This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]euric6[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (0子コメント)

This thread has been locked.

In future, I would encourage you (all of you) to read our rules before participating in this sub.

Also, from our sidebar:

It is our intent and purpose to foster and encourage in-depth discussion about all things related to books, authors, genres or publishing

[–]herbine 781 ポイント782 ポイント  (14子コメント)

Sigh. It's a literary way to commemorate and the journalist reporting it uses "sights" instead of "sites" for the places where the books are left.

[–]00093293 280 ポイント281 ポイント  (10子コメント)

I am not a smart man, and that stuff bothers me.

Does no one have an editor anymore? Jesus.

[–]Byroms 78 ポイント79 ポイント  (8子コメント)

I only know the example from Buzzfeed and even then it was just the guy who got fired for writing an article about Hillarys health saying it, but apparently if you have a certain status you are just allowed to upload your "articles" to the site.

[–]00093293 65 ポイント66 ポイント  (1子コメント)

But don't some of the best writers need an editor?

Not just books but journalism too?

That is pretty silly, I mean unless you are some aggregate type site that has a new article every few seconds/minutes, a proofreader should give it a good once over, right?

It wouldn't take but 5 minutes. Hell, I would do it for free. I even see mistakes in some major outlets too.

[–]Byroms 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They should have an editor, but with enough clearance they don't require one.

[–]ailinmcc666 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (4子コメント)

fired not firwd

[–]RobertNAdams 50 ポイント51 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Muphry's Law: "If you write anything criticizing editing or proofreading, there will be a fault of some kind in what you have written."

(The misspelling of "Murphy's" is a deliberate play on "Murphy's Law".)

[–]Byroms 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fixed, tyvm.

[–]SimplySquiddy 42 ポイント43 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not to mention in the very beginning, where they refer to her as "Emmy Watson".

[–]IronFarmSnuff 42 ポイント43 ポイント  (0子コメント)

She's most likely using sights in the "sights to see" kind of way. Very common in British English. For example, you'd say "I'm going to London to see the sights".

[–]ThaiTeaWhyTeas 442 ポイント443 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hollywood actress Emmy Watson celebrated...

Is that bothering anyone else?

[–]Dofiii 97 ポイント98 ポイント  (0子コメント)

For some reason i though she was going around hiding other people's books. I guess this makes more sense.

[–]harrymuesli 850 ポイント851 ポイント  (18子コメント)

ITT: 150 comments complaining about 15 negative ones.

[–]rueckhand 397 ポイント398 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Haven't seen a single negative comment yet, only "wow the salt in this thread is real"

[–]harrymuesli 198 ポイント199 ポイント  (3子コメント)

There's like 1 anti feminist rant and a bunch of jokes about littering and stuff. Nothing 'salty'. I was actually disappointed when I got to the bottom. "That's all? That's what kept me up and nearly slightly concerned for three minutes?"

[–]lengthynonsense 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Hmm this sounds familiar.

[–]harrymuesli 43 ポイント44 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I was paraphrasing Hyde from That 70s Show.

Eric: Guys... I have to tell you about this dream I had. It was about Donna. Okay, it was five years in the future.
Hyde: Five years in the future? Did you see Jackie? How's she holdin' up? Do I need to get out now?
Eric: Hyde, in my dream, Donna gave up her life plans to be with me. And she was so miserable, she left me.
Hyde: That's it? I took my feet off the table and turned slightly to the left for that?

[–]DepravedMutant 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you're a fan of Hyde maybe don't google what the actor's been up to recently.

[–]flash__ 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Eh, they get re-sorted don't they? They are probably buried at the bottom now.

[–]ricesnot 50 ポイント51 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This thread was cleaned up by mods, you cannot see some of the old comments anymore.

[–]euric6[M] 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Still a lot of dross if you care to scroll down.

