全 17 件のコメント

[–]ZyvronDie Amerikanen, die sein zo shtom, he. 71 ポイント72 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Holy shit, dude. There are so many links that Yankbot didn't even try.

[–]PerfectHairSkin like tenfold shields. 52 ポイント53 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Holy shit it's the mother of all effort posts

[–]Fire_Bucket 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I cant even be bothered to read the whole post here, let alone read the original thread and then compile it all together so neatly.

[–]stymphalist 43 ポイント44 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I love how they can't just tell Germans that they'd all be speaking German if it weren't for America, so they have to resort to Russian.

[–]Ben_Kerman[S] 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (1子コメント)

The other comments:



He just had to put an indirect "CUCK!" in there.

(Link because long). The comment got removed while I was writing this post up, so here's a copy:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38675522

BBC: Germany's defence spending of €37bn in 2017 will be 1.2% of GDP.

So if Germany spends 60% of it's obligation to protect itself, NATO should only protect 60% of your country when the next war breaks out.

Germany literally doesn't give 2/3rds a flying shit about defending itself. To me it feels like Merkel wants to destroy Germany and rebuild from the inevitable ash-heap

Edit:

Here's the NATO international website for the inbred Aryian children self-reliant German people denying the policies Merkel herself signed in 2006.


http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_67655.htm


The 2% defence investment guideline

"In 2006, NATO member countries agreed to commit a minimum of two per cent of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to spending on defence. This guideline principally served as an indicator of a country’s political will to contribute to the Alliance’s common defence efforts. Additionally, the defence capacity of each member country has an important impact on the overall perception of the Alliance’s credibility as a politico-military organisation.

The 2014 Wales Accord:


http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm


Allies whose current proportion of GDP spent on defence is below this level will:

  1. halt any decline in defence expenditure;

  2. aim to increase defence expenditure in real terms as GDP grows;

  3. aim to move towards the 2% guideline within a decade with a view to meeting their NATO Capability Targets and filling NATO's capability shortfalls.

The 2% minimum wasn't changed. Germany was just asked nicely to stop what they were dong, like what Germans normally do with their wife's boyfriends.


I don't get it. Instead of the attitude, why not just pay your dues?


It is time to dissolve NATO anyway. Why should we defend you if you won't even pay your dues?


THAT'S MY PRESIDENT!
You want protection? Pay for it. No more free rides.


Have you guys considered maybe spending 2% of your gdp on defense?


Well, like that could be Merkel's opinion, but her and Germany's 300 billion bill is now due.


Paying your fair share of your own defense is the line you want to draw in the sand? Of all the legit gripes, this is one you cannot weasel out of.


Loyal centipede here - solid meme. I got a laugh at some OC that wasn't a spillover from us for once. For real, good job on the meme.
Your NATO bill is still unpaid.
PAY YOUR BILLS YOU FUCKING DEADBEATS.


maybe you wouldn't be able to afford cheetos if germany paid their fair share.


I'm not. Better pay up you fuckin krauts


The invoice is because germany hasn't been paying the full 2% towards the nato budget that was agreed upon. denying this when the numbers are publicly available makes no sense.


When the Germans want to be NATO members but they don't want to pay for it
🎻

[–]giddycocks 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (0子コメント)

it's obligation

/thread

[–]TakbirTorsten5/5 bretty gud :DD 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Its 0030 in Germany and I would like to go the bed now. Thread will be locked for the night".

Wtf litteral nazi mods?

[–]UncleSlackyTemporarily Embarrassed Millionaire 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

TYFYS! o7o7o7

[–]ChaIroOtokoWe ain't got none of that "Democratic Socialism" . 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Great work OP!

[–]chairswingerCuckus Maximus 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Petition to exempt all Germans from bans for "brigading" as it had already reached more than 10k upvotes before this was posted

[–]sonyhren1998 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You put some effort into this compilation.

[–]throwaway998977 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Are... are you on some kind of stimulant? Ritalin perhaps?

[–]Ben_Kerman[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

What, why?

Also no, I'm not.

[–]throwaway998977 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You typed out a full page (you posted a comment with even more), links and formatting included, over some thread on the internet. Not criticizing, just marveling at your dedication.

[–]Ben_Kerman[S] 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well 90% of it is just copypasted (copy comment source and permalink, put it in >[](), and np. the links with replace all in NP++). Then I just rearranged it a bit and wrote stupid commentary.

Probably still way too much effort, but I was bored. :P

[–]girigiri 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dude, top quality post. O7 o7