全 159 件のコメント

[–]randomthrowawaiii [スコア非表示]  (37子コメント)

Prostitution is legal and still taboo in my country. What gives?

[–]ChileanGalbig money mane [スコア非表示]  (17子コメント)

how long has it been legal?

[–]randomthrowawaiii [スコア非表示]  (16子コメント)

70s I think? I'm from the Netherlands

[–]tomerjm [スコア非表示]  (13子コメント)

It's taboo there? Really? But the red light district and everything, so nice.

[–]ChileanGalbig money mane [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Yeah most of my politicians go there and spend tax money there to get "culture"

[–]whitestguyuknow [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Do they have rules and regulations for stuff like that?

[–]randomthrowawaiii [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

Well if you say to your friends you went to the whores they'll see you as a loser

[–]SensiSparx [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Well I think it's more in the lines of saying you were jacking off... Everybody does it, but saying it kinda makes people say you're a loser.

[–]JohnnyBGooode [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

but saying it kinda makes people say you're a loser.

Who the fuck do you talk to?

[–]SensiSparx [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

What the fuck are you on about?

[–]JohnnyBGooode [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Who says you're a loser for mentioning jerkin off?

[–]Toperoco [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

People who like to pretend they never jerk off because they can just call one of their 20 bitches who are just waiting to get a piece.

[–]nickolaiproblem [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Weed legal to and how's healthcare I only take universal as an answer.

[–]addmeontinder [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Our healthcare's alright, amazing compared to the American healthcare meme.

[–]IncomingTrump270 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

To preserve the sellers market status of pussy.

It's more of a stratification/branding thing at that point though.

In countries where prostitution is legal, women have agreed that there is a price for pussy, but any pussy you can buy "isnt worth it" and "only lame men would buy it"

[–]MrJekel [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

People get uncomfortable when you cut out the bullshit.

[–]imtalking2myself [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

No no no, you misunderstand. It's taboo in public where potential pussy (or mom/sister/wife/daughter) will hear you and disapprove. It's NOT taboo at all in any setting where there are only men.

Source: Am Greek.

[–]PMdatSOCIALCONSTRUCT [スコア非表示]  (13子コメント)

At many points in time prostitution was legal and taboo was the force that kept it down not the law.

There no sensible reasons to want a woman to become riddled with STD's and have tons of kids from random punters in most cases too pathetic to fuck a woman without paying for it.

A lot of it is about ensuring the next generation isn't made up of low quality degerate whore spawn. Ultimatley no, women are not thirsting for your neet autisdick and trying to keep it all for themselves.

[–]randomthrowawaiii [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

There no sensible reason to want a woman to become riddled with STD's and have tons of kids from random punters

I agree but why would we listen to what women want?

[–]Senorbubbz [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

In Brazil prostitution is legal and regulated, meaning you can't fuck them without a condom.

I don't know what fantasy world you live in, but if prostitution were to become legal it wouldn't be the shitshow you're imagining.

[–]bazilbt [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I think he is talking about historically. Before effective prophylactics.

[–]PMdatSOCIALCONSTRUCT [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Well it's hard to tell in an age old shitshow like Brazil whether it'd create a shitshow.

I don't know what fantasy world you live in

A fantasy land where affordable contraceptives and knowledge of the spread of disease and its mitigation are relatively new develpoments. A strange land where before these things societies developed other means of battling these social ills. 👍

[–]BunsOfAnarchy [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

You apparently haven't heard of condoms

[–]PMdatSOCIALCONSTRUCT [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Christ you people are retarded.

I said historically.

[–]BunsOfAnarchy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Just read your post again. Do not see the word historically. And would not explain today even if you had.

[–]NotEvilWashington [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Low quality degenerate whore spawn

You've clearly never visited the south.

[–]PolarisC8/m/anchild [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I was gonna ask why we let trashy people have so many kids hahaha

[–]PMdatSOCIALCONSTRUCT [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I've seen enough Westerns to know that that's because of too many Saloons.

[–]Stud_lee [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah cause we already have welfare for that.