[–]nanothief 33 ポイント34 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Sort by old, and you will see that out of the first 10 top level comment posted, 6 are either deleted or anti-feminist/anti watson (and the deleted ones were likely negative as well). So when people were making the comments complaining about them, they were in the majority. Here are the non deleted ones:

I have a feeling that hanging out with Emma would be a fucking nightmare.


Let's see what rights men have, what rights women have, and what feminism fights for. Women - Get a shorter sentence for the same exact crime men do...


2012: Marriage Material 2014: Date Her Material 2016: Danger Zone She's starting to slip into the No-Go zone.


Fucking hate Emma Watson

[–]the_calibre_cat 94 ポイント95 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Whoa, six comments? RED ALERT. MAN YOUR BATTLESTATIONS. NOT A DRILL! I REPEAT, NOT. A. DRILL.

[–]harrymuesli 57 ポイント58 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Well to be fair, how is being anti Watson a crime? I never liked her either but that has nothing to do with her social work.

[–]RebelWithoutAKaz 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They gave her every fucking good line of Ron's from the Potter books and Rupert Grint still outshined her.

[–]Timues 147 ポイント148 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I love how the girl going up the escalator in the background of the preview pic is probably thinking "Did I just see Emma Watson!?"

[–]Unlucky_Magician 1364 ポイント1365 ポイント  (177子コメント)

She is doing something that she finds fun and that she thinks is good for the world. Free books of this variety won't hurt anyone. Yet, there is so much salt in this thread.

[–]idiocy_incarnate 233 ポイント234 ポイント  (28子コメント)

I guess it depends how good she is at hiding things, if she's any good there won't be many of them getting read.

[–]weeeee_plonk75 208 ポイント209 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Her recent Vanity Fair interview starts with her 'hiding' books on the NY subway, and one of the books she just places on a seat. I don't think she's really hiding them.

[–]DepravedMutant 226 ポイント227 ポイント  (5子コメント)

That's just littering.

[–]Signal2NoiseRatio 44 ポイント45 ポイント  (2子コメント)

SWAT has cordened off that subway entrance, Hasmat teams in route. By the time the anthrax lab testing results clear the 'hidden' book, tax payers will have spent $1.34 million. Thanks, Emma, just, Thanks Darling.

[–]KawKawww 97 ポイント98 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I like to imagine Nicolas Cage running around the city trying to find Emma Watson's books about strong female characters.

It's all unimaginably well hidden.

[–]BorgDrone 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I can't be the only one who read the headline and thought she went to book stores and hid the feminist books from the shelves there so no one would be able to find/buy them.

[–]sentrixbq 59 ポイント60 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm gonna hijack the top comment here. If anyone thinks this is a cool idea, check out BookCrossing for a fun way to leave books in public for other people. If you're interested in the specific books Emma has been sharing, you can check out her page for it on GoodReads.

[–]Piano18 387 ポイント388 ポイント  (132子コメント)

It's honestly disappointing how close-minded some people are. They are getting rattled over a woman placing books about strong women around the city. Ridiculous.

EDIT: Goodbye, inbox

[–]toreramatadora 410 ポイント411 ポイント  (62子コメント)

I think the problem is with the word "feminism". When Reddit reads that word, it doesn't matter the context it is being used, Reddit is gone.

[–]koniboni 247 ポイント248 ポイント  (22子コメント)

These self appointed anti-feminists are so easily triggered

[–]mrdude817 113 ポイント114 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I like to call them snowflakes ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–]TheEmaculateSpork 51 ポイント52 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Both sides are really, I just wonder where the reasonable people who can consider both sides went. Yes, women like the Hugh-mongous lady are fucking twats, but idiots on Reddit jumping to attack anything with the word "feminist" in it are equally annoying. People use labels so differently nowadays, you need to evaluate the action not the label. And if you look at what she's doing there's really nothing wrong with it.

[–]Icuminpiecestwo 48 ポイント49 ポイント  (37子コメント)

This. main stream media has created so much negative content related to the word feminism. This is because the spot light is on radical feminist that harass innocent men for crimes they never committed. This is sad because these women do not represent feminism. True feminism is noble and something I believe everyone can get behind.

