上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 328

[–]alexmbrennan 59 ポイント60 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Re FOV: Increasing FOV will break the scanner and make at least one mission impossible to complete.

[–]NightTimeElk 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Is that a sidequest on Eos by chance? There is marker above a terminal and on the map, but there's nothing in it to start it..

[–]ChuckCarmichael 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

I think that one's just generally broken. I didn't touch my FOV slider and I can't accept it either.

[–]NightTimeElk 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

There's got to be something that does it, because I watched TB's video and on Eos he activated a random sidequest which was the probe recovery. And I suspect it's the last one I got on that planet..

[–]FlagVC 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

isn't the FOV slider for MP only? Or am I misremembering what it said?

[–]GingerNightmare 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Multiplier, not multiplayer. I made the same mistake

[–]NightTimeElk 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's for both as far as I know. At least I remember cranking that all the way in sp and being weirded out by that.. Too much 😛

I'd assume it also works in MP

[–]FlagVC 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

.... I think I finally understand why the game looked so different over at a family members house. Dayum.

[–]BC_304 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Probably too late here but i'm pretty sure that bug is caused by marking a mining probe before you actually accept the quest.

If you've never touched a mining probe, the first time you go to the terminal it should give you a message to acknowledge the quest. The same thing happened to me and it's the only thing on Eos I haven't done.

[–]Foul_Actually 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I have FOV maxed and have scanned many things, or does it seemingly work, then not work for a specific mission?

[–]alexmbrennan 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Increasing FOV reduces the range of the scanner, i.e. you have to move closer to the object. At least one mission (Peebee's loyalty mission) has an environmental hazard that prevents you from standing close enough for the scanner to work at maximum FOV. Because having gameplay elements depend on graphics settings seemed like a bad idea to me I used the word "broken".

[–]Nelax18 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Oh is that the problem? I jumped into the hazard and scanned it just in time to be thrown back on safe ground...

[–]nswizdum 103 ポイント104 ポイント  (33子コメント)

What struck me as odd, is a lot of the big "problems" with the voice acting, facial animations, and models, are very early in the game. You would think if anything would be polished, it would be the first 2 hours of gameplay.

The longer I play, the better it seems to get.

[–]Alkazaro 76 ポイント77 ポイント  (32子コメント)

Stockholm syndrome? Or does it actually get better?

[–]Zelandias 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (0子コメント)

A bit of both. There's more thought put into the middle of the game where the bulk of the meaningful story takes place, but you're also running about doing all sorts of quests and murder sprees and whatnot so your time between seeing the rampant issues that were so prevalent in the first few hours is widened, and it makes it feel like it's happening less.

[–]nswizdum 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (3子コメント)

So far, it seems like it's actually getting better. I'm only about 8 hours in though. It's like the intro to the game was the last thing they did, and they rushed it.

[–]Poonchow 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Same. The intro was a huge fucking mess. Not just animations or anything people are really crazy about... it was the story, dialogue, lack of context on anything. I had NO idea what was going on within the context of the game, so if I hadn't seen the Andromeda Initiative videos and other stuff prior to loading the game, I would've felt like a chicken with my head cut off.

After 8-10 hours they've started actually explaining things and slowing down so they can actually get story out. It seemed like they wanted to "start with a bang" without showing us what was actually supposed to be going on. Fortunately it gets better.

Contrast that with the way ME1 started out and it's like night and fucking day. ME1 handled the "start with a bang" intro very well without leaving me lost.

[–]PM_ME_CUTE_SNEKS 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Honestly what bothers me the most in single player is the absolutely shit-tier UI design. The game didn't even fucking teach you how to change equipment. I expected a menu option when off-mission or something, but apparently that was too logical, so you have to wander into some dumb fucking location that's effectively hidden on the ship to manage that.

EDIT: It's not even in a logical location given the layout of the ship.

[–]slimmsy 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Roughly 45 hours in. The game definitely gets way better. Its such a shame the technical issues plague the game. If it weren''t for those it would be my favourite mass effect game in the series.

[–]MusRidc 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You meet more aliens. Issues with facial animations are a lot less pronounced with the non-Asari aliens. Then the combat:exposition ratio sways from a lot of dialogue and a bit of combat more towards combat with little dialogue in between. And last but not least the story really picks up after you leave Nexus for the first planet. Dialogues are still cringy af at times, but the overarching story gets a lot more interesting and immersive.

[–]Wolvenheart 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

While the travel cinematics, animation and the resource grind remain a consistent annoyance, the game is pretty good all around, story and gameplay wise.

[–]aullik 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (24子コメント)

I mean look at what tb is showing us. It just looks shit! The planets look ok from space. and i think thats it. The nexus just looks horrible. It would still look bad if you disable all npcs. it looks absolutly awefull with the npcs.

Edit: The desert dessert planet looks fine to. But it still somehow looks fake. I think this doesnt look better than crysis, a game that is 10 years old.

[–]lati91 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I for one think the overall environment design in the game is one of the strongest points along with the rather satisfying combat and crafting. I don't know what exactly you mean by "fake" but of course, the planets are going to look "fake" in order to make them feel like they are actually in an entirely different galaxy and a planet. If you mean graphically, I don't certainly think it looks like a graphically leading AAA-game but it doesn't really look that bad either. Some of the texture/geometry work (you should see the Krogan companion in-game!" look exceptionally good.

[–]Boltarrow5 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (1子コメント)

NO NO NO EVERYTHING LOOKS HORRIBLE OMG!

[–]RogueHelios 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's getting a tad bit annoying that people are being this melodramatic over this.

Ffs people the games not that bad, some of you act like you're playing Big Rigs or Atari ET. Hell maybe you are and someone ripped you off when trying to buy Mass Effect.

[–]skyturnedred 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Only Dice knows how to properly use Frostbite.

[–]gretgfx 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Dragon Age: Inquisition looked good/great and had animations that were up to par with Bioware.

[–]RazzyBoyRo 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (5子コメント)

No, DA:I had literally the same issues. Especially the meh character creation.

[–]Savber 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Really? I like the character creator in Inquisition. The sliders alone felt way better than most CC.

[–]RazzyBoyRo 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I enjoyed the game, i just don't like the engine it's on, it makes the characters look like plastic and their hair worse if you don't give em a darker shade of color.

[–]KingKnee 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (4子コメント)

The dessert planet

Sounds sweet

[–]aullik 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I always fuck this up. Thanks for telling me :D

[–]Taorgax 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (4子コメント)

I... really don't see it. It looks fine to me. Maybe not breathtakingly beautiful or anything, but "shit"?

[–]nswizdum 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have noticed it does not scale well. I think the environments look beautiful on my PC at 4K. However, the console screenshots I have seen look awful, faces lose all texture, everything gets blurry and muddy, etc.

[–]Hambeggar 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

It just doesn't look good enough for the hardware needed to run it. You look at things like Battlefront or Battlefield 1 on Frostbite and you wonder how Andromeda looks worse and yet needs much better hardware.

You look at the previous Mass Effect games and at the time they looked amazing AND ran well because of how well Unreal scaled. Meanwhile, Andromeda...

[–]nswizdum 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Its not fair to compare to games like Battlefront or BF1 because those are not open world. Its a lot easier to make the scenery look good when you always know what angle the player will be looking at it from.

