全 185 件のコメント

[–]MrRowe 158 ポイント159 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Sounds awesome can't wait to play it

*See's Sergeant Sally and Eadric.

On second thought Dragon Priest seems pretty fun.

[–]Infernals112 98 ポイント99 ポイント  (20子コメント)

And I thought this was a shitpost.

[–]PureImbalance 64 ポイント65 ポイント  (16子コメント)

might be, he didn't include his rank :P

[–]snuffrix 70 ポイント71 ポイント  (13子コメント)

Watch out, you should see his comments about his rank in the Competitive Subreddit post. This guy thinks he's god's gift to Hearthstone.

[–]000-00-0 54 ポイント55 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Their reply about having played TCGs at a high level for the last 10 years almost reads like the navy seal copypasta

[–]JohtoKan 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (9子コメント)

[–]Deneb_Stargazer 33 ポイント34 ポイント  (6子コメント)

And for the really, really lazy:

"Casual.

So I was top 5 worldwide in a digital tcg by age 17, that would be 10 years ago. I have hit legend consistently since GvG, with my first build getting me there being one that I called "The fractal mage" which was centered around hobgoblin + violet teacher + echo + knife juggler + sorcerer's apprentice + mirror images + ice lances. When I playtested this paladin deck initially in its first days, I was playing against meta-competent players that are already legend, because those are my friends in-game. I have already played this game against people who have been in the structured meta, I HAVE BEEN IN THE META this whole expansion, and I have played literally dozens of paladin lists. Obsession a little, please don't call me casual because I have a profession."

[–]lolmoo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Lol, it even got removed. Guess it isn't that good after all!

[–]Somebodys 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I kept waiting for that. While rank doesn't mean much when it comes to deck building, it definitly helps give you credibility. The deck looks like it has some powerful stuff going on and I would give it a try if I hadn't dusted Sally and the Pally Legend.

[–]Somebodys 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I still think it's a shitpost.

[–]Matazaonreddit 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's just unironic. He really believes what he writes.

[–]myrec1 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

These kind of people are the worst. They will ruin this world. They think how great, right, awesome etc. are they, but they do not realize they are NOT.

[–]Caulaincourt 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Plays great around Cat Trick!

[–]Arensen 111 ポイント112 ポイント  (29子コメント)

I'm not sure whether this is a really weird deck or a really elaborate shitpost, but I like it either way.

[–]000-00-0 75 ポイント76 ポイント  (7子コメント)

OP cross posted to competitivehs where they said they've reached rank 9 with the deck (but it definitely must be an amazing deck that's blown the meta wide open because they've been playing TCGs for the last 10 years and know their shit)

So yeah, elaborate shitpoat

[–]Somebodys 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Meh. He could be a rank 15 player and found a great deck and made it to 9.

[–]otaia 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I experimented with murloc aggro Paladin this season and piloted it to rank 5. Terrible matchups against a lot of meta decks and generally bad at coming back from behind. I'd expect similar results for this deck. At low ranks, people often run replacements for cards they don't have, and they make too many mistakes piloting the decks, so it's really easy to climb.

Also, it's funny that OP isn't seeing much Pirate Warrior, Rogue, or Mid-Jade Shaman, and instead talks about a completely different meta than actually exists at higher ranks.

[–]Somebodys 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

All true. I played a few games With Kibler hand buff and didn't really like it. Looking at this dudes deck on paper I can see what he's going for and would be willing to try it out if I didn't have to craft legendaries I've already dusted.

[–]LordShado 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

To be fair, the dragon package does have a pretty big advantage over dragon priest, as dragonfire potion is useless against half your board. Agree mostly with what you've said though.

[–]ightbe_crookshanks 50 ポイント51 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Not responding to anyone asking for rank or stats, safe to call this one a really high effort shitpost

[–]SphereIX 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (8子コメント)

It's a shitpost. The deck is bad.

[–]Tickal 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow! Who knew hearthstone could be so deep!

[–]DomesticViolence 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Deck looks like shit, any proof of success?

[–]TenlettersHS 66 ポイント67 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Nice meme deck and writeup, I'm definitely gonna try this list out.