[–]iThinkThisIsAGoodOne [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free

[–]Beltox2pointO [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Something being taboo is a social construct (can't believe I'm using it seriously) so the OP logic still somewhat applies.

[–]FluxxxCapacitard [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

"Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. Why isn't selling fucking legal?"

--George Carlin.

R.I.P.

[–]BilgeXATemporary flair [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

But men make the laws so how does that work?

[–]TheSlicemanCometh [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Married men make the laws. Who are married men beholden to?

[–]Murgie/d/eviant [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Women who have no need for sexual leverage over other men anymore, not that they have it to begin with, given the advanced ages political power tends to come at.

Seriously, do you even listen to yourself think, man?

[–]Xephyurjackledaman [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

take sexual leverage away from the average female

good news friendo! in the middle east this is already done

[–]Osagiel [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Yeah, by taking literally any leverage away from women. They can't even ever get divorced from the husband they are forced to marry, and they only own property if their man allows them.

[–]Themightyoakwood [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Ah, so rather than legalize prostitution we should all convert to Islam.

[–]Edghyatt [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The Middle East is so fucking backwards that the one thing women can do freely IS to divorce their husbands, but only on the grounds set by their culture, like him having a small dick and such.

[–]Murgie/d/eviant [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It's almost as though /pol/ knows their ideology is shit they'd be unwilling to live under. :\

[–]RewindRepeatIt [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I mean TBH you can't deny that sex is mostly a "seller's market" that heavily favors women.

Just go on a dating site and make a fake profile as an average-looking chick. You'll be drowning in messages and likes and dick pics. Now go make a fake profile as a handsome man. It'll mostly be crickets except for a few likes/messages here and there.

All a woman has to do to get a man is exist. Men have to jump through hoops to try and get a woman.

[–]bubbaholy [スコア非表示]  (21子コメント)

implying men haven't been the writers of laws basically forever on this planet

[–]Qipven [スコア非表示]  (13子コメント)

implying everything men do isn't to please women

[–]senpeters [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

implying men please women for reasons other than the reciprocity of being pleased themselves

[–]BluntsnBoards [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

implying it isn't one huge circle jerk where nobody is pleased

[–]OnTheSlope [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

implying women give pleasure in addition to allowing it to be given to them

[–]bantam83 [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

implying there are only two genders

[–]Gwanara420 [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

No, you did that wrong. The things you put after the implying is supposed to be factual.

[–]SaikoGekido [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Exactly. Sex relates to the physical reproductive organs. Gender is a psychological/sociological construct. There are only about 3 sexes, and an infinite faerie dust cloud of genders, since gender is subjectively defined by an individual's perception of their own being. Like describing what the color purple tastes like, it's going to vary from person to person.

Also, this makes me extremely pissed off about the restroom debate. It's really sex vs gender and personal freedom vs social responsibility. If the little girl on the door represents gender, then as a public facility it represents the public perception of that gender, which means that only passable trans women should be allowed. If it represents sex, then that's super easy, since they only have to remember whether they had something chopped off/put on to know. From the public reaction, it's definitely the first one, in which case the argument isn't about sex vs gender, it's the other part about personal freedom vs social responsibility. That is the argument that they should be having, give up personal freedom to conform and use the restroom associated with the gender they most closely resemble, or fuck the world and little Sally's eyes, who was too young to process what pre-op means, and embrace freedom of choice to pick the destination. And if you really think about that, don't we already enforce the first option with the existence of separate restrooms? Really makes you hmmm 🤔

[–]b240c [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

is this copy pasta? i think youre onto something here...

[–]TommiH [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

implying America isn't christian conservative

[–]Counterattack199 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Pretty sure I don't sit on my ass and eat cheetos to please women

[–]FlexGunship [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

implying women haven't used their sexual monopoly for thousands of years to direct the goals of weak men (i.e. traditional party politicians)

[–]Murgie/d/eviant [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Being sheltered enough to believe democracy has been the norm throughout human history.

