I’ve received a few different questions about the second season of Daredevil, which puts Matt & Foggy’s legal practice front and center in a key storyline, which I won’t spoil here. I’ve just gotten through watching the season, and wow is there ever a lot to discuss—and not in a good way. More to follow.
The Book
Our new book, The Law of Superheroes, is now available! Order your copy today!Facebook
RSS Feeds
Email
Send in your post ideas, questions, and comments:
James DailyLaw and the Multiverse CLE
On-demand CLE courses from Law and the Multiverse, presented by Thomson West:
What Superheroes and Comic Books Can Teach Us About Constitutional Law
Real-Life Superheroes in the World of Criminal Law
Everyday Ethics from Superhero Attorneys
Kapow! What Superheroes and Comic Books Can Teach Us About Torts
-
Recent Posts
- Logan
- Conflicts of Interest in the Representation by Matt Murdock of Alleged Criminals Apprehended by Daredevil
- Mailbag Roundup
- Wonder Woman: Illegal Immigrant
- Is Batman a Murderer?
- More News From My Day Job
- Daredevil Season 2, Part 2 – The Trial
- Daredevil Season 2, Part 1
- Daredevil Season 2
- Bound by Law: A Copyright Law Comic Book
Search
Teaching with Comics
Archives
- March 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (1)
- January 2016 (1)
- November 2015 (6)
- September 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (4)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (2)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (2)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (8)
- May 2014 (8)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (3)
- November 2013 (1)
- October 2013 (2)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (12)
- May 2013 (11)
- April 2013 (15)
- March 2013 (12)
- February 2013 (12)
- January 2013 (14)
- December 2012 (14)
- November 2012 (17)
- October 2012 (20)
- September 2012 (11)
- August 2012 (14)
- July 2012 (15)
- June 2012 (14)
- May 2012 (15)
- April 2012 (10)
- March 2012 (14)
- February 2012 (12)
- January 2012 (14)
- December 2011 (15)
- November 2011 (15)
- October 2011 (15)
- September 2011 (15)
- August 2011 (15)
- July 2011 (13)
- June 2011 (13)
- May 2011 (14)
- April 2011 (15)
- March 2011 (18)
- February 2011 (14)
- January 2011 (24)
- December 2010 (29)
- November 2010 (7)
Categories
Disclaimer
On this blog we discuss fictional scenarios; nothing on this blog is legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading the blog or writing comments, even if the authors write back. The authors speak only for themselves, and nothing on this blog is to be considered the opinions or views of the authors’ employers.Awards
I take it Matt Murdock could be in serious trouble if the general public knew that he was both the vigilante who performed the citizen’s arrest and the lawyer who was defending him in court.
Yes, conflict of interest could be an issue!
“Not in a good way,” huh? Yeah, the portrayal of courtroom procedure was pretty atrocious.
More than just procedure. Ethical errors all over the place, particularly from the DA, and especially when the DA is supposedly calling Mudock & Nelson out on ethical mistakes.
I suspect that there’s a catch-all excuse for everything: EVERYTHING is corrupt in Hell’s Kitchen.
@James Pollock: Sounds like Hamilton’s “Everything is legal in New Jersey.”
Dramatic excuse, not legal excuse.
To be honest, the rumors I’ve heard about the portrayals of courtroom procedure in the second season have kept me from watching it. At some point, I will ultimately do so, but I am filled with a bit of dread.
@Jim: Anxiety over the courtroom … does that qualify as judge dread?
It’s more about the lawyers than the judge
Though Lawyer Dredd would be a very different media franchise…
To be fair, the DA’s ethical violations and hypocrisy were presented as exactly that. Which is why Matt and Foggy were so confused by her behavior as it was contrary to everything they knew about law.
I was willing to let just about all of of the legal stuff slide until (spoilers for final episode) Foggy — who’s been practicing law for what, a year at this point? — gets offered not just a position at a prestigious firm (which is understandable), but to be made a NAME partner. All on the strength of his opening statement in the Punisher trial, which wasn’t THAT good to begin with.
But really, the legal flaws in Season 2 pale in comparison to the sheer awfulness of the Hand/Elektra storyline.
They apparently want him bad enough that they’ll advance him the equity buy-in.
Maybe the other equity partner is Jen Walters?