This post is for guys whose aim is to get laid and guys who're seeking for more, but only if the girl has sex first before anything else.

Summary

In the current dating climate, where the hookup culture is so prevalent, it almost immediately signals to girls that you're beta if you start out dating her conventionally, e.g. take her out to dinner, a movie, museum, beach, etc. If your goal is to get laid, it's obvious that not every girl you date will end up sleeping with you on the first date, if ever at all. Guys who have been burned that way inevitably feel used and led on, like he was used for his resources without the reciprocal sex that he expected at the end of the night.

Body

What's the solution to this problem?

You stop stepping into her frame right from the outset. Conventional dates are always in her frame: you're planning a date to impress her, she takes payment upfront (you usually pay anyway, and you give her your precious companionship before anything sexual happens), it's hard to escalate in public, she has the freedom to leave anytime, and she can easily say no at the end of the night when you invite her back. Why guys continually adopt this ineffective sexual strategy is beyond me. You can't screen/filter a girl out who's taking you for a ride if you do conventional dates; you'll reel in a lot of gold diggers who're looking for free dinner or drinks or companionship.

The superior sexual strategy is to simply invite her over for the first date based on any number of "plausible deniability" pretexts: drinks, movie, video games, pizza, etc.

First, you're screening her for sexual interest. No girl puts herself in a situation where she expects the guy to escalate heavily on her, unless she can see herself having sex with the guy.

Second, you screen out the gold diggers. These are the women who know better than to go over to a guy's place for a couple of lousy drinks he already has in his drinks cabinet. The women who come over will already have some baseline sexual interest in you.

Third, you'll have total privacy to escalate, and escalate quickly. You're essentially skipping the step where you invite her back to your place at the end of the night, and you're really fine-tuning your logistics game to the highest degree possible. You save time and effort and money.

Fourth, you set the tone right from the start and fundamentally set yourself apart from the other guys. You're establishing the precedent that you won't give her the privilege of a proper date like a spineless beta would, until and unless she puts out. And even then, it's up to your discretion to dispense non-sexual attention or companionship. You don't actually say this to her, but she'll subconsciously pick up your "nuclear" do-or-die strategy. It's risky but also very attractive and gives her tingles.

The usual concerns

• "That's too risky. She'll say no of course, she's not a slut." Oh yeah? Well, have you tried it? You'd be surprised how many girls would say "yes" to that, particularly if you make it clear that you don't do dates, and that the only opportunity to meet you is at your place. It's either your place, or you walk away. Believe it or not, she usually caves in. Really, give it a shot. Think like Chad. What would Chad do?

• "She could be a psycho/hambeast/catfish." Then meet her right outside your apartment building first without disclosing the actual unit you live in and do your screening there. The chances of this happening will be miniscule either way. The pros outweigh the cons.

• "If I 'build rapport' with her first, I might change her mind to come over to my place." This is some grade A bullshit. Girls more or less already know whether they'd fuck a guy or not just by looking at him. You're not going to change her mind; in fact, she might even change her mind from "yes" to "no" after you take her out on a date and reveal your beta tendencies. Play it safe and get her to your place ASAP, get her to enter your frame, and escalate on her like anyone who's not a total beta would.

The way I see it, even for the girls who agree to come over right away, a few of them end up leaving after I escalate on them. Any guy who has asked over a large-enough number of girls (think 50-60) will know that this strategy isn't 100%. Think about it. These girls have already pretty much stayed open to the idea of sex on the first date, they're willing to enter my frame, there's no material incentive like expensive dinners or drinks to entice them, they had to drive all the way here, and -- despite all that -- the odd one or two girls still manage to not want to have sex upon arrival.

So get this: a girl coming over is almost always a sure thing, but it occasionally isn't. So why take an even bigger risk by spoiling her with a date, even before she pays up with sex? Do you like to be taken for a ride? Because that's how you get taken for a ride.

This girl who came over yesterday gave me some serious LMR, and she straight-up blurted out, "I'm not used to doing this so quickly. I'm usually wined and dined beforehand." I told her, "So... You expect me to bring you on a five-course meal candlelight dinner at a fine dining restaurant, followed by drinks on a fancy rooftop bar, before inviting you over to my place?" She laughed out loud, and I continued escalating, and I fucked her. You guys have been spoiling your own market by giving so much upfront even before she puts out, so why would these girls have any incentive to put out after she enjoyed all the perks you so enthusiastically offered her? Think about it.

Conclusion

Screen her for sexual availability and interest by inviting her over right off the bat. No compromises. Let her know you "don't do dates." Never give into her alternative suggestions of coffee, drinks, dinner, etc. Either come over or you move on. And then see your n-count soar.