments are vastly more effective when given during or before puberty. To deny that option is a very large statement. Especially when the justification is extremely rare cases of uneven sports competition.

[–]dragonfangxl 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sports competition isn't the main reason, it's just a small side effect. We don't let kids smoke, even with their parents permission, because kids are too young to make smart decisions on that. We dont let kids drink because they are too young to make good decisions. But a 14 year old is going to be able to decide whether or not he is ready to undergo extreme surgery that has irreversible side effects?

[–]GaryOaksAlcoholism 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you read the article(s) regarding this athlete they all say that whatever hormonal supplements he's taking don't disqualify him from anything so that point of contention is null. I don't know why that's the case but there you go.

Edit: I made a typo

[–]jelly_cake 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Let him choose what he wants to put in his own body.

[–]dragonfangxl 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Absolutely. When they are 18 and can make smart decisions. If he's too young to rent a car, he's too young to decide he wants extreme unnecessary surgery

[–]jelly_cake 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's exactly how it works. Hormones are the first step, and often the only one.

[–]k_dragon 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

PEDs are allowed if you have a medical reason in almost every sports organization ever.

[–]dragonfangxl 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Wanting to be a dude is not a medical reason

[–]k_dragon 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Indeed, because if there's one person who should determine what's appropriate for medical treatment and what's not, it's you. Not doctors, not psychiatrists, but you. Good job.

[–]JonVBear 269 ポイント270 ポイント  (31子コメント)

The only time anything close to this has happened is when a FtM transexual was forced by his conservative state to fight in the girls league.

Edit: There was an incidence of it occurring in MMA but the point is that this is a very rare issue that should be handled by the sports governing body. It isn't really an issue of politics.

Performance enhancing drug cheats win way more often than transgender athletes.

[–]dudeguymanbro69 173 ポイント174 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Yep. This situation is essentially nonexistent, and cartoons like this serve to create outrage over hypotheticals.

[–]LackOfHatsConservatarian 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

If you type in "man wins womens" on Google, you can find a handful of instances of this happening. Not a crazy amount, but enough for it to be an issue.

[–]JonVBear 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It is an issue yes, but its been overblown. It's an issue for the various sporting governing authorities/doctors/sports scientists and not politicians & the public.

Its definitely not an issue of conservativism/liberalism. These people exist and someone(who is educated on the subject) needs to decide where they compete.

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 35 ポイント36 ポイント  (11子コメント)

You're allowed to express dissent in r/conservative, but not an alternate reality.

http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/03/female-athletes-crushed-by-women-who-were-once-men/

Liberal gaslighting at it's finest on display here. Liberals make a big deal out of something (in this case, knocking down gender barriers), then get challenged on it, then claim conservatives are making a big deal out of nothing.

[–]TheLAriver 42 ポイント43 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Nope. Liberals make a big deal about respecting gender identities, conservatives invent imaginary straw man arguments they think they can win, then liberals reiterate that the conservative outrage at their own straw man is irrelevant to the actual topic at hand.

It's funny, because your comment is exactly the gaslighting you're accusing people of doing. Not only is that article deeply editorialized, it relies on an absurd implication that the trans people in question have transitioned because it would give them an athletic advantage. That's oblivious, at best. Based on the language that article uses, I'm not expecting that best case scenario.

You're allowed to express dissent in r/conservative, but not an alternate reality.

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Who cares if it's editorialized? And who cares why these people transitioned?

The original allegation was that nothing close to the example in the political cartoon happens. I showed it does. The end.

You want another example?

http://www.courant.com/sports/high-schools/hc-hs-cromwell-track-andraya-yearwood-0407-20170406-story.html

Look how far ahead he is. He's in a different bloody ZIP code as he crosses the finish line.

[–]ChemECatalysts 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Here is another example, but this time a trans boy forced by law to stay and compete with the girls. This is complex issue and not something that can be simplified into a cartoon drawing.

