•
•

Bring on the downvotes: NAWALT (self.MGTOW)

justajudgepenitent が 投稿

This isnt a shit post I'm a regular lurker on this thread and I honest to god live in a cabin in the woods by myself going full on monk/hermit mode.

For me, AWALT is a helfpul overstatement. It's equivalent to "the house always wins" in a gambling context. I do think there are a few women out there who don't fit the mold, the unicorns but they're so rare that there really isn't a snowball's chance in hell I'll find one. I don't think AWALT is technically true, but it sure is practically true.

I don't object to the use of AWALT on this thread, I think it's very helpful, but when I get criticism from my blue pilled friends about the concept I tell them it's a helpful overstatement in the same way you would tell your kid that all strange men offering candy from vehicles are bad (ASMOCFV).

That sounds logical to said blue pilled friends until I start talking odds. Then we diverge.

全 4 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト (提案されたアイデア)
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Eyes_Of_The_Dragon 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You have a bowl of M&Ms. 90% are poison. Do you grab a handful and start munching?

[–]justajudgepenitent[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Exactly. But is it true that all M&Ms in that bowl are poison? You're better off thinking that and moving on

[–]Raiden627 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This is a common misconception. AWALT doesn't literally mean all women are the same and there aren't some women who are still decent but that at a base biological level hypergamy for a woman will always be at play. They don't even realize it half the time because it happens at such a subconscious level. As a result, every women has the chance the become your worse nightmare. You don't need to stick your hand in the tigers pen to see that.