198
199

Bizarre 'megaship' captured by International Space Station camera before Nasa 'dims the feed' (mirror.co.uk)

shortadamlewis が 投稿

全 130 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]PKMN_Master_Red 60 ポイント61 ポイント  (45子コメント)

In my opinion, I think the footage is real, but doctored.

I don't believe any of the times we've seen stuff like this has been an accident.

Honestly, I think NASA has been setting humans up for an alien arrival (whether it is real or fake is another matter, e.g. Bluebeam) but this is all part of a mass conditioning so that when it does happen, only some people lose their shit.

[–]EricCarver 33 ポイント34 ポイント  (19子コメント)

Yes. The way people reacted to the radio show decades ago with the original 'war of the worlds' showed there are people that panic at the thought of an exceptional power hurting us.

Whether there are alien artifacts under the antarctic ice, a base on the back side of the moon, dimensional visitors via CERN portal, or whatever - it does seem to be a driven narrative to be more accepting to the alien possibility.

[–]blakdart 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Yes. The way people reacted to the radio show decades ago with the original 'war of the worlds' showed there are people that panic at the thought of an exceptional power hurting us.

There was no panic. That was propoganda from newspapers.

[–]EricCarver 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (7子コメント)

really? I thought there were packets of panic but maybe I read too much into overblown stories? It's been ages since I've read on the subject so I admit my perception of the incident could be wrong.

[–]Coldturkeypolitics 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (6子コメント)

I find it funny you instantly backed down on your belief despite him using no sources just his own words

[–]EricCarver 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I didn't back down so much as I admitted I didn't have a ready source and wasn't in a position to source it. I wrote it down to source at lunch time. nothing more than that. I give people the benefit of the doubt if they sound like they know a subject more than me, atleast until I can confirm or deny it.

[–]EricCarver 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (2子コメント)

from wiki:

"The War of the Worlds" is an episode of the American radio drama anthology series The ... It became famous for allegedly causing mass panic, although the reality of the panic is disputed as the program had relatively few listeners.

[–]Coldturkeypolitics 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

There was no panic

The reality of the panic is disputed

these are different things

[–]EricCarver 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, your literal logic is correct. no panic means 0 people panicked. mass panic would be many people over large area. But as this show had few listeners, a few people panicking is somewhere in the middle - and as /u/blakdart stated, it was closer to the low end as paper exaggerated it.

[–]KiA423469420 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Words are information. Sometimes "just words" is plenty. Have you ever heard the parable of the blue-eyed islanders?

It also may not have been a very distinct belief, requiring only minor inputs to adjust. The skill of having stably ambiguous beliefs is refreshingly common on conspiracy forums.

[–]Blainerss 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Its also gotta help knowing just how vast space is as technology has advanced a lot since then. I think the simple fact that there is soooo many planets out there that could be just like Earth, that a lot of people have come to accept that there's a good chance we are not alone.

[–]EricCarver 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

agreed. odds are just too high, even when you are talking about infinitesimally small chances but when there are near infinite systems - there's always a chance.

And we know it worked on atleast 1 system (ours) so knowing something is possible means it is always possible it happened again.

[–]The_Noble_Lie -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Space is not vast...

[–]Blainerss 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

and you came to this conclusion how?

[–]The_Noble_Lie -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

In many years; first and foremost, by very closely examining the footage released to a gullible public. In other words, evaluating the "primary sources" while removing all preconceived notions about what Ive "known" since being a small child.

[–]Avid_Smoker [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Yeah, examining footage is a real great way to measure the vastness of space.

[–]The_Noble_Lie [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I dont know the answers. All I can do is examine and critique the fakery.

Question when and how you learned what you did. What foundation does it stand on?

[–]specialdialingwand [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How do you account for the ability of backyard astronomers to take pictures of stars, and then use simple ancient mathematics to determine their distance, with limits of this simple technique at about a distance of 500 light years?

Even if this was as vast as the universe was (with relatively simple physics saying that it's much larger), wouldn't a sphere 60000000000000 miles in diameter be considered vast?

[–]kodiferous 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (8子コメント)

The skeptic in me doubts this is the case. This got picked up by Drudge and that's kind of mainstream but otherwise your average person would have no clue about this. If you're not reaching the masses then your conditioning is mostly for naught.

Then there is the question about whether or not anything from the Secure10 Team is legit. That has been called into question a couple of times when their videos have been posted.

[–]NevrEndr 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Secureteam is the only UFO channel I subscribe to on YT.

