This isn't just a small word change, activists argue. There are potential regulatory implications here. https://newrepublic.com/article/141174/epas-science-office-removed-science-mission-statement …pic.twitter.com/ihvmwkp88e
Scoop: The EPA's Office of Science and Technology has erased "science" from its mission statement https://newrepublic.com/article/141174/epas-science-office-removed-science-mission-statement …pic.twitter.com/YfUr129A9K
-
-
@emorwee Next we will update our agency mission accordingly. Seriously tho, good work here, Emily.pic.twitter.com/Vkx5qpwnId
-
-
-
I don't see an office of Science & Technology site on the EPA site
@emorwee@alwaystheself. -
But, I do see 'science' discussed on the Office of Research & Development site of EPA
@emorwee@alwaystheself. https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-office-research-and-development-ord … -
@womanistpsych@alwaystheself read the article. links to it are there. OST is under office of water. -
Not pressed, but: "OW provides guidance, specifies scientific methods and data collection requirements,..."
@emorwee@alwaystheself.
-
-
-
@emorwee@ValerieVolco FWIW, it looks like the Obama admin may have changed OST mission from GWB admin's version https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/6000031T.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=2000+Thru+2005&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIndex%20Data%5C00thru05%5CTxt%5C00000012%5C6000031T.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=hpfr&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=1&SeekPage=x&ZyPURL … -
@saeverley@ValerieVolco I imagine each administration changes the description. Importance is how it changes -
@emorwee@ValerieVolco Not to be cynical, but could argue adding "science-based" - for a science office! - is..odd. If you have to say it... -
@saeverley@emorwee@ValerieVolco Perhaps more odd: a science office removes a reference to science and substitutes a deference to industry. -
@altUSEPA@emorwee@ValerieVolco Where is the deference to industry that you allege? -
@saeverley@altUSEPA@emorwee@ValerieVolco the word economically probably covers that -
@nninety@altUSEPA@emorwee@ValerieVolco Obama EPA frequently said rules were "cost effective" and will "make money." Also anti-science? -
@saeverley@altUSEPA@emorwee@ValerieVolco let's stay on point here - I'm not going backwards obamashama this is happening today - さらに表示
-
-
-
-
@leslieault@emorwee Well, they might science in future, but only at the request of#PruittEPA's corporate masters. -
-
-
@emorwee --on left-we will work for clean water. On right-we'll see how much we can get away with.
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。