[–]Hambeggar 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fine, I'll compare like everyone else has these last few days. Witcher 3 looks better and runs better.

Either way, Andromeda still has high requirements for the graphics it delivers IMO.

[–]FireballSam 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't know why, but I found it so funny around 35:50 when TB is talking about how his character's personal motto is "I got this!" which he can't avoid. The image of Ryder's forced optimism alongside TB's normal demeanor is so jarring it's hilarious.

[–]Onomatopesha 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's funny, any other than a calm, cold and assuring answer (which would be my usual go-to answers were it not for the fact that none of those show any semblance of personality), I found most of the answers to have some sort of cringe-worthy lines.

And that sucks! I wish I could choose different answers as I do depending on how I want to approach a situation and not feel cringy or roll my eyes. As for the facial animations, while most of them were.....hideous at most, some were really nice to see (i'd have to look for the Asari one shrudding).

As for the tone, I totally agree. It feels as if there is no real conflict, not only from the Kett but also from the interactions with your mates. I felt I couldn't "connect" with any of them, and in one way or another, they were all attempts at creating personalities similar to the ones in previous MEs. That threw me off.

[–]hulibuli 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (2子コメント)

The whole game seems to suffer from Joss Whedon-school of witty writing. Liking or disliking it is a matter of taste though, personally it pushes me away from the game since the game feels like it wants to railroad your Ryder to be a certain type of character in the end whereas Shepard was very different depending on the player's actions and choices.

[–]Onomatopesha 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yeah, pretty much. For me, it put me off really bad. Halfway through I just wanted it to end, no dialogue in-between. While I do agree with TB that character development is indeed hindered by nostalgia, I found that the dialogue kinda makes you lean towards a certain attitude unless you want to mute the dialogue. That plus the lack of conflict between the characters themselves just put me off.

In the end I only enjoyed the combat. Though it's much different from what it was (and I tend to enjoy the latter more), it's just not enough for me to recommend this one to anyone else.

[–]hulibuli 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What I noticed from the couple of first hours of the game is that there's much more "out of conversation" dialogue from Ryder that you can't control than Shepard had. Like in the landing in the first planet, the whole disgussion between the Ryder and the rest of the group in the shuttle goes without any option for the player to decide how his character will reply. I do remember that in Mass Effect 2 and it's beginning, the exact same situation was done with the dialogue wheel.

That already makes my character say way too much witty shit I'd prefer him not to, that it pushes me away from the game. Makes me feel like the writer wants to force me to enjoy his/her amazing writing for the characters without letting me to decide.

[–]Scyths 37 ポイント38 ポイント  (20子コメント)

I honestly didn't play the 3rd game, I was interested in a brand new mass effect with a new story from scratch, but after seeing all the shit that's going on with the game I honestly lost all my interest in it, I was then thinking that maybe I buy it for the multiplayer to play with a friend or friends and do the story like that, but then I also lost all my interest when I saw that the multiplayer was just Killing Floor set in a distant future, nothing story related, so yeah, here I am having wanted this game to be good expecially on multiplayer but being disappointed on multiple fronts, this is just my opinion. Also what the fuck is wrong with all the faces holy shit, are they all constipated in the galaxy andromeda ?

[–]TheJesseJames 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (3子コメント)

ive put over 40 hours in to ME:A so far and the multiplayer is the same as bioware has made ME3 and DA:I so that was to be expected and its quite enjoyable. as for the single player yes it has alot of minor issues but its a very fun game and delivers the mass effect experience that i was hoping for, some of the animations are bad especially on the female Ryder but its definitely worth trying out for yourself for a few hours

[–]nathanpinard 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

After you unlock the memories, you can't stop playing....

[–]RogueHelios 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

The more I get memories the more I miss Mr. Krabs as my dad. :(

[–]Huntrrz 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Forgot about that! I tend to tink of him as Lex Luthor.

[–]Kamagamaga [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

That's a shame. I hated the ending, but the other 95% of the game was outstanding imo. I haven't played it since and I was pissed at the ending, but I don't regret playing it. I think the saying "It's not the destination, it's the journey" is wrong as the destination is still very important, but the journey portion of the game warrants a playthrough because it's still really good. The second is still my favorite, but if it wasn't for the ending, the third would probably be my second favorite.

[–]ceban 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I really like ME3, if you enjoyed 1&2, you should get it imo. Some people have issues with the ending, but that doesn't mean the rest of the game is bad. Oh and space ninja Kai-Leng sucks. But those are the two only problems with ME3 imo.

[–]Nospaz 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Tl;dw:

"If there is 7/10 game, ME:A is one. Good game but it has flaws."

[–]Masane [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

1:49:45 for the explanation of what "7/10" means. Without that, you probably won't understand it correctly.

[–]Lone_Sword 96 ポイント97 ポイント  (19子コメント)

I'm sorry, but what type of No Man's Sky bullshit line is that at 1:34:25.

"I don't know if you can ever be done with this game, there's so much to do."

The game takes 50-70 hours to 100% complete. Unless you treat procedural generated fetch quests like Skyrim's Radiant Quests system as "never being done with the game", then there's clearly an end to meaningful content. Considering TB has lambasted those meaningless quest systems before, him throwing out that line that you can never be done with the game is bullshit.

[–]ActionCactus 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I thought that statement was hyperbolic (ironic, I know) and was essentially intended to indicate the sense of scale the game offers.

I'm 40 hours in and I can say it still feels like I have the entire universe to explore, possibly because I actually enjoy the sidequests.

I will say that I actually disagree with him on what he was saying about the MMO-like quests. I've only watched MMOs, I've never really played one, but my impression is that MMO quests that people don't like are generally "collect X number of Y and I'll pay you". Those are boring, and they're seen often in games. One that sticks out in my mind for some reason is a bear pelt quest from Skyrim; a lumberjack woman hated bears so she wanted like 15 pelts. It felt stupid.

This game feels different, though it could possibly be just because I like Mass Effect. Every quest, even if it is a fetch quest, seems to have some sort of twist to it. Even if it is mechanically a fetch quest, the context is made interesting by the writing or they throw something weird at you (I know there was one fetch quest in which I had to retrieve lost supplies, but I found that bugs had eaten all the supplies at the very first endpoint that I reached and I had to just return home and report the problem). It just seems like it works pretty well here.

[–]brrrrrrarrrrrr 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dude you missed out on the bug quest, if you scan the pieces of the broken boxes on the ground there's even more to it.

[–]Obrusnine 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Uh, 50-70 hours? Hell no. I just beat the game and I'm 79 hours in, and I still have at least 20 Helius Assignments and 30 tasks sitting in my journal. I stopped doing the tasks pretty early to. Those are those meaningless quests you're talking about.

I agree with you on that "you'll never be done" thing though. I'm just saying it takes longer than you said.

[–]Lone_Sword 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I put in about 59 hours and 100%'d it. Obviously only EA knows the average 100% completion time with any certainty, but the 50-70 hours seems like the average I've heard. Granted, I think the point still stands even if it takes 100-150 hours.

