Back
When balancing cards, are you more apt to add additional colorless mana (say, going from 2G to 3G) or to turn colorless costs into colored costs (say, going from 2G to 1GG)? What situations warrant one method over the other?

We don’t use colored mana symbols to strengthen or weaken cards very often, since usually the fundamental problem with a card being too strong is how much total mana it costs, not how reliably a multicolor deck can cast it. If we change a card from 2G to 1GG, it’s still just as strong in the heavy/mono green deck as it was before.

Instead, we use colored mana as a knob to tune how many different decks have access to a card. If we want a card to be a reward for going heavily into a color, we’ll give it more colored mana symbols. Usually we’ll do that with “rate” cards, which are just powerful but not very build-aroundy. Conversely, we make a lot of the Johnny/combo cards a single colored mana, so that creative deckbuilders have more variety in what they can do with them.

-Ian

  1. dealingwithaces reblogged this from beornwulf
  2. beornwulf reblogged this from wizardsdeveloper
  3. faerie-lore reblogged this from karnslivergolem
  4. animar-smol-of-elephants reblogged this from karnslivergolem
  5. karnslivergolem reblogged this from kytheon-hero-of-akros
  6. voicesofchaos said: This was very useful. Thank you!
  7. estinadaemon reblogged this from wizardsdeveloper
  8. shorewall reblogged this from wizardsdeveloper
  9. pbrisbestbeer reblogged this from wizardsdeveloper
  10. sofacoin reblogged this from wizardsdeveloper