38
39

/r/badphilosophy commie /u/Get_erkt necromances an old /r/drama thread with a Berlin wall of text and dozens of copies of the same comment. (reddit.com)

Ultrashitpost が 投稿

全 142 件のコメント
並べ替え:
トップ (提案されたアイデア)
ベスト新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Deity_Of_Darkness 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (2子コメント)

So much surplus autism in one post. Looks like they lack the self awareness to realize that most people don't give a shit about communism and that he looks like some homeless man ranting on a street corner.

[–]Ultrashitpost[S] 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (1子コメント)

What's remarkable is that the thread is a month old, and he only now responds to them.

It's as if the robot suddenly rebooted and executed autism.exe

[–]darth_stroyer [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

He spent four weeks composing that """"essay"""" and he still ends every paragraph with "think about that".

[–]Orsonius 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (111子コメント)

I hate the people in /r/badphilosophy

they are the most smug, arrogant, useless redditors of them all.

I don't even care if they are left like me, they are just assholes.

[–]YHofSuburbia 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (53子コメント)

Basically all the /r/badx subs except economics and sometimes history (until you start taking about communism ofc) are run by histrionic far left types who like to drown everyone they disagree with walls and walls of text while passing off opinions as fact and circlejerking each other relentlessly. It's pretty sad, I think most of them only have reddit going on in their lives.

[–]KT-47 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (8子コメント)

badeconomics isn't even in the same league. they are legitimately a credit to their field, all the other badx's are just marxists sucking each other off

[–]ThatOtherPromise 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

BadHistory is good m8

BadMath was fun

BadLit was so so pretentious that it became funny

[–]TrattativaStatoMafia 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

all the other badx's are just marxists sucking each other off

dude you rekt them hard

[–][削除されました]  (5子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]TrattativaStatoMafia 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    i'm whiter than you, post a timestamp

    [–][削除されました]  (3子コメント)

    [deleted]

      [–]TrattativaStatoMafia 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      that's not a timestamp

      [–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

      [deleted]

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        don't underestimate yourself

        [–]Pretentious_Nazi 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (8子コメント)

        badphilosophy is awful. Which is a shame, because philosophy is awesome.

        [–]ThatOtherPromise 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (7子コメント)

        AskPhilosophy is decent though, not askhistory good, but good enough

        Though honestly is only decent because of /u/TychoCelchuuu

        I do wonder what is there for him to take the time to actually answer so many questions, is like he gets paid or some shit.

        The others seem to find more fun in circlejerking about their moral superiority in BP

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

        badphil and askphil have the same top mod you fucking idiot

        [–]ThatOtherPromise 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (5子コメント)

        Yeah, drunktune

        What is your point? are you usually this butt blasted or is today a special day?

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

        what makes badphil a bad sub and askphil a good one?

        are you usually this butt blasted or is today a special day?

        sorry i'm trying to mix with the /r/drama crowd

        [–]ThatOtherPromise 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

        has the same top mod

        therefore has to be equally good

        o i am laffin 😂

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

        this is why they mock you: you are unable to explain yourself, only memes and buzzwords

        [–]fourcrew 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        to be fair, i like the meme he used.

        [–]DriftUponDawn [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        it's a fine meme wtf is your problem

        [–]Orsonius 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (21子コメント)

        I'm an evil commie but the peeps over at badphil piss me off because they think they are right and everyone else is wrong. but they don't even bother to explain shit

        [–]bleasehalb 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Badphil contains only the highest caliber of minds such as angrydm and unwordableweirdness.

        [–]atnorman 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (8子コメント)

        but they don't even bother to explain shit

        Why do we often write fucking novels on reddit then? 🤔

        [–]ThatOtherPromise 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (5子コメント)

        Can you believe that suhuman didnt even bother to read my mini novel filled with condescension and sanctimonity where I assume the least possible charitable interpretation of his ideas? lol gonna laugh at him in another public sub that he can easily acess by clicking on my post history, that surely will motivate him to read my micro novel

        Dude I am not denying we are dicks over here but at least we are a bit self aware you know

        [–]atnorman 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

        filled with condescension and sanctimonity where I assume the least possible charitable interpretation of his ideas?

