Hat tip to Kohel Haver for pointing me to Bound by Law, a free comic book created by the Duke Law School Center for the Study of the Public Domain. Bound by Law is a funny but educational introduction to the basics of copyright law, including fair use, infringement, and the public domain. The book uses a documentary filmmaker as an example, but many of the issues apply equally to other arts and media. Check it out!
The Book
Our new book, The Law of Superheroes, is now available! Order your copy today!Facebook
RSS Feeds
Email
Send in your post ideas, questions, and comments:
James DailyLaw and the Multiverse CLE
On-demand CLE courses from Law and the Multiverse, presented by Thomson West:
What Superheroes and Comic Books Can Teach Us About Constitutional Law
Real-Life Superheroes in the World of Criminal Law
Everyday Ethics from Superhero Attorneys
Kapow! What Superheroes and Comic Books Can Teach Us About Torts
-
Recent Posts
- Conflicts of Interest in the Representation by Matt Murdock of Alleged Criminals Apprehended by Daredevil
- Mailbag Roundup
- Wonder Woman: Illegal Immigrant
- Is Batman a Murderer?
- More News From My Day Job
- Daredevil Season 2, Part 2 – The Trial
- Daredevil Season 2, Part 1
- Daredevil Season 2
- Bound by Law: A Copyright Law Comic Book
- Batman v. Superman and Import Licenses
Search
Teaching with Comics
Archives
- January 2017 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (1)
- January 2016 (1)
- November 2015 (6)
- September 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (4)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (2)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (2)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (8)
- May 2014 (8)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (3)
- November 2013 (1)
- October 2013 (2)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (12)
- May 2013 (11)
- April 2013 (15)
- March 2013 (12)
- February 2013 (12)
- January 2013 (14)
- December 2012 (14)
- November 2012 (17)
- October 2012 (20)
- September 2012 (11)
- August 2012 (14)
- July 2012 (15)
- June 2012 (14)
- May 2012 (15)
- April 2012 (10)
- March 2012 (14)
- February 2012 (12)
- January 2012 (14)
- December 2011 (15)
- November 2011 (15)
- October 2011 (15)
- September 2011 (15)
- August 2011 (15)
- July 2011 (13)
- June 2011 (13)
- May 2011 (14)
- April 2011 (15)
- March 2011 (18)
- February 2011 (14)
- January 2011 (24)
- December 2010 (29)
- November 2010 (7)
Categories
Disclaimer
On this blog we discuss fictional scenarios; nothing on this blog is legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading the blog or writing comments, even if the authors write back. The authors speak only for themselves, and nothing on this blog is to be considered the opinions or views of the authors’ employers.Awards
“Incidental” copyright claims (such as a filmmaker shooting street scenes and someone happening to be listening to a certain song) are parasitic claims, IMO. The law provides that such are not violations, but studios/labels/etc continue to make these claims and shake people down for fees because it’s cheaper than fighting the lawsuit.
Why do courts continue to make it possible for these claims to be made? When the law is settled already? Isn’t it an abuse of the courts?
The book has been out for a while (yikes – just over 10 years now). Good stuff.
It would be interesting to see just if graphic treatise is a viable genre.
The Retconning (Third) of Torts?