[–]giraffebacon [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

being stupid enough to not realize that politics/politicians are not exclusive to democracy

[–]CtrlAltFetus [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Today in society's where all people are permitted to vote, women have more power because they make up a larger percentage of the population and voters

[–]Mechanical-one [スコア非表示]  (19子コメント)

For those curious the real reason is tied directly into similar reasons why gambling is illegal in most places in the US.

See it all circles around the prohibition era puritanism. Alcohol became legal again the other things less so.

[–]MaximilianKohler/b/ [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

prohibition era puritanism

It's still plenty alive today.

[–]Squeejee09fa/tg/uy [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Should really just be called "American Puritanism"

[–]MaximilianKohler/b/ [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Not really. Sadly it exists in many European countries. There are very few countries with legal prostitution.

I recall a youth version of a liberal political party in one of the nordic countries who wrote up a very logical reasoning for the legalization of one of these types of things and the "actual version" of the political party came out strongly against it in a defensive manner. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/incest-and-necrophilia-should-be-legal-youth-swedish-liberal-peoples-party-a6891476.html

Some other examples I saved:

UK's been banning sex acts they deem to be gross: https://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/the-end-of-uk-bdsm-282

Germany & Denmark used to have laws that banned animal abuse but not bestiality specifically. Moral outrage from puritan types caused them to instate regressive anti-bestiality laws: https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/46k9sp/bbc_news_sex_with_animals_remains_banned_in/d05s8di – Documentary "animal fuckers". – https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/46k9sp/bbc_news_sex_with_animals_remains_banned_in/d05vtcy

[–]Murgie/d/eviant [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

UK's been banning sex acts they deem to be gross:

Haven't the right been in charge in the UK for a few years, though?

[–]MaximilianKohler/b/ [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

The right exists in every country.

[–]Murgie/d/eviant [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

What wasn't at all the question. Maybe I should clarify.

The action you provided as an example was actually conducted under David Cameron of the Conservative party, during a majority Conservative coalition government.

Would you like to make a revision in light of this new information?

[–]MaximilianKohler/b/ [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Should really just be called "American Puritanism"

Not really. Sadly it exists in many European countries.

.

UK's been banning sex acts they deem to be gross:

Haven't the right been in charge in the UK for a few years, though?

.

The right exists in every country.

[–]Divest1987 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yup. It would be liberals demanding that bestiality be made legal.

[–]Scathainnfa/tg/uy [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

also human trafficking concerns

[–]SmashBros- [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The idea is to regulate it and have it run through the government, in order to combat human trafficking. That way, people wouldn't be forced into it, client interactions would be safer, and health standards could be enforced.

[–]TheSlicemanCometh [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Begging the question. Why did the Puritans and their religious forefathers also ban gambling?

Because single men left to their own devices would be at the whore house and casino and bar all day just having a grand old time spending all their money rather than wifing up and making/raising babies.

The civilizations that didn't make babies died out. The ones that banned whore houses and gambling survived.

Every law we have, from the beginning of time, was enacted by men, to protect and preserve women and children. The feminist idea that men are oppressing women with laws to protect them is unimaginably asinine.

[–]NotEvilWashington [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

They made too much money for the time.

Don't quote me but something like a regular whore house made 5,000 weekly the average worker made 50 monthly.

Religious leader jumped on that fact and made a push to ban brothels.

[–]QuoteMe-Bot [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

They made too much money for the time.

Don't quote me but something like a regular whore house made 5,000 weekly the average worker made 50 monthly.

Religious leader jumped on that fact made a push to ban brothels.

~ /u/NotEvilWashington

[–]Murgie/d/eviant [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Every law we have, from the beginning of time, was enacted by men, to protect and preserve women and children.

You literally just finished countering that point in your own comment.

[–]Draculix/v/irgin [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Oppressed by the matriarchy huh? That's a new one.

[–]Murgie/d/eviant [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah, if only.

That's the thing about these types, deep down inside they all long to be the very SJWs that they hate.

[–]ItsACaragor [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I see you have never had the pleasure to meet red pillers yet. How I envy you.