However, you did not include the two pieces of information that every deck guide should have in order to be taken seriously... Aka Winrate and rank achieved.

[–]JohtoKan 39 ポイント40 ポイント  (4子コメント)

He said in the /r/competitivehs thread that he's currently rank 9 with it.

Not so sure about evidence of "cracking the meta".

[–]TheDarqueSide 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Apparently they don't track their wins or anything... I just... I don't get how you could try to do something like this and not track your wins? Like if you want to show people this deck cracks the meta, you're gonna, y'know, need stats.

[–]Daniel_Is_I 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because it's a shitpost.

[–]Somebodys 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Serious question. Is there an app on Droid for this? I have one on my PC but am going to be forced to be a mobile only player soon.

[–]ceelar 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Man, shoutout to /r/competitivehs for the constructive criticism they are giving OP.

[–]Darghy 50 ポイント51 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Could you provide any proof to what rank you have reached with this deck or your win-loss ratio over a large sample size? You have put a ton of work into this, but if the sample size is around 15 games between ranks 10-15 (which is likely since you claim every matchup to be a good one) then it is not a "meta breaking" new tier 1 deck.

[–]Somebodys -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Rank and deck building are not always mutually inclusive. The deck he posted does and some powerful stuff going on that I, at least, haven't seen tried before. I would give it a spin if I hadn't dusted multiple Sally's and Pally dude.

No I don't believe his at match up claims.

[–]hororo 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (2子コメント)

People wanna believe Paladin has a secret good deck so bad that they upvoted this rank 9 deck to the front page.

[–]The_Stank_of_Dank 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (3子コメント)

It seems like a nice deck, too bad i dont know how good it is...

[–]76gv 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Holy hell, "this deck is art"? I might've liked this post if you weren't so full of yourself. The level of self-delusion almost reads like copypasta.

[–]HSFireflyer 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Deck is interesting but without any sort of proof of success it's hard to take it seriously no matter how much heart you put into it. What rank were you playing around?

[–]OGVanni[S] -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (6子コメント)

I just did my first legend climb this week and made it to 9. I am a regular dude that posted this for people to read, it went to r/hs and now people want me to get screenshots and play hearthstone not realizing that I literally am behind like 30 messages to reply to so I only reply to the newest one and I really should be in bed by now but i am replying to reddit

[–]HSFireflyer 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Fair enough but if you're a regular dude you shouldn't be advertising that you want to write professionally and also make the claim that you "broke the meta" when at Rank 9 you're quite far from the meta that actually matters, Legend meta. All I'm saying is that you only have yourself to blame for your inbox being spammed and the negative replies in this thread.

[–]MFranco3 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Low rank must be fun... because i don't see a guide to pirate warrior, water decks or dragon priest... so no tier 1 deck in your list (and you cracked the meta?... nerfs defeated aggro shaman by the way and jade shaman isn't close to be a big problem).

Also no proofs and alot of people can't test it because they don't have eadric or sally...

[–]tacocatz92 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

since op didn't encounter any pirate warrior what if someone here that have a pirate warrior deck test it out with him in casual play? but op have to use original list though , but i'm guessing op gonna be busy/don't have time etc. :P

[–]Freedom420911 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Been trying this out in casual.

Not seen a single matchup mentioned. All Zoo, Pirate Warrior and Tempo mage. Not too great against them... Too slow and no comeback mechanics.

Might take it into ranked and see if I come up against any of the mentioned matchups

[–]OGVanni[S] -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Zoo! Ok so zoo, zoo we don't like. We like reno, we don't like zoo. Any time you play ANY class that's fielding multiple minions, the rule is that discover is hope. Every time you say no comeback mechanics, instead think hmm, should I have leaned on my discovers ahead of time, should I have saved them for brann, etc. Zoo is still rough because zoo is a heavy tempo build, and it's real easy for them to stick 4 damage over 2 minions while still clearing your board.

Pirate warrior, that's all the opener. I have never been at turn 6 against a moderate pirate warrior opening and thought "hmm this is pretty tough to call, I wonder if he is still in this game." The only time that happens is when you had great taunts and a good ivory knight against a great pirate opener.

