Let's pick on red pill's evolutionary psychology logic.

Women like men with resources for long term relationships and good looking, dominant men for short term sex.

Men need to trade their resources for a long term relationship.

If you're a good looking, dominant male it is in your best interest to cheer for women wanting to have casual sex because that means more hypothetic partners for you.

But if you're too unattractive for casual sex then it makes sense that you should judge women as sluts and be pro-family values as your best prospects of sex is to have a long term relationship. The more women there are interested in short term sex, the less pool of hypothethic partners you have available for you and possibly the more scared you are that she's gonna be unfaithful because casual sex is so socially accepted.

So what does that say about TRP? Is it a community of strong alphas or a community of frustrated guys who can't nail a girlfriend and so judge women for casual sex and wish everybody would be married age 18? You take your own conclusions.

Their instinct to judge women for casual sex is rationalized as "women who marry and have kids later in life have more genetic mutations that they will pass on offspring so it's totally rational to be pro-family values" amog other stupid justifications.

Now i don't mean to say this is either right or wrong. I'm just using TRP stupid logic against itself. If they were alpha they would want women to be sexually free under their own interpretation of things.

P.S.: With this post i invite TRPers to see the irrationality of their own ways, but i don't mean to hurt anyone or make fun of them. This is a serious post.