[–]Obrusnine 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (4子コメント)

What exactly do you mean by 100 percent? You mean you completed all of the assignments, did all of the Allies and Relationship missions, and killed all of the architects? I haven't even done all of that yet.

I think I've made a mistake here actually. I'm playing on Hardcore and I generally don't fast travel. I also have about 80 percent of the Helius Cluster explored in the Galaxy Map. Maybe that contributed to my playtime being longer.

[–]Lone_Sword 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Ah, yeah, that might be it. I played on normal and used fast travel. I'd imagine a hardcore run without fast travel, you can easily get 150 hours out of it.

[–]Obrusnine 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yea and I can't wait to play through again on Insanity. The game's story is so-so, but man is the combat fun.

[–]Quickjager 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Just saw Dansgaming play it on Insanity, holy shit the enemies were bullet spongey. The combat would become a slog at that point, like Skyrim higher difficulty.

[–]Ardailec 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

All of the Mass Effect games become bullet spongy on Insanity. There is a reason why you were practically forced into an Infiltrator or a Soldier.

Turns out if everything takes 10+ seconds to kill, the best option is the most broken sniper rifle (Black Widow) in the game and doing what it takes to pump it to the max.

[–]Gatecrasher53 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Of course TB finds expansion/exploration and building colonies a more relatable goal, hes british.

[–]CheloniaMydas [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

But as a modern day Brit myself it seems all we want to do is throw away our country and status and just be a small collection of sheep farms

Building colonies is a concept form an age we are no longer living :(

[–]1LegendaryWombat 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I tend to not agree with the whole 'journey is more important that the destination' argument, as does most of humanity. You can have a good experience, but studies have actually proven that having something bad at the end of a good experience significantly reduces our opinion of it, compared to say a bad bit in the middle or beginning(aka the peak-end rule).

The end is REALLY important, its why many people(myself included) still dislike mass effect 3 because the ending is so awful.

For now, i'm going to give Andromeda a miss until they sort out the technical stuff and the people are less weird. The UI stuff and all that, possibly can be fixed by modders and stuff, maybe. But for now, its not worth my money, i'd rather not support the 'release-a-buggy-as-fuck-game-and-then-fix-it-afterward' business practice, its getting real old.

[–]RazzyBoyRo 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yeah there were bugs, but Witcher 3 had bugs too and redesigned the U.I what..like 2 times?

[–]1LegendaryWombat 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

There ARE bugs.

Witcher 3 absolutely had bugs, and it took me more than a week to find one. Yes, they changed the UI, but the UI from the start was perfectly fine to me, they just decided to make it better, sure, why not. Hell, the second time they changed it i didn't even notice.

[–]TheBusStop12 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

maybe you were lucky or I was unlucky, but I encountered a lot of bugs in the Witcher 3, even 1 instance where using sign more then once crashed the game (took me a bit and some googling to figure out why that mission kept crashing)

[–]TooFewOtters 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I get the feeling he's purposefully being a bit contrarian on this one. I don't know. It sounds like he's trying too hard to hype up certain parts. He touches on the criticisms the game has gotten, like the animation and the dialogue, but just kind of brushes it off. A lot of it seems to praise the combat and weapons augmentations.

And the line at the end, the remark he made about "not caring about how compelling the writing of the story is", but says that he "cares about the journey, not the ending" makes no sense to me.

[–]Alagorn 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Is this longer than the Revenge of the Sith review?

[–]Ridish 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

it's 1 h 53 min 44 sec

[–]Holybasil 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Revenge of the sith review? What am I missing?

[–]RavarSC 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I assume they're talking about the Red Letter Media reviews

[–]kuddlesworth9419 41 ポイント42 ポイント  (45子コメント)

Facial animations and character animations are pretty important. They are game breaking in a game like this because they rely on a certain amount of immersion. A game that got it right in 3rd person that I have played recently would be the new Hitman game. It's also a much better looking game in general. And probably more fun from what I have seen of Andromeda so far.

Different Genres I know but one game is mediocre and unpolished the other is really quite great and one of the most polished games I've ever played.

[–]ActionCactus 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (14子コメント)

Facial animations and character animations are pretty important. They are game breaking in a game like this because they rely on a certain amount of immersion.

Did people just not play games like this until 5 years ago?

[–]VidiotGamer 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's not just that, it's the aesthetic - The more realistic you get with the art direction, the better things like your 3D rigging and animations have to be otherwise it gets more noticible.

When I was looking at that video I was like, "Textures are really good, lighting effects are pretty good, some problems with the shadows, but the model rigging and meshes are B- material and the animations are janky."

I'm sure most people will come away from this thinking that the aliens look better than the humans, that's probably because when we see some dude with bipedal goat legs walking around we suspend our belief and just go with it, but inversely when we see Ryder duck into her "I gotta poop so bad" run, I just don't want to look at it.

Also, the skeletons for the humans don't look correct to me. I'm not an animation expert, but the hands and limbs look disproportionate to the torso, which definitely wasn't the case with the previous ME games.

Finally, I'm not a fan of the art direction in this game. John and Jane Sheppard were actually fun to look at in the previous games - they looked cool. Ryder looks like a derp. A lot of the characters look like derps. The outfits are bad. Hell, just look at this comparison someone did :

https://68.media.tumblr.com/81c8681f39898322478d7b9ef212b8e0/tumblr_ol1ksilcwp1tjgsdso1_500.png

One of those guys looks like a bad ass and the other looks like a dipshit.

If I'm going to play a "rpg lite" sci-fi cover shooter, then I at least want to look awesome doing it.

[–]rootb33r [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

holy shit, the whole textures/modeling/graphics argument becomes much clearer when you see this comparison.

Unbelievable how bad ME:A is. Dude looks like he belongs in Sims 3

[–]hulibuli 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Well we played the original Mass Effect trilogy, which happened to do it better than the newest one.

That's not how it's supposed to be, not if you want to people buy the game.

[–]ActionCactus 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I honestly don't agree/understand the perspective people have when they say that. The very best animation moments in the OT are objectively less detailed than the best moments in Andromeda (in the main plot missions, at least. I'd challenge someone to show evidence against me here), but the bar set for normal conversations is pretty much the same. There are some truly shit conversations here and there in Andromeda (inb4 Addison), but overall the general experience is the same/better than what you had in the OT.

When the bar for the average conversation is pretty much the same it's pretty disappointing, yeah, but I don't really understand the magnitude of the effect it's had on people. Animations on-par with the trilogy that finished 4 years ago don't really seem like a huge deal to me, especially when we all found them so serviceable.

I can't deny that it would have been preferable/excellent if they pushed the boundary a little bit more and made a more engrossing experience, though.

[–]GepardenK 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I honestly don't agree/understand the perspective people have when they say that. The very best animation moments in the OT are objectively less detailed than the best moments in Andromeda

Sure, but it's not about technical detail - it's about how you are able to convey emotions and charisma. Half-Life 2's facial animations are all objectevly outdated in every field compared to any of the ME games, yet they serve the story and the dialouge much much better

[–]ActionCactus 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Okay, I don't disagree, but you then have to consider that Valve took as long to make HL2 as Bioware took to make ME:A and they painstakingly perfected the animations for every scene in their linear game, whereas ME:A had to animated 1200 characters, 65,000 lines of dialogue, and heart-felt moments for every character.