[–]stilgar02 120 ポイント121 ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's not just the main stream media that's the problem here. I'd say even more so the fault lies with sites like reddit. Go to /r/videos and do a top search for 'feminist'. 9 of the top 10 all-time posts put feminism in a bad light. And yet when someone brings up feminism on reddit the argument is often 'well you should choose better people to represent yourselves.' Failing to understand feminists aren't choosing these videos or people as being representative...reddit is.

Edit: It's so sad that we're in a thread about Emma Watson doing awesome things...and once again we're talking about these "bad feminists" who hide under your bed and scare children at night. Every thread about women's issues on reddit, no matter the content or context, devolves into this same old god damn debate; talking about who is and isn't "representative". I regret even making my initial comment, because it only serves to further this trend of discussing representation rather than the core issues at hand.

[–]Frankandthatsit 79 ポイント80 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Not really. Entire parts of the internet like Jezebel, Huffpo, Tumblr et al do a pretty darn good job at making "feminism" something akin to a joke. Lena Dunham shouldn't be considered a feminist or any sort of cultural icon if you want to be taken seriously.

[–]lipidsly 37 ポイント38 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Unless youre into sister fisting

[–]kidamnesiac94 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Follow the money. People like Dunham sell because they're controversial. Supposedly socialist-leaning publications still like money and will choose sales/clicks that advertise feminism in a bad light rather than write dry, measured opinion pieces that paint it in a good light.

[–]DepravedMutant 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Jezebel isn't making feminism look bad on purpose.

[–]shirleysparrow 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Who? Which feminist is spotlighted in the news for doing this?

[–]SupremeMemeLord 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah we must be watching different mainstream medias because I see nothing but support for feminism 99% of the time.

[–]Szudar 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's funny that both sides blame mainstream media for creating bad connections with something.

[–]Pufflehuffy 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

They're also a very small minority of the movement, which is large, broad, and inviting overwhelmingly. I've been a feminist my whole life, surrounded by many strong feminist women and I've never heard or seen them do anything to harass innocent men or anything of the sort.

[–]the_calibre_cat 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They're also a very small minority of the movement, which is large, broad, and inviting overwhelmingly.

Yeah, try telling a feminist that you don't really agree that the government should be buying them their contraceptives. See how "overwhelmingly broad and inviting" it is afterwards. It's broad and inviting to people who are already feminists.

EDIT: Huh. Downvotes. Where did I go so wrong. /s

[–]Newoski 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No true scottsman

[–]myassholealt 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Feminism is a trigger word for many people. Especially on the Internet.

[–]4CatsInATrenchcoat 58 ポイント59 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It shouldn't be a surprise that Hermione is at it again with trying to get everyone to read books

[–]BushidoBrowne 81 ポイント82 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Omfg!

I bet if I find one it will have my letter for Hogwarts!

Right?

It's okay if I'm 22 right?

I can still attend?!?

[–]elunak 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (1子コメント)

What a wholesome comment. I'm waiting for mine at 19.

[–]han1f92 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

24, starting to look like I am gonna have to Filtch it.

[–]sentrixbq 576 ポイント577 ポイント  (111子コメント)

Jesus Christ Reddit. Why do you need to shit all over this?

Celebrities need to keep their opinions to themselves.

Since when? Tell that to the one we elected president.

She's forcing her beliefs on others

What? Aren't you the same people who yammer on about how important it is to read things you disagree with when people get tired of seeing your racist bullshit alternative facts you spam.

Feminism is evil cuz men have troubles too.

Then do something to fix those troubles. Don't tell others they can't try to improve because your life isn't perfect either. Work to move people UP not DOWN.

[–]blobblet 408 ポイント409 ポイント  (58子コメント)

Feminism is evil cuz men have troubles too.

Then do something to fix those troubles.