        Yes, that's accurate, good job. I totally do that, and only that. Glad you were able to point this out rather than just lying about me.

        that he can easily acess by clicking on my post history

        "He can see if he does something he has no reason to do"

        Wow. Again, a thrilling argument.

        but at least we are a bit self aware

        I'm not so sure.

        [–]ThatOtherPromise [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

        Wat dude

        I dont know you, you might be a wonderful dude, what the fuck do I know

        I am talking about the sub in general

        "He can see if he does something he has no reason to do"

        Wow. Again, a thrilling argument.

        hahahaha u wat

        This is how reddit, especially the parts where you people go to argue, work:

        1) Someone replies to redditor

        2) redditor clicks on said person post history

        3) redditor checks to see if said perso posted on X sub that is against ( insert redditor dumb political opinion )

        4) If they do belong to group redditor dislikes proceed to be in the defensive for the rest of the argument if redditor even bothers to read what said person wrote

        You know this is more or less true.

        Cmon the people at sam harris fucking knows you guys by memory, they know you are all talking shit behind them

        If I post 20 comments from this sub, other meta subs like circle broke/srs/srd and bad philosophy you wouldn't notice the difference

        [–]atnorman [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

        I am talking about the sub in general

        But this is similarly myopic. The people who actually argue don't really do that. Lurkers are shit, but okay, that's true everywhere. And they're also not arguing.

        This is how reddit, especially the parts where you people go to argue, work:

        If it is true, which I'm less than certain of, that's their problem. They did something that couldn't have possibly turned out well for them, and, surprise, it didn't.

        [–]ThatOtherPromise [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        If it is true, which I'm less than certain of, that's their problem. They did something that couldn't have possibly turned out well for them, and, surprise, it didn't.

        and I know that dude, but you have to understand that that is how a shitload of people use this website, is a waste of time but I see it happen a lot. I mean ffs there are words that if you say them you are automatically in group x or y.

        No one is charitable to someone whom they know is laughing behind their backs

        Btw is lurkers and 2/5 of your mods or so honestly

        [–]atnorman [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        No one is charitable to someone whom they know is laughing behind their backs

        And?

        Btw is lurkers and 2/5 of your mods or so honestly

        I highly doubt that.

        [–]Orsonius [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        wasnt done when they banned me and just spouted memes instead of actually making an argument.

        but to be honest, most self-described philosophers are twats who just wanna feel superior.

        Especially christian ones.

        [–]atnorman [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        wasnt done when they banned me and just spouted memes instead of actually making an argument.

        And? Do you understand that people act in different ways in different contexts?

        but to be honest, most self-described philosophers are twats who just wanna feel superior. Especially christian ones.

        lol

        [–]CheezitsAreMyLife 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        it's a meme sub not an explainer sub. The same people post ironically in askphilosophy

        [–]Deity_Of_Darkness 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (9子コメント)

        I'm somewhat far left, but holy, r/badphilosophy makes me sympathize with Ayn Rand fans and some conservatives. They aren't even that good at arguing against right wingers, ad hominem passes off as "argument" there.

        [–]WearyTunes [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        you should reevaluate your ideological stances if a memey internet community can make you fault on them so easily

        [–]Orsonius [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

        Yeah from my interactions with them before they banned me. they aren't actually trying to argue, but just ridicule.

        I mean I understand the "enoughXspam" subs that do that, but I thought badX was supposed to be good and actually explain shit, but they are just circlejerking.

        [–]Deity_Of_Darkness [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

        They just bitch about how Sam Harris is so horrible, how every atheist is a fedora wearing obese neckbeard, how Zizek doesn't know what he's talking about and how they, these unemployed armchair internet pesudophilosopher's "know" more than him.