I'm not saying quantity over quality is a good thing, but Mass Effect's strength over the years has been in the characters and the worldbuilding, and I honestly think the emphasis is placed on the latter (if it was the former no one would have wanted ME:A in the first place; they would have wanted to talk to the same characters again). In order to build a large, believable and rich scifi RPG universe, it requires more dialogue than HL2 did. You lose some quality, then.

Still, one would think they'd push the bar a bit more for their 'next gen' title..

[–]GepardenK [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Well yes, I agree that HL2 is a unfair comparison. While HL2 is very old it is also very linear and has few characters. But I still think the character quality in ME:A is very dissapointing for an 60$ AAA, particulary in the wake of games like The Witcher 3.

Being a huge open-world Witcher 3 also had it's fair share of dialouge/animation-bugs, but despite bugs it managed to convey emotional depth through bodylaunguage consistently for pretty much every character. And that's the biggest failing of ME:A I feel - it's not the obvious flaws in facial animation, but rather how mediocre and 'shallow' the emotional journey is even when the animations are at their best. It looks and sounds good when everything is working, but there is no depth or purpose there.

[–]Nexus1411 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree with what you've said! The facial animation issues have been blown out of proportion by people who've only seen Addison and Sarah Ryder gifs. But I'd like to point out that lip sync, albeit poor, isn't the worst aspect of Andromeda's facial animations in my opinion.

I think it's the eyes of the characters (humans mostly). They are dead as fuck and they barely convey any emotions. When it comes down to eye and eyebrow movement, I actually think ME2 and ME3 did a more convincing job years ago.

[–]Commander-Pie 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

If you think think that then you never actually played the OT.

[–]hulibuli 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I know you like to go through all the content critical to ME:A and spam shit out of them, but you could at least try to contain your meltdown.

[–]Mech9k 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

ME 1 had better animations, like actual emotion behind the characters. Not just dead eye stares.

And yes, I have seen videos of the two compared together. Never mind games like HL 2, or most recently, W3.

[–]kuddlesworth9419 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Even fucking Fallout game faces don't look this bad.

[–]Sofaboy90 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

it just feels like you havent really watched his video at all

[–]kuddlesworth9419 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I did I just disagree with him on a few points. But that's just opinion. I place immersion quite highly on what I want in a game.

[–]Cobraninja97 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (18子コメント)

Around 42:30, he is wrong the weaponry goes further than 5 levels, they can reach up to 10 if you level up enough.

[–]sqlfoxhound 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (16子コメント)

He´s half right, actually hes 9/10 right. You dont get your character to a point where youre able to reach lvl10 guns on your first playthrough. And unless youre a completionist, with a healthy quest selection you barely reach lvl5.

[–]SeljD_SLO 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

"you barely reach lvl5" what do you mean, the game says that I'm completed 35% of the game and I already have lvl5 gear (I explore and do everything).

[–]sqlfoxhound 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I went the "semi-completionist" path, where I completed every quest I was handed, with the exception of those task based ones where youre not given a map marker. Theres a number of those I havent completed for obvious reasons (Id have to check through every corner and part of a planet, with no visual cues). I stopped fighting at respawning outposts pretty early on, however, as there was no quest related reason to kill every dropped pod you came across. By the end of the game I was leveled to a point where I could upgrade to lvl7 weapons.

Its likely that if a player really felt like it, they could level up much further by engaging every pod, and there is plenty of those in the game, but as I said, there is no reason or urgency to do those unless you are picking a fight due to really liking it. Its a good choice to have.

Based on this, if a player went through mostly the golden path missions with sidequests here and there (which is a very popular option if you check threads where players compare their completion rates and times), its not unreasonable to assume that they wont get to level 5 weapons unless they find them.

[–]Reinhart3 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

And unless youre a completionist, with a healthy quest selection you barely reach lvl5.

I'm level 23 in my game and I'm not too far into the game, probably around 30-35% and every weapon I see is level 3-4.

[–]sqlfoxhound 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thats because you get upragde restrictions a tad later when a weapon level is tied to 10 character levels. And as the XP demands climb as per predictable model, the "next weapon level" is further and further away. You can finish the last third of the game easily without even climbing through 10 levels in terms of your character progression.

[–]ChuckCarmichael 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Wasn't it like this in ME 1 and 3 as well?

[–]sqlfoxhound 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

No.

ME1 and ME3 were vastly different in terms of weapons and progression. ME3 has static guns which werent tiered level wise and you were able to have max level weapons in ME1 quite a stretch before the end of the game. Im talking about spectre gear here, but from what I remember, the weapon tiers were tied to character progression while the weapon manufacturers were tied to story progression.

In case of skills, though, I think a completionist run in ME1 allowed the player to unlock between 50 and 75% of available skill points. I think 75 is mighty generous but Im allowing for some room. And ME3 completionist run allowed the player to either max out the character completely before the final fight or get within -1 maxed out skill. Mind you that doing a completionist run (90+ task/quest completion) in ME1 and ME3 was easier than in MEA, but farming for XP is impossible, whereas its perfectly possible in MEA.

[–]ChuckCarmichael 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'm pretty sure you could only upgrade your weapon to level 5 in your first ME 3 playthrough and only got them to level 10 in New Game+. I did a quick google search on it that supports this (see here and here).

In ME 1 you could theoretically get max level gear on your first playthrough, but it was tied to your character level (as you said), and reaching max level in one playthrough was pretty hard if not impossible (I played through the game multiple times, doing everything possible, and I still never managed to do it).

[–]sqlfoxhound 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ah, holy crap. Sorry for that. I played ME3 when it was released and never played it again until a week before MEA release. At that point ME3 had a number of mods (Expanded Galaxy Mod was one of the mods I used) and I thought that weapon progression system was introduced by that, weapon levels seemed uncharacteristic in ME. (ME1 did have tiers, but not actual player controlled leveling)

[–]INiiS 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Can confirm for both (I actually am replaying the whole OT right now). ME3 weapons goes up to 5 on first playthrough and then up to 10 in the second, as you said.

And for the levels in ME1, even doing all the sidequests you can only go up to 58-59 (in hardcore, with all DLC and whatnot ,unless you therum laser glitch, but it hardly count as "normal").

[–]CleanAccountSteam 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He is also wrong shortly after when he says you cannot use R&D at checkpoints.

[–]nathanpinard 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Augs are great, but they also suffer from massive lack of info. I had to craft and re-load 5 times to find out the following:

Electric augs just makes you shoot electricity, which is great, but reduces the range quite a bit.

The "bounce" aug reduces your range by what feels like 80%. Don't put it in a sniper rifle.

The "health drain for reload" aug drains your health after each empty clip, even if you STILL have ammo. It'll actually kill you if you use it too much.

The grenades aug makes your ammo heavy and it bounces. I though it would've been more like an RPG.

Anyway, research, weapons and augs would've benefited from a preview system like the abilities/skill menu. Because I couldn't see how weapons really worked and whether if I even wanted them.

[–]Alveck93 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This.

I put the ricochet mod on my first Black Widow sniper. Messed it up so bad.