He calls it out if it's fake or just doesn't post it at all. Clear example being the "demonic presence" in the beginning of this video. Other YT channels just run with everything as if it is all real which is absurb. The channel usually analyzes anomalies in the ISS feed, Google Earth, or telescopic imagery.

Do I think every anomaly on the channel is an alien ship? No. Is secureteam biased in their analysis? Absolutely.

Still the best current event analysis in regards to the ET conspiracy on Youtube IMO.

[–]ursadalgCais 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Did you just say Drudge is "kind of mainstream"?

Please dont take this as an attack, but Im seriously blown away at how in general Drudge is overlooked in terms of influence.

Drudge is more influential then any MSM network. The number of hits his site gets is ridiculous. He presents certain stories and words his links to stories intentionally.

This is the digital age. Everyone has a super computer (phone) on them 24/7. Drudge is THE preferred online Western political news network. Even those that dont agree with Drudges clear bias follow him in order to get a pulse on how the other side is operating.

He is literally steering the western political narrative and its almost completely overlooked.

[–]Azista86 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The number of hits his site gets is ridiculous

Drudge has a script that auto-refreshes the page every 30 seconds automatically

[–]WadeWilsonforPope 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Does the drudge sell advertising?

If they do then they have a reason to post fake news.

[–]mki401 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just check Alexa page ranks, Drudge doesn't even crack the top 100 for the US. Every other MSM site i checked ranks significantly higher.

[–]kodiferous 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree with everything you said. The reason I said it was "kind of" mainstream is because the uninformed masses either don't know about it out check it regularly like some of us. Whereas they might flip past MSNBC/CNN/FNC when glued to the TV.

[–]chillagalet98 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This "Secureteam10 is fake, always will be and people can never change" narrative is getting really annoying. Atleast there is someone who is putting up the latest news for almost a million subscribers to be aware of. It's the ayylmaopilling.

[–]digiorno -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Movies and TV shows could be considered conditioning as well.

[–]satisfyinghump 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree with you. Fake disclosure. Its almost like there is an algorithm. We have already had moments in the past where a strange small object is visible and then a second later, NASA cuts the feed. Like clock work. The thing is there are so many competing theories. Like those who believe in a flat earth and that ISS space videos are shot in a giant pool (though there ARE videos of air bubbles in space...)... So how can we see UFO's? (Not supporting any of these, just discussing). The theory of abductions really being done by government / shadow agencies , as an excuse to harvest fetuses and organs and perform experiments on people with a specific blood type (Rh- vs Rh+)... But it DOES feel like a fake disclosure is being built up to. Some sort of event that forces the uneducated public to allow for a one world government, digital currency and police force/military.

So yeh.

[–]str8upcoffee 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Once this project "Bluebeam" arrives, if ever, will it be the "grey" aliens or the human looking aliens that step off the ships? I'll have a hard time believing the aliens that look human but claim that they're from a different galaxy.

[–]statusquowarrior 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The theory is the humanoid form is common, but it evolves from different classes of animals. We got from apes, other might develop from birds, insects, reptilians. It seems there's a blueprint and the humanoid form naturally happens.

What some people have been saying is that project Bluebeam involves beings that look extremely like us, so as to not cause a huge impact.

If disclosure comes, you know they're not telling everything if they say they only found beings that are basically like us.

Full disclosure comes with all knowledge of dozens of beings we've been in contact with.

[–]turbosubaru 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

If the bible is true it could also explain the pre trib rapture=Alien abductions.

[–]4bconn 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (5子コメント)

The rapture is a view of the millennialist branch of Christianity. Most other branches do not believe that christians will be "abducted into heaven."

[–]uss_star_traveler 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Just because a 'branch of Christianity' believes or doesn't believe in some sort of doctrine, doesn't validate it or dismisses it. The church is divided on many topics, so I would look elsewhere for answers - such as the source itself: 2 Th, Daniel, Rev

[–]4bconn [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I agree just was pointing that out so others don't think that is the only way the text is interpreted. I still don't understand why you called me a Jesuit lol

[–]turbosubaru 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Thanks Jesuit

[–]4bconn 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What exactly do you mean by that? I know what a Jesuit is obviously, but I don't get your context.

[–]ramby270 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Creepy that after WW2 the US brought over a bunch of Nazi scientists and engineers and even NASA hired many of these former nazis.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip

[–]bigodiel [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

either that or let the Soviets snatch them. Much of our rocketry tech is based off Nazi era breakthroughs. Not to mention other fields less known talked about and highly controversial

[–]HelperBot_ 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip

HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 40310

[–]MrNeverwhere [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How is it creepy that Russia and USA split the spoils of Germany and its advanced rocket industry? They were both rushing to secure the rocket /jet engine technology knowing the other side would do the exact same thing......I think it would be creepier if they didnt.