That part is the only one I can't agree with, I feel like you're - whether intentionally or not - misrepresenting the argument. One common criticism of feminism is how it strives for the advancement of women while claiming a struggle for equality, in some cases overreaching their goal and creating a situation where men are being discriminated against.

Now, whether this criticism is justified or not, it can't be dismissed with the argument that someone should create a movement to strive for the equality of men in those areas. If equality issues are being created by proposals by the feminist movement, criticising them for that is fair and square, and speaking up against it is "doing something to fix those troubles".

Don't tell others they can't try to improve because your life isn't perfect either. Work to move people UP not DOWN.

This argument, in my opinion, is also flawed. In some areas, there is simply no difference, for example in access to the job market. A law that states "when applying for a job position, a woman has to be hired if she is equally qualified to a man applying for the same position" (which exists in some countries, is implied in any mandatory quota of women in professions, which is also in effect in several countries, and is a popular demand of feminist groups as a measure of equality) moves women "UP", but since it takes away the (idealistic) former 50-50 odds men had of being hired in such a situation, it also somewhat takes away from their career outlook, moving them DOWN. This is not a situation where the cake automatically becomes bigger when you readjust the pieces.

[–]alanofford 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (2子コメント)

In England what you've described is called "positive discrimination" and is against the law. There is allowance under the law for "positive action" which is "intended to give special encouragement to one sex, without actually discriminating against the other".

If there's another country which practices the kind of discrimination you describe then I'd be interested to hear about it, otherwise this statement is misleading as is the idea that it's "a popular demand of feminist groups". As others have pointed out the goal is equality not disadvantaging anyone.

Source quoted: https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/discrimination/discrimination-because-of-sex-or-sexual-orientation/discrimination-because-of-sex/#positive_action

[–]blobblet 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

German law has pretty much the same outcome, except positive action is explicitly acknowledged as a legal form of discrimination in sec. 5 AGG.

Yes, the goal is equality and that's a good thing, but we get there using a "necessary evil".

[–]soullessgeth 35 ポイント36 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Then do something to fix those troubles. Don't tell others they can't try to improve because your life isn't perfect either. Work to move people UP not DOWN.

it's annoying because it's typically a bunch of upper class white women berating everyone else for not being wealthy enough.

work to bring others up not down? considering how the entire economic environment is stacked against working class folks to benefit wealthy types like actresses...that's nice sounding propaganda but no one wants to hear that right now. we are sick of 40 years of neoliberal CRAP and sick of being berated by the morally bankrupt elite class

[–]RollBread 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Then do something to fix those troubles.

Dividing into sides is how we end up not solving anything, all that results in is people fighting each other over pointless shit.

I'd rather there be a bigger movement towards equality all as opposed to the rights of one specific group.

EDIT: You can downvote me all you want, I think equal rights for all is a good idea and I more than willing to take flak for it. I know I help by donating and working for charity which is more than any of you.

[–]MyOtherCarisaZaku 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Celebrities need to keep their opinions to themselves.

really since when? WHERE IS JA!? since then.

[–]glad1couldk3k -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Since when? Tell that to the one we elected president.

Of course that thing where he's a billionaire businessmen is overshadowed by his time as a reality show host.

What? Aren't you the same people who yammer on about how important it is to read things you disagree with when people get tired of seeing your racist bullshit alternative facts you spam.

The thing is, Feminist won't do that. If they had the ability to do that they still wouldn't believe in stupid shit like the wage gap that was debunked back in the '80s.

Then do something to fix those troubles. Don't tell others they can't try to improve because your life isn't perfect either. Work to move people UP not DOWN.

An average woman living in the west has an objectively higher living standard than an average man in the west. Now, have you ever known of such power dynamic in history where the alleged oppressors were living objectively worse lives in every way than the people they allegedly oppressed?

Isn't that the point of oppression? To make someone else's life worse in order to make your own better? In the days of american slavery were the masters living worse lives than the slaves? Hm... Really makes you think, doesn't it?

