| | |
Planned Parenthood
., you promised to INVEST in women's health, not cut birth control access. Veto this resolution.
Queenie 🛡 59 分
返信先 @PPact @POTUS
How about you drop 3% of your services to continue offering the other 97%? Taxpayers happy to cover 97% of your services.
CNN = Fake News 59 分
返信先 @PPact @POTUS
States have this power go bitch at them
Zaina Innabi 59 分
返信先 @PPact @POTUS
Haha not investing in you, they are investing in real women's health care
Linnea Molotov 58 分
返信先 @PPact @POTUS
you would do better to tweet to Vlad Putin.
Claire Silberman 58 分
返信先 @PPact @POTUS
The velocity of the GOP's viciousness has been remarkable. All that pent up "know your place"-ism....
Jackie Guy 57 分
What does that mean?
SueFab 57 分
返信先 @PPact @POTUS
we need a PRESIDENT who is honest and will govern.
Jackie Guy 57 分
How about the FACT that federal money is NOT used for those abortions? Grow up.
D 57 分
返信先 @PPact @POTUS
You need to understand that women's health issues and tax funded abortion are two different things. We have nothing against preventive care.
Queenie 🛡 56 分
Yeah, it's only used to pay salaries, facilities, & technology where the abortions take place. Taxpayer funds are FUNGIBLE!
Jackie Guy 55 分
So you're saying that women who use PP services are not really women?
D 51 分
返信先 @PPact @POTUS
Birth prevention is one thing. Pre-birth abortion is a very different thing. Witch one do you consider access ? No tax funding for abortion.
Juliet 50 分
People like you = the reason we still have systemic problems. Such ignorance.
December River 49 分
返信先 @PPact @POTUS @GOP
doesn't have the courage to go against the and the Tea Party. He's a tool. He'll give in and break his promise. Just you watch.
Debbie Culwell 48 分
Apparently the Hyde Amendment is just too complicated for some.
Queenie 🛡 47 分
Apparently the shortcomings of the Hyde Amendment are too complicated for others.