Tempo mage is funny, you went to casual for sure. Tempo mage is just a fast and consistent way to win, they aren't all that common...you're playing casual so you're playing all the decks that people use to get fast wins. Of course you're not getting the common matches lol :)

[–]Freedom420911 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Oh yeah definitely. Don't want to play a deck for the first time on ladder though. Just took it onto ranked and trashed a Jade Druid. Will play around with it a lot more. Definitely takes getting used to how it plays and what to mully etc.

Thanks for the post

[–]Somebodys 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Don't want to play a deck for the first time on ladder though.

Why not?

[–]Freedom420911 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Unless it is complete curvestone you can end up making big misplays etc and dropping rank. The new floors take a lot of this stress away but I was fairly close to breaking through another floor.

Since MSOG casual has been pretty shitty though. It used to just be people trying out meme decks and now 4/5 games I play are just pirate warrior with nothing changed...

[–]Somebodys 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Meh, it's just ladder. Unless you are pushing top 100 ladder your rank doesn't mean anything.

[–]TP-3 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (13子コメント)

Congrats on rank 1 legend, taking an entire expansion to build and refine a deck to finally crack the meta must feel pretty great!

[–]ramoniazzz 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow you've really put a lot of work into this. If only I had Eadric and Wickerflame, I'd totally play this!

[–]Davismism 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This whole journey is the weirdest shit out.

[–]shadyape4 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Why did this get popular lol

[–]Matazaonreddit [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

r/hearthstone has no standards. And there is hope. It's paladins version of Barack Obama "Yes, Uther can!"

[–]OGVanni[S] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

its because of the rhyme scheme in the title

[–]ksr_is_back 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

the rank 15 meta breaker

[–]turkizhere 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Are you being serious? First of all, 7 of those cards going to disappear into Wild. Second of all, those cards that disappears are the main tech cards, especially Eadric. Thus, you haven't really cracked the meta, especially since this deck will be obsolete in a couple of weeks.

Also, what you wrote at the end just shows that the entire post is a shitpost.

[–]Tarantio 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Are you being serious? First of all, 7 of those cards going to disappear into Wild.

The Wild meta isn't much different from the standard meta at the moment, so if the deck is good in standard now, it's not too much of a stretch to think it could be the base for a good deck in wild moving forward.

Certainly worth testing, anyway.

[–]youmustchooseaname [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Wait, why do you think it matters that cards are going away for a deck to break the meta or not? You do realize that in 3 weeks an entire expansion will break the meta, right? Breaking the meta doesn't mean you made a deck that has staying power for months on end.

[–]Stuie721 -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

If you think it's a shit post, why do you seem so annoyed?

[–]turkizhere 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Because when I read the post, I thought it was a serious effort from someone who wanted to share a deck that could work against the meta. But at the end when he began demanding payment for business inquiries and such, and when there was an emphasis on soon to be rotated out cards, made me realize that the real problem with the meta are the jades.

Renodecks will disappear from the meta, and cards that enhances the kazakus effects (Brann) are going to disappear as well. In other words, Jades are the real problem with the meta and the deck OP made is completely useless as it will not change the meta.

Hence, OP is just wasting our time with these imgur images of golden cards and sample texts.

[–]snaiii 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Any replacement for eadric?

[–]kliu0105 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ue Brann+Informant+Brewmaster to discover 8x Humility

[–]OGVanni[S] -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

have you ever played against a jade druid snaiii

[–]Selite 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

No Lorewalker Cho?

[–]OGVanni[S] -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

if only, if only, the woodpecker cries

[–]bonkiii [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

You need to get this on the CompetitiveHSCJ subreddit in case you haven't already, it took me reading just about 40% of this guide (which is fairly much) to figure out that this is a shitpost

[–]Budfox_92 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Take my up vote no doubt I will be queuing into this deck

[–]MagentaSnow 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Are you 12 years old? Judging from the edit and your childish attitude towards commenters, you must be.