[–]IncomingTrump270 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Red pilling isn't about "being oppressed by muh matriarchy". It's about casting off the vaginal Jew.

[–]avicek [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

I mean if men control the world like 4chan thinks, wouldnt this mean prostitution would be legal? I doubt 4chan thinks women have been making the rules that go against prostitution, and their argument makes seem like if men were in charge it would be legal

[–]prodigy2throw [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Would you tell a girl you liked that you went to a prostitute?

[–]OyVeyGoim [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Yes, if she doesn't like it, then she can fuck off.

[–]prodigy2throw [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Do you think most women would be cool with it or not?

[–]IncomingTrump270 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The real question being answered here is "why aren't women screaming constantly for legalizing the sex trade?"

[–]geared4war [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

So why is it okay for a girl to ask for expensive gifts in exchange for a relationship but taboo for a girl to be honest and upfront about the financial aspect of a relationship?

[–]gibisee3 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The illusion of choice? If a girl fucks with someone in exchange for rent/gifts, they can say they'd still do it without those things.

[–]IncomingTrump270 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Because money is just physically manifested power. It's also open ended in terms of value.

Gifts are finite, subjective, and much less valuable on the open market.

[–]propelol [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm having the vaccinations he's having.

[–]RomeNeverFell [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

That's not how economics works.

[–]Werman20 [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Kinda is tho

[–]anoneko/int/olerant [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

this is also why loving kids is a taboo, because the only value females have is a diminishing capital as they age, thus they're unable to naturally compete with the younger generation

as such, the forced monopoly on sex is introduced and lobbied

[–]jet199 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

"Loving" is an interesting way to describe raping

[–]bjt23 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Please get help and stay away from children.

[–]crowmemer [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

This argument doesn't work since a 20 year old is often hotter than a 30 year old, so the only thing lowing/rising the age of consent laws would do is shift the scale.

[–]IncomingTrump270 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm not defending the guys pedo-Esque bent

But it's a matter of context.

If 15 year olds were considered adults and they could engage in the sexual marketplace (not talking about prostitution), they would be included in the overall strategy and selection process of men.

This would put more pressure on older women and effectively "price" them out of the market.

15-30 would be the "sexual prime".

Instead of "21-35" we see now in urban centers.

[–]JohnnyBGooode [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

What the fuck? Get help you fucking piece of shit. There aren't strong enough words to describe the type of garbage human that you are. Kill yourself. Seriously. Make sure to livestream it so at least you can bring some joy to someone before you die.

[–]Tailz_2K5 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

seventies I think it's more in the middle east this is already done.

[–]NotEvilWashington [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The big question now if prostitution became legal would the price of sex go up because of increased regulation or down because of a flood of the market?

[–]Beanzii [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Aussie here, brothels all over the place. Women still have leverage.

[–]thekza1 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This is actually true. Prostitution empowers the customer (men) and almost always leads to sex slavery.

[–]hub1111 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Germany& Denmark used to have laws that banned prostitute houses and gambling survived.

[–]IAmA_TheOneWhoKnocks [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

That would mean that somehow women organized and got legislation passed to make it illegal, which we all know wouldn't happen without the government male majority allowing it

[–]6gpdgeu58 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

And these people wonder why women hate them

[–]ferrarifan/biz/realis [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Prostitution is pretty much legal nowadays. Even if it's technically against the law, the police doesn't enforce it at all, precisely because it's harmless (as long as there is no pimp abuse). In every city, there is always one or two streets unofficially reserved for streetwalkers. You can also walk into a trashy strip club and ask for their extra services. And it is actually legal in lots of places/countries. Anyone can have sex with a prostitute if they really wanted to.

What prevents it from being not taboo is the moral guilt of having to pay for sex. You redpillers are just as retarded as feminists. There is no patriarchy that collectively decides to pay women 30% less. Just as there is no matriarchy that collectively decides to keep prostitution taboo so that women can have "leverage". Unless you're a wallstreet millionaire exclusively fucking high-end escorts, you're a loser if you have to pay for sex.