•
•

CMVCMV: Cheating is always a woman's fault (self.PurplePillDebate)

Temperfuelmma が 投稿

Imagine a store from which a thief can steal only if the shopkeeper allowed him to. Who's fault is it if the thief steals something from the store?

I'm not saying what the thief did was right, what I'm saying is the fault is completely on the side of the shopkeeper because the shopkeeper could've avoided that situation but instead chose to facilitate it.

It's like, you're driving on the highway, someone jumps in front of you and you run them over. Without any context the fault is entirely on you because you're the one that run over a person but with context the whole situation could've been avoided if that person didn't purposely jump in front of you. So the whole fault of the accident is with the person that could've avoided the accident but chose to create one.

Similarly, men will seek for sex, it is this drive that is responsible for the survival of our entire species. It is the duty of a decent woman to turn down a man. If a woman chooses not to turn down a man it is entirely her fault for facilitating a man to cheat.

This isn't even a controversial subject. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, if she lets the gates open for someone it's her fault if that person that is predisposed to enter opened gates enter her's.

全 28 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]future_space_boobs [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

so what you're saying is men are children with no agency.

no wonder women initiate most divorces... they're constantly playing sexual babysitter.

as a certified misandrist who opposes men's suffrage, we finally agree!

[–]Electra_CutePurple Pill Woman [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Joking/Circlejerking aside I am actually starting to believe that a lot of the Red Pill user base hates men and they use feminism as a vehicle to project it.

The way they talk about "Chad" and "Betas" while constantly creating feminist straw mans is making me really wonder.

[–]CrazyTom54It's just blue pilled locker room talk [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

We all know that they secretly fantasize all their accusations about feminism actually being true so they can watch from the sidelines as all the "chads" and "betas" are killed off, which is why they get so upset when told that all their accusations are actually false

[–]Electra_CutePurple Pill Woman [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Well they never seem to give me a link or any material of the specific feminist(s) they are referring to. Maybe they are correct.

Do not jump the gun too quickly.

[–]CrazyTom54It's just blue pilled locker room talk [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Do not jump the gun too quickly.

Awww.... but I wanna make my red pill conspiracy theories and live up to my username.... :(

[–]Electra_CutePurple Pill Woman [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

This is more than a "conspiracy theory", it is a view of the general Red Pill user base that is beginning to manifest into my mind.

Such as it is with any personal view, my view is subject to biases and inaccuracies.

[–]CrazyTom54It's just blue pilled locker room talk [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Such as it is with any personal view, my view is subject to biases and inaccuracies.

And as we all know (thanks to TRP itself), if it has biases and inaccuracies, then it must be true!

[–]Tacticalogistics [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Looking past your horrible analogies, what are you even talking about? So if a heterosexual man cheats on his SO, then it's the woman's fault for sleeping with him, and not the man who was in a relationship? Or are you saying that if a heterosexual woman cheats on her SO, it's her fault for cheating, in which I have to say "duh". What exactly are you trying to say?

This is the type of post that the mods over at TRP said they might start removing around January, because more and more post were starting to read just like this one, thanks to sperging, angerphased, newbies. This is also the type of post that bp uses to attack trp. And then you have rps who have to state that guys like you do not represent the majority and that the sidebar and high quality posters are really the face of trp.

Better luck next time.

[–]wtknightHardcore Romantic [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If a woman doesn't know that a man is already committed in a relationship or marriage, then how could it be her fault that he cheated?

[–]Princeso_BubblegumFem Pill [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

What if the relationship is between two men and one of them cheats with another man. How is this the fault of any woman. 🤔

[–]CrazyTom54It's just blue pilled locker room talk [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Because the man that he cheated on his boyfriend with was this man <3

[–]AutoModeratorVoted Hardest Working PPD Mod of 2016[M] [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]Atlas_B_ShrugginScarlett O'Horror [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Brilliant

[–]CrazyTom54It's just blue pilled locker room talk [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Sounds more like trying to dodge the blame.

Oh but it wasn't my fault that I flirted with his wife and had her cheat on him with me! I'm just following my biological drive! It's really that bitch's fault for not turning me down!

[–]Temperfuelmma[S] [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

It's really that bitch's fault for not turning me down!

Obviously. All she had to do was say "no" and that would've been the end of that, anything more from the man and it would be sexual harassment/assault at best, rape at worst. Women are well aware of the tendency of men to be chasing after sex, most women will have used sex as a form of control over her partner at least once in their life. I've seen this before, women committing little crimes indirectly all the while pulling strings in the background and placing all the blame on some guy.

[–]CrazyTom54It's just blue pilled locker room talk [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Men are nothing more than monkeys and have no control over their thoughts and actions. We are merely sheep following our biological programming! Hitler did nothing wrong!

[–]Electra_CutePurple Pill Woman [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Is being divorced always the males fault?

[–]disposableboyfriend [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Of course. He should not have gotten married in the first place :)

[–]CrazyTom54It's just blue pilled locker room talk [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Imagine a store from which a thief can steal only if the shopkeeper allowed him to. Who's fault is it if the thief steals something from the store?

It isn't called stealing if it is allowed. That literally goes against the definition of stealing. This is a terrible analogy.

With this sort of logic, a serial killer could get away with murder.

"Oh but I was just following my urges. It was really the victims fault for knocking on my door and then entering my house after I invited them inside. After all, humans are the gatekeepers to their own lives are are ultimately responsible for whether I get to kill them or not."

[–]Temperfuelmma[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Allowed not in the sense that the shopkeeper opens the door, lets in the thieves and tell them to go crazy.

Allowed in the sense that the door was locked, shopkeeper saw thieves outside the door, shopkeeper opens the door and lets in the thieves knowing full well he'll get robbed and then gets robbed thereby facilitating the crime.

[–]CrazyTom54It's just blue pilled locker room talk [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Allowed in the sense that the door was locked, shopkeeper saw thieves outside the door, shopkeeper opens the door and lets in the thieves knowing full well he'll get robbed

That is literally the same as the shopkeeper opening the door, letting the thieves in, and allowing them to go crazy.

It is still giving them permission to take from his store. Therefore, it is not stealing.

[–]whyyoureadmyusernameBad Faith Opportunist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This isn't even a controversial subject.

Lol

I am questioning whether or not you are genuine because this post is just so awful.

If a man chooses to cheat it's his fault. Because he chose to go out and find a broad and then spend the time to get her to spread her legs for him. No one made him go out and hunt for poon. He made that decision. It's his fault.

Imagine a store from which a thief can steal only if the shopkeeper allowed him to. Who's fault is it if the thief steals something from the store?

Do you know why this 'thought experiment' is some of the dumbest shit I have ever read? Because if you let someone steal something, THEY AREN'T FUCKING STEALING IT! You can't steal something from someone if you have express permission to take that something.

Please tell me you're a troll. No one's actually this delusional right?

I can't believe I just read this shit.