[–]Sydrek 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (21子コメント)

I caught myself writing a huge comment but decided it's best not to post it as not only would many not had bothered to read it but mostly as it could had been viewed as a "personal attack" by TB.

So the bottom line is this, i don't know why but it does feel like he's holding ME:A to another standard then he does for other games, especially two titles comes to mind: Skyrim and Fallout 4.

As that popped in my mind for multiple reason but mostly when he talked about how there's a lot of content and the exploration is great.... yet at the same time never gave that chance nor the credits to the two above mentioned games, and personally i find they both (yes even 2011's Skyrim) blow it out the water compared to ME:A.

Or how he goes on about how the planets are looking beautiful, yet i can think of another sci-fi game that has as good if not better looking and interesting vistas, you know... Star Wars the Old Republic (also a 2011 title).

So having played the above mentioned games, i don't see the justification of trying to use those aspects of the game as borderline selling points / desperately trying to find the good in the game.

He gave it a 7/10, i think a more suited "score" would be at it's best a 6/10 once it's patched AND with a discount. Which is another point i want to briefly touch upon, i feel TB often forgets that the price is very if not the most important part of a game as that set's the stage for the level of criticism.

He either buys his game for which in return he make's money off thanks to his job and if not he receives them for free. But your average gamer can't afford to buy a game every week at release, hence why 7/10 is really too generous.

ME:A is a average game, not a horrible game and not a great game so nothing to write home about how you found the love of your life... but one might think so if it was your first.

[–]XiaoRCT 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The biggest problem is that people expect him to shit on it.

Sure, he ranted about Skyrim, but if you ask TB about it he would never call it a bad game. And while he is ranting in defense of ME:A, his final veridict is still "it's a mixed bag".

Plus, I don't think It's fair to say that there's the same depth of exploration in ME:A as there is in Skyrim. I mean, just the line variation system they've got in place in ME:A already adds way more depth to dialogue than Skyrim ever had, and that's coming from someone who loved Skyrim.

Plus, TB was a firm defender of STOR, but saying that STOR looked as good/better than ME:A is delusional lol

I do however believe that yeah, a 7/10 is a higher grade than a game deserves with all the flaws TB brought up himself, but the dude was never an advocate of grades anyway

[–]Alarien 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

To be completely fair to TB, your comparisons are entirely wrong. Skyrim and Fallout4 have very shoddy mechanical gameplay compared to ME2-4. The combat in both the TES games and the Bethesda Fallout games are very wonky. The combat in the ME games after the first one are all much tighter and more intuitive. Thus, his review makes more sense in context of "TB" than it might for you.

Personally, I'm tired of the people hand-waving baloney arguments at this and other games while overlooking strengths. The game doesn't have "bad writing." There are moments that aren't good, but overall the writing is just fine. It's certainly no worse than NWN1, BG1, or ME1. It's not stellar, but it's not obnoxiously bad. I would argue that The Witcher 2 had some horrid writing (I actually do believe that), but you would argue with me, wouldn't you? Why? Because "hand wave" bad writing is really just a subjective thing people like to throw around when they want to dislike a game.

Yes, the character animations do really suck. They're right up there with Bethesda terrible. Yes, the PC UI sucks. That's right up there with Bethesda and Ubisoft terrible for PC. The original ME UI was goddawful as well, until it got fixed. Then it was only kinda terrible. But let's all forget that and jump on the hate wagon. Is this KOTOR1 or BG2 or even Dragon Age: Origins? Nah. Is it DA2? Maybe, but I liked DA2 a lot on second play through. Is it DA:I? Yes, but improved in a lot of ways (other than character looks).

This game is not the "death" of Bioware. It's an ok start for a soft reboot with some fun gameplay and a reasonably interesting story. That's about the same as Mass Effect 1 was, frankly. (As an aside, the death of Bioware was the exit of Greg and Ray and also the exit of Drew... who's apparently back on TOR now).

[–]D33zOO [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Funny how you make a good comparison to this game with games of 10 years of age, i mean shouldnt there be a little bit of progress? A tiny weeny bit? Even in friggin story writing. And while you are right, Mass Effect 1 didnt have the greatest story writing it had a bit of hope, a bit of expectation mixed in, what are the reapers, whats the great storyline we can expect, what does andromeda have at its end? I am tired of people ignoring critique and its every 2nd post i read no matter where i go, ppl are writing omg this game is amazing, best one i have ever played and i am like NICE what game are you talking about and then its just mass effect andromeda

[–]Alarien [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

ppl are writing omg this game is amazing, best one i have ever played

No one reasonable is saying that.

[–]Scootzor 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (10子コメント)

I caught myself writing a huge comment but decided it's best not to post it

And yet here it is... However, I do agree with your point. Looks like he is trying really hard to "not bandwagon", so he spends 2 hours trying to overanalyze a fairly mediocre and heavily flawed AAA release.

[–]Sydrek 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

hehe this is nothing compared to the other text in which i tried to go over point by point and how flaws of other games that he loved to shit on also exist in ME:A... but yes still turned out too long, sorry

[–]Sofaboy90 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

does that mean you disagree with the "fun" aspects he is presenting? i didnt play the game and i proably never will, even if the critics and all users gave this a 10/10 and it would be toughed the best game ever i wouldnt play it because its not my kind of game but i understand the things hes suggesting that are fun for him. if people like you disagree with him on his opinion, perhaps tell us why you dont enjoy the combat, why you dont like this planet managing because it seems like he really does and its not something i see pop up in games very often

[–]Scootzor 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

One is not obligated to play every AAA game that comes out. There are plenty of all-round better games with less downsides constantly coming out, so one doesn't have to bargain with oneself over how many flaws is "too many". Play Nier, play Zelda, play Dark Souls 3 DLC, play Horizon or a plethora of great indie games that came out in the last month or two, whatever floats your boat. All far better games.

The most interesting part of this game is its title. Its the only reason reviewers keep digging through the dirt trying to find something worthwhile in this game (as it currently brings massive amount of views). If it wasn't called "Mass Effect" very few would even care.

[–]Colbert2020 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (5子コメント)

What do you expect? His content is almost always contrarian. Most things which are lavished with praise he criticizes heavily, and other titles which are criticized heavily he will defend. This is the guy who literally would run his character into walls and stare at textures just to complain about them... or run into one bug and complain about how terrible the game is.

Here's a tldr version of ME:A - it's the worst of the series. That's saying a lot. If you want a good comparison, it's the Dark Souls 2 of its series. Sure, Dark Souls 2 isn't a bad game, but compared to what it's meant to live up to, it's a disappointment. This game is Mass Effect in brand only.

[–]RazzyBoyRo 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Did you watch the video? He's giving credit where credit is due. That's all.

