全 9 件のコメント

[–]summerincassiopeia 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So nothing new and continued speculation. Sounds about right.

[–]Zalenkroos 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Is 'Get French Football' L'Equipe? Is there a proper source for this?

[–]GroteBergMan98Callum Whelan[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Get French Football is an aggregator, they just cite newspappers like L'Equipe

[–]highertellurianMata -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

I don't understand how this works if we are after lukaku as well.

Edit: Downvotes for asking a valid question

[–]TheRedDevil95 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't know if we're actually working on a Lukaku deal, but obviously the club is working on alternate solutions in case Griezmann decides to stay. Imagine the Griezmann deal falling through in july and we would have to start looking for an alternative from the scratch.

[–]CatFoodBeerAndGluePaul Scholes, he scores goals 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Pretty sure we can consider more than one transfer option at once.

[–]Blue9Nine -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Lukaku/Zlatan up top, Griezman behind, Martial on the left, Mkhitaryan on the right, Pogrrera behind. Problems would obviously be with balancing Zlatan and Lukaku's playing time, what to do with Rashford and the lack of defensive cover with Pogba as part of a midfield 2.

Edit: Oh and the crazy money involved to get both + any other targets we have

[–]dumbledore_albusBailly 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Where does Mata fit into this picture?

Also, both purchases only work if we continue with a 4-2-3-1 formation. If we need to switch to 4-3-3, one of the two, or Mkhi or Martial and Mata become surplus. And I doubt any of them would want/agree to just add depth to the squad, instead of being a regular starter.