Further more, Emma Watson is worth 70 $ million. An average american man will in hist entire life earn only 2$ if he save every penny. Now this woman is pointing at that man and telling him that he is the oppressor, that man that would need to work for 3 500 years and save every penny to have the same economic power she has for being pretty. He's the oppressor. How far up your own ass does she need to be to actually think that? Sexists, racists and homophobes are insects compared to the giants that are the rich, and yet she's pointing down at them and blaming all of society's ills on them, never mind her that levels cities with each step she takes. She's not the issue, move on.

[–]weeeee_plonk75 91 ポイント92 ポイント  (7子コメント)

This is awesome! I've only once found a book 'in the wild,' but it really brightened my day (even though the book itself wasn't my sort of book).

I also just read Emma's Vanity Fair interview, and it starts with her hiding books on the NY subway. I hope that whoever finds the books takes the time to read them :)

edit: looking at the listed books, I don't think all of them are necessarily feminist books so much as books about women. Here's all the ones the article mentions/ photos show:

  • 'How to Be a Woman’ by Caitlin Moran
  • 'My Life on the Road’ by Gloria Steinem
  • 'Mom & Me & Mom’ by Maya Angelou
  • 'Half The Sky’ by Sheryl WuDunn and Nicholas Kristof
  • 'The Color Purple’ by Alice Walker
  • 'Persepolis' by Marjane Satrapi

[–]AndyKSul 44 ポイント45 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Also worth pointing out Persepolis is a graphic novel and not just a story centered on feminism.

Also goes into cultural differences that the protagonist faces, politics in Iran, and a coming of age story as well.

[–]Realniceandtight 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (0子コメント)

One of the best I've read. Great book.

[–]sentrixbq 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (2子コメント)

If that made your day, check out BookCrossing for a fun way to leave books in public for other people. If you get lucky and other people enter them in the site you can keep tabs on where they travel to.

[–]weeeee_plonk75 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I had no idea this exists, and thank you for sharing it! Have you participated or ever found one of the books?

[–]sentrixbq 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've never found one of the books with their label but I've left a few. I'm super obsessive about the spines and condition of my books so if I let a friend borrow one and they return it in a condition that bothers me I donate it somewhere and get a new copy for my shelf.

[–]Phiau 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ok. The books dropped bored the life out of me, but that's because they're not what I like. If anyone gets a love of reading from finding one of these then the world is a little brighter.

I was introduced to my now favorite genre by a "take a book, leave a book" in a hostel once. I've since re-read that book 5 times and filled a bookcase with ones like it.

More people should do things like this.

[–][削除されました]  (7子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]sentrixbq 84 ポイント85 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    She's big on getting people reading. I've seen her talk before on other interviews about doing this for other occasions or simply leaving random books she likes. I find it difficult to criticize someone using their celebrity status to find a new way to encourage people to read and share more books.

    [–]Shaq2thefuture 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    The girl who got famous cause of a book series likes books. Color me surprised. The real takeaway is that people sure do like being obtuse and insecure about the literature of others.

    [–]acollision_3 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Especially on a subreddit dedicated to reading!

    [–]sentrixbq 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    She should have been giving away copies of 1984!

    [–]dylan2451 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    And then told everybody about it?

    Indirectly yes. she was pretty quiet about it, but she put hand written notes in them which would obviously lead back to her. The people who found them posted on social media about it, so there wasn't any doubt that there would be a story about her

    [–]JSizzleSlice 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    To her credit, people will take it much more seriously and it'll have a bigger impact if people see it's the Harry Potter girl.

    [–]euric6[M] 150 ポイント151 ポイント  (49子コメント)

    Guys, play nice. Our rules ask for the assumption of good faith, and (at least) a civil tone at all times.

    I would also recommend you take a minute to read the article before you start decrying feminism in the comments here. This act is an attempt to:

    celebrate the achievements of women

    and

    “The idea is make people love reading again and to spread the love, like random acts of kindness.”