[–]ZeusLovesYou 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Honestly, I think NASA has been setting humans up for an alien arrival (whether it is real or fake is another matter, e.g. Bluebeam) but this is all part of a mass conditioning so that when it does happen, only some people lose their shit.

Meh, I've watched cartoons.

We will look like a cow to them. And milk us.

I'll get drunk while everyone freaks out. Also something about water, that wasn't a cartoon though. I'll have water on hand though.

[–]Acollectionofverbs 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (17子コメント)

Thanks to companies like SpaceX, the price of moving items into space is dropping a bit. That along with better technology getting cheaper and lighter, hopefully we can expect to see citizen HD streams coming to us soon. Bypass the middle man completely.

[–]therealtruetrue 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (16子コメント)

Never gonna happen. Space is faked by the world's space agencies and contractors, including SpaceX.

[–]Acollectionofverbs 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (12子コメント)

How so?

[–]bigodiel [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Earth is flat. Checkmate science

[–]The_Noble_Lie 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Fake video footage, fake ISS, fake astronauts ... fake fake fake.

As for the physics, bending light is almost entirely the answer.

[–]Acollectionofverbs 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Why is that?

[–]The_Noble_Lie 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What would you like to know specifically? Id be more than happy to talk to you about light.

[–]bigodiel [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

you ask too many questions, while knowing the answer. A tree falls, shatters a house, yet the wolf still hunts at dawn.

[–]dopeedits -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Check out crrow777 podcast, they just did a 12 hour series on space (NASA, SpaceX, Virgin galactic etc)

[–]FORKinmyDICK 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (4子コメント)

That's a terrible answer. "go watch 12 hours of video because I can't formulate a few sentences that explain the concept. "

[–]dopeedits -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I can but I don't have the time right now to formulate an adequate response for this huge topic. There are so many things to say. Just comparing the speed of a bullet to the speed of the rocket in which humans are supposedly shot into space. Or that Virgin galactic intended to do 2 space tours a day in 2008. Just take a look at the spaceport (the unused roads) in New Mexico. Many more things, everybody who is interested check out the podcast. And by the way it is not a video, it is podcast (sound only), so you can clean up your room or do other tasks while listening.

Do you think it is not worth to listen a few hours to educate yourself on the possibly greatest conspiracy of all time? That space is something different that what is being portrayed?

[–]dopeedits -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (2子コメント)

You can also read other responses on this thread. I have the slight feeling you projected that thought of not being able to write a few coherent sentences. Yes I looked through your profile and read your posts.

[–]FORKinmyDICK 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Good for you buddy. Doesn't make your response terrible for a discussion. Sorry it makes you butthurt

You have too much time if you looked through my boring ass post history to deconstruct my non-existent 'projection' of not being able to write a few sentences.

[–]dopeedits 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I did write a few sentences. The thing is I only want to write things which are correct and looking up stuff takes more time than writing. Sorry that I'm not an expert on this topic who can spout out facts like it's nothing (for example, crrow777). I am not butthurt, I just despise people like you who condemn posts like mine. A discussion was not my goal, rather showing people source for more info. Now let me enjoy my Bali vacation thank you.

[–]Dads_BBQ_Brisket 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

in the capacity in which we explore it or...?

[–]PhunnelCake 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

How?

[–]krom_bom 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is pretty interesting footage, but I have to wonder... if such a craft was this close to earth, and apparently that large, wouldn't it be easily visible to thousands of amateur astronomers?

[–]StonedPigeon 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not so sure about that. Don't the telescopes have an extremely narrow cone of vision? where even the slightest wrong move or slip could send you light years away from your original position? And would the astronomers even be looking for things in the upper atmosphere? Wouldn't they be looking at stars which are much farther away? which implies that the telescope couldn't even be zoomed in enough to investigate the upper atmosphere in detail, and even if the ship did pass over the telescope, it would have just been for a split split split second due to the relative size of the craft and the telescopes.

Maybe.

[–]HarryParatesties 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (1子コメント)

"Welcome to earf!"

[–]szalinski 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (2子コメント)

it's the current year and we still can't get a camera better than something off a phone from 2001

[–]uss_star_traveler 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You do know that NASA intentionally runs low-resolution cameras on the ISS for this exact purpose, right? They keep all the 5k stuff for themselves.

