2. The AMA, doctors & nurses orgs, AARP, hospitals & others oppose Obamacare repeal in large part because they're stakeholders in it...
-
-
-
3. Paradoxically, the inclusion of institutional stakeholders is what caused some who identify as "on the left" to oppose Obamacare in 2009.
-
4. Nothing short of government-administered "single payer" was acceptable to those Obamacare opponents as it was being legislated...
-
5. Interestingly, the state of Vermont - with support of its governor - tried to enact single payer, titled "Medicare for All" but balked...
-
6. ...after its true costs became evident: an 11.5% increase in state payroll tax plus premiums as high as 9.5% of a person's income...
-
7. While *I* could and would justify such high initial costs for single payer health care, most consumers & voters would quickly reject 'em.
-
8. The sad truth is that had "Obamacare" been "single payer" the *easiest* thing for the GOP right now would be to dismantle it...
-
9. What makes it so difficult for the GOP to repeal Obamacare now is that, again, it gave stakes to many institutional sectors...
- 他17件の返信
-
-
-
@AlGiordano Dems need to start talking about adding the public option to reduce costs.#PublicOption -
@chiefster16 You don't sound like anyone who has ever organized a winning battle around a complex policy issue. You're spitting nonsense. -
@AlGiordano OK just keep winning. -
@chiefster16 Use your google. I do win most of the battles I enter. That's been public record for decades & because I organize, not whine. -
@AlGiordano You could have politely given an alternate comment. Instead you had to be a dick. Only an a-hole would listen to you. Goodbye. - 他1件の返信
-
-
-
@AlGiordano Since Dems agree ACA needs improvement why isn't there Dem bill to boost subsidies, cut deductibles. Why no positive alternative -
@zugerd Perhaps because they don't have the votes and it would be only a symbolic gesture? -
@AlGiordano Of course but debating it would show the "ACA is dying" argument is bullshit. ACA not dying if GOP stops starving it. - 他1件の返信
-
-
-
@AlGiordano Obama outsmarted them again. He made it able to withstand GOP attempts to dismantle, and GOP was ill prepared to replace. -
@zatchry@eclecticbrotha@AlGiordano I think they expected to continue to have nonsensical "repeal" votes without coming up with a plan. -
@jocelynjtweet@eclecticbrotha When confronted with abysmal facts about their "replacement" they scrambled to include a Phase 2 and Phase 3. -
@Mombity@jocelynjtweet@eclecticbrotha The only reason there is a hypothetical "next phases(s)" is becUse they want to use reconciliation. -
@Mombity@jocelynjtweet@eclecticbrotha They can't do the other stuff under reconciliation b/c they're not budgetary. But w/o the CBO=> -
@Mombity@jocelynjtweet@eclecticbrotha >>being able to analyze them (b/c they don't yet exist) the coverage losses are horrific & the >> -
@Mombity@jocelynjtweet@eclecticbrotha >>so-called drop in premiums (not a real drop, just a slightly lower increase) seems insignificant. -
@Mombity@jocelynjtweet@eclecticbrotha If they want CBO (and voters) to assess the entire plan then they have to put it all up at once. - 他1件の返信
-
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。