[–]DXGypsy [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

I love reddit. Commenters say asshole attitudy things to OPs and then get offended when OPs snark back. I don't blame the guy. He worked hard on this and wrote out an incredibly detailed outline on how to build and work it, and then the usual crew of nay sayers and piss moaners want to shit on it, hat out of hand. You want civil discourse? Do your part.

[–]JohtoKan [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Check out this reply on /r/competitivehs. At what point did the commenter there deserve the reply he got from OP? He was reasoned with very calmly and yet still replied with cocky nonsense.

Edit: comment was removed, here's what it said:

"Casual.

So I was top 5 worldwide in a digital tcg by age 17, that would be 10 years ago. I have hit legend consistently since GvG, with my first build getting me there being one that I called "The fractal mage" which was centered around hobgoblin + violet teacher + echo + knife juggler + sorcerer's apprentice + mirror images + ice lances. When I playtested this paladin deck initially in its first days, I was playing against meta-competent players that are already legend, because those are my friends in-game. I have already played this game against people who have been in the structured meta, I HAVE BEEN IN THE META this whole expansion, and I have played literally dozens of paladin lists. Obsession a little, please don't call me casual because I have a profession."

[–]MagentaSnow [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If he provides no data or ranks, only is rank 9 (claims to be such a genius with no proof), he should expect this kind of reaction. It's completely justified.

[–]TheDarqueSide 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

So... Where's the evidence? Because a lot of people have asked and nobody has received a proper answer.

[–]forgotpassword2-_- 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

how does it do vs pirate warrior?

[–]kliu0105 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

From the comphs thread:

dude you'd be amazed, pirate warrior loses if they don't trade lol. The appropriate early game play for them is to trade because of argus and brewmasters (brewmaster = extra discover, can dig for consecrate and other forms of protection). You get to sacrifice important cards to aggro because you don't need to brann your discovers so long as you live through the worst of it (4/3 axe will ruin your day, wickerflame and sally will ruin his.)

So basically if the warrior plays poorly the deck works, which means the deck doesn't work.

[–]youmustchooseaname [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Well if the pirate warrior is still at rank 9 they probably play pretty poorly.

[–]menlyn [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I played this deck a bit today at dumpster legend.

15 games, 9 wins. Pretty fun. However, as per the OP assertion that it shits on legend, I disagree, pirate warrior is practically an auto loss.

[–]OGVanni[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

So you're saying it's day one and you have a 60% winrate at legend on your first day with no experience or advanced thought about the build?

[–]__TheDude__ [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Have you tried out Blubber Baron with this deck? I didn't have Sergeant Sally so I slotted one in and it's been great. I wish I had two.

[–]OGVanni[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Hmm, Baron seems like a good idea yeah :) The problem with taking sally out for that is that sally saves our lives if we ask nicely

[–]__TheDude__ [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I would recommend trying it instead of the Grimestreet Enforcer. I am 4-2 with the deck, and it has had a huge impact twice already. Both times I kept it in my opening hand, and both times it was 10/10+ for 3 mana played before turn 10. A very small sample but still impressive.

Fun deck, thanks!

[–]Hahnsolo11 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

ITT: OP is making a ton of stuff up and is getting some well deserved hate for it

[–]Suired [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

just want to say congratulations for proving the magic theory once again: any card can be a time walk under the right conditions.

[–]tacocatz92 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

since op didn't encounter any pirate warrior what if someone here that have a pirate warrior deck test it out with him in casual play? but op have to use original list though , but i'm guessing op gonna be busy/don't have time etc. :P

[–]think_once_more 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I've been playing a lot of handbuff and a few differences/important tidbits that I noticed intrigued me:

A) using brewmaster on potentially buffed minions: you trade the buff for the battle cry, and that's smart in most cases. Especially when you get another body in return.

B) no dopplegangster. It's a dead card until most of the buffs are on it, making it a dead card until late game most of the time. Great write up on it.

C) no taunts, only because argus is so strong. Do you ever feel mana starved with using argus? Wickerflame is a great card tho.

D) lack of board clears are possibly made up by large taunts, sally and eadric. No equality = no problem?

I really like the deck. I will make the same and try it out. I cannot craft sally or wickerflame, but everything else is fair game.

