1
2

Evidence of a nuclear 9/11 (self.conspiracy)

EaterOfSound が 投稿

There is a difference between what most people are willing to accept about certain events, what conspiracy communities commonly label as fact or disinfo, and what actually happened. There is definitely disinfo about exotic weapons being used (see Judy Wood), but that is meant to detract from serious allegations of non-conventional ordinance being used. Tactical nukes have been around for a long time, and more recent generations of the tech can be tuned for specific blast purposes, such as minimal radiation and maximum blast wave damage. If you are interested in researching this instead of writing it off as "that's too far, because it's hard to believe", here are some resources:

Video of a tactical nuke test in late 50's

USGS dust analysis found strontium in WTC dust

Department of Energy found tritium in WTC dust, which they claim came from the dayglow exit signs in the planes, as well as being in scopes of rifles in an armory. . .)

DoE personnel from the Office of Secure Transportation seen in WTC 7

The U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration's Office of Secure Transportation (OST) provides safe and secure transportation of nuclear weapons and components and special nuclear materials, and conducts other missions supporting the national security of the United States of America.

Incredibly loud explosion seconds before north tower collapse

Wargame exercise list from 9/11 comission, search "WMD" "Terrorist group that has will and means to strike North America with WMD. TRACK MONITOR: FLY TRACK AS THOUGH IT MIGHT BE GOING TO NY OR WASHINGTON DC" -10/21/1999 "Terrorists with explosives who plan to detonate them over NYC" -9/9/2001

Nuclear Emergency Response Teams sent to training exercise in Europe on 9/10/2001 to 9/15

Continuity of Government plan designed to keep the govt running in the event of nuclear war was activated by Counterterrorism Czar Richard Clark on 9/11, some time between 9:45 and 9:56 am. The south tower collapsed at 9:59:00am, so the CoG program was activated somewhere between 14 minutes and 3 minutes before the "collapse". If it wasn't a detection of radiological ordinance that caused CoG to initiate, what else could explain that measure being taken?

This info seems to suggest that some sort of exotic tactical device was used in addition to the nanothermite that took down the shell structure. The core of the building was stronger than the steel skin around the perimeter, and watching how the cell antenna started to drop before the external structure gives credibility to the core of the building being destroyed before the exterior. That timing lines up with the loud boom in the tripod video.

"But what about the radiation?" Take a look at the occurrence of rare cancers first responders and people in the area have died from, including an astoundingly high rate of Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blasts could have been tuned for minimal radiation, but there would still be some. It's also interesting that nothing was build over the old foundations of the buildings. Instead there are two fountains that constantly flush water over the area.

"It's hard to put it into words, and maybe one doesn't need to"

全 6 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Putin_loves_cats 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'm a firm believer that a mixture of all three technologies were used and/or some other far more exotic tech. Each theory has some merit but also some flaws. Just my two cents.

[–]EaterOfSound[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

What evidence would suggest something more than nanothermite and tacticals?

What are the flaws in a nanothermite + tactical scenario?

[–]Putin_loves_cats 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

The cars and paper. Basically heat or lack thereof.

[–]EaterOfSound[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Cars near the tower or the ones farther away? There are pictures of cars that were in the proximity of a truck bomb that detonated near the George Washington Bridge. After the mural van drove around, a BOLO went out for other work vans. The crew of one van were arrested, another van detonated.

What about the paper, that there was some unburned? There were gaping holes in the towers for over an hour, as well as tremendous outward velocity as the towers went down and paper is mostly surface area so it would catch wind better than some other objects. To me (imo) it makes sense that not all paper that existed in the 110 story office buildings would be consumed.

[–]Lookingfortheanswer1 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Dr Judy Wood is legit nukes are disinfo... how do nukes turn a building to dust without making any light and very little noise and no seismic signal?

Are you disinfo?

[–]WDTTG 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

For those who don’t like the lie behind door #1 (19 bad guys), they present you the lie behind door #2 (thermite). Then, if you don’t like the lie behind door #2, you are offered the lie behind door #3. (nukes) Any lie is okay with them as long as it keeps people from looking at the evidence Dr. Wood presents. This is why “thermite” is okay with those promoting “mini-nukes,” and why “mini-nukes” is okay with those promoting “thermite”.

A TODDLERS GUIDE TO 9/11 PART ONE OF FIVE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLyNb9BjTmM

IRREFUTABLE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlkZLlzOfVQ

Popular theories about what destroyed the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001 are:

1 Fires from jet fuel and office materials weakened steel in the upper floors and the buildings collapsed

2 Conventional controlled demolition blew out supports at the base and the buildings collapsed

3 Thermite cut steel columns on virtually every floor and the buildings collapsed

4 Conventional explosives blew the buildings up

5 Mini-nukes blew the buildings up

Theories 1, 2 and 3 rely on gravity to bring the buildings down while the last two blow them up. Popular theories, yes, and dead wrong. Five facts scientifically documented in Ph.D. engineer Judy Wood’s comprehensive textbook (Where Did The Towers Go?) prove the popular theories false beyond any doubt whatsoever. Yes, I know it’s amazing. Who’d a thunk it’d be this easy?

THE FACTS:

DEBRIS: What debris? There was so little debris from each 110-story building that there was no “pile” or “stack.” Rubble totaled less than a story. It was a football field as a survivor who emerged from Stairwell B, North Tower, exclaimed. No computers, toilets, and only one small piece from one Steelcase file cabinet were found. Some steel and mostly dust remained. Lack of debris on the ground from quarter-mile-high twin towers whispers “no collapse.” See Chapter 9.

BATHTUB: A bathtub or slurry wall surrounded 70 feet of WTC subbasements to prevent the Hudson River from flooding the WTC and downtown. If each 500,000-ton tower had slammed into the bathtub in 10 seconds or less, the protective wall would collapse. Did not happen. Upshot? Collapses did not happen. See Chapter 5.

SEISMIC IMPACT: “Had the towers collapsed, foundation bedrock would have experienced tremendous force hammering on it throughout the ‘collapse,’” writes Dr. Wood. Seismic instruments registered disturbances far too short in duration and far too small to record tower collapses. This was true of both the twin towers and 47-story WTC7. Again, no evidence of collapses. See Chapter 6.

SOUND: There were no loud explosions, as established by videos, witnesses, and the official report of NIST. Nor were there loud screeches and screams from massive metal falling, colliding, scraping and collapsing on metal. See Chapter 6.

DUST: Photos, videos and witness testimony show the towers turned to powder in mid-air. Tim McGinn, NYPD, said, “I was standing there for a couple of seconds thinking where the f**k is the tower? I simply couldn’t comprehend it.” The dust rollout was so enormous and thick it blocked out sunlight and left an inch or more of dust covering downtown. Much of it wafted into the upper atmosphere. The volume was incredible. Particles from dust samples were smaller than red blood cells and about the size of DNA. As for toxicity, researchers said the dust “recorded the highest levels we have ever seen in over 7,000 measurements we have made of very fine air pollution throughout the world, including Kuwait and China.” See Chapters 8, 9, 14-16.

♥The Miracle of Directed Energy Technology on 9/11♥

https://redice.tv/news/the-miracle-of-directed-energy-technology-on-9-11