    Women do awesome things, and let's spread the love of reading. What the hell is wrong with that?

    [–]You_Are_All_Absurd 49 ポイント50 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Remember, even if you don't believe in an ideology and utterly oppose it, you should still want people to read books about it. So you should have no complaints about any book being left for people for free.

    Reading a book has never forced someone to adopt its ideas. I've read Mein Kampf, it didn't make me a Nazi. If anything, it immunized me from it.

    So even if you completely despise feminism and oppose it, you should want people to read feminist books.

    [–]Lugiawolf 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    This. I fucking abhor most modern feminism, but they have a right to speak. A lot of modern feminist talking points are rubbish - it has, as a movement, gotten far and away from the founding ideas of equality and rationality. They can get away with so much because everyone they disagree with is shut down and called a bigot...

    But how are we any better if we do the same? If we shut them down and don't let them speak, then all that does is prove that we are afraid of them.

    Let all voices be heard, and let reason prevail. We should strive toward a meritocracy wherein all opinions are voiced and the best ideas win - not a dictatorship where censorship is king.

    [–]iloveslothsss 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    All the comments are about how the comments are nasty, but I haven't come across a nasty comment yet.

    [–]Gl33m 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    What? I thought we already talked about this. Emma Watson can't be a feminist anymore, because she has boobs.

    [–]RollBread 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Are they more in plain-sight hidden or in a bright envelope or something?

    [–]king_dingus_ 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Where'd she hide them?

    [–]qbertwins 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Wasn't Emma Watson connected to Panama's offshore hidden bank account? Suspicious

    [–]Bageeka 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    As a NYer you couldn't pay me to pick up some shit left on a subway. Don't care what it is, wouldn't care if she rubbed her tits on it, I'm not touching it. Someone right after she dropped it could've rubbed their asshole all over it. Most 99% of people here feel the same way. She should try it in England and see how well it goes over there

    [–]Xalteox 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    The funny thing is that this will very likely be a collector's item simply for the note in the front cover. Aka you could sell it for fat stacks. Free money though.

    [–]ForeverStaloneKP 95 ポイント96 ポイント  (20子コメント)

    I'm only 27 years old, but I can honestly say in those 27 years i've never once seen a Woman treated as anything but an equal where I live, which just so happens to be where Emma Watson is from. It's the norm to treat people the same as you'd expect to be treated. I really don't understand where all this western feminism has come from. I can understand it if you're living in the radical parts of the middle east where they are forced down certain paths, but an incredibly rich english girl parading about womens equality and all the other well off western women who get worked up over it really gets on a lot of peoples nerves. You're fighting for equality of all women, so why are the well-off western women the ones who end up as internet memes, always acting like they are being suppressed by men and getting triggered by everything with their completely overblown reactions.

    Modern-day Western society is not one that oppresses women and if you think it does, you need a reality check on what true oppression of Women is like. Try being beaten to death by a mob of angry men for doing something they deem wrong. That is what feminists should be fighting for. Not the stupid bullshit that ends up as an internet meme.

    Reminds me of that video of the woman saying she was sexually assaulted because a Man said his name was Hugh Mungous. Try that shit in a country where women are actually going through trouble and need equality and you'll end up beheaded. Remember that next time you have a hissy fit over something insignificant. It isn't about you. It's about womens rights for people who really need it.

    [–]larrydavidismyhero 92 ポイント93 ポイント  (11子コメント)

    Well so long as you've never seen it, I guess it must never have happened.

    [–]skcalbllaredrum 34 ポイント35 ポイント  (8子コメント)

    Can you name one thing women aren't permitted to do that men can in modern day, first world countries?

    [–]hohohoohno 41 ポイント42 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Get their tits out in public.

