use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
1,942 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Click here to read the rules of the subreddit.
Any and all low effort and off-topic content is subject to removal by a moderator if necessary. We're taking off-topic content very seriously.
Just keep it as on topic as you can. We are here to discuss JonTron and JonTron related content. Let's stick to that notion.
Related Subreddits/Friends:
Official Discord logo shown above created by /u/segatasam.
JonTron Minecraft Server
Comprehensive list of JonTron subreddits
Lost Jontron episodes, streams, and panels.
Click here to see who has Gold Flair and why!
JonTron: My Statement (youtube.com)
SegataSam が 1時間前 投稿 - announcement
[–]Dudeofallteenages[M] [スコア非表示] 28分前* stickied comment (0子コメント)
So as it turns out, we still had a few approved submitters that were able to post despite the lockdown. Oops. So, since OP did get here first, this post is now an announcement. Commenters, you'll be expected to act in a civil manner, any rule-breaking will be investigated.
[–]SegataSam[S] 59 ポイント60 ポイント61 ポイント 1時間前 (8子コメント)
i don't know how i'm able to post things despite the lockdown but he made a video so you're welcome x
[–]Miscellaneous777 50 ポイント51 ポイント52 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
I'm glad he decided to talk about this, and this video feels a lot more well-thought out than the Destiny debate.
I'm also glad he said that he's taking a step back from all this and getting back to Comedy, which means we can get back to Shitposting! :)
[–]totallynotazognoid84 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント 54分前 (0子コメント)
PRAISE BE THE SHITPOSTS
[–]SpahgattaNadle 196 ポイント197 ポイント198 ポイント 1時間前 (52子コメント)
Sure, but at the same time it's difficult to take Jon at face value when he says to 'not read into' the stuff that he said. It seems inadequate to me to make some pretty out there and racist statements and then say 'don't read into it' or 'don't dissect it'.
[–]RequiemEternal 94 ポイント95 ポイント96 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
Yeah, while I appreciate his attempt to lay things out clearly and calmly like this, it didn't sound entirely convincing. It sounded more like he was saying "I'm sorry you misconstrued me" rather than actually apologising for the things he said.
I understand debating puts you on the spot, but Jon had so many chances to correct himself and he didn't. He didn't even do much of that here. These just sound like slightly less extreme variations on his original points.
I'm not trying to cause more drama here, but I just hope people don't forget this easily. It's not the kind of thing that should be swept under the rug with a a simple four minute video.
[–]h5h77 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 17分前 (0子コメント)
also that point he made about people seeing themselves as americans is what destiny was saying to him, and he was having none of it at the time. Honestly it just seems like damage control "i did nothing wrong, you just misunderstood me", but like, jon, you're the one who brought up gene pools and shit
[–]453265436354654 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント 35分前 (6子コメント)
He's a racist.
[–]MikoSqz 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント 24分前 (0子コメント)
That said, despite the racist views I don't think he's evil per se.
He's just ignorant, a little simpleminded, and in general just a huge, huge titty.
[–]SalokinSekwah 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Overall, stick to making funny videos.
Jumping from left to right to left to right while throwing out political "opinions" is not Jon's thang
[–]BlueThunderBomb 68 ポイント69 ポイント70 ポイント 1時間前 (15子コメント)
I'm glad Jon decided to do a proper statement, the flustering on the stream didn't help, and i'm glad this is going to be "the end" of politic shit from Jon.
[–]lackingsaint 104 ポイント105 ポイント106 ポイント 52分前* (4子コメント)
Uh... are people really listening to this or just kind of hearing his tone of voice and assuming he's cleared things up? He dipped his toes into actual apologising for his volatile arguments and misguided "facts", and then immediately started defending himself by saying "I just think white people should be able to protect the interests of their race". That ENTIRE debate was asking what he actually means by "protecting the interests of the white race", and his complete inability to explain that without coming off as a massive racist was the problem. Now he's coming in and saying "People are upset by facts and statistics" without actually acknowledging when he used debunked "rich blacks commit more crime than poor whites" statistics to try to argue this was something inherent to black people? So basically he "apologizes" but also stands by everything that everyone criticized him for, so nothing was actually cleared up but Gaming Reviews Incoming!
As an aside, perplexed by his citing of that Mic video at 2:51 as some kind of anti-white "garbage". That video is expressly about highlighting how all of us, regardless of race, suffer from racial bias. You'd think he'd watch the video before using it as an example.
[–]Stanley_the_Goose 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 13分前 (0子コメント)
you'd think he'd watch the video before using it as an example
Yeah well he's already proven to not exactly be the best when it comes to research
[–]commanderlooney 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 9分前 (0子コメント)
My sincere hope was that he would make an "Oh God, am I an asshole?" video where he looked at what he said with some friends around him who jokingly point out his faults.
Instead we get a non-apologetic, "Mistakes were made" talk, followed by weak justifications of him being misunderstood.
[–]kitthehacker 260 ポイント261 ポイント262 ポイント 1時間前 (18子コメント)
This is kinda bullshit.
Nowhere does he admit to any kind of fault despite claiming things that are demonstrably incorrect. He even completely contradicted several things he originally said without ever mentioning that he got it wrong the first time round.
Plus, he may have been flustered in the moment and a poor debater but the issue was never the specifics of what he said or how it can be construed. The issue is the fundamental ideology behind those things he said. Even if people are taking the things he said further or more literally or worse than what he actually believes, it doesn't matter because even the most mild version of what he was saying is still really fuckin' racist.
Ironic that he says he hopes people keep learning when he's clearly learned nothing from the conversation that's arisen as a result of all this.
[–]fullforce098 59 ポイント60 ポイント61 ポイント 40分前* (7子コメント)
I'm afraid he'll only gonna get worse. A lot of fans that disliked what he said during his debate have jumped ship while a ton of alt-righters have rushed to support him (I'm sure t_D will be here any moment). Those Youtube comments are gonna be filled with people defending him, he's gonna get a shit ton of tweets from supporters, and he'll fall even deeper into this bubble where he doesn't have to question himself or answer to facts. Hell, even this sub has been scrubbed clean of any post critical of his politics while confining it all to megathreads that can be ignored (not that I'm being critical of the mods, I understand why they did it). He will avoid the negativity and wrap himself in the support like a safety blanket.
Not only that, but he just brought this to his YouTube channel. He's popped his political video cherry. If this video gets any sort of traction, he may make more. Especially if he's hearing nothing but support because he's brushing off the criticism. He doesn't have to hide anymore, either, the damage is done. He can be more open now if he wants too and attract even more supporters.
[–]getintheVandell 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 26分前 (1子コメント)
Destiny will always be here. ;)
[–]ralpher313 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 16分前 (1子コメント)
I'm pretty sure that's why he made it unlisted. Also, he specifically said he's not gonna talk politics.
[–]biggal6 27 ポイント28 ポイント29 ポイント 53分前 (2子コメント)
You hit it on the head.
It really seems like when he made a few too many edgy jokes, and was not prepared to deal with the back lash, and then followed the people supporting him the loudest.
Post Game Grumps the landscape of YouTube changed. More are watching in general which makes people like Jon known even if they aren't being watched. For example, I know exactly who iJustine is, but I haven't watch a video of hers in about 6 years. I know Vsause, Smarter Every Day, Kinda Funny, but I don't really watch them. So people across all walks of like know who Jon is. So his edgy harmless jokes get over analyzed because he makes most of them on Twitter and Twitter is a horrible place to make those kinds of jokes. Just look at what happened to Colin Moriarty. The joke harmless in the right context, but on Twitter it makes him seem like an Ass hat.
So when he started getting more flack from "SJWs" he revived support from people who have outrageous views. He started listening to them and believing in it. He just absorbed and then spit out talking points about race and violence that has no real base in facts. He then became more and more defensive because he had to be as a comedian in this climate and because people with far-right views often are more defensive. He just couldn't admit he was wrong, so he had to just start making up things about how rich black people commit more crimes than poor whites. At this point we see what he's really become. Someone who assumes the worst in the people he is not, which is the real problem here. He sees Mexicans, African-Americans, and Muslims as more dangerous. Point blank. No way around that. That is where the problem is.