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/27/517491492/17-year-old-transgender-boy-wins-texas-girls-wrestling-championship

[–]thekingearl 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

We had men who indentified as women compete in the 2016 Olympic games. Some of the sports even went as far as to say other athletes wouldn't necessarily know if their counter part s are born biologically women or not. Just this week USA Volleyball ruled that a transgendered man who identifies as woman can compete for a spot on the women's volleyball team.

It does indeed happen. If you think it doesn't you're sticking your head in the sand.

[–]SunnyKeen 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Bless you for using correct pronouns

[–]TeddyCruzing 123 ポイント124 ポイント  (49子コメント)

If this is in reference to the recent news of a TransBOY wrestler winning the state championship (These aren't actually boys they're girls who WANT to be boys, lots of confusion on that by conservatives, but remember they're referred to as the gender they WANT to be) then she did actually lose to another biological girl.

The biological girl that was a transsexual wanting to be a boy won so easily because she/he was on testosterone hormones as part of their hormone treatment to become more boyish. This gave her/him a large advantage since it's about the same as a girl taking steroids and getting to compete among high school "clean" girls.

[–]grimlee 135 ポイント136 ポイント  (15子コメント)

Should also mention she WANTED to wrestle the boys, but the state wouldn't let her

[–]Galax-e 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (14子コメント)

I think it is also worth mentioning that sitting out when they said no was an option. It's simply not fair to ruin it for the female wrestlers, while you're fighting a legal battle to get you into the male division.

I think the state should let them compete with boys, but I don't exactly know how that should be legislate​d.

[–]k_dragon 39 ポイント40 ポイント  (2子コメント)

If he'd sat out, nobody would have paid attention and the case would quietly die. Wrestling the girls made a point and drew public attention to the case, and how there are thousands or millions of people who all want him not to wrestle the girls, which can be turned to his favor.

[–]DefenderCone97 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (7子コメント)

You know about the case now though. Maybe everybody freaking out about it will actually get board to let him wrestle against the boys.

[–]Haust 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (6子コメント)

In this case, it may have been better to let her wrestle the men, but they'll have to apply the rules equally. This means when a man wants to compete against women, they'd have to allow it. And we're back to the unfair advantage issue.

[–]ElsatheIceKhaleesi 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But unfortunately a lot of people don't want to accept that men and women have vast differences. We are not physically equal, even if we are (and should be) legally.

[–]pyskell 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think wrestling the girls may actually have helped him make a better case. Sitting it out leaves out evidential proof that FtM males are stronger than biological females.

Personally I think if someone gives you rules to follow, and you can see how stupid it is, the best way to defeat it is to follow it exactly as they've described.

[–]AManHasNoFear 47 ポイント48 ポイント  (19子コメント)

The average teenage boy produces around 12-15 times the amount of testosterone as girls the same age. The girl who won was receiving 12 times the amount of the most powerful anabolic hormone as the other girl. How was she not disqualified simply because she was taking steroids?

[–]Sorakalistaric 50 ポイント51 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Blame the conservative rule makers who insisted that she play based on her birth certificate gender even with full knowledge of her testosterone intake. Even then, taking testosterone regardless of your gender or medical needs should be disqualifying for sports.

[–]k_dragon 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (7子コメント)

It's allowed for medical needs in almost every sports organization ever. Which makes sense, actually, because you pretty much cannot survive as an adult without a lot of one sex hormone or the other. You'll be ok for a while, but eventually your bones will decay.

[–]ElsatheIceKhaleesi 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

You're talking about a rare occurrence that has absolutely no relevance here. This kid wasn't sick or at risk. Gender dysphoria isn't a deadly disease, it's a mental disorder. And honestly even if it was life or death, it does suck for that person but if gives them the kind of advantage where they basically win by default, then they can't compete.

I'm sorry but while I get that this condition is really rough emotionally for the patient, I would say it's ethically wrong to disadvantage multiple other people because a singular person had an ongoing issue. These other girls work extremely hard for this sport, and someone comes in and gets to use pills to bump up their game? Nah.

