"Just an observation from your history here."
That is a lie and a moronic one at that. You posted that in reply to my comment which had nothing to do with you in any way whatsoever; I said the army likely murdered him, not that you did - you can thump your chest all you like, but you are not the army. The reply you mentioned was in an entirely different context.
Such blatant lack of reading comprehension! Or is it a refusal to remove the blinders?
Lies upon lies again. "Could have" only means that it is a possibility, not that he thinks that it was the most probable scenario like you said ("His own brother's words indicate that it was the most probable reason." - your words).
Yes you are. "it only goes back to the mental health issue I mentioned."
Lies and misinformation again. I had prefaced that with "First off, I find it hard to believe that the guy killed himself out of sheer paranoia; secondly, even if that is the case..."
A theory that cannot be backed up by an iota of evidence, and flies in the face of facts is not called a "theory"; it is called "fantasy".
My theory is at least a theory. You are simply lying.
Glad you admitted to it. Thank you.
Admitted what? The only thing I've admitted to there, is the fact that you are lying. If you're fine with that, good for you.
I totally believe them all. Sure. The only one that is insightful and makes a sense is the interview with Bir Bahadur Singh. That the sahayak system is abused by senior officers has been discussed before. But that abuse doesn't even begin to approach what you're alluding to in your nonsensical posts.
You can lie all you like, but those are hard news sources. Even if you completely disregard the one you don't "trust", there were still four more (I had provided an alternate news18 link for the last one, since I had correctly guessed that you would whine about it the original link being from a .pk publication). Lying and memeing does not change facts.