[–]OGVanni[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (4子コメント)

You have taunts! Ok, let me just run this down real quick.

First of all, netherspite historians and informants can both lead to taunts. They also lead to removal spells, which is better than a taunt sometimes. On average, this means you don't really need too many taunts. Wickerflame helps so much though, would hate to run this deck without him. I've played him as a 3 mana 6/6 divine shield taunt + heal 12 so many times that I cannot physically imagine an alternative.

Dopplegangster, yes. Dead card as in you're dead for having him, it's the double edge of him being so OP.

Board clears, there is no room. Removal, there is no room. We have to discover. We do not need board clears with eadric and aldor and keepers of ulda, the goal of this deck is to ignore whenever possible instead of directly dealing with things

[–]think_once_more 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I ran a couple games. Unfortunately I don't have the dust for wickerflame and sally, I had to make due. Instead I put in a rag lightlord to try to replace healing, and a consecration. As you can imagine, significant downgrades overall.

That being said I went 9-2 at rank 9. You're correct about the removal. I also found myself bouncing arguses back quite a bit. This deck runs so many mid game threats, with mana manipulation to boot. It almost feels like facing a jade deck, when I'm tossing out 5 mana 7/7s and discover cards. Most decks cannot deal with that.

[–]OGVanni[S] [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Dude honestly, I thought about it and the spot-on closest 3-drop replacement I could find for Wickerflame was...Disciple of C'thun. I know, I know. But nothing else can clear 2 damage that easily on turn 3 while still leaving a body. Even rogue has to burn a backstab on wickerflame, he is almost always card advantage.

Consecrate is ok for sally yeah. If you find you're just losing trades, I suppose earthen ring farseer could work for that 3 damage snuck in there somewhere, but still would always rather have wickerflame. He is underrated because paladin is bad right now, he is everything annoy-o-tron wishes he was

[–]kliu0105 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Argent Horserider leaves a body.

[–]OGVanni[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

ah yeah that's right, way better choice! don't know how that one slipped my mind, doesn't go through taunt but still way better. I might even try using one of those just to see how much I can get away with...really like having that wickerflame heal though when he's a 6/6, but that also implies it'd be a 6/1 charge...hmm.

[–]Team KabalAaroSa 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Seems like a fun deck, I'd try it if I just had Sally, Eadric and Burnbristle, and all of those seem pretty vital to the deck. This is a very well written guide though!

[–]hexotopaedia 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Too bad Rogue and Warrior own a big chunk of the meta now, it would have been great back in Shamanstone, if it actually works/worked up ladder (no proof posted).

[–]drekonil 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Smuggler's Run is easily one of the most underrated cards of this expansion.

Hahahah, very funny.

[–]athoshs 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

CRACKED THE META GUYS, I ACHIEVED RANK 9 LUL

[–]_MotherGoose_ 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Best shitpost ever, thank you.

[–]BattlefieldNinja [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The best shitposts are when the poster doesn't know it's a shitpost.

[–]Caulaincourt 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

On a more serious note, do you think this deck can work without Sally and Eadric and if so, what would you recommend as replacements?

[–]ViriumSC2 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

"Do you think this deck can work without Sally or Eadric"

Boy do I have news for you...

[–]Caulaincourt 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I realize the answer is probably no, but it's a reasonable question. Those are cards that didn't really see play before, so not many people have then and with an expansion coming, almost no one is going to craft. Obviously, the deck is always going to be weaker when you have to look for suboptimal replacements, but the question is how much. Whether it just pushes the deck down the tier, or makes it downright unplayable.

[–]tipo19 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

The thing is, even without Sally and Eadric (wich IMO don't add much to this deck) the deck is still VERY subpar. It's not those two cards that dictate if it is playable or not.

[–]Caulaincourt [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah, I tried it for a bit and have to agree with you.

[–]Fixthemix 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I've been screwing around alot with the handbuff paladin as well, and this deck looks solid. Might have to craft an Eadric and Sally to test this out.