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

        these unemployed armchair internet pesudophilosopher's

        some of them are professors

        [–]Deity_Of_Darkness [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        Actually, most of them aren't academics. And those that are academics, whether they are professors or graduate students, it's still embarrassing reading their comments.

        [–]Ylajali_2002 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        name 1

        [–]atnorman [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        Wokeup?

        RA was never super prolific but he's a professor somewhere.

        [–]Orsonius [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        They could have just called the sub "/r/wedontlikesamharris"

        [–]xjapxn 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        /r/badlegaladvice can be pretty funny

        [–]Ylajali_2002 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        It's just inevitable that the badx subs are gonna attract far more armchair intellectuals with stupid internet grudges than people actually knowledgeable about the field. If you're interested in a subject enough to be studying on a regular basis you're probably not going to have much time to devote to trolling reddit for comments you deem ignorant. And if you've studied a subject for longer than a couple years you've probably had to make peace with the fact that laymen regularly flub the subject pretty badly. You are not going to live a long life if you are regularly spazzing out about people who don't have the same highly specialized knowledge that you do.

        In reality it seems like the badx subs are filled mostly with the kind of first-year student who just finished psych101 and takes it as his duty to lecture anyone who says "Freudian slip" on why Freud has been thoroughly discredited by modern psychology.

        I'm not an expert in philosophy, but I majored in it for my undergrad, and it's clear to me at least that a great deal of the posters on /r/badphilosophy aren't nearly as knowledgeable as they'd like to believe. They pretty regularly botch basic, well known concepts, but it's generally tolerated unless it goes against the circlejerk.

        [–]Shitgenstein [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        And if you've studied a subject for longer than a couple years you've probably had to make peace with the fact that laymen regularly flub the subject pretty badly. You are not going to live a long life if you are regularly spazzing out about people who don't have the same highly specialized knowledge that you do.

        Most of us are at peace with the 'laymen' flub and willing to clarify things, in fact this is done regularly in /r/askphilosophy. The subreddit was originally for frustration from the most arrogant and stubborn, as you say, "armchair intellectuals with stupid internet grudges" who would debate nonsense on end with those with academic backgrounds. Then it got popular to an extent.

        I'm not an expert in philosophy, but I majored in it for my undergrad, and it's clear to me at least that a great deal of the posters on /r/badphilosophy aren't nearly as knowledgeable as they'd like to believe. They pretty regularly botch basic, well known concepts, but it's generally tolerated unless it goes against the circlejerk.

        A great deal of posters are just random redditors who came to the sub from other bad and meta subreddits. How do you square the accusation of elitism with having an open-door policy?

        What basics are regularly botched?

        [–]atnorman 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (9子コメント)

        are run by histrionic far left types

        You realize the top mod in badphil is a conservative, right?

        [–]dexceit 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

        One conservative in a sea of commies. Dont pretend commies dont control the discourse (am i using this word right?) dude. Its intellectually dishonest.

        Sincerely,

        A psuedointellectual internet troll who knows fuck all about philosophy, except that french philosophers piss me off

        [–]fourcrew 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        A psuedointellectual internet troll who knows fuck all about philosophy, except that french philosophers piss me off

        what did he meme by this

        [–]atnorman -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

        Dont pretend commies dont control the discourse (am i using this word right?) dude. Its intellectually dishonest.

        .

        A psuedointellectual internet troll

        Well, at least you're correct about that.

        [–]dexceit 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        .

        Gj refuting my argument. Come on man, at least admit that your userbase is mostly made up of commies. Idk what your political affiliation is, but users tend to outnumber mods.