My 2 cents on the origin, but I don't know him so what do I know?
[–]Luigidagawd 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 4分前 (0子コメント)
Damn I hate arm chair psychologist on Reddit. He's probably not being pressured into anything he's just tired of this culture of getting rational people to shut up. Any rational person can look at statistics and make up their own minds. The facts are all there, but western culture is to just ignore them. People would rather have their children raped them be called a racist. It's honesty sickening.
[–]thebross9 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 26分前 (0子コメント)
Sounds like that's how the alt right started
[–]bass- 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Yep.
[–]notHiro 49 ポイント50 ポイント51 ポイント 1時間前* (6子コメント)
I wish he would have clarified some things. If you want to avoid answering why you think young black males in America have high crime statistics because you're afraid of sounding racist, that's a problem. If you truly think there's currently no discrimination in America, that's not because you came in unprepared for a debate. You can't just give a blanket statement about how you were misrepresented when you mention people assimilating into the gene pool.
I know a lot of people are going to take this as an apology and move on, but it seems to me he doesn't really think any differently. Slamming the Irish thing in the video seems like he did it just say, "see, I don't believe that stuff!" when it's clear via his twitter and the debate he has a really warped perception of some things.
[–]PotluckPony 61 ポイント62 ポイント63 ポイント 1時間前* (50子コメント)
See, if this Jon who seems well rested, collected and prepared had been at the debate, there would likely have been almost no controversy or outrage.
Edit: Point is, I don't think a lot of the disgusting things he said came from a place of hatred, as much as ignorance. Both hatred and ignorance can be changed. To me the fact Jon corrects many ignorant statements he had made in the debate with this video shows progress in that regard. I think a more prepared Jon would have been a less ignorant Jon.
[–]Toastrz 36 ポイント37 ポイント38 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
I wouldn't quite say that. In this video, he likely scripted or at least generally planned what he was going to say and how he would say it. Lengthy improv situations like debates just aren't his strong suit, so I still think he would have presented himself poorly.
[–]PotluckPony 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 12分前 (0子コメント)
Lengthy improv situations like debates just aren't his strong suit, so I still think he would have presented himself poorly.
You're probably right, and writing a script probably involves fact-checking himself as well, which he sorely needed in the debate. It's probably why he goes out of his way to correct some of the more ignorant things he said in the debate with this video.
[–]hselfe 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
Yeah I agree. And, this may sound mean, but that is on Jon. Jon should have prepared and I don't think you can really say otherwise. However, doesn't mean people get to take him out of context and call him a nazi.
[–]Magikarp_13 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 48分前 (0子コメント)
Eh, I think it depends on how serious a debate you're expecting. If he was expecting a more casual conversation, it's not surprising. I know I certainly don't particularly like it when people start citing sources in a casual debate, since it makes it require so much more effort.
[–]jesuz 119 ポイント120 ポイント121 ポイント 1時間前 (16子コメント)
Really? Like his racist opinions would go over if he said them calmly?
[–]Stevenjgamble 122 ポイント123 ポイント124 ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)
"yeah man, ive been working out, playing some zelda, rich blacks commit more crime than poor whites, and jaques is nice and healthy"
[–]lobsterwithcrabs 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 21分前 (1子コメント)
He grabbed that stat from this WaPo article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/23/poor-white-kids-are-less-likely-to-go-to-prison-than-rich-black-kids/?utm_term=.b66f43bd5776
I mean you can talk about why its true that rich blacks are more likely to go prison than poor whites or how to fix the problem, but screaming racist when someone mention the statistic gets us nowhere.
[–]PotluckPony 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
I don't agree with what Jon said in the debate, I've made that clear in the other threads. From this video it sounds like upon review, that Jon himself doesn't necessarily agree with himself either. He practically argues against statements he made in the debate in this video. The very fact that he's not doubling down and instead has the sense to reflect on the entire fiasco and admit he was wrong on various topics, is a good sign.
[–]evokalvalates 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 1時間前 (7子コメント)
My favorite part is when he cites "black people overwhelming voting for Obama" and neglects to mention how Obama got the majority of the white vote too. Funny how his eyes glazed at that moment in the voter chart he shows. Almost as if he really was digging to further his contrived narrative and justify subtle racism.
[–]DudeWithThePC 57 ポイント58 ポイント59 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
Were you not listening to what he said? He said "it'd be like if she said this" not that he actually believed that.
[–]evokalvalates -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 32分前 (0子コメント)
Then why neglect the statistics at all ;)
Do note, Trump didn't get majorities in voting groups besides his own racial demographic. People who make the "blacks voted for Obama" argument are often incredibly ignorant or hiding something, seems like Jon is doing the latter when in the same video he's showing screenshots of dogshit tier Brietbart articles quoting Biden out of context.
[–]ricdesi 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 48分前 (2子コメント)
He was using it as a hypothetical, and immediately said it was a ridiculous and unfair point to make.
[–]thatdudeinthecottonr 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 28分前 (0子コメント)
You entirely missed the point of that comparison.
[–]bunker_man 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 38分前 (0子コメント)
Also, you know, it means a ton for poor black people that there be a black president. People seem to ignore that those aspects aren't just pandering. The narrative shit of validifying someone's existence by letting them know they can be in a role previously thought unthinkable is a big deal.
[–]bunker_man 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 39分前 (0子コメント)
To be fair, he might have said them in a more vague way.
[–]blastedin 38 ポイント39 ポイント40 ポイント 1時間前 (6子コメント)
No. He literally said that immigration = genocide, and a bunch of similarly inexcusable shit. There's no backtracking from that by saying "oh i've been tired and didn't articulate well"
[–]KitKatMasterJapan 30 ポイント31 ポイント32 ポイント 55分前* (5子コメント)
Exactly. When I'm tired / drunk, I might be like "You know what? Your haircut is ugly."
I wouldn't say "I think reverse racism is real and there's no discrimination in America"
[–]TheMightySloth 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 30分前 (2子コメント)
You don't become a white supremacist after midnight?
Weird.
[–]KitKatMasterJapan 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 28分前 (0子コメント)
Only on Tuesdaysjokes
[–]TheProudBrit 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 22分前 (0子コメント)
Nono, it's if you feed someone after midnight they turn into a white supremacist.
[–]AustinAuranymph 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 19分前 (0子コメント)
It's not reverse racism. It's racism. If you think racism against white people isn't real, you're insane.
[–]GRRM_Reaper 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 6分前 (0子コメント)
Of course there's no such thing as reverse racism. There's only racism. Anyone can be racist, regardless of their race.
[–]planetprison 45 ポイント46 ポイント47 ポイント 1時間前 (11子コメント)
This is a pre-written PR statement he made to dig himself out of a hole. What he said in it makes very little sense. He basically just denies he meant any of what he said, and now he's going to pull out of the debate for the sake of his career.
[–]PotluckPony 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 56分前 (3子コメント)
This is a pre-written PR statement he made to dig himself out of a hole.
Unless there's something going on behind the scenes regarding his sponsors, from a purely numbers standpoint, he didn't need to. And keep in mind, I found what he said in the debate to be deplorable, I was not among those defending his opinions. But this PR move is purely for his fans, specifically his fans that are outraged, disgusted, confused, or hurt. You may interpret the video as you will but I feel he knows he said some incredibly ignorant things in the debate. I feel that the fact he's putting out a follow up video where he's himself suggests it's possible to see what he said in the debate as "ethno-nationalist", and that he's correcting several ignorant statements says as much.
[–]MrKyurem 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント 1時間前 (6子コメント)
He basically just denies he meant any of what he said
He defends his main message pretty strongly in this video though...
[–]planetprison 42 ポイント43 ポイント44 ポイント 1時間前 (4子コメント)
He does both. He asks you to ignore things he said and also complains about anti-white racism.