[–]k_dragon 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

His game wouldn't be bumped up if he were legally allowed to compete against guys, since his blood testosterone levels have been brought up to healthy male ranges. Now that he's still in the competition, but against the girls, there's actually pressure on the state to change the law and eliminate the unfairness.

[–]PubliusVA 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Her body wasn't having any problem with natural hormone production, though, so it wasn't that kind of issue.

[–]k_dragon 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

The whole point of transition is to be a guy. Her levels have been brought up to healthy, normal male ranges. Maybe you think transition is a bad way to treat dysphoria, but frankly it's neither your responsibility nor your right to make personal decisions for other people.

[–]SaffellBot 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (8子コメント)

If you view transgenderism as a medical issue then it seems rather unfair to deny someone the ability to participate in sports because of medical treatment they are under going.

I don't particularly agree with that stance. Obviously the best thing is to compete with similarly physical opponents. Perhaps requiring Trans students to compete with their new gender is the best policy. Perhaps disallowing Trans students on hormone modifying medications is the best, but unfortunate, policy.

[–]ElsatheIceKhaleesi 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (7子コメント)

The only fair thing is to have both ftm and mtf trans students compete with men. Mtf with the girls is still incredibly messed up for these girls who biologically cannot be as strong as a man.

[–]Barbiewonkenobi 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Mtf students would usually be taking estrogen and testosterone-blockers, which would take away their strength advantage.

[–]ElsatheIceKhaleesi 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Can I see some stats on that? The mtf people I've met (very few but still) are pretty open about their remaining masculine traits. Plus, a student probably isn't completely transitioned. There's still an advantage.

[–]Mist_Rising 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Think it's a double reference to that and the wieght lifting thing where a transgender did end up winning (and maybe setting a record..?)

[–]Zachums 34 ポイント35 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Most of the people that were outraged about it didn't even read the damn article. He wanted to compete with fellow boys, but because of Texas' backwards school boards, they forced him to wrestle with girls because he was born as a girl. I'm fairly confident he would have gotten wrecked if they allowed him to do as he wanted, but I guess we'll never know.

[–]GaryOaksAlcoholism 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He actually won the last couple matches because his opponents refused to wrestle him. He is allowed by league rules to take the supplements (iunno why but they don't consider it cheating). If you read any articles at all about the incident they mention both of these things, but not many people do so I'm just pointing that out.

[–]jreeves18411 51 ポイント52 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Except that wrestling is not separated by gender.

[–]azwethinkweizm 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (2子コメント)

It is in Texas. We have men's and women's wrestling in high school. Men cannot wrestle women and vice versa.

[–]RainbowEatingPandas 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Came here to say this. Person who drew it is from an archaic time, or only played segregated sports. When i wrestled there were girls in my division. None at my weight placed in the top 5 but they were still allowed to compete.

[–]cats_suck 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (24子コメント)

Did this actually happen?

[–]Khaleesdeeznuts 97 ポイント98 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Ironically what happened is pretty much the opposite of this.

A teenager who is a female but identifies as a male wanted to compete in boys wrestling classes. The state of Texas would not allow her so she did what they would allow, which was competing with girls. And she wiped the floor with them. But she never asked to compete with girls. She was forced to.

[–]treycartier91 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Were male hormone treatments part of the transition? Thats a part I get concerned about when relating to transgender people and sports. Testosterone injections seem like a major performance enhancer.

[–]Khaleesdeeznuts 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (6子コメント)

I agree. It gets sticky from there. I'm not going to sit here and act like a transitional hormone doctor (like so many others are apparently) so I don't know what they get. I'm gonna guess she was on some kind of drugs that yes did give her an advantage over other girls. But This was a case where she did not want to be in that division. When the alternative is just not competing I think that's more unfair.

[–]RogueGunslinger 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

You think one person not competing is less fair than the entire rest of the division losing to someone with a PED advantage?

[–]PubliusVA 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

When the alternative is just not competing I think that's more unfair.

Except to everyone else besides this one individual.