The live feeds offer an illusion of transparency in what NASA is doing, that is why they run a 60p cropped live feed

[–]szalinski -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

thank you captain obvious

[–]godlameroso 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Secret space program orbital platform? Wilcock was right?

[–]ad5555 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's always an arquillian battle cruiser, or a corillian death ray....

[–]str8upcoffee 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I fear the day they arrive and declare "Take me to your leader". And then Trump takes out his revolver and shoots the alien dead in front of the world.

[–]Chill_Confirmed 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (3子コメント)

NASA was improperly named at its conception.

It should be the DOG Department of Gatekeeping

[–]nondualove 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Apparently "nasa" in Hebrew means "greatly deceived" or "beguiled"

[–]xxbeast15 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Cerberus

[–]KiA423469420 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Siriusly?

[–]gulfstreamg650driver 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Somebody cracked the door open in the studio.

[–]Homer_Simpson_Doh 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No no, they were just seeing this.

[–]mr-dogshit 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

The footage has obviously been heavily cropped and zoomed-in. Why though? NASA's cameras on the ISS are HD (example). Sure, you'd want to "enhance" and concentrate on the object, but by cropping/zooming so much you lose valuable visual context.

My guess is the full un-cropped footage would perhaps show the frame of the view port or other parts of the ISS which would reveal the "UFO" to be nothing more than a reflection in the glass of objects inside the ISS itself (examples of these reflections can be seen in the video above too)... similar to UFO photos from yesteryear that turned out to be nothing more than reflections of lampshades in a window.

[–]shortadamlewis[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Nice try NASA...

[–]mr-dogshit 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Shit! I've been sussed!

*escapes on alien powered BMX*

[–]BojiDaemon 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Seriously guys it's just swamp gas. Go home

[–]MumenRiderForJustice 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Ya'll got any more of dem pixels?

Also, maybe it's just me, but it feels like the video is footage slowed down and cropped.

[–]nondualove 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

NASA camera shows a blurry flickering light far off in the distance.

mirror.co.uk: "It's a mega-ship Deathstar pointed right at us!"

[–]Rocksolid1111 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Spy satellite.

[–]waverlyposter 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The Mirror? You've got to be kidding!

[–]Podesta_lvl_InfoSec 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Can someone explain why everyone on r/conspiracy eats up all the bs from the Freemasons over at NASA?

[–]nondualove -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I would love an answer to this. It's hard to understand as there are countless fail and hoax compilations, documentaries, and lectures that are so easily accessible, easily verifiable, and entertaining for any conspiracy buff. Moreover, I personally believe discrediting NASA opens the way to understand the hijacking of natural science by metaphysics, which of course opens the door to the highest level of conspiracies

On a related note, I have noticed flat earth topics remain at 0 points, except for the ones calling it a psy-op or mocking it in some fashion, which get hundreds or thousands of up-votes. As well I have noticed that flat earth topics at times could not be looked up with the search function. I would see a post like "Flat earth??", go under the "new" tab and search the entire title, or just "flat" or just "earth" and this topic wouldn't show up. So interesting that the most fascinating conspiracy theory I ever came across is ridiculed and dismissed without investigation. This is probably how those who woke up early to 911 must have felt

[–]Podesta_lvl_InfoSec -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (2子コメント)

discrediting NASA opens the way to understand the hijacking of natural science by metaphysics

I'm just getting into this aspect now, mind-blowing stuff.

As far as Flat Earth goes, I thought it was completely insane (probably speaks to the effectiveness of FES). Then I came across Eric Dubay and his 200 FE proofs on YouTube and now my whole world view is fucked.

If anyone has a link to disprove all 200 proofs and re-establish my worldview that would be chill.

[–]nondualove 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Mind-blowing indeed! Funny how I finally reached the understanding that we are not the ego, only consciousness, and all of this so-called 'knowledge' were not facts necessarily as they were always subject to doubt. But I still couldn't help but spend countless hours meditating in the attempt to tie in this infinite universe and its age, as well as evolution by Darwinian natural selection to this realization I had. I had to render it simply as a mystery because the seeking of an answer was unnecessarily causing dissatisfaction, so it probably was not meant to be solved.

But it turns out macro-evolution and this 4 billion year-old earth in this infinite universe were concepts purposely instilled in us.

Keep on researching! You could also check out Jeffrey Grupp (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjb1EUArFz4m8atP1MYSIqQ), he may have found startling evidence of the firament by attempting to re-create the 'sundogs' we observe (halo around sun) using a glass bowl and a light source. Life-changing stuff!

Eric Dubay has a message board called ifers-123.st if you're