        [–]Ferenix2/u/StratoDaster's #1 fan [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

        He is not a conservative in any conceivable way. What passes as "conservative" over there is simply not being a full blown trotskyst and/or using elitist argument about the "epistocracy" having to install a dictatorship and a system that is not 100% egalitarian since it needs to kill all the actual conservatives, while if they draw even some very mild criticism of cultural marxism from say - fucking Aristotle- badphil users have a conniption and scream how it's all very complex and if they read him well they would see how his ideas were closer to social justice. In the same breath, everyone who disagrees even a bit with feminism is declared a Nazi.

        [–]atnorman [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        Huh? Under that notion I'm a conservative, and I'm certainly not. The top mod is legitimately a conservative, fan of Hayek, the whole deal. You just don't know what you're talking about.

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        You HAD to mention cultural marxism

        [–]Ultrashitpost[S] 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (5子コメント)

        True

        /u/drunkentune , i think it's time to pull the plug on this one.

        [–]ThatOtherPromise 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        I mean I dont wanna be that guy but I would be deeply worried if I modded a sub that unironically upvoted AngryDM and unwordableweirdness

        [–]drunkentune [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

        I'd pull your plug.

        Am I doing /r/Drama right?

        [–]alexmikli 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (5子コメント)

        Every single person I know that it's into philosophy is smug as fuck. Combine that with someone thinking their philosophy is best and others are inherently bad, and you get a smug, arrogant, and useless asshole.

        [–]Orsonius 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (4子コメント)

        yeah even among the people I associate with, the person I fought most with studied philosophy. who would have guessed.

        [–]ThatOtherPromise 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (12子コメント)

        wow are you gonna let that pass /u/atnorman? /u/irontide? they are talking shit about your baby!

        Yeah anyway turns out knowing more about morality really has nothing to do with not being a smug arrogant cunt 🤔

        [–]atnorman 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (11子コメント)

        Why the fuck was I tagged? Moreover, I have that user on -1, so I suspect they're pretty daft and should be banned.

        [–]Ultrashitpost[S] 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        We like to tag random people around here, like letting fat tigers chase a drone.

        [–]wokeupabug 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (8子コメント)

        Why the fuck was I tagged?

        Why is a post in /r/drama, linking some other post in /r/drama by some rando, filled with ranting about /r/badphilosophy?

        A: Oh, we're in /r/drama

        [–]atnorman 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (7子コメント)

        Right, but why me?

        [–]wokeupabug 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (6子コメント)

        They're been on to you since the details of Project Atwood got leaked. Even when we make sockpuppets for our Cointelpro and contrive to get them met with eye rolls and banning at /r/badphilosophy, they still get identified as our agents. It doesn't matter though, we already got Milo fired, and if they've found out about our plan to litter reddit ads with subliminal messages that decrease testosterone production, the program's already been running long enough to have feminized most redditors. I say drop the act and claim our win.

        [–]CheezitsAreMyLife 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

        this but unironically

        [–]ThatOtherPromise 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

        (((/u/wokeupabug))) might think he is being sarcastic

        ...but I know the truth about the (((cabal)))

        [–]Ferenix2/u/StratoDaster's #1 fan [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        I wish you really did

        [–]ThatOtherPromise 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        if they've found out about our plan to litter reddit ads with subliminal messages that decrease testosterone production

        Hey I am trying to bulk so could you please not?

        [–]drunkentune [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        They really know us: we're all communist Christian theologians... and butthurt pseudo-intellectual postmodernist liberals.

        [–]tablefor1 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        communist Christian theologians... and butthurt pseudo-intellectual postmodernist liberals (Marxist-Leninist).

        [–]ThatOtherPromise 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Eh why not

        [–]Deity_Of_Darkness 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

        They aren't even good philosophers. It's just filled with bitter christians, communists.

        [–]Orsonius [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

        Yeah it feels like the most butthurt philosophers are usually christians or even worse, theologians who think they are o so smart. but actually just have shit arguments and a worthless degree in theology.

        No wonder they are bitter.