[–]KingOfTheP4sCruz supporter 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, actually. She had been receiving male hormone treatment before and during competition.

[–]DJSlambert 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yep. To play Devil's advocate, the student wanted to be allowed to wrestle in the boy's division, but Texas law dictates you must go in the division that's on your birth certificate.

(I linked to google so you could pick the news source of your choice)

Here is another example similar. A male-to-female power lifter shattered FOUR world records in the female division with a single lift.

[–]PavementBlues 42 ポイント43 ポイント  (25子コメント)

I've had some good conversations with folks here in the past, so I'm hoping that you'll hear me out when I bring a disagreement to the table.

I've seen two issues brought up by those who don't want trans women competing against cisgender women. First, there is the issue of muscle mass. Second, there is the issue of bone density.

Regarding the first issue, muscle loss is one of the few universal effects of hormone replacement therapy for trans women. Testosterone isn't just required to build a masculine physique, it's required to maintain it. After a certain amount of time, muscle mass will shrink down to normal female ranges. That can vary depending on how hard the person is working out and how much muscle was originally built (which is a fair concern that should be addressed), but research has shown that two years is a good rule (unless puberty was blocked entirely, in which case the testosterone hasn't had time to masculinize the body and you don't need to wait as long).

Regarding the second issue, it's true that trans women have greater bone density than cisgender women. However, the same can be said for black women, whose average bone density ranges are nearly identical to those of Caucasian men. So if we want to use this as a metric for unfair advantage, that opens up a whole can of worms.

Just some thoughts. Hopefully they can help inform the conversation, whether you ultimately think that transgender people should compete or not.

[–]rjohnson99 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Hormones are very powerful and they do play a role in changing the physiology of people who take them to transition to a different gender. No question.

With that being said. Here's my question: Why do we see consistently see trans-gendered women completely dominating in sports where they compete with normal women?

[–]dmhellyes 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Do we? Is the Olympic team full of transgendered women or something I'm unaware of?

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Considering the recentness of these developments, do you really think that's a good example?

I believe we will see this pushed into more absurd territory in the coming years, though, and biological males will have a clear advantage.

[–]rjohnson99 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Olympics? Not so much yet. In 2020 I guarantee we'll see transgender women smashing records.

Here's a few examples to think about though.

Transgender weightlifter Laurel Hubbard, who was born a man, won the Australian international women’s competition March 19.

Transgender cyclist Jillian Bearden, a 36-year-old biological male and Colorado Springs native, won the women’s division of the El Tour de Tucson in four hours and 26 minutes in November 2016.

Transgender Savannah Burton, born a male, used to play on a male dodgeball team. But Burton, a Canadian, transitioned and now plays on a professional women’s dodgeball team. In 2015, Burton competed in the world championship.

"Burton, as a male, threw balls so hard that they would bounce off opponents’ chests with a loud pop."

Transgender football player Christina Ginther, who was born a male and is six feet tall, has sued a semi-pro women’s football team for discrimination and is now playing for another women’s football team.” Now he has his sights set on competing with the women in the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo.

Transgender MMA fighter Fallon Fox, born a man, gave his female opponent a concussion and broke her eye socket in 2015.”

Gabrielle Ludwig ,50, who was born Robert, joined the women’s basketball team at Mission College in Santa Clara, California, in 2012. Ludwig is 6 feet, 6 inches tall and weighs 220 pounds.

Hannah Mouncey, 26, is a 6’ 2”, 220-pound man claiming woman status. He “was previously captain of a men’s handball team in Canberra, Australia. He played 22 games for the men’s team, including the 2013 World Championships and qualifications for the 2016 Olympic Games.” Now, taking female hormones, he has joined the Australian women’s handball team.

A 55-year-old man going by the name “Lana Lawless” and claiming womanhood, won the women’s division of the World Long Drive Championship in 2008.

This is all normal right?