[–]MrKyurem 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)
Considering he made a remark about people having to deal with statistics, I think he is still defending some of his more controversial statements (namely, the race-based crime). He is obviously trying to cool the situation down a bit - anybody sane would try and do that - but he's not completely backpedalling on what he has said.
[–]planetprison 24 ポイント25 ポイント26 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
He's flat out denying multiple things he said. He also complains about tribalism when he was the one that brought weird white supremacist views to the discussion.
[–]MrKyurem 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 53分前 (0子コメント)
I do think it's fair for them to backpedal on some of the things they've said - it's clear that they're much better rested and more level headed now, unlike during the twitter stream, which wouldn't've been when they were most prepared for a debate to put it one way. You do bring up a good point about the tribalism comment, though.
[–]bunker_man 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 37分前 (0子コメント)
Nobody said that it was a well written PR statement.
[–]TheSneakySeal 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
That's just a little naive
[+]oiimn スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント 1時間前 (8子コメント)
Its as if some people just want to see the world burn, or as some might say, just want to be outraged.
Some things that he said where not good, but the shitstorm that happened because of it was unbelievable
[–]HavocT 62 ポイント63 ポイント64 ポイント 1時間前 (5子コメント)
No, he said some seriously disgusting shit... the reaction was quite justified. That he wasn't "well rested" doesn't excuse that. I agree with /u/PotluckPony, but having seen him not "well rested" and not prepared makes me feel as if we have seen more of his real views than if he was..
[–]doggleswithgoggles 25 ポイント26 ポイント27 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
Yeah getting rest doesn't make you go from "if you think discrimination exists today in America you live in fantasy land my friend" to "I do believe discrimination exists but it goes all ways"
Getting called out does.
[–]ButtersTheNinja 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 45分前 (0子コメント)
I'm pretty he was referring to institutional racism initially, and the discrimination he later elaborated upon is interpersonal racism.
[–]Indiggy57 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 53分前 (1子コメント)
I don't know man, when ever I'm tired I suddenly find myself hating black people. When I'm well rested I'm as sensible and egalitarian as the next man but if I don't get my nein nine hours I start skewing crime statistics and spouting pseudoscience genetic theories. Good thing I'm not an insomniac or I might end up invading Poland.
[–]bunker_man -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 30分前 (0子コメント)
Speaking of not being well rested I'm so tired now that I'm at the state that it prevents me from sleeping. I really need to fix this.
[–]bunker_man 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 30分前 (0子コメント)
Yeah. Not being well rested doesn't make you randomly have totally different views. At worst, it might make you say them in a slightly more offensive tone.
[–]PotluckPony 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
Even Jon says in this update video that in the debate he was "all over the place" and said many things that could be misconstrued, so it's no surprise people were taking all kinds of different messages from what he had said in the debate.
[–]kaszzai 38 ポイント39 ポイント40 ポイント 49分前 (8子コメント)
It's not a matter of "expressing himself badly" or "being misinterpreted". It wasn't an isolated incident it was a whole debate in which he went on and on about things he obviously knows not enough about to speak of them. Also I don't know how you can misinterpete "If you dont think we've gotten rid of discrimination, you are living in a fantasy land". I'm glad he will shut up about politics though.
[–]AnvilofSpinning -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 44分前 (7子コメント)
Also I don't know how you can misinterpete "If you dont think we've gotten rid of discrimination, you are living in a fantasy land".
America abolished laws that would discriminate between races. This is what he was getting at. It's a simple fact.
You don't see white only parks, drinking fountains, pools whatever. The idea that the government is somehow racist is that of a fantasy land.
Of course he isn't denying that racist PEOPLE still exists. He was talking about legislation.
[–]Jbg35 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント 36分前 (6子コメント)
Voter registration laws in various states have been proven to be based on oppressing race.
Don't Ask Don't Tell through 'good intentions' oppressed LGBTQ people.
The travel (or muslim depending on what day you catch officials) ban.
Systemic discrimination doesn't have to be overt for it to happen or still exist.
[–]TheBankaiMaster 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
I feel like this video should've been longer and gone more into detail instead of sweeping the whole thing under a rug but w/e hope he learned from this
[–]NoPickles 65 ポイント66 ポイント67 ポイント 1時間前 (19子コメント)
If john want's people stop thinking in racial terms why is he parroting white nationalist speak?
If he isn't a white nationalist why did he say it makes sense for White people to want to stay a majority.
Jon Tron is a part of this regression on race.
If you watched the stream JonTron knew what he was saying and stopped himself from saying even more dumb shit.
also
If he wants to clarify what he said he should read aloud his own words and explain them.
[–]ButtersTheNinja 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント 32分前* (5子コメント)
So I want to preface this by saying, I'm not a white nationalist. I'm Latino, so it wouldn't even make any fucking sense for me to be white nationalist but, here we go.
Just because an idea belongs to a group that you disagree with, or find abhorrent doesn't make it wrong. Even people the most genuinely hateful, and disgusting people in the world will make good points on occasion. It's important to not look at ideas based on their origins, but based on their merit.
Also not every idea that Jon put out was intrinsically white nationalist. I'm not white nationalist, and there were some small facets of things than Jon said that I agreed with in amongst everything I disagreed with.
Whether or not you agree with the idea that white people should be the majority in America, the necessity of being white supremacist is a non-sequitur. You have have the belief that people should remain a majority in their own country without believing your race is superior to all others.
This doesn't actually refute his points. Regardless of whether or not you agree with him calling names, and throwing derogatory words at Jon does not refute his arguments. If you feel like the reason why he is wrong is obvious, then it should be no effort at all to refute the arguments, which can also have the benefit of actually convincing people to your side rather than making them feel alienated.
Prove that these aren't his words. If you can't do that, don't accuse him of using other people's words. It's a ridiculous argument, and even if they aren't his words, if he feels as though he is bad at articulating his thoughts through his own writing, so long as he agrees with what he's said now, why does it matter if he wasn't the writer?
Politicians have script-writers for them, because they may not be able to articulate their thoughts, and opinions well, and nobody really seems to complain there, so why is it wrong in this instance?
EDIT: This last point is a slight error on my behalf, while I still agree with my argument, and think it's a valid argument to what some people are saying, it was not what the original poster was saying I completely misread, and misinterpreted what was written, and apologise for doing so.
[–]Constipated_Llama 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 12分前* (1子コメント)
Prove that these aren't his words.
That's not what OP meant. They meant that to clarify, Jon should read aloud the things he said on stream and explain them.
At least, that's what I assume.
[–]ButtersTheNinja 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 11分前* (0子コメント)
I'll give you that this may actually be true, but I'm going to leave it in my post since I have seen other people making the wild accusation that Jon is just reading off other people's words in this video, and that claim is still baseless, and ludicrous.
EDIT: Upon rereading the original comment, I now agree that I misinterpreted it, I apoligise. I have mild dyslexia, and am extremely exhausted, and sleep deprived having just moved houses less than 24 hours ago.
[–]NoPickles 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 6分前 (0子コメント)
It's important to not look at ideas based on their origins, but based on their merit.
True.
But what Ideas did Jon say that had merit? I really don't know what idea that Jon said looked to solve a problem that can be studied or quantified to look if it has merit.
He talked about culture and what should be and what is okay. A lot of beliefs and world views that are more Sociology than Math.
A statistic isn't merit it isn't a idea it's just a number that can mean a lot of things. You can't give out merits for statistic.
If you agree with White nationalist a majority of the time on race and view on what USA should be, I would say you are a white nationalist. I don't know what else there is to say.
Whether or not you agree with the idea that white people should be the majority in America, the necessity of being white supremacist is a non-sequitur.
Well I didn't say he was a white supremacist. I said or infer he was a White Nationalist because as Wikipedia says.
White nationalists seek to ensure the survival of (what they see as) the white race, and the cultures of historically white states. They hold that white people should maintain their majority in majority-white countries, maintain their political and economic dominance, and that their cultures should be foremost.