        [–]Deity_Of_Darkness [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        They get really bitter if you tell him you have a STEM degree, or even a degree in economics. God forbid you are an engineer, to be fair, most engineers don't know anything about philosophy and have bad ideas about what is philosophy, and then they shit on philosophy majors. If you have to justify your degree all the time, you lose patience with people.

        [–]atnorman [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        They get really bitter if you tell him you have a STEM degree, or even a degree in economics.

        ...

        I'm a math/physics major. Some of the more prolific posters are STEM majors. Also, I think the last survey said we were like 2/3s atheist and agnostic? To be fair, there was no question about Marxism, so w/e. But you clearly know nothing about the sub.

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (26子コメント)

        you hate them because they know what they're talking about and you are a typical idiot

        [–]Ultrashitpost[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (15子コメント)

        You seem awfully defensive about all this. Maybe we should make a thread about you.

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (14子コメント)

        badphil is a very good sub, why do you hate it? is it because you think moral relativism is intuitive and the strong position? is it because you can't accept that eating animals is unethical?

        [–]Orsonius 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (9子コメント)

        I got banned and ridicules by them. I don't remember why they did it, but it was just a shitty experience.

        A group which kicks you out and laughs at you without actually making a case, except self-congratulatory ego stroking is just not worth respecting.

        Also how can you both be a moral relativist but think eating animals is unethical.

        I'm not a relativist and don't eat animals, that is logically coherent.

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

        without actually making a case

        i don't believe you.

        Also how can you both be a moral relativist but think eating animals is unethical.

        not really. You can be a moral realist and think that eating animals is ethical, but if you are an anti-realist you don't believe that moral claims can be true or false.

        [–]Orsonius [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

        i don't believe you.

        That's fine. it's like 2 years ago.

        not really. You can be a moral realist and think that eating animals is ethical, but if you are an anti-realist you don't believe that moral claims can be true or false.

        Well i do think, given a certain context, moral claims can be true or false. and some contexts have more utility than others. So basically some moral systems are better than others and I therefor think some claims about morality can be true or false, just as claims about health can be true of false, even though health is hard to define and objectively prove.

        [–]Shitgenstein [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        That's fine. it's like 2 years ago.

        Hold a grudge much?

        Why are you owed "making a case"? Why does every idiot, who will predictably be too stubborn to accept any case whatsoever, deserved a soapbox wherever they go on the internet?

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        well you are a realist, welcome to the club.

        [–]Ferenix2/u/StratoDaster's #1 fan [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

        Everything you said about them applies to the entirety of the far left from Merkel to Pol Pot and so applies to you, piece of shit.

        [–]Ultrashitpost[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        Even if it were unethical (which i do not believe it is), i'd still do it just to piss off vegans.

        [–]glmox [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

        is it because you think moral relativism is intuitive and the strong position?

        >implying anything short of hardline moral skepticism isnt objectively wrong

        [–]ThatOtherPromise 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (9子コメント)

        And I know a lot about surfing, but if I made a subreddit where I talk down to people who doesnt know anything about surfing you would rightfully call me a moron

        Same shit

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (7子コメント)

        it's more like a sub for mocking people who think they know about surfing but they actually can't stand on the board, and think that a particular kind of surfing is bad because a famous surfer was kind of a dick.

        [–]ThatOtherPromise [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

        No famous surfer was a dick though we are all pretty chill

        🏄

        No but seriously imagine that a newbie says " wow California really has the best beaches to surf " I would think " haha that is kind of silly 🙂 " while the BP version of a surfist would go " what a fucking subhuman cunt jesus fucking christ that is pathetic and arrogant he is just a newbie he shoudnt have opinions about anything ugh ugh ugh, also I bet he choose california cause its a white first world place, racist scum "

        This analogy was very dumb but u got the point

        [–]Ylajali_2002 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

        Dude I don't think that helps your argument. It would be beyond pathetic for a surfer to devote any amount of energy to mocking somebody because they're bad at surfing but think they're good. Nobody cares about some idiot who thinks he's a pro surfer except for other idiots who think they're the real pro surfers and are out to prove something.