[–]Sofaboy90 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (3子コメント)

metascore: 74

tb score: 7/10

truely a contrarian.

its mostly the userbase that bandwagons the negative aspects of the game while ignoring the good parts of it like there arent any. these days a game has to be either shit or incredible and im glad there are people like tb who can give me a reasonable opinion because im uneffected by this shitstorm the gaming community has made out of this. you know why? because ive seen so many completely pointless, pulled out of thin air- shitstorms on the internet

[–]D33zOO [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

wat the shit, wats mass effect? a great rpg with a great storyline, whats mass effect andromeda? a decent shooter with a mass effect backround, how can you compare it to "completely pointless, pulled out of thin air- shitstorms " i mean its ok if its a decent shooter, that doesnt make it a decent Mass Effect SUCCESSOR, thats what it is and what you will get in the future from EA. It's great that you seem to enjoy it, but all the GREATEST and BEST parts of Mass Effect seem to have gotten lost in this "successor" and TB seems like to compare it to idk CALL OF DUTY or ASSASSINS CREED or BATTLE FIELD obviously its amazingly great in comparison to it, but if u compare it to idk Fallout or TES which are the genre type of open fucking world successes then it hugely looses points, and he simply doesnt focus, you could say he ignores it, on bad parts of ME A where as in skyrim or fallout he pointed those parts out

[–]op_is_a_swede [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yup my thoughts as well after watching it. TB probably got more than a handful of cash for smoothing over just how atrocious Andromeda really is compared to the other ones in the series. I suppose it was only a matter of time before someone approached him as well from the big studios, being how big he is now and all. Liked him way better when he didn't have that many subscribers and went with a more underground true-to-the-truth style. Now its turned into positive for anything AAA because I'm making money so fuck you.

Another great has fallen. Sad but not really surprising in the world of Youtube.

[–]KingofSparrows 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (3子コメント)

People play Mass Effect because of the story, the setting, the writing. Personally, I'm glad this game, that has bad story, bad setting, bad writing, is getting hammered, even if its for the wrong reasons.

If this game is a 7 out of ten then what the other Mass Effects??? And be aware, those are games which aren't completely perfect either.

This review seems to me to be a knee-jerk reaction, defending a studio that has slowly been lowering its standards. If he wants to defend the animations, so be it. But defending the entire game... That's just completely irrational.

[–]beneath_ 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (1子コメント)

But he didn't defend the animations, he clearly mentioned that the poor animation quality is a serious problem and might be a deal breaker for a lot of people. As for the rest of the game, he clearly mentioned all the aspects that he PERSONALLY thought, sucked (such as the horrid UI design) and those aspects that are good (such as the combat). The way I see it, he definitely didn't defend the entire game. I think what it really comes down to though, is personal preference, especially with a game as flawed as this.

[–]TheBusStop12 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

yeah, remember that TB preferred Bioshock 2 over 1 simply because 2 was mechanically superior, he has always preferred gameplay over story, and Andromeda's is superior to the OT

[–]deadbulky 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (11子コメント)

TB been drinking the koolaid a bit much here, its really kind of shocking how much of a positive light hes trying to put on this turd.

[–]ChuckCarmichael 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (5子コメント)

It's not a turd, it's still a fun game, and there are many positive reviews about it out there to show it. As TB said, you seem to have your view of the game tainted by the negative press.

[–]deadbulky 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Ive played the game and watched a couple of people play it start to finish, its a bad game, also you thought mass effect 3s ending was bad? OH BOY what you got coming

[–]Chiefwaffles [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Woah woah woah, hold it right there.

Are you actually saying that Mass Effect 3's ending was better than Andromeda's?

Holy shit. That's an incredibly deluded statement that can only come from someone with an extreme want to hate it. Hating the game itself, sure, but saying the ending is worse than #3's? Wow.

[–]deadbulky [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Simply put

Yes

Its that bad, i'm guessing you have not played through and seen it?

[–]Sofaboy90 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (3子コメント)

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/mass-effect-andromeda/critic-reviews

you people are acting like this game is some 1/10 material, i know people like you dont trust the gaming press a lot, rightfully so, thats why we watch totalbiscuit but if he agrees with what the press is saying, dont you think this whole shitstorm is a little blown out of proportion?

when people get so emotional and angry about topics their vision becomes blurred to the point where they do not even want to accept anybodys opinion who is different, i feel like thats happening to a lot of people in this thread. the unwillingness to be proven otherwise and blaming tb for his vision to be blurred and not your owns. let me ask you, how much time have you spent playing the game and how much time have you spent reading comments and watching videos that hate this game? its more than likely that tb has done more of the first and less of the second so as a neutral person like me, i think hes a little more qualified with his opinion. tho i was never going to buy that game in the first place, no matter how good it would end up being, played the first mass effect, wasnt my kind of game at all, so never played 2 and 3 either

[–]deadbulky 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

From what ive seen the only overlyemotional people over this are the people defending it, i guess all the game reviewers are also wrong? As you said you have not even played 2 or 3 to compare, i'm also guess you have not actually played the game itself.

TB in the video is glossing over all the problems, the combat is ok, the enviroments are well done Everything else is...woooof

Its more like a 5-6/10

[–]Sofaboy90 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

so you give it a 5-6/10, he gives it a 7/10. he thinks the game is very slightly better than you and yet you say hes drinking the koolaid a bit much here?

[–]deadbulky 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No its because during his video he glosses over all the issues trying to paint the game in a positive light to make it look better than it actually is, its obvious he is pulling his punches here, just having decent combat and nice environments do not make a good game, have you played and finished it?

[–]RazzyBoyRo 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's just giving credit where credit is due, shocking i know.

[–]Cobraninja97 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I feel they were going for an original series star trek feel to the atmosphere of the game in terms of tone and theme (boldly going where no human has gone before and exploring) rather than the gritty Battlestar Galactica theme you mentioned. So I much prefer this kind of feel over a dark and gritty one.

[–]Shuskey 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think the scanner adds to that a lot.

[–]JDLENL [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I actually wouldn't mind the planetary transitions if not for the fact that they look so jarring and forced. They aren't smooth at all, and it feels like you're in some sort of motion simulator at an amusement park going from planet to planet.

[–]EatYoVegetablez 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I love seeing people in the comments complaining about a game they haven't played. TB is right about this game, I've played 45 hours now and what he says really rings true.

[–]Nexus1411 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (2子コメント)

The game is very flawed, but I'm enjoying it quite a lot regardless and I am actually so sick of being told how crap it is by people who have never touched it.

After 30 hours of play, I think TB was spot on with his review.

[–]EatYoVegetablez 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, I feel you. As a huge Mass Effect fan (100% runs on the other games multiple times) Andromeda scratches the same itch that they did. It has a lot of problems, mostly with some annoying bugs and the UI (and the traveling jeez) but the rest of it is really quite good.

[–]Alveck93 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Agreed. I can objectively point out several issues within my game, but honestly none of them have actually reduced or prevented my enjoyment.

[–]imicca 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This video is so short. Disappointed. You failed us TB. I expected at least 4 hours of Settings menu rant and 2 hour montage of glitches/funny animations. (p.s. no,just kidding, I love this video :)

[–]Obrusnine 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's always good to see more FAIR coverage of this game. There's so much BS floating around it's hard to determine what the actual quality of the game is for the average person.

[–]astalavista114 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've played (most of) the first planet, and thus far the shaky animations haven't been an issue. It's got more of an ME1 feel, but with combat more in line with ME3 MP. I haven't had a problem with the story at about 10 hours in (although it's worth noting I didn't really have huge problems with ME3's story until the last couple of missions - baring Kai Leng and the Macguffin of Doom's sudden reveal).

That said, I haven't watched TB's vid, because I don't want any spoilers.