    [–]hohohoohno 61 ポイント62 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Get a good job whilst trying for a child

    [–]6-_-j 38 ポイント39 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Men and women don't have equal roles when it comes to having a child. The man can work as normal, the woman can not. Sure it would be nice if free money came from the sky just because a woman is pregnant but it doesn't, someone has to pay for it.

    [–]hohohoohno 80 ポイント81 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Be sexually promiscuous without being labelled a whore.

    [–]hohohoohno 62 ポイント63 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Wear clothing that makes them feel sexy without being cat called and intimidated in public.

    [–]BrassBison 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Sexy mens clothes?

    [–]hohohoohno 70 ポイント71 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Have a child without it affecting their career.

    [–]Alexrcreamer 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You know the mods are getting a little trigger happy when every fucking thread I open now has a mod giving some sort of condescending disclaimer at the top.

    [–]Agastopia 55 ポイント56 ポイント  (36子コメント)

    Jesus what's happening in this comments section

    [–]sentrixbq 189 ポイント190 ポイント  (28子コメント)

    Reddit doesn't like Emma Watson anymore because she's an evil feminist and that scares them. She's supposed to stick to acting and never have an opinion.

    [–]flash__ 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I love it when one side of a debate on here completely straw-mans their opponent. Absolutely love that intellectual integrity that is probably a result of most of this site being teenagers and college students.

    [–]acollision_3 33 ポイント34 ポイント  (16子コメント)

    Yup, there are few subs where you can post things involving feminism, race, gender, etc where grumpy people don't pour out of the woodwork

    [–]mrdude817 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    These same people fucking love Jon Voight though. That actor can give out opinions as often as possible and they won't blink twice.

    [–]sentrixbq 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    and Morgan Freeman doesn't believe in Black History Month! Why can't more minorities be like him?

    [–]pheakelmatters 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    The comment section is what happens when an internet site reacts to a sex object making a statement contrary to that fact. I mean really, why should what she's actually about interfer with someone's jerkoff fantasy ?

    [–]Byroms 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Thats a bit sexist, isn't it? I'm a woman and hate feminism. Do I wish Emma Watson would actually fact check her beliefs? Yes, I would. But hey, she can do whatever, I'm not her supervisor.

    [–]DownSouthJunkie 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I suggest she reads some different propaganda since in America it is the best place in the world to live as a women. I can think of plenty places where women could do with a hand but America isn't one of them.

    [–]Carouselcolours 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Emma's done this for a few years now. It is something she enjoys doing, and she just happens to be in the middle of a huge promo tour right now. Doesn't really change that she loves spreading literacy.

    [–]YiloMiannopoulos 43 ポイント44 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    If anyone understands the struggles of woman, it's Emma Watson.

    Just that morning she had to decide between her Maserati or her Rolls.

    [–]hohohoohno 60 ポイント61 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    That's like saying Obama doesn't understand racial discrimination.

    [–]Jupiterswrath 39 ポイント40 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Ah yes, because being wealthy automatically disqualifies you from taking political stances on issues you feel strongly about.

    [–]ThaNorth 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    I did that one with a book I found. It was about a gay man in the Middle East or something. I left a note on the cover saying on this book changed my life and I hope somebody else can find meaning from it also and left it on a park bench. I have no idea what the book is really about.

    [–]weeeee_plonk75 45 ポイント46 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Are you saying you found a book, didn't read it, and wrote a note saying that you did read it? Or are you saying that you read it, enjoyed it, but in the end have no clue what the theme was?

    [–]DepravedMutant 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Wait, you mean you just lied that it meant something to you? That's hilarious.

    [–]PM_ME_YOUR_PREPPING 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    So littering...

    [–]keeble909 59 ポイント60 ポイント  (9子コメント)

    I have a feeling that hanging out with Emma would be a fucking nightmare.

    [–]YakYonson 74 ポイント75 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    One of those "in small doses" type of friends.

    EDIT: Lol, why am I being upvoted but the original post, with which I am agreeing, being downvoted? I don't get you people.

