•
•

Interested in everyone's opinions on hypothetically going after Kylian Mbappe (self.reddevils)

RedArmyNicKeane が 投稿

Young, athletic, decent control of the ball, seems to see the pitch well (better when he's on the ball than when he's off the ball).

He would likely cost a hefty fee to bring him to United, but would follow the trend of having young, hardworking, athletic skill up top along the likes of Martial and Rashford.

Martial could help him to adjust to the EPL, seeing as Martial played in Ligue 1 and made the adjustment between the leagues successfully. Could work with Rashford up top to be a deadly future striking duo. Could learn from the likes of the "Swedish Football God".

Opinions?

全 13 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Ibs99Blind 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Stunning player with great potential; we don't need him.

[–]RedArmyNicKeane[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Care to elaborate why? I'm genuinely curious on your viewpoint.

[–]Ibs99Blind 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Rashford and Martial represent our young, inexperienced players with lots of potential. Although we need a striker long-term, we either need an experienced world-class striker, or someone with physicality. Hypothetically, it'd be a dream to sign him. However, we don't need a striker with potential right now, we need a top striker.

Also, he'd cost upward of 60-70m.

[–]bob1001Scholes 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's hard to say. 18 year olds are unpredictable. Look at Renato Sanches, I'm Portuguese and I love the guy, but his season at Bayern has been shit. I'd rather he stayed at Benfica for longer and I hope Mbappe stays at Monaco for longer. But he'll probably end up moving and it's impossible to know if he'll keep up his form.

[–]RedArmyNicKeane[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I don't disagree with him staying and developing, it would likely be what's best for him. However, we seem to be okay with giving young talent the matches they need to develop, so it would be a better move for Mbappe to come to us rather than City.

[–]RFerrer-Mkhitaryan 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

so it would be a better move for Mbappe to come to us rather than City.

Debatable. Guardiola is very youth-oriented. Mourinho isn't.

[–]bob1001Scholes 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Best move is for him to stay there. Here or at City he'll be replaced if he starts playing badly or won't be given the amount of playing time he gets at Monaco.

[–]bob1001Scholes 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Doesn't matter. We shouldn't be buying young talents and stint their development. I hope he stays there, becomes a consistent, good player and then leaves.

[–]RFerrer-Mkhitaryan 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Seems a waste. If we are to buy a striker, they should be at least as good as Ibra.

No point signing another prospect forward when we already have Rashford and Martial. Our big needs lie in other positions.

[–]RedArmyNicKeane[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

That's a tough ask to buy a striker as good as Ibra. Even at his age, he's still one of the most clinical finishers in the world.

[–]RFerrer-Mkhitaryan 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

But if we buy Mbappe and Ibra leaves after next season we'll be relying on two teenagers to be our main goalscoring outlets. It's risky.

That's a tough ask to buy a striker as good as Ibra

Or maybe not forwards as good/better than Ibra, because then you have to look at players like Lewandowski, Auba, Higuain, Suarez, etc. who are unnattainable. Rather someone that is a proven goalscorer at the top level.

[–]enwhykiidMartial 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lukaku would be a great replacement

[–]LeorenthelaPogba 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

if we could buy him and loan him back to monaco to keep developing i think he might be good for us in the future, but right now , we already have the young talent strikers role full.