[–]RazzyBoyRo 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They should have let you explore more with the trial, like at least exploring your first vault or going to the second planet so people could see "Hey, well, it gets better at least"

[–]Sofaboy90 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

i mean the metascore of this game is 74, this shitstorm doesnt come from reviewers, ive seen some people on reddit upvote the gamespot review that gave it a 6/10 but thats literally the lowest score a reviwer has given, some other 6s and the rest is higher

[–]Bannihal_Celter 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Great Video TB. You hit the spot once again. I am really enjoying it , even though after all the "criticism" everyone was shouting out loud i almost didnt buy it. I like to play a female when the chance is given but the standard Sarah Ryder looks, well, shit. So i made my own Character from stretch and i was really surprised by how not-bad the animations were. Really i think thats the way to go. dont choose a preset but make your own char, male or female. The overall game looks fantastic so thats a plus but yeah there are a couple of annoyances. BUT so far in my experience, when i found something to be asnnoying i just avoided doing it and honestly, the game just lets you do that. (i dont like the crafting system so i just buy my stuff). All in all a 7/10 is definetly the right score for this game. So if you are going to get the game just remember this: Make your own character and you will have a great time :)

[–]hoseja 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (26子コメント)

So, shitty Bioware iteration gets 2 hour review and he won't touch Witcher with 10 foot pole because "ethics". So salty about that.

[–]Wissenschaft85 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why do you even need him to do a WTF is about Witcher?

[–]WylfCynical Mod 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Somehow I feel Witcher 3 did alright, even without TBs support ;)

[–]lardox 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Steady on now, you might jinx it!

[–]Mangentle 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

witcher 3 did too well already to jinx it, considering its developers considered the series to be over and done with

[–]nathanpinard 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Witcher 3 has it's issues and he would've pointed them out. For starters: SO MANY QUESTION MARKS.

[–]pkkthetigerr 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

The question marks arent even the side quests. Those are literally just random stuff you can run into in the countryside hardly like ubisofts markers.

[–]Alarien 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Witcher 2 and 3's problem was goddawful combat in context of other 3rd party action games that make it look incompetent. Witcher 2 and 3's strenghts was an amazing graphics job, generally good polish and writing and characters that appealed to a lot of people. Despite personally disliking those two games, I recognize how good they are overall and am very pleased with CD Projekt Red.

The problem is that people feel the actual need (sense of belonging or security issues, I imagine) to jump in and agree with other people's opinions, so this hate bandwagon on Bioware in general is just steamrolling, but based on nitpicks, cosmetics, and straw arguments. ME: A is a solid and fun game with some glaring flaws. That's all TB said, and it's pretty fair.

[–]Boltarrow5 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean...yeah? He feels his integrity would be compromised with something he was close to. Im quite happy that he made that decision. Also this is not a "shitty iteration" lol

[–]UndeadOne 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Wait, what's going on with TB and Witcher?

EDIT: Well, after reading replies, it sounds just like TB. He's always been about integrity. Don't see what's wrong with staying true to his policies.

[–]donblowfishthe true Ralph Wiggum 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (2子コメント)

when witcher 3 came out TBs e-sport team was sponsored by GOG which is owned by CD Project. CD Project owns CD Project Red . Thereby ethics

[–]Alveck93 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Sounds perfectly reasonable.

Laudable even, there's enough degrees of separation there that many may not consider it.

[–]donblowfishthe true Ralph Wiggum [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Better to be safe than sorry

[–]Beroin 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

afaik the developer studio sent him a bunch of stuff and are his friends so a review would be a conflict of interest (in his opinion)

edit: yeah also gog stuff

[–]Stevificus [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

The bulk of Mass Effect: Andromeda actually takes place about 600 years after Mass Effect 3, not trying to be a douche, but figured someone might be interested in it's position on the timeline.

[–]SWJS1 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They leave the Milky Way in 2185 and arrive in Andromeda in 2819, 634 years later. They leave several months before ME3, toward the end of ME2.

[–]Ryko89 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I like this review of his. My opinion can differ a lot from his opinions at times, but this was hitting the nail on the head. I love this game with a passion, and he is one of the only reviewers that look past the echo-chamber meme machine of the internet. Solid game, but has a lot of flaws. I love playing this game, I am worried that it will be overshadowed by all the negativity surrounding it.

[–]Spearka 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (4子コメント)

[–]Colbert2020 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's the Dark Souls 2 of the ME series.

[–]BobtheDino96 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's shitter don't play

[–]KinkyViking 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's you injecting your own opinion and it's not even close to what he said.

[–]ActionCactus 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

that's the exact opposite of what he said lmao

[–]Wefee11 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

2 Hours to answer the question "Wtf is this game"

[–]Kanjidude [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

He's clearly quantity over quality nowadays. Why produce a clear and concise video respecting his audience's time when he can just ramble on for hours, and rake in loads of Youtube money in the process.

[–]Yukondano2 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (6子コメント)

With the number of comments here I feel like I'm shouting into the void a bit, but TB's video has honestly made me want to get this game. The negative press around it seems sensationalist (which is absolutely normal for the media so I've already adjusted for that) and exaggerates one flawed area without considering everything else. "But it's so expensive and took so long, how are there these errors!" because clearly they focused their attention elsewhere. They should have allocated their resources better, yes, but it's not like those hours and dollars disappeared into the void like people seem to suggest. But anyways, looking past the animation problems and everyone's incredibly puffy faces (seriously, the hell is with that?) this game looks pretty cool. Fluid movement is something I'd love to see, I adore the movement system in Warframe because of how fluid and responsive it feels and I'm happy to see more things like it. I frankly don't give a damn about the pausing and resuming strategy if I can still fight and have fun.

[–]hulibuli 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This sounds more that you are just looking justification for your purchase than that TB actually made you want to buy the game, tbh.

[–]Oraex 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Don't get it. The further you are into the game, the worse it gets.
I'm currently on a planet Kandara and it is a complete shitshow.
The devs don't respect your time.

They force you to go through multiple loading screens and ridiculous slow opening doors (like 5+ seconds) just to talk to someone for 30 seconds and than send you all the way back. And this happens multiple times in a row.

80% of the game are shitty filler content that they could remove and the game would be better without it.
Its like Dragon Age: Inquisition just worse.

I like the combat and the multiplayer is fun, but if you want to play it for the singleplayer, don't. Its a gigantic waste of your time.

[–]teardeem 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Hey that almost sounds like the original mass effect 🤔🤔🤔

[–]GigaGrey 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Do you not like elevator music?

[–]Oraex 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Original Mass Effect had similar problems but it is worse in this one thanks to the open world.
I really can't remember Mass Effect 1 having 10 side quests that force you to just fly around the galaxy to scan multiple locations to get to the actual quest location.

[–]Chiefwaffles [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'd say get it.

There are some problems with backtracking as the other guy mentioned - if you do all the significant sidequests as you go, (I essentially did all the quests in a planet when I first got there) they get a bit sparse late-game and the ones you do get force you to backtrack to series of visited planets just for the quests.

It's nice to a point, and makes the universe feel more realistic, but with the delays in travel it gets a bit annoying. Luckily this only really applies to a small amount of optional quests much later in the game.