        Just think about this for longer than a second. What you're describing is extremely and unambiguously childish.

        [–]TrattativaStatoMafia [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        Dude you are describing /r/drama

        I don't give a fuck if badphil mocks people (anonymous people) who are smug idiots. Bad philosophy is bad and needs to be fought.

        The typical /r/drama approach to socialism is bad and childish and anti-intellectual, I will mock you endlessly for it, it stifles the political debate. Can you please accept that socialist philosophy was born a century before historical communism? You know what's pathetic? Arguing about something you know nothing about.

        And almost always mocking is condemned and downvoted, in badphil, not here, here it's the whole point of the sub.

        [–]Ylajali_2002 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        This is even worse. The difference here is that /r/drama is openly retarded and celebrates that fact. No one here believes they're going to be a distinguished Professor of Drama once they get over their internet addiction and crippling social anxiety. No one here believes they're reddit's top Drama Expert just because they took (and probably failed) Drama101 at their shitty tier 3 college.

        Bad philosophy is bad and needs to be fought.

        Well, you're not the hero we deserve, or the hero we need, or really even a hero at all. I'd much prefer to put my faith in people who weren't actively seeking out and engaging in only the dumbest philosophical arguments on reddit. It doesn't inspire much confidence that your "expertise" is only "expertise" when viewed against the opinions of literal morons.

        The typical /r/drama approach to socialism is bad and childish and anti-intellectual, I will mock you endlessly for it

        Oh no a group of college dropouts is going to lecture us about socialism. Surely this will be the end of /r/drama.

        Honestly, I wouldn't have a problem with any of this if you just dropped this pretense of you guys fighting some grand, heroic battle against ignorance. You're shitposting on the internet. You're not fighting anything, except perhaps adulthood. Get over it.

        [–]Shitgenstein [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        If there was a subreddit for teaching people surfing and a subreddit for not teaching people surfing, what would you call the expectation of the former of the latter?

        Moronic, maybe?

        [–]no_maps_no_plans 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (11子コメント)

        Also capitalism is structurally incapable of stopping climate change. So if we dont end it, itll end itself. Think hard about this

        Soviets didn't give two fucks about the environment. Commies love their poor irrigation and heavy metal in their soil.

        I didn't read most of it except this

        /u/Get_erkt really makes you think......

        [–]Soulwound 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

        Cue the "the soviet union wasn't really a communist state" counter-argument.

        [–]AgentGotse [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        But the other day Yuri Gagarin had a birthday and then it was a communist utopia.

        [–]Ultrashitpost[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (7子コメント)

        Also the "capitalism is structurally incapable of stopping climate change" argument is ignorant of history, since environmentalism was originally a conservative thing.

        [–]Fiery1Phoenix 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

        ...Thats just wrong. Roosevelt was the first conservationist president, and he was a Progressive, and part of the liberal party at the time

        [–]Ultrashitpost[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

        The Romantic environmentalists preceded Roosevelt.

        [–]Fiery1Phoenix 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Right, and romanticism was associated with liberalism and progressivism

        [–]TheChtaptiskFithp 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

        Don't disagree with you but conservatism and capitalism being synonymous is a recent US thing.

        [–]Ultrashitpost[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

        Everything is capitalism anyway, communism has never bene achieved.

        [–]TheChtaptiskFithp [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        Still the conservatives of that time, and soon maybe the conservatives of this time, are less averse to "reigning in" capitalism.

        [–]Deity_Of_Darkness 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        I mean, I have problems with some corporations and capitalism, but these people are completely incoherent when it comes to actually presenting any intelligent policy, they appeal to marxist/anarchist idealism like local direct democracy, they have no plan for dealing with global environmental issues, or even how specific institutions should be reformed/restructured.

        Look at Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, for all their sabotaging unions and being assholes, they have invented useful technology that addresses climate change, transportation, new energy sources,etc.

