FTFY "I love the extension block proposal. It is incompatible with Segwit".
I love the extension block proposal. It is compitable with BU.https://medium.com/purse-essays/ready-for-liftoff-a5533f4de0b6 …
-
-
-
It solves malleability and let LN works, those are the reasosn why we were needing SW. Let's move forward!
-
-
-
do you mean implementing emergent consensus in an extension block?
-
No! That's not what he means.
-
-
"I love the extension block proposal. It is not SegWit and was not developed by Core." FTFY?
-
I love
#UASF. It gets rid of greedy miners.pic.twitter.com/MhY8lzhOWv -
Boy you really are trying your best to wreck a bullish year for bitcoin in any way you can. What's your game? Altcoins pump & dump?
-
What is wrong with auxiliary blocks invented in 2013? Why the new name? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=283746.0 …
-
why let miners control the block size of the main chain if we have extchain for scaling?
-
So another 'great' idea that'll never become a reality? Keep up the good work. Lol
-
"I love the extension block proposal." Yeah, not hard to see why!pic.twitter.com/tj1Z1FZTSX
-
It's not compatible with this: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source …
-
they forgot to put the Block Size Increase under
#segwit -
Why extension block when you can just increase the block size limit? Why are people scared of hardfork?
-
Only BTC with Segwit.
-
Who taught this chimp how to read! Amazing!
-
Consensus doesn't want your BU Bull's Urine. You have to participate within consensus rules as is or face rejection from play.
-
This proposal is interesting, but it could be made compatible with segwit. You should that, so that we can at least begin to discuss it.
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。