The sidequests are so much better than Inquisition's. It's astounding, really. Inquisition had sidequests which consisted of 1 line of dialogue -> kill enemy/find item -> 1 line of dialogue.

Andromeda has some number of those, but they're made very obvious and are very optional, and the extreme majority of these types of missions (called "Tasks") are very simple to do. They're either things like "while you're here, can you scan these items?" or "while on this planet, go to these locations and scan/kill the stuff there." It's all stuff you can do on the side as you focus on the sidequests and actual story missions.

The game shines with the rest of the sidequests. It felt like every sidequest had a compelling decision and story, which were greatly complemented by the amazing combat in Andromeda. A large number directly contribute to the main plot and those that don't still feel like they're part of the main story - you're still exploring and doing your job of improving conditions and making the area a better place. These sidequests are quite common and you'll be doing a large amount of them per planet.

So if TB's video made you want to get the game, I'd definitely say get it. I'd still recommend the game to people that already haven't made up their minds, but with someone like you I feel like I can almost guarantee you'll enjoy it.

And if you're really uncertain, there's always the 10-hour trial from Origin Access and if you're really uncertain there's also a short refund period on Origin.

I know my opinion is apparently very unpopular in Reddit, but I do genuinely think you'll enjoy it.

[–]Maceor 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

the pellet spread on this shotgun is a bit weird...

yes TB, that is because that shotgun shoots slugs

[–]AcceptablePariahdom 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (45子コメント)

Man I'm looking forward to a breath of fresh air from TB. He's not one of the morons that'll just write off the game because of the animations.

Yes, the facial animations and some of the character model interactions are unforgiveably bad for a full-price, AAA game in 2017. But animations aren't the only fucking thing in a God damn video game.

The story is up to Bioware's usual standard, I daresay better than 3's bullshit. Characters are fleshed out and interesting, their interactions with Ryder and each other are fantastic. The voice acting? I could gush for an hour on how good the voice acting is.

And the combat... I'm sorry. I still consider ME2 the best in the series overall, like most Mass Effect fans, but... Combat in ME:A is the best Mass Effect has ever had. Hands down. It's so fluid, so crunchy, so incredibly satisfying. There are a couple cases where those character model issues make their way into harming gameplay when some enemies will do some crazy "Bethesda style" buggy actions in combat like flying way into the air or getting stuck on top of each other. But it's easily forgiven since that only ever happens in overworld skirmishes, and the combat is otherwise amazing.

Not limiting you to a single class and giving you total control over your powers, weapon loadout, weapon and armor modifications, and even adding a research and development feature for all those things... you can really play how you want, and every style I've tried is immensely satisfying. It was the perfect step for a Mass Effect RPG.

I'm silly and wrote this up after only watching half an hour of the review, but I'm confident that even if TB and I don't agree on all points, the main thing is that I'm quite confident he won't say ME:A is crap because the animations are crap. The reviewers that have been saying so are fucking idiots, and I'll be happy to hear as unbiased a review as possible without that level of stupidity.

[–]teor 49 ポイント50 ポイント  (24子コメント)

I could gush for an hour on how good the voice acting is.

Are you like from the 90's? Or is ME:A your first voiced game?

[–]S3v3n_Skies 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Mate, what are you on about? The ME series has always been about the story and how it was delivered. The writing and cut scene animations in this game are atrocious. In ME, the reward for combat has always been story progression, so to play a game and ignore the part for which you're actually playing the game is what's actually moronic, I'm sorry. Now if you play this game and enjoy it for what it is, that's fine, more power to you, but it does not excuse it for being bad at what it's supposed to be.

In what galaxy, pun intended, do you consider: "Why do you think they're so angry about? Oh, maybe because I shot their friend in the face..." to be good writing? Or the banter between Peebee and Krogen McWhatshisname talking about superheroes and supervillains? Excuse me? Here we are millions of light years in deep space in an alien galaxy, being attacked by unknown creatures and our only topic for conversation is how Peebee's face might resemble a superhero? WHAT? WHY?!

Have you seen the murder investigation side quest? No? See the link below and enjoy the animation/writing... pretty much sums up this whole game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lk_3oziqJzc&t=5s

And can someone explain to me why does the Nomad have break lights?! Were they expecting heavy traffic on these new ALIEN worlds?

[–]KingofSparrows 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Yeah, he seems to go out of his way to defend this game for no reason, except that people are dogpiling on it for the facial animations. The game simply has a bad story, a horrible one actually. And the setting is worse. That's also what made Inquisition terribad. NOT SIMPLY that the Hinterlands were mostly empty. For some reason he has to go and white knight something that's, at best a mediocre product, and at worst a completely shitty one.

[–]francis2559 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

In his own way, TB likes being contrary.

Still, it's of some benefit to see a review that's out of lock step, even if it's a bit of a knee jerk. Same reason I want to see the negative reviews on an amazon product that's otherwise 5 stars.

[–]Puddimans-FIN 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

And can someone explain to me why does the Nomad have break lights?! Were they expecting heavy traffic on these new ALIEN worlds?

Obviously its in case they run into an alien police officer, so they can avoid getting an alien ticket for having no break lights... duh!

[–]RazzyBoyRo 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean, they were planning to settle outposts and even cities as they were talking while you are roaming around, it makes sense,... That's a lot of potential trafic.

[–]RobotWantsKitty[S] 31 ポイント32 ポイント  (8子コメント)

He's not one of the morons that'll just write off the game because of the animations.

So people are morons because they have different priorities and preferences in a video game?

[–]MusRidc 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, but people already know this game has terrible lines and janky facial animations because there are so many videos showcasing the game's shortcomings in those departments. They all just focus on animation glitches, ridiculus facial animations and awful dialogue lines that would even make 14 year olds cringe.

But no one ever talks about combat gameplay. About how exploration works, progress works, how the overarching story develops, etc. TB even touches a lot of the game's flaws. I feel that personally I'm on the same page as TB. When I'm playing the game a lot of the "game breaking glitches" aren't as apparent as when you're watching a video on Youtube. And much to my dismay (I wanted to hate this game so much for many different reasons) I actuall yhave fun with the game. I got it heavily discounted and have absolutely no buyer's remorse.

Edit:
To clarify the "discounted" statement: I wasn't bragging, just saying wouldn't buy this at full price. It's definitely worth a discounted price, just not full price. Also, if you're patient and have Origin Acess, I think the game might end up there more sooner than later.

[–]Reinhart3 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not limiting you to a single class and giving you total control over your powers,

As someone who just plays as a full biotic this change feels like ass because I can't use more than 3 abilities at once and constantly swapping loadouts feels awkward. In old games I could have Warp/Throw/Pull/Singularity/Shockwave/Barrier all up at once and now I need to make multiple loadouts, and most of them need Pull and or Throw to be good.

[–]zqzqz 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Feature length TB, hype!

[–]roarquel 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

6 hours later- 1440p still only available as 30fps. Jesus even I can encode faster then that.

[–]shanoftw [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Before watching the video there are two things I can say about the game: 1) I can say more negative things about the game than positive 2) I am still very much enjoying the game, and am not at all sorry that I bought it.

Now onto the thoughts of a person who put a lot more...thought into this than me.