This doesn't actually refute his points. Regardless of whether or not you agree with him calling names, and throwing derogatory words at Jon does not refute his arguments.
??????????
I wasn't trying to refute anything.
I was just saying Jon's vies on race were the regressive one.
I can explain why I think that but this isn't a politics sub and I believe should focus on what Jon has said.
Prove that these aren't his words. If you can't do that, don't accuse him of using other people's words.
I was saying he should read his own words that he said on stream.
That he said.
Can you clarify what you are saying?
[–]alexmikli 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 33分前 (1子コメント)
His point on immigration seemed more like that he understands why some white people think too many foreigners coming in is a bad thing, not that he personally thinks that.
[–]CobaltPhusion 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 4分前 (0子コメント)
On the basis of what is happening in Europe, I think he and anyone looking past the media hiding what is really going on, would understand the risks of letting in literally everybody who comes to your doorstep.
[–]bobcatastrophe 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 44分前 (7子コメント)
White people want to stay the majority because minorities face many additional problems and nobody wants to experience those problems.
[–]RZRtv 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 32分前 (4子コメント)
But why do minorities face those many additional problems? HMM 🤔🤔🤔
[–]bobcatastrophe 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 25分前 (2子コメント)
Because people are more likely to vote in their interests than minority interests.
[–]RZRtv 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 17分前 (1子コメント)
What are white interests that aren't minorities interests? Which of these things can be codified into law through the legal process of our government?
[–]bobcatastrophe -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 11分前 (0子コメント)
For example, gay marriage rights. The reason they weren't passed for so long is because they were a minority and couldn't secure enough votes to pass the law.
[–]usery -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 4分前 (0子コメント)
Why does the WNBA have fewer viewers than the NBA? Why are 90% of prisoners male. Not every disparity is the result of oppression, and many times its either natural or self inflicted.
This is the problem with the destinies of the world, they must deny cultural difference to push the cultural relativism which justifies their desire for mass immigration into western countries. If the west is nothing exceptional, nothing can be lost, but this simply isn't based on any historical reality. As explained by Naill Ferguson Civilization - Is The West History: Episode 01 Competition
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXoujgzuzBV68V2Jg-UbWgkhOrZaC4XBi
Beyond that, people like destiny are regressive hacks who undermine the very groups he would claim to stand up for. Regressive Prime destiny
Louis Le Vau
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utQxTNd6AUA
[–]magmadorf 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 15分前 (0子コメント)
I'm a minority and I don't face any problems... inb4 "YOU'RE JUST LUCKY!!!"
[–]ogskie_ 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 28分前 (0子コメント)
nah man, we got rid off discrimination. It's all good.
[–]TheyCallmeDoctor 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 31分前 (0子コメント)
It makes sense because no matter who is the majority, would obviously want to stay in that position
[–]sp0rttraxx -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 13分前 (0子コメント)
But let's say Jon is black, if he said that he wanted to promote and advancement of black culture and make blacks the prominent race In the country, that'd be fine?
[–]Arkonisas 92 ポイント93 ポイント94 ポイント 1時間前* (44子コメント)
I don't know, I have a hard time trusting him. I understand that under pressure you sometimes say things you come to regret, but he litteraly said there is no discrimination in america anymore. What else could he have possibly meant by that ?
I still think Destiny pushed him too far and he said what he actually thought deep down
[–]thosefuckersourshit 37 ポイント38 ポイント39 ポイント 1時間前 (29子コメント)
I think he meant "No systemic discrimination exists", which while not really true is a lot more easy to see why someone might think that.
[–]Yauld 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 1時間前* (24子コメント)
"No systemic discrimination exists"
I feel like that's obviously what he meant, but it makes it no less questionable, putting good faith in a power structure that's provably disciminatory.
Edit: some sources:
http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/black-americans-given-longer-sentences-than-white-americans-for-same-crimes?news=843984#.tzalfkfg6ey.facebook
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpp08.pdf
https://people.ucsc.edu/~rfairlie/papers/published/jole%202002%20-%20drug%20dealing%20and%20se.pdf
http://ago.mo.gov/docs/default-source/public-safety/2013agencyreports.pdf?sfvrsn=2
https://www.nap.edu/read/18613/chapter/1#viii
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01256.x/abstract
http://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2497&context=articles
[–]bobcatastrophe 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 48分前 (19子コメント)
How can you prove that it's discriminatory?
[–]Yauld 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 33分前* (7子コメント)
I'm sure you could find more.
[–]otherwiseyep 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 24分前 (2子コメント)
Here, for starters: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/07/us/wrongful-convictions-race-exoneration.html?_r=0
[–]453265436354654 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 27分前 (7子コメント)
Who is in prison?
[–]Coteup 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 25分前 (2子コメント)
The prison system is DISCRIMINATORY against men!
[–]Yauld 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 13分前 (0子コメント)
I mean it is. I'm not sure what your point is?
[–]AustinAuranymph -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 18分前 (0子コメント)
But you won't hear liberals whining about that.
[–]ButtersTheNinja 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 29分前 (3子コメント)
provably disciminatory
This is kind of meaningless though.
If you say something is "probably" a certain way, you're making an argument based on your feelings, and not based on any actual evidence.
Please don't take this as an attack on you, because it's not, but if you want to actually make this argument you need to actually find examples of institutional systems of racism that are actually discriminatory rather than just proposing the idea off the cuff without anything to back it up.
[–]Yauld 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 28分前 (2子コメント)
Read that again. Provably, not probably.
[–]ButtersTheNinja 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 26分前 (1子コメント)
Provably
I have literally never seen this word before. Until I googled it literally a couple of seconds ago I had no idea what it was.
Also your edit hadn't actually been edited yet on my end, so I just assumed it was a typo sorry!
[–]Yauld -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 24分前 (0子コメント)
np.
[–]hselfe 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)
The impression I got when he said that was in terms of law - I don't think Jon was saying there isn't racism because it will never truly go away.
[–]tutter 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
If he means mass discrimination by the law, then it is much easier to believe, since there are not any literal Jim Crow Laws anymore. But that does not erase the social discrimination that happens still.
[+]987f スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9 ポイント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)
Where is this discrimination?
[–]bunker_man 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 40分前 (0子コメント)
Down the street, and turn left at the stop sign.
[–]totallynotazognoid84 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 44分前 (0子コメント)
You blind?
[–]skelitor121 35 ポイント36 ポイント37 ポイント 1時間前* (3子コメント)
Regardless of what Jon says, I'm a bit disappointed that he thinks his statement means anything now that he's had his time to go back over his points and change them and research them. It's a bit bullshit to think that your opinions only work out well when they're unquestioned, untested and unparalleled. Jon is only capable of sounding like a smart man when he's sitting in his room, alone, an echo chamber of transparency, but when he's put up against someone who asks him to explain or challenges his opinion he devolves to ridiculous statements and racism, and we're supposed to think he's gotten the raw deal outta that?
You're reading this and thinking, maybe, I'm too harsh on Jon in this statement. I don't think so-- here's why; If Jon knows that his statements only sound good undebated, then why did he go into a debate? -- Why make it a point to communicate this at all? sharing your opinions is one thing but to go out and INVITE ARGUMENTS when you can't hold together a point is a bit fucking stupid. I don't blame Jon for being a poor conversationalist in that debate, I don't think his opinions were inherently flawed, only that he delivered them so shitty -- like hes saying IN this explanation-- but he hasn't really addressed why this redeems him when it was indeed his decision to start this.
Lemme post-preface this by saying I never thought Jon was a "nazi", and even despite his statements I was skeptical he was a racist. You can see my previous posts (before the lockdown) where I got called such bad names by both sides for what seems to be a skeptical neutrality in the matter, but I am dissatisfied with this response. Jon cherrypicked topics that he wanted to clarify, and exposed them as if they were rational things, not really explaining why Rough-Draft-1 of these thoughts contained such sterling bits like on Tibet or Japan or South Africa..
