全 11 件のコメント

[–]Andynonomous [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

The natural state of stateless society are hunter gatherer tribes, and it is hard to imagine a less capitalistic culture than hunter gatherer cultures.

[–]Blood_tree[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

We are talking about modern times. People aren't going to larp as primitivists just because society has collapsed. Just because the state is gone, the technology and infrastructure (might be in a bad state though) doesn't just disappear. Also the competitive nature of the security market and its resulting inefficiency due to being a natural monopoly is well established with the presence of tribal warfare that was far more violent than WWII.

[–]Hq3473152∆ [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

The nature state of a stateless society is instability followed by emergence of a state.

[–]Blood_tree[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

So in other words Anarcho-Capitalism since private security firms are a natural monopoly.

[–]FiveofSwords [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

there is no such thing as a stateless society. Nature abhors a vacuum.

[–]Blood_tree[S] [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Read the OP. I specifically said that it is a transitional state.

[–]FiveofSwords [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

okay but then why do you care naming it? I would think the real nature of anarchy is almost entirely defined by what caused the former state to fall and what new states are coming.

[–]Blood_tree[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

My point is that the state of affairs in Somalia is identical to what Anarcho-Capitalists advocate. A free competitive market of several independent private security firms and polycentric law.

[–]Kirkaine23∆ [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Does your typology make a meaningful difference between "civil war" and "market of security firms"? If so, what is it, exactly?

[–]Blood_tree[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Panarchy/Anarchy is a competitive market of security firms, civil war is an oligopoly with anti competitive measures.

[–]Kirkaine23∆ [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The barriers to entry alone would seem to make this an oligopoly in every case (also the scarcity of resources such as dams, power plants, docks, radio stations) and that's before we get into the fact that most of the actors you talked about are sponsored by external states.