[–]Budfox_92 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Eadric rotates out in April so be very careful with that

[–]The_Big_Daddy [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

This was a really good, in depth discussion on the deck you made. My only question is, what makes this deck any better than Jade Druid? Druid does what this deck aims to do (keep putting out bigger and bigger beatsticks until your opponent runs out of answers), but Jade Druid does it a lot better since they have amazing class tools as well as literally infinite beaters with Jade Idol.

I just feel like this is one of those decks where the main draw is that "It's a [insert underrepresented class] deck that's playable". That's not a bad thing, and it's a great concept and all that, I just don't see how it's better on a competitive level than other midrange decks like Jade Druid and to a lesser extent Dragon Priest. Maybe you could provide some insight?

[–]OGVanni[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Jade druid gets deeply mentally disturbed every time you use a 5/9 Eadric. It's pretty bad. The thing about druid is that it needs its board space in the midrange, if you start setting things down to 1 attack, you may as well have destroyed it. That's pretty intense on a 3 mana 5/5. Druid also needs that damage on the board to NOT use spells, so you also cost them another spell if they want to live. They have to deal with a 5/5 minion for 3 mana now, and that's why druid falls apart in the midrange vs this build. Keeper of Uldaman is also there.

Jade druid doesn't literally have infinite beaters, they still have to draw and field them. They are not this invincible powerhouse in the midrange, they are highly adept at the late game and have a steady means of getting there. This paladin is instead very flexible in early/mid/late play. The only games you outright lose in the beginning are good or better aggro hands, so you have time to play towards turn 3 or 4. Through the lens of imaginary mana, that first 3 mana does not matter if there is no threat to the hero health, so again, only aggro matters. Everything here can at least trade with patches and pegleg on turn 2 now, so they squeeze in extra damage.

As for dragon priest, people don't realize this deck just eats priest outright. Priest has to get a lot of card draws, stick a lot of damage and then persist to hit you in the face for several turns without you fielding taunts or atk reductions. The longer you go, the more each card in your hand starts to massively outvalue the priests, so you just start throwing stuff down to bait the removal and field 3 significant waves. The priest cannot live through 5~9 minions that are all 5/5 if they're slightly behind on tempo. So that's the strategy, it's fairly easy to do and you can get it started from 4 cards in hand if 2 of them are respectable discovers.

[–]Joggebro [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Looks cool. Don't know why it would work better than all the other paladin shit i tried. But worth a try :)

[–]klonk2905 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Genuinely tested it the last 2 hours.

That "perfect curve" happened once on ten games.

9 loss, 1 win

Well, it's pretty bad and even the small size of my 10 games "sample" is drowned by that loss rate.

And yes, I read the "so called insight guides and images within"

[–]OGVanni[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hmm, strange, what rank? Have several people reporting much better win rates at legend. What is your experience with paladin, what were you playing towards, what did you lose to, etc. Nobody else has said a rate anywhere near that low, at 10% win rate dude it's safe to say its just you or a streak.

[–]tornadofay 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

looks fun to play and i love playing pally, too bad i don't have the legendary minions. RIP f2p 2017.

[–]OnionButter 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Extremely well done guide. Kudos.

I think there is a pretty big hurdle for many to try this list as it includes some fringe legendaries that not many players would have crafted.

Wickerflame - Strong card, but paladin has been bad so tough to justify a craft.

Eadric - Rotating in a month, never really been in meta.

Sergeant Sally - Niche card

I'm missing Wickerflame and Eadric. I've wanted Wickerflame and would probably do it if it was just him, but not going to craft Eadric at this point.

[–]OGVanni[S] -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

dude yeah I know, I don't have anymore f*cking dust except for this stupid golden rag I made that I can't DE

[–]papesz7 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I don't know why everyone keeps attacking this post, nice deck, will try it with a little change (sadly)i liked it :)

[–]ExamplePrime -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Don't like this deck must be a shitpost"

"Don't like this specific card must be a shitpost"

"Don't think he is high enough for me so its a shitpost"

This subreddit is why I just read the posts and never check the comments. Very cool deck that seems to good developments and insights into making Hand Paladin work. This Kraken deck seems like it could be changed a little bit and still function very well.

Glad to see people still trying new shit.

[–]tors17 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

RELEASE THE KRAKEN!!!