[–]dmhellyes 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean, something to keep an eye on? For sure. Something that is a real problem with women's sports? Ehhhhh, seems like a stretch. While the El Tour de Tuscon is quite prestigious (not to mention the profession women's dodgeball league in Canada), my gut tells me there isn't much actual competing in these leagues.

[–]rjohnson99 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just to clarify my position: I have no problem whatsoever with transgender people. Live your life however you want I don't care if you want to identify as male, female, neither or both.

[–]Zienth 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

There's a fun tangent history lesson behind that. East Germany pumped so many women full of steroids that a lot of them ended up transitioning to men after their athletic career was over.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doping_in_East_Germany

[–]theboyfromganymede 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Thanks for the info, I figured that transwomen lose most or all of their muscle mass but I didn't know that stuff about bone density.

[–]PavementBlues 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

For sure, glad that it helped!

[–]alecesne 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (3子コメント)

The problem ironically is that there's a rule banning males from wrestling with females, so the trans student was not allowed to wrestle with the boys

[–]PubliusVA 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

A rule banning females from wrestling with males, you mean?

[–]CakeMagic 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'm definitely not a conservative and I'm all for transgender people being whoever they want.

However I do feel there are lines that shouldn't be crossed. One for example, any sports should be categorized by their biological gender. I don't care if you think you're a woman and have lived as a woman throughout your whole life, your body is male whatever you like it or not and males have stronger bodies than females on average.

[–]lethalmanhole 79 ポイント80 ポイント  (32子コメント)

"Think of the children!" - except when the child plays second fiddle to someone with a mental disorder who thinks he is a she and can literally beat girls because he's physically stronger than she.

I guess that's tolerance.

[–]a_funsized_gentleman 73 ポイント74 ポイント  (31子コメント)

I think you're getting mad at the wrong thing here. The athlete in reference of this comic was born a girl, and tried and wanted to wrestle in the boys division, because he or she identified as a boy, despite being born a girl. You're making this out to be "This boy just wanted to say he was a girl to beat up girls and feel good about himself!" when it's literally the exact opposite.

[–]mista0sparkle 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I think, unless we're going to do all sports as unisex, the only sensible thing would be to require both trans-men and trans-women to compete with men. Trans-men want to compete with men anyway, and trans-women have incredibly unfair advantages over biological cis-women, especially if the trans-woman has transitioned after puberty.

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Unisex sports would be the end of women's participation at most levels, with virtually none at the most elite level. Female categories were carved out for this reason in the first place.

[–]Btk258 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (8子コメント)

That's not what this comic says.

[–]lethalmanhole 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (14子コメント)

In that case, she shouldn't be allowed to compete for using unnatural amounts of primarily male hormones to make herself stronger. Still wrong.

[–]a_funsized_gentleman 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (8子コメント)

I agree, whatever rules were in place forcing something like this to happen is definitely wrong and outdated. I can't help but get the vibe you're angry at the kid here and not the officials/rules who decided that because this athlete was born a girl, she has to wrestle against other girls.

[–]theghostecho 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Good point there, those hormones would give her an unfair advantage

[–]Snugglejitsu 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're right. So let her compete with the boys.

[–]Oaklandisgay 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ann needs to step her pussy up

[–]RabidPan 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I really don't think this is a common problem. I'm not in favour of this, but there are larger problems to think about when it comes to transpeople

[–]temporalarcheologist 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Why not just have weight divisions instead of making anti transgender comics

[–]tomtom615 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Oh but there are weight divisions, but don't worry. The girl who beat Ann didn't win because of weight or how hard she worked. Her penis beat Ann. Now that she won state she can go back to being a boy because that's the only reason she would want to identify as a girl.

[–]Kali_eats_vegetables 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Do you really believe there are boys who pretend to be transgender so they can win all girl tournaments? I am having a very hard time believing you actually think that is true.

[–]temporalarcheologist 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (6子コメント)

You're a hateful prick that obviously does not understand what weight division means & like you getting facts from an anti-transgender comic Wtf?