Jon didn't address why he, as an immigrant, said things like "immigration is an assault of culture", only writing it off as "oh no I meant THIS".. In fact, he didn't address ANYTHING. All the questions are still unanswered, he has simply responded "I am not a racist if you ignore the racist things I said and just remember that racism is a bad thing and I am not bad I swear"
I love ya, Jon. I love that you DID make a response. Ya fucked up, and I can forgive you. I love that you tried to come out and be genuine to us, I recognize that. But the biggest glaring thing you haven't addressed is "WHY". He says "I never thought this," "I never meant that," -- then why did you say them? And if you said them under duress, why did you insist on debating those matters like you were always right? If you can see the issue with what you said in the heat of the moment now, why not then?
EDIT: Didn't Jon say racial discrimination doesn't exist anymore in the Stream? Wouldn't that undo literally everything he just said? Lol, I'm probably wrong.
[–]kidsan 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Damage Control - The Movie
[–]Jbg35 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 56分前 (0子コメント)
I had a lot of side eye going on watching this. I'm not going to touch on his start on the media because that's just a dodge.
Firstly, increasing tribalization: this is the good ol' 'we should all be together!' stance when people want to shut down conversation and here is why that's a problem. People see in terms of 'race' or 'sex' or 'gender' because one aspect of society greatly wants to make what is not on top lesser. Whether that be through rights, laws or however such they'd like to keep people down.
Then he says people don't want to have an honest conversation especially when you bring up an uncomfortable statistic. He doesn't say which ones he brought up were uncomfortable, though. Was it the one where wealthy black men were more likely to commit a crime than poor white men? I'd sure be interested in knowing but it's not in this video.
The Samantha Bee bit was cute with the 'Well, what if she said this about black people!' and the 'I'm not saying that's true' follow up.
He then wonders why people label themselves as Dash-American when we should all be americans. Look at our census forms. Or job forms. Heck, look at anything you apply to and there'll be a thing asking you what your race is. And that's always seperate from whether you're actually a national or not. That's not even counting all the people that don't really want you at the table so identifiers are claimed to keep their self worth. But they still end in 'American' so what the hell does it matter what people call themselves?
Not once did he say he was sorry, or apologize or even that he might've been wrong. Just that he didn't articulate himself well.
So tell me again why this is okay just because he had time to think about what he wanted to say.
[–]alcaste19 33 ポイント34 ポイント35 ポイント 1時間前 (20子コメント)
A statement. Not an apology or rescinding.
My dude, it's not enough. Brainwashed my /pol/ and now you hate me, a diehard fan. Apologize.
[–]magmadorf 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント 1時間前 (3子コメント)
alright i apologize because you're black
haha sorry
[–]alcaste19 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 59分前 (2子コメント)
dunno why you got downvoted it's a good joke
[–]magmadorf 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 58分前 (1子コメント)
my shitpost feels appreciated now
ty
[–]h5h77 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 9分前 (0子コメント)
made me laugh out loud, you are appreciated
[–]mjmannella 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 18分前 (3子コメント)
How do you apologize for having opinions?
"Look, I'm really sorry I think in certain ways that don't align with your ways of thinking. I'll really try and think more like you."
[–]tatertatertatertot 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 21分前 (0子コメント)
No one is misconstruing what he said.
It was said as straightforwardly as possible.
He says he's against tribalism and racial thinking...but HE kept doing exactly that, over and over and over again. Then he blames everyone else by saying they don't want an honest conversation about race.
This is a common tactic used to weasel out of saying racist shit too loud...just suddenly convert into "why is everyone so obsessed with race, get rid of the hyphens" sort of stuff. Even when the person was JUST talking about supposedly innate and irreconcilable racial differences.
And then he whines about Samantha Bee comedy bits? Jesus, Jon.
He is doubling down again, just this time he's decided to blame everyone else for his own mistakes, shirk all personal responsibility, and pretend he didn't say what he said.
[–]Squeejee09 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 1時間前* (0子コメント)
Here's the problem. John says the country would be better if we stop thinking on terms of race. But the whole white supremacist assumption people jumped to was based on his statements that the white majority in America is super important to our country and is under threat. And it isn't just the debate, that's merely the last and most explosive chapter of this whole debacle - let's not forget what he said and wrote elsewhere leading up to it.
This whole video is just backtracking and it shows. He's trying to downplay what happened, re-frame what he said, and offer a bit more defense to what's left of his positions all at once and it was honestly more sad to hear than if he went for a full retraction or even doubled down on what he was saying. I would really like to go back to passively just assuming JohnTron is a super cool guy behind the camera, but the cat is out of the bag on what he believes and frankly that's going to be a permanent black mark on him in my mind.
[–]thesnakeinthegarden 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 41分前 (5子コメント)
"I said black people are bad for society compared to whites, but it came off racist, so I wish i had said it in a way that didn't make people think I was racist."
No one is bothered by how you said it.
[–]AustinAuranymph -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 10分前 (0子コメント)
Quit abusing quotation marks. He didn't say that. Saying that he did say that makes you a liar and it discredits your cause.
[–]otherwiseyep 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 30分前 (2子コメント)
This is a mush-mouthed non-apology. He's doubling down on all the stuff he got called out for. He doesn't "suck at debate", he just has shitty, stupid, racist opinions, and he wants to go back to a one-sided reality where he gets to do all the talking, and everybody else just listens.
[–]AustinAuranymph 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 5分前 (1子コメント)
You seriously expect him to say
"I'm a horrible racist who has shitty, stupid, racist opinions and I humbly admit that white people are the scum of the earth. Thank you for helping me realize that I am literally Hitler and I don't deserve to be alive. I'll be in Times Square later today chained to a pole if anybody wants to punch me in the face or chop my dick off. All hail Hillary Clinton."
Because nobody is going to say that. He still has the opinions he has. He's just trying to explain them better. He's not going to stop being himself and pretend to change just so he gets better PR.
[–]otherwiseyep 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 4分前 (0子コメント)
Do you sometimes accidentally tie your shoes together?
[–]getintheVandell 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 36分前 (3子コメント)
I.. Hate the way he phrases this.
"You're all just misconstruing my words. But don't worry, let me tell you how it is."
Like, dude.. Can you just say that maybe, maybe, you were vastly uninformed about some topics and you're open to listening and discovering? Please?
[–]NormallyScott -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 34分前 (2子コメント)
You all are using quotes wrong.
[–]getintheVandell 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 28分前 (1子コメント)
I'm quoting how I view JonTrons message.
[–]AustinAuranymph 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 3分前 (0子コメント)
So, through a filter of hatred towards white people and jealousy of his success? At least you admit you're not seeing the reality of it.
[–]Rick_Tobberman 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント 47分前* (0子コメント)
Nah Jon that's not how it works, you can't just retract all the shit you said, or act like you never said them. "I know the irish were descriminated against" that certaintly wasn't what you thought 2 days ago. This entire video is disengenus and kind of disgusting. Sadly it seems like the fanbase at large is eating it up.
[–]Gamegrumps505 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 48分前 (0子コメント)
Damage Control: The Video
[–]tactopoda 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
Honestly just seems like he hasn't learnt a thing, and he's gonna get a lot of people patting him on the back making him feel good about it all.
He wasn't racist, he wasnt misrepresenting statistics, he wasn't downplaying actual struggles and complex topics, arguing racist troll worthy shit that actually harms people at the end of the day, he was just misunderstood (and don't forget, "fuck white people" is the big problem).
I'm just so disappointed. And really fucking sad. Ah well.
[–]Just_an_asian_here 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 5分前 (0子コメント)
Yeah man :( it's hard to separate the art from the artist in this situation. Sucks.
[–]Leonnis 27 ポイント28 ポイント29 ポイント 1時間前 (37子コメント)
Seems like he contradicted himself on some statements, hmmm.
Looks like he thinks that discrimination exists now as opposed to what he said before.
[–]mcantrell 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント 1時間前 (36子コメント)
It's almost like he got flustered and said things in a way that could be misconstrued originally, hmmm.
