25
26

HUMORChimamwhatever and other "logic" (self.GenderCritical)

lavenderamethyst が 投稿

http://imgur.com/a/MJbQd

全 35 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]little_red_lion 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (3子コメント)

That's awesome. Front bleeders makes me wonder, are there back bleeders? They should probably get that checked cause it's not normal.

[–]FYouHeironymous 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I mean... I have hemorrhoids. So kinda?

[–]RiseOfSlimerMarx and Engels were TERFs. Lenin and Mao were SWERFs. 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't make Kenny McCormick's mistake of shoving a tampon up your ass.

[–]fretmadamA New Wave 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Depending on the day sometimes the blood spreads to more than just the front.

In all seriousness saying front bleeder shows a lack of understanding basic anatomy. Then again I would not be surprised to read this after the whole "front hole" thing.

[–]lavenderamethyst[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yes, the "front hole" bit was the inspiration, for sure.

[–]fretmadamA New Wave 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wonder should it be bottom front hole? Or do mouths not count?

... Of course they don't, silly me. Women should never open their mouths unless to eat or suck a peen.

[–]Black_PhillipaDisgruntled Goat 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

They know we have urethras, right? Holes are only important if you can sling a dick in there I suppose.

[–]fretmadamA New Wave 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

And yet they don't differentiate between the upper and lower front holes. Oh well. Not like language matters anymore in our post truth society.

[–]othliathe worst 31 ポイント32 ポイント  (6子コメント)

I don't know if I feel comfortable putting "Chimamwhatever" in some strawperson's mouth to make a point. It's racist and unless you're directly quoting someone who said this in all seriousness, this just leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

[–]WhatRedditWants 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree. Unfortunately, I think as people with an embattled perspective we have to be hyper-vigilant against all other forms of prejudice, because any evidence of it is used to further tar radical feminists as bigots. This is not helpful. And frankly it makes me feel, as a black woman, slightly alienated from this sub.

Edit: I understand the point OP's making. I just don't think this is the way to make that point.

[–]lavenderamethyst[S] 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (2子コメント)

The point there is that, for all their blithering about being intersectional, they don't listen to black women, and they don't respect them.

[–]happonfy fan för fallos 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But you made up "Chimamwhatever" here: they didn't. Which doesn't seem very respectful to me.

[–]cantaveritas 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

yes, agree with that. Its exactly the kind of thing these half-educated tumblrites would say. In fact, terf is a slur has someone mangling Germaine Greer's name.

[–]BimblebyGiant bipedal vagina. 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This was my immediate thought, too.

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]lavenderamethyst[S] 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Their "logic" is that bonkers, yep. I wrote it as an amalgamation of all the bs I've been reading around the current hype.

    [–][削除されました]  (18子コメント)

    [removed]

      [–]susiesmum 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      You are mistaken. a transwoman is a different kind of man, not a woman at all. Most transgender "women" are what used to be called transvestites, who have no intention of removing their male genitalia.

      [–]willoism 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      Rectangles have different struggles than squares, is the point, a conflation the two does neither right.

      [–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

      [removed]

        [–]lavenderamethyst[S] 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (13子コメント)

        Nope. Are you lost?

        [–]cantaveritas -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (5子コメント)

        all squares are rectangles? Are they? I thought I learned at infant school a rectangle has two short and two long sides...did Mrs Jackson tell me big fibs?

        [–]deluxecashews 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

        a rectangle is any shape with four sides and four right angles

        [–]Ohlins 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        And humans can't change sex. Making so called transwomen still males. You're arguing a triangle is a square because it identifies that way. Just because a triangle may appear as a square if you can't see it in it's entirety (only seeing one side of the triangle for instance) doesn't mean it's a square.

        Males can mask their sex by playing dress up, taking hormones or having surgery . That just makes them males playing dress up, taking hormones or having surgery. That does not change the fact they are male.

        [–]dharmabird67 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

        I thought the umbrella term was quadrilateral.

        [–]emptiedriver 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Rectangles have 4 right angles. Quadrilaterals have four straight sides but the angles can be acute / obtuse. So, a square's a kind of rectangle, which is a kind of quadrilateral - which is a kind of polygon...

        Doesn't really apply to sex differentiation. More like trying to make a square into a circle...

        [–]Amareldys 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Square is a subset of rectangle

        [–][削除されました]  (6子コメント)

        [removed]

          [–]lavenderamethyst[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (5子コメント)

          Where you go wrong is your first assumption; I'm not here to "win an argument". This is a humorous post in a gender critical subreddit. You're not teaching anything here.

          [–][削除されました]  (4子コメント)

          [removed]

            [–]lavenderamethyst[S] 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

            If you believe that "a transwoman is just a different kind of woman", you're in the wrong place.

            [–]deluxecashews -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

            i do not believe that!! thats what ive been trying to explain. i was playing devils advocate.

            [–]susiesmum 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

            You think a feminist subreddit needs someone to play devils advocate? You are a troll, aren't you.

            [–]bicycling_elephant[M] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

            You have never posted here before that I am aware of, but you come in making claims that deny basic biology and are not at all in line with radical feminism. If you're not a troll, you sure are acting like one.