        What most of these marxists/anarchists don't want to admit is, that capitalism has done some good thing and still does some good. It's been over a hundred years, and they still haven't agreed on what amounts to as theoretical differences that are irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. They all hate capitalism, they can't agree on either resurrecting the Soviet Union, Mao, or collapsing civilization so people will be forced to live in some shitty, local "direct democracy" community where the uninformed vote on things they don't understand like medicine, utilities, agriculture,etc.

        [–]alexmikli 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (11子コメント)

        Why are all the bad___ subs run by communists? How'd that happen?

        I feel like /r/badpolitics users really don't have ground to stand on if they're communists.

        [–]cruelandusual 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        When you've got nothing going for you but the certainty that you're right, the only way to win arguments is to seek out bad ones.

        And nobody can compete with the combination of failure and delusion of communists.

        [–]WearyTunes [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

        Why do i think all the bad___ subs run by communists?

        badhistory: because "actually, it's more complex than that" is a classic example of historiographical cultural marxism

        badphilosophy: because i don't understand the references and they make fun of stem ;_;

        badlinguistics: because any critique of prescriptivism sounds kinda srsy

        badsocialscience: because they talk about class, wont use my definition of feminism, and use buzzwords like 'normative' :'(

        badeconomics: accelerationism?

        badpolitics: no argument there

        badliterature: heh, liberal arts

        badmath: [tbd: i forgot whether they're majority constructivist or not]

        [–]Ferenix2/u/StratoDaster's #1 fan [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

        Exactly. What you describe as "it's more complex than that" is some Marxist word-trick where the important information is condensed in a word while the rest of the wall of text is a barrage of long winded insults blended with some irrelevant information that does not change in any way the heart of the matter. It's all tricks, like this post of yours.

        [–]WearyTunes [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        lmao

        [–]DominusLutrae [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        It's okay that you don't understand the big words. We don't literacyshame here.

        [–]Ferenix2/u/StratoDaster's #1 fan [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        Even you are a mod now! Congratulations!

        [–]horseseatears 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

        /r/badpolitics's definition of bad politics is anything that's not communism.

        An easy way to tell that a sub is full of people whose only value is as a tax credit is that /u/wearytunes is in the mod list.

        [–]WearyTunes [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        oh no

        [–]alexmikli 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

        How does he mod that many subs?!

        [–]riemann1413 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        /u/wearytunes is more mod than man at this point

        it's all he does

        it's all he can do

        [–]Sergant_Stinkmeaner [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        /r/badhistory is still really good and sane.

        [–]jorio 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Think hard about this.

        No.

        [–]Ferenix2/u/StratoDaster's #1 fan [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        ITT: Neo-Drama talks about what makes badphil a shithole, does not recognize it's the same that makes itself a shithole. No epiphany acquired , even though they start their post with a declaration of belonging to the same side and posting on similar subs.

        [–]Ultrashitpost[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        I am not going to deny that, i just enjoy pooping in the open

        [–]SnapshillBot 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        No wonder you have an army of pretentious neckbeard losers following you around

        Snapshots:

        1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, ceddit.com, archive.is*

        I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

        [–]TotesMessenger [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

        I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

        If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

        [–]dealin_roofies [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

        /u/ShenronDragon autism is a perfect insult because autists are dog fucking subhumans you worthless furry.

        [–][削除されました]  (2子コメント)

        [deleted]

          [–]krutopatkin 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

          what is april 1st

          [–]18aidanme 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

          oh shit, gonna go off myself now.

          [–]Tophattingson [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

          "Exploitation" as a Marxist concept depends upon a demonstrably incorrect economic theory (LTV) and hence can be dismissed without further comment, and with it the entirety of what /u/Get_erkt posted.

          [–]ProfessedBug [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

          Anyone who uses autism as an insult is a shit person. Hands down.

          Friendly reminder that u/ShenronDragon is autistic. Carry on.