    [–]MarcoMaroon 42 ポイント43 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I have a feeling she's eccentric and I'd still be friends with her even if she and I disagree on things.

    [–]warfrogs 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    This is fantastic. Good for her. To anyone saying this is wrong, she's spreading thought that she presumably agrees with in a way that she finds valuable. Some people take up political causes and work within the legislative framework. Others write articles online. Then other people just shitpost in their respective supportive subreddits.

    She chooses to spread her message and promote literacy. Fucking good for her. A+

    [–]trapaik 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Meanwhile in countries where women actually need someone to fight for their rights their behind beheaded and stoned to death.

    [–]IVIaskerade 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    A - okay?

    B - they're hobo toilet paper by now

    [–]YakYonson 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Just for dumb schlubs like me to find it and say, "What is this? I can't eat this," and chuck it.

    EDIT: Downvote away fellas. That was the joke.

    [–]Stobie 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Was going to UV, but then you told me to DV, so I did.

    [–]Isoprenoid 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Hiding them? Is that because she doesn't want people to find them? /s

    It's a joke, people, lighten up.

    [–]UrbanMilk 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Can't you see? She's sexist mysogynist for hiding feminist books from women instead of giving them away! /s

    [–]Websauce97 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Girl on the escalator... "ERMAGURD ERMA WURTSON!"

    [–]00093293 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Lol I love the one woman looking back at her in the picture.

    That's the "holy shit is that Emma Watson!?" face.

    [–]pepolpla 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I don't agree with some of the things she says, but the salt in this thread is ridiculous. She isn't hurting anything. If you find one of these books you can just ignore it.

    [–]AFlaccoSeagulls 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I love Emma and I love how she's always doing things like this. Hope she never loses the desire to have fun while educating people and just being involved in issues that impact her and others' lives.

    [–]shadeslayer0930 -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (8子コメント)

    This comment section, along with other posts about the personal lives and beliefs of authors, seriously makes me want to unsubscribe from r/books right now. There's just too much hate and salt in this sub, which is surprising since this sub is dedicated for books, not atheism, feminism, or politics.

    [–]plaregold 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It's a default subreddit. Most of these comments are from people who never frequent or participate in any discussion here. I don't believe that this is representative of the active subscribers. You just have to know what you're getting yourself into when you open up these kinds of threads that invite trolls out of the woodwork.

    [–]weeeee_plonk75 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Given how new the post is, I wonder if this sort of vitriol is present in all subreddits or if the problem is that /r/books is a default sub.

    [–]KingEsjayW 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    The bigger a sub gets the worse it becomes in my experience. So making it a default automatically makes it worse.

    [–]stinkywizzleteets6 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Then do it.

    [–]spartanbadwolf 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    And your transformation to the dark side wil be complete.

    [–]frogandbanjo 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Books are about things sometimes though.

    [–]conti555 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It's in vogue to publicly declare how liberal you are. Wish we could just stick to books.

    [–]KingClams 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I think all the hate is from people expecting something about Emma to just be on her next role in a movie and/or her looks, and are butthurt when they find out it's about her personality and what she believes in.

    This is an amazing thing for Emma to do and I'm super proud to be a fan of her :)

    [–]iwillyel 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Why is she hiding them? Wouldn't it be better to just give them away instead of making them harder to get ahold of?

    [–]TheStorm117 -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    oh look.

    free toilet paper.


    what? emma gets to express her opinion, i get to express mine: she likes books about feminism, i think they're full of shit.

    get it? ah? ah?

    [–]Tehsoupman12 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Holy fuck, you'd think a sub about books wouldn't be littered with fucking cancer like this, but good lord.

    [–]infamousnexus 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Hopefully they stay hidden.

    [–]sapphopulp 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    If feminism is so terrible, then she's providing people with an opportunity to read about it and make their own decisions. If people actually read a book about the politics they like or dislike they might be shocked at what they find.

    [–]xDraGooN966 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    So she just littered