[–]tomtom615 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I'm being facetious. Of course the girl didn't win because of what's between her legs. That comment was​soaked in sarcasm

[–]delta_echo 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm really struggling with forming my opinion of this issue. There was a good /r/changemyview on it not that long ago.

[–]drunk98 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Exactly how transitioned do I need to be to legally wrestle women for trophy?

[–]rainbowsforall 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is probably against what most of my fellow liberals believe, but I'm not so sure transgender people should be able to compete in these kinds of one on one strength based sports at all, or at least until we better understand the implications. I believe that they deserve just as much respect as anyone else and the same opportunities whenever possible. But there are situations in which the structure of their bodies or the nature of their hormone treatment may cause their participation in a sport to be unfair to others or even themselves (depending on which gender group they're allowed to compete in). I don't want them to have to be excluded but we have to consider fairness for others as well. Maybe it doesn't make as big of a difference as we might think, but until we know that for sure controversy is going to continue and with good reason.

[–]golden_crow 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I thought that was the whole problem, one student identified as female but was generically male, and therefore barred socially from competing with males, but advantaged when competing against females.

[–]DrTrafalgarPHD 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Genders don't play sports, athletes do. You beat the person in front of you, no exceptions. That's the joy of competition. If you quit a sport because you get beat then you're a bad athlete and a worse competitor.

[–]Sno_Wolf 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is dumb as shit. Almost all high school wrestling teams are mixed gender because there isn't enough interest in girls-only team.

[–]Oaklandisgay 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

You mean she lost to a girl who identified as a girl? If she were a boy she'd be competing with boys, but everyone in this comic is a girl... I don't get it

[–]Rambo1stBlood 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I love it. So far past the gender and sex relation.. you can't even wrap your mind around it! Damn you are from the future.

That is awesome. I don't see it either! Clearly just a bunch of girls! wheres the boy in this comic!?

[–]optionhome 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (14子コメント)

Very nice. The liberal brain went from participation trophies to no female winners because insane males now compete against them.

[–]TweedleNeue 58 ポイント59 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Hes biologically female. And didn't want to compete against girls, but wasn't allowed to compete against other boys.

[–]voksul 64 ポイント65 ポイント  (1子コメント)

But that would involve people here actually doing any reading about the story instead of leaping onto a misleading headline to shit on liberalism gone too far.

[–]rjohnson99 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, they also don't mention that Texas is a state that allows you to change the gender on your birth certificate. The officials involved acknowledged they were following the rules that said birth certificate decided gender.

This girl wanted to wrestle boys but apparently not enough to do the proper paperwork. They don't let women fight in MMA that are on testosterone why should this be different?

[–]acerusso 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

You are leaving out a part on purpose. She was taking testosterone. It gave her a huge advantage. its like an athlete openly taking performance enhancing drugs

[–]EagenVegham 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

He also wanted to compete in the male division so that it wouldn't be an issue but the rules made him compete based on his birth certificate.

[–]acerusso 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

She shouldn't be competing. She is doping. Not in any league

[–]DranoshSoCon, FinCon, antistatist, anti"equality" 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (6子コメント)

So don't let her play, tell her sorry but you're not a male, and you're obviously taking testosterone which is performance enhancing

[–]TweedleNeue 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Or let her compete against boys? We would allow a boy who requires testosterone for medical reasons to compete. Why not a trans man as well?

[–]koolex 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Why is this a conservative thing and not a common sense thing? Any liberal I know including myself agrees that the biological advantage would ruin sports for women.

[–]tomtom615 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

That also puts the idea of people saying they're a different gender just to win at sports. Do you think someone would want to live with the difficulties that trans people face just to win a game?

[–]koolex 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I bet you if it was allowed in the olympics you would see a lot of "transgender" athletes pop up out of the wood works from other countries and it would ruin women's sports. Men have a biological advantage in physical sports and it isn't fair cross that line because of gender identification.

Even if there are legit trans athletes they would spoil the sport because no women would be able to keep up with them.

I don't want to exclude trans people from sports I just don't want to allow it be such an exploitable advantage it ruins it for an entire gender.