[–]Leonnis 70 ポイント71 ポイント72 ポイント 1時間前* (33子コメント)
He literally said that discrimination doesn't exist. Now he said that it does. It's a clear contradiction. You don't start thinking that discrimination doesn't exist just because you're nervous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STCjk1JCt44 Quote "We've gotten rid of discrimination in our western countries." and "If you don't think think we've got rid of discrimination you're living in a fantasy land."
[–]ralpher313 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Boogie talked to him recently. We can only assume he changed Jon's mind.
[–]mcantrell 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 1時間前 (30子コメント)
No, but you might say "discrimination doesn't exist" when you really mean "systemic discrimination doesn't exist" when you're being Gish Galloped by an autistic sperglord in a stream.
[–]Squeejee09 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 52分前 (1子コメント)
jontron the donald kotakuinaction
jontron
the donald
kotakuinaction
Jesus what is it with you people and calling those you disagree with Middle School-tier names?
[–]Gazareth 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 12分前 (0子コメント)
What exactly do you mean by "you people"?
[–]Joon01 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント 1時間前 (3子コメント)
"Autistic sperglord"? Oh, so you're 12? Someone who uses that kind of language has no place in a discussion about race. You're clearly a juvenile who thinks hatespeech is fun.
If you're actually over 15 that's incredibly embarrassing for you.
[–]sleepy_as_fk 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 4分前 (0子コメント)
Definitely hasn't progressed past 12 mentally. Only losers who spend too much time on /pol/ are defending Jon at this point.
[–]SadMcDsworker 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 3分前* (0子コメント)
The terminology is definitely bad, but Destiny does act pretty fucking childish and is actually pretty bad at debating. Making this whole thing that more embarrassing for Jon
[–]ShutYourFaceJabroni 39 ポイント40 ポイント41 ポイント 1時間前 (10子コメント)
That's still not true though.
[+]tylerrex96 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント 1時間前 (7子コメント)
... But it is though
[–]ShutYourFaceJabroni 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 1時間前 (6子コメント)
Explain the difference between crack and cocaine punishment, then. Explain racial profiling and stop and frisk embedded into the culture of the NYPD.
[–]tylerrex96 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)
Going on record, I'm entirely against stop and frisk. It's a violation of rights in many regards, under any context.
Can you undeniably prove to me that stop and frisk is pushed against minority people exclusively? That that was the intention of the legislation? If not, then it's not systemic oppression. That one cop you labeled as a racist has probably stopped plenty of people in his life, and probably not exclusively minorities. And if it has been and he's actually just a racist fuck? Then guess what, he's a racist fuck. That's not the system. That's a racist cop who should be removed from his job.
The thing you have to take for oppression is that, on law books, it does not exist. As such, you have to treat it as "innocent until proven guilty." Are there very glaring examples of racism in the US? Absolutely. On all sides. So much of the agenda has turned into "this whitey is out to get me, even if it was justified." You play the racism card and the argument ends, very often without validity.
[–]Marelityermaw 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 18分前 (0子コメント)
Something doesn't need to exclusively target a minority to be considered racist. The fact that minorities are disproportionatly effected by it makes it racist.
[–]Jbg35 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 43分前 (0子コメント)
But that view doesn't come out of nowhere. It's wrong to accuse somebody who hasn't done anything sure. But there's a difference between 'this whitey is out to get me' and 'this black person is out to get me' .
Legislation doesn't have to legally define that they're mainly going after minorities to be oppression. It's all based on how whatever power is given is used. These are the stop and frisk details from 2002.
https://www.nyclu.org/en/stop-and-frisk-data
[–]Leonnis 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 1時間前 (9子コメント)
Please don't tell me that systematic discrimination doesn't exist.
[+]tylerrex96 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9 ポイント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント 1時間前 (5子コメント)
Examples? Sources?
[–]getintheVandell 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)
When people say "systemic", for some reason they seem to think that it means it's written down on paper somewhere that we can find. This is not true. Systemic is very simply defined as: Embedded within and spread throughout and affecting a whole system, group, body, economy, market, or society. In short, it can be a meme or idea that may have unintended side effects on a group of people.
Let's take the simplest, most raw example: black men get sentenced to longer periods of jail time than their counterparts.
This is indicative of something that is clearly systemic. It seems extremely obvious, to me, that people have biases and view black people as belonging in jail more - a systemic bias that should be accounted for with smart policy-making.. Ideally.
[–]tylerrex96 -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
Can you provide examples of this that have zero chance of another interpretation of the sentence? I'm actually curious.
[–]getintheVandell 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 43分前 (0子コメント)
I apologize with the information overload. I've been dealing with so many alt-righters lately that if I bring a source, they always discredit them as being "propaganda". Unless it appears on breitbart.. For some reason.
https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/assets/141027_iachr_racial_disparities_aclu_submission_0.pdf
https://newsone.com/1859475/black-people-receive-60-longer-sentences-for-same-crimes/
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/7/14834454/exoneration-innocence-prison-racism
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/17/opinion/sunday/unequal-sentences-for-blacks-and-whites.html?_r=0
https://thinkprogress.org/study-black-defendants-are-at-least-30-more-likely-to-be-imprisoned-than-white-defendants-for-the-29d567b44377
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324432004578304463789858002
[–]Leonnis 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 39分前 (0子コメント)
I found these.
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/mar/15/jalen-ross/black-name-resume-50-percent-less-likely-get-respo/
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/12/business/economy/discrimination-in-housing-against-nonwhites-persists-quietly-us-study-finds.html
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2015/03/ferguson-as-a-criminal-conspiracy-against-its-black-residents-michael-brown-department-of-justice-report/386887/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/03/04/the-12-key-highlights-from-the-dojs-scathing-ferguson-report/
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/the-return-of-school-segregation-in-eight-charts/
[–]AustinAuranymph 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 13分前 (1子コメント)
So, when the majority of convicts are black, it either means that the criminal justice system is for no reason, targeting black people, or, black people statistically commit more crime. But one of those possibilities hurts your feelings, and challenges your idea of racial equality. So you choose to believe that the police are all racists, despite how unlikely that would be.
Occam's razor, my friend. The most obvious answer is usually the correct one.
[–]Leonnis 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 9分前 (0子コメント)
Why do they commit more crime?
The stats show that they do commit more crime, I don't disagree.
[–]Yauld 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)
"discrimination doesn't exist"
(copy pasted)
[+]mcantrell スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
Provably discriminatory? Interesting claim.
[–]Yauld 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
[–]AustinAuranymph 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 17分前 (0子コメント)
People can change their minds when presented with new information. Crazy, isn't it?
[–]ShutYourFaceJabroni 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
It's almost like he exposed his beliefs and doesn't want to suffer the consequences that free speech brings, so he's back pedaling.
[–]Joon01 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Right. I hate all those times when I get flustered and go off on huge racist tangents. Happens to us all, right? I'm trying to talk about one thing and all of the sudden I've been going on about white genocide for three minutes. lol whoops!
Getting "flustered" might make you phrase something poorly. It doesn't put minutes of alt-right bullshit in your mouth. That's a nonsense defense.
[–]RandomDudeOnReddit 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 1時間前* (6子コメント)
What did he mean by
"for those who see everything in terms of race, to suddenly turn around and object when white people speak up in what they believe are in the best interests of their race."
EDIT: If a group of white people were to decide on the best interest of themselves, I don't really care but how far do you go with that? Legislation that only benefits the group of white people? Is that constitutional for a law to only benefit the white population? Do we have laws that POC only benefit from and the white population doesn't benefit?
EDIT 2: You can't have laws that benefited one (X) group of people while shutting out another group (Y) of people and then take away the laws while X group still have the benefits, like that's is the history of the US. Whites at one time had many benefits that the law permitted them to have while excluding other groups of people, once these laws were found to show a disadvantage to POC, then the laws were rescinded. But in that removal, the benefits that white people had weren't taken away, the benefits were taken and who knows may have evolved into another peripheral benefit that may have not been observed originally.
