全 71 件のコメント

[–]MrNeverpeterNOOT ☭ NOOT 201 ポイント202 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Women hold up half the sky- Bald Chinese Communist Man.

[–]XxX_Mao_XxX 93 ポイント94 ポイント  (9子コメント)

"The whole party and country will hurl itself into the fire and break the neck of anyone who tramples on women's rights" - Albanian bunker dude

[–]gibberishtwist 205 ポイント206 ポイント  (21子コメント)

Sometimes I forget that the communist spaces on Reddit are more feminist than the feminist spaces and I just

I love my comrades

[–]_Old_Major 34 ポイント35 ポイント  (0子コメント)

We love you too comrade

[–]atakeonhooperA trash can called 'ideology' 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (0子コメント)

women literally inaugurated the revolution, comrade

[–]TheGreatDarthTaterBash the fash 'til you've got a rash 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (0子コメント)

😘☭🇨🇳🇨🇺

[–]starm4nn(PM if interested in copy of Castro's Autobiography) 118 ポイント119 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Seizing the means of production on the first date? What a recipe for disaster. You have to get to know a comrade first.

[–]SpamIsapro 139 ポイント140 ポイント  (6子コメント)

It's never a bad time to seize the means of production.

[–]AryaSnarkerOne must imagine Sanders happy 34 ポイント35 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Only a libertarian would try to seize the means of reproduction on their first date.

...Not like they'd ever succeed, though.

[–]Teh_Sauce_GuyPraise be to Uncle Ho 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'd like my means to be siezed before the first date 😏

[–]nopus_deikill the man behind the man behind the man behind the throne 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (0子コメント)

And a Trump, literally...

[–]14pintsofpaella 61 ポイント62 ポイント  (23子コメント)

Shame that the day will be filled with people gushing over people like Emma Watson trying to dominate the conversation in order to make money, instead of the struggles of female workers worldwide.

[–]Gigadweebancom 41 ポイント42 ポイント  (22子コメント)

I mean tbf Emma is legit (even if she leans more towards the capitalist-tolerant side of leftism), and it's not like she started off as some socialite with no talent

although yeah it would be nice if the working class was heard more

[–]arthursbeardboneTrue Comrades live in on in the red blood of our hearts 44 ポイント45 ポイント  (11子コメント)

even if she leans more towards the capitalist-tolerant side of leftism

oh that nonexistent thing

[–]Gigadweebancom 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (10子コメント)

I know we circlejerk about it here but capitalist-abiding leftism is a thing. We are extremely far left here. Although, it does mostly depend on whether you use left/right as a combined term, which most people do. That being said, I don't agree with it, but we can still acknowledge it.

[–]arthursbeardboneTrue Comrades live in on in the red blood of our hearts 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (8子コメント)

If you're a capitalist, you're right wing. It is contrary to the definition of left to be capitalist.

[–]Bananasauru5rex 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (7子コメント)

"Capitalist-abiding" doesn't necessarily mean "capitalist" in a strict sense.

Like: there are some leftists who want to slowly reform capitalism through policy changes, and they often seem "capitalist-abiding." And there are other leftists who want to shoot capitalists and blow up their institutions wholesale. As much as the idealists here would like to say, "if you stand by capitalists without shooting them, you're as good as a capitalist yourself," I would be surprised if anyone here had actually done so.

[–]arthursbeardboneTrue Comrades live in on in the red blood of our hearts 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Revisionists are liberals, plain and simple. Leftism requires the immediate abolition of capital oppression.

[–]whoaaa_mantransitional state n' all that 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

But what about Marxism-Leninism? It's part of the ideology to go through the demographic shift of agrarian feudalism--industrial capitalism--market socialism--FALGSC.

Not saying that they want to stay in capitalism, but they see it as a necessary step to achieving communism. If you're a left com I'm sure everybody but Marx is a revisionist but the most successful examples of socialism in practice have been forced to go through market socialism via central planning.

To say any type of leftism "requires the immediate abolition of capital oppression" is just ahistorical.

[–]arthursbeardboneTrue Comrades live in on in the red blood of our hearts 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

You're misunderstanding. Those who wouldn't take up arms against capitalists are revisionists. I'm a ML. Someone who would vote in a capitalist election, would follow their laws, and try pointlessly to change the system we seek to abolish aren't leftists. They're liberals.

[–]Bananasauru5rex 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

So, are you saying that, in practical and legitimate terms, on a daily basis you take up arms against capitalists? Can you explain what you do with those arms? Are you holding up factories, shooting capitalists, instating workers' unions, or what?

[–]kyleehappiness 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

you think bougie capitalists will just sit by and watch their corporate empires collapse? whew lad.

[–]Bananasauru5rex 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, I don't think that. But I do think that people who think that can still be leftists.

[–]Arch-duke 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nah, this sort of 'leftism' is just liberalism. Liberalism != leftism.

[–]Arch-duke 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Never mind how she was busted for tax evasion.

[–][削除されました]  (3子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]Arch-duke 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I'm pretty sure she knew about her offshore British Virgin Islands company that she used to buy her £40,000,000.00 house in London.

    [–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

    [removed]

      [–]AutoModerator[M] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Your post was removed; it contained a slur. Please edit it, and then report this comment (in true FULLCOMMUNIST style) with the reason 'Stalin did nothing wrong' and we will reapprove it. Thanks for keeping FULLCOMMUNISM clean.

      I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

      [–]melodys-echo-chamber 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

      Emma is a white feminist. her feminism only reaches middle class white girls and she has put down women of color multiple times.

      [–]goodkid_mAAdkibbutz 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      Not saying you're wrong, but do you have examples? I've never heard that.

      [–]melodys-echo-chamber 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      she said beyonce deciding to show off her body wasnt feminism. she's still stuck on that 2nd wave feminism where intersectionality doesnt cross her mind.

      [–]chinggis_khan27Hoxhaist anarcho-annihilationist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Not sure that's fair. It appears she was trying to express a nuanced view in an interview where she was positive about Beyoncé overall. She said:

      [Beyoncé's hit album] is so inclusive and puts feminism and femininity and female empowerment on such a broad spectrum.

      [–]Goyimsmaomao 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      so this is what i did wrong

      [–]Sanity_Assasin 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      I'm so wet right now

      [–]BlackBird_Freedom 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Stirner was right

      [–]grin2b 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      "We act as if that being of a man or that being of a woman is actually an internal reality or something that is simply true about us, a fact about us, but actually it's a phenomenon that is being produced all the time and reproduced all the time, so to say gender is performative is to say that nobody really is a gender from the start."