@MsPackyetti @SophiaBush nobody believes this. And they had a duty to hold confirmation hearings for Garland. They should be ashamed.
-
-
@MsPackyetti Do what's right@GorsuchFacts. In an unprecedented move decline, stating u give the seat 2@MerrickGarland_ No 1 likes a thief -
-
@MsPackyetti@SophiaBush can't put him on#SupremeCourt until president is cleared by#FBI. Why not put Garland on now so Court is full? - 他1件の返信
-
-
@MsPackyetti@paolobacigalupi meanwhile, in NC, GOP majority NCGA just passed bill to put party affiliation next to judges on ballots -
@MsPackyetti@MMSnodgrass - if he feels that so strongly, he should insist that Senate first vote on Garland, before preceding to his own. -
@MsPackyetti You get two snaps in a circle for that one.#OhSnappic.twitter.com/NNhYwjmHTW -
@MsPackyetti@MarkCC Missing the last clause. "Judges nominated by Republican presidents only, of course." -
@MsPackyetti truth , gorsuch has been bought & paid for by someone and we don't know who -
@MsPackyetti or at least given him a hearing. -
@MsPackyetti@ericgarland Let's get#StolenSeat trending! -
@MsPackyetti where's the lie -
@MsPackyetti Napolitano and Jeanine examples of obviously biased, republican judges. -
@MsPackyetti@EricKleefeld Great statement if you believed it. Failure to hold hearings for Garland prove you're a liar. -
@MsPackyetti@jonlovett guessing confirmation comes before the hearing -
@MsPackyetti I'm not upset they didn't confirm Merrick Garland. I'm upset they didn't have the courage to vote him down. -
@MsPackyetti@jonlovett Or at the VERY LEAST, held hearings.
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。