[–]totallynotazognoid84 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 54分前 (1子コメント)
He's saying that due to how commonplace it is for non-white people to defend their race, and make decisions based on what's best for their race, that it's hypocritical of those same people to attack white people for doing the same thing.
[–]RandomDudeOnReddit 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 48分前* (0子コメント)
So let's say that a large group of white people decided that the slowing of migration of people is what's best for their own people.
I think what's wrong with the current argument is that people perceive this to be a white-only benefit. Right leaning people don't make the point that maybe other POC can benefit from the halting of migration.
I think I need more time to think on this, because what comes into my mind is, "At what cost?" In that protection of slowing migration you are (I don't know if this is the right word) fucking over other groups of people. Whereas in a textbook law that protects a group of people, typically a minority, there is no other group of people that get "fucked."
Am I making any type of sense here? I feel like I am but not as cleanly as I want it to be.
[–]Stevenjgamble 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 1時間前 (3子コメント)
yeah this is weird fucking statement. I know what jontron means, and that hes claiming the left pushed people to divide by race and now people are racially minded and think like a unit.
But what a weird fucking america problem. Why arent all people, just people? why the fuck does race bleed into absolutely everything
[–]SuperduperAID 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
I think that's his point
[–]magmadorf -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
because we're all gay
trust me
[–]fake_brasilian 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 8分前 (0子コメント)
Race bleeds into it because ignoring the hurt a group of people experienced is inhumane. It's like a Syrian refugee is crying on the street because they hear a jackhammer which reminds them of gunfire in Aleppo. One wouldn't stoop down to them and say "forget Aleppo" because it's a human experience, and to ignore someone's experience is to toss your humanity aside.
I know this is some hippydippy shit, but to say "why can't we all just be people" is also carrying an implicit suffix to the sentence that says "like us?" I'm not saying you or anyone means the implication, but to those that received those words, it sounds like "why are you complaining when my life is fine."
It isn't so much a categorization of race, but it's understanding the infinite facets of humanity that the left wants to do. Being considerate not just in regards to someone's race, but their gender, age, economic status, location, physical and mental capabilities, and more. I'm definitely not saying paint a broad brush over a group, but to listen to a group's pain and genuinely empathize. People are people for sure, but what makes them people is their context.
[–]Hydreigonfan01 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
Will this video lengthen or shorten the restriction on the site?
[–]mjmannella 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 22分前 (0子コメント)
I'd say lengthen. Not many people are happy with Jon's clarification video, and it's only gonna make people more upset.
[–]luckybunny95 -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 34分前 (0子コメント)
I for one am glad he cleared things up, and to be honest he makes sense in his arguments. Not complete sense, but some none the less. I do enjoy his videos, and I find him to be a hilarious person, but honestly politics can bring the worst in all of us.
[–]FlatlineMonday 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 21分前 (0子コメント)
Yeah I don't buy it. He won't address the two biggest and ugliest statements he made which IMO are the "gene pool" statement and the "crime rates consistent with Africa" statement. Sorry Jon but that shit is inexcusable.
[–]RetroPirate1 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 15分前 (5子コメント)
"jon is still racist!!!"
"he still said racist shit wah wah!!!"
fuck you, that's his opinion get over it
[–]xirb 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
So what's his excuse for saying foreigners dilute the gene pool?
[–]Sheeploss 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
Looks like he just repeat his views less explicitly and whined about white people
[–]AustinAuranymph 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 11分前 (0子コメント)
Samantha Bee whines about white people. JonTron complained about being demonized in the media for his skin color. It's fine when black people complain about being hated for their skin color, but when a white person does it, suddenly he's a Nazi.
Just admit it, you hate white people. If he's a racist, you are too.
[–]rasmp 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
All the shitty things i said were due to me being nervous. Let's not talk about all the false statistics i perpetuated, i diden't know better, gosh!
Anyways, HUwhite racism is a real problem
[–]Wolfwatching78x -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
At least he didnt apologise. Those outlets shown say racially charged shit all the time and are applauded. Its fine to generalise and pubicly hate white people, speak of them in terns which otherwise would be unnacceptable to any other group, so dont be surprised if theres a push back. There cannot be identity politics for every group on the planet but whites. Jon may not have framed it right, but he is right on the issue. Destiny may be a better debater, but he judges standard of living by affordability of an iphone, and is fine with the exploitation of workers, while virtue signalling the talking points of champaigne drinking sjws. The last group to really be attacked for their priveledge were jews. By all means though, keep pushing the mass immigration argument and going against the wishes of the majority of working class people, make them compete in a rat race for jobs then call them nazis and racists. You soon will have the rise of real fascism, and we'll all be fucked. The fact tge centre is drifting should set off alarm bells for all of you commentaters here that want to call Jon racist and nazi, this is the world cultural marxism is creating.
[–]987f -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Collectivism vs. individualism. The internet has given people with strong group identity an outlet.
[–]SupremeKai4 -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 28分前 (0子コメント)
Ok, so it seems to me that Jon might still be generalizing a race based on a statistic that may or may not be true. I'm going to separate the artist from the art though. I got really mad the other day and vowed to never watch a JonTron video again, but I've cooled down and I'm over it. May the shooting continue.
[–]Lentle26 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 6分前 (0子コメント)
I agree with your opinion about the reverse racism stuff, but that was not the only thing in the stream. You said some pretty terrible things, and while I'm willing to believe some of it can be chalked up to bad debating skills, frankly some of it can't. Some of the statements you made were racist. Comparing a supposed wide spread white oppression to the Tibetan Genocide? You didn't even apologize for the some of the racist statements you made, you just made excuses and didn't own up to your actions.
Finally, what ever happened to you saying, "come at me with facts" when critizing SJW, yet you do the same thing in a political debate. To clarify, I hate both SJWS and altrighters cause they both are bullshit racists.
[–]cigoth 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2分前 (0子コメント)
Lol destinyfanboys and SJW libtards getting BTFO on this subreddit. Good thing anti-Trumpers and destinyfags can't brigade the youtube comments, 90% of his fans will still watch his videos.
[–]BroughtToYouByCoke 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Jonny boy was prepared this time. Luckily people actually game him some times and Coca-Cola™ so he could make his arguments better than they were.
[–]FilthyRedmond 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 39分前 (0子コメント)
I'm gonna take a break from Jontron for a few months. I just want to come back in the future and see if things have changed. Maybe I'll watch the new videos, maybe not.
[+][削除されました] 38分前 (1子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]alcaste19 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 12分前 (0子コメント)
Easy to say when you're not the subject, my man. If you just want things to go 'back to normal' maybe first look into why they changed in the first place.
[–]Marelityermaw 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 28分前 (0子コメント)
I was kinda hoping for more than this. Jon didn't say things that could be taken out of context and make him look bad, he made remarks that were legitimately racist, regardless if he meant them or not. I was expecting he'd actually acknowledge this or apologize for it, this video feels like a huge non-apology.
[–]TheSneakySeal 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)
ITT: fanboys forgiving a white supremacist. I'm all for comedy and forgiveness but he doesn't seem to have changed his views at all and until he unsubscribes from breitbart and T_D he's done for. His views are clouded with unfactual evidence where no discussion takes place.
[–]OohCapsLockImScared 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 41分前 (1子コメント)
I completely agree (here come the downvotes). He's welcome to an opinion if it's well informed and harmless but when you try to prove black inferiority using crime statistics it really doesn't deserve respect.
Think about it this way; if I shared a statistic claiming that blue cars are more likely to crash what am I trying to prove? There's no way that it's not saying that blue cars are worse or others are better, and it doesn't show anything else.
It's the same with this, sharing a statistic claiming that black people are more likely to commit crime is purely a racial thing because it couldn't be used to confirm anything other than a racist viewpoint (or at least in the context he gave it in, he was using it to try to prove racial inferiority)
[+]totallynotazognoid84 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)
Good on Jon for defending his views in a more clear and well thought out manner, even though I still disagree with some of what he said.
Sadly, if I know the internet (and I do), people won't accept this. They're too petty and arrogant to accept that not everyone will agree with them, and will continue to keep the fire of hate burning.
[–]bigoledmjy 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 29分前 (0子コメント)
I don't hate him, I would just rather not support him. Free market etc.
[–]Paukchopp 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 13分前 (0子コメント)
Yeah you're right. We should be more accepting of racism in our society. /s
[–]NormallyScott -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 43分前 (0子コメント)
Atleast he took the time to address it and I think he's being genuine so that's all that matters to me. Anyone else is free to disagree, but I won't listen to half-baked arguments.
[–]MrIste 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 9分前 (1子コメント)
This just seems like he's trying to catch the same controversy train as PewDiePie in order to save face. He opened the video by showing what articles wrote about him, as if they were unfair and he's a victim. He didn't apologize for the intent behind his arguments or the ultimate point he was making, just that he didn't do a good job of debating it. What kind of half-assed shit is that? How is Jon acting like he's the one trying to have an "honest conversation about race" while pulling statistics out of his ass and verifying that they're true with a smug laugh?
[–]zomuon -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 6分前 (0子コメント)
he doesn't have to apologize for anything
the media is unfair, first because of the clics, second because of shiting on ther competitors
You are the kind of social justice idiot why he started talking in the first place. Go back to tumblr
[–]wilc8650 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 29分前 (0子コメント)
Poppin' some chest hair.
[–]Domthecreator14 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 17分前 (0子コメント)
He's still gonna make a crazy amount of money and he's still going to think the way he does. It's whatever at this point, just give us new Jontent.
[–]Nukemarine -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 11分前 (0子コメント)
I've got no dog in this fight, didn't really look into what got JonTron in the hotseat, but the apology for what it was seemed ok. Only question I have is why are his teeth so bright?
[–]Jellyra_ 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 6分前 (0子コメント)
I unconditionally love JonTron.
π Rendered by PID 13523 on app-129 at 2017-03-19 14:14:30.992039+00:00 running 32e28f7 country code: JP.
[–]Dudeofallteenages[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (0子コメント)
[–]SegataSam[S] 59 ポイント60 ポイント61 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Miscellaneous777 50 ポイント51 ポイント52 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]totallynotazognoid84 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SpahgattaNadle 196 ポイント197 ポイント198 ポイント (52子コメント)
[–]RequiemEternal 94 ポイント95 ポイント96 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]h5h77 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]453265436354654 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]MikoSqz 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SalokinSekwah 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]BlueThunderBomb 68 ポイント69 ポイント70 ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]lackingsaint 104 ポイント105 ポイント106 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Stanley_the_Goose 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]commanderlooney 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]kitthehacker 260 ポイント261 ポイント262 ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]fullforce098 59 ポイント60 ポイント61 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]getintheVandell 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]ralpher313 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]biggal6 27 ポイント28 ポイント29 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Luigidagawd 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]thebross9 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bass- 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]notHiro 49 ポイント50 ポイント51 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]PotluckPony 61 ポイント62 ポイント63 ポイント (50子コメント)
[–]Toastrz 36 ポイント37 ポイント38 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]PotluckPony 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]hselfe 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Magikarp_13 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]jesuz 119 ポイント120 ポイント121 ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]Stevenjgamble 122 ポイント123 ポイント124 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]lobsterwithcrabs 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]PotluckPony 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]evokalvalates 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]DudeWithThePC 57 ポイント58 ポイント59 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]evokalvalates -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ricdesi 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]thatdudeinthecottonr 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bunker_man 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bunker_man 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]blastedin 38 ポイント39 ポイント40 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]KitKatMasterJapan 30 ポイント31 ポイント32 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]TheMightySloth 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]KitKatMasterJapan 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheProudBrit 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AustinAuranymph 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]GRRM_Reaper 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]planetprison 45 ポイント46 ポイント47 ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]PotluckPony 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]MrKyurem 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]planetprison 42 ポイント43 ポイント44 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]MrKyurem 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]planetprison 24 ポイント25 ポイント26 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]MrKyurem 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bunker_man 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheSneakySeal 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]oiimn スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]HavocT 62 ポイント63 ポイント64 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]doggleswithgoggles 25 ポイント26 ポイント27 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]ButtersTheNinja 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Indiggy57 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]bunker_man -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bunker_man 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]PotluckPony 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]kaszzai 38 ポイント39 ポイント40 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]AnvilofSpinning -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]Jbg35 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]TheBankaiMaster 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]NoPickles 65 ポイント66 ポイント67 ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]ButtersTheNinja 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Constipated_Llama 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]ButtersTheNinja 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]NoPickles 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]alexmikli 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]CobaltPhusion 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bobcatastrophe 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]RZRtv 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]bobcatastrophe 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]RZRtv 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]bobcatastrophe -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]usery -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]magmadorf 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ogskie_ 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheyCallmeDoctor 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]sp0rttraxx -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Arkonisas 92 ポイント93 ポイント94 ポイント (44子コメント)
[–]thosefuckersourshit 37 ポイント38 ポイント39 ポイント (29子コメント)
[–]Yauld 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (24子コメント)
[–]bobcatastrophe 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]Yauld 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]otherwiseyep 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]453265436354654 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]Coteup 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Yauld 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AustinAuranymph -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ButtersTheNinja 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Yauld 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]ButtersTheNinja 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Yauld -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]hselfe 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]tutter 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]987f スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9 ポイント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]bunker_man 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]totallynotazognoid84 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]skelitor121 35 ポイント36 ポイント37 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]kidsan 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Jbg35 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]alcaste19 33 ポイント34 ポイント35 ポイント (20子コメント)
[–]magmadorf 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]alcaste19 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]magmadorf 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]h5h77 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]mjmannella 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]tatertatertatertot 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Squeejee09 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]thesnakeinthegarden 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]AustinAuranymph -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]otherwiseyep 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]AustinAuranymph 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]otherwiseyep 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]getintheVandell 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]NormallyScott -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]getintheVandell 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]AustinAuranymph 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Rick_Tobberman 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Gamegrumps505 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]tactopoda 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Just_an_asian_here 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Leonnis 27 ポイント28 ポイント29 ポイント (37子コメント)
[–]mcantrell 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント (36子コメント)
[–]Leonnis 70 ポイント71 ポイント72 ポイント (33子コメント)
[–]ralpher313 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]mcantrell 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (30子コメント)
[–]Squeejee09 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Gazareth 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Joon01 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]sleepy_as_fk 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SadMcDsworker 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ShutYourFaceJabroni 39 ポイント40 ポイント41 ポイント (10子コメント)
[+]tylerrex96 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]ShutYourFaceJabroni 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]tylerrex96 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Marelityermaw 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Jbg35 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Leonnis 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント (9子コメント)
[+]tylerrex96 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9 ポイント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]getintheVandell 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]tylerrex96 -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]getintheVandell 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Leonnis 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AustinAuranymph 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Leonnis 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Yauld 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (2子コメント)
[+]mcantrell スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Yauld 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AustinAuranymph 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ShutYourFaceJabroni 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Joon01 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RandomDudeOnReddit 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]totallynotazognoid84 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]RandomDudeOnReddit 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Stevenjgamble 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]SuperduperAID 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]magmadorf -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]fake_brasilian 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hydreigonfan01 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]mjmannella 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]luckybunny95 -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]FlatlineMonday 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RetroPirate1 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]xirb 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Sheeploss 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]AustinAuranymph 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]rasmp 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Wolfwatching78x -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]987f -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SupremeKai4 -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Lentle26 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]cigoth 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]BroughtToYouByCoke 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]FilthyRedmond 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (1子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]alcaste19 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Marelityermaw 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheSneakySeal 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]OohCapsLockImScared 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (1子コメント)
[+]totallynotazognoid84 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]bigoledmjy 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Paukchopp 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]NormallyScott -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MrIste 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]zomuon -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]wilc8650 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Domthecreator14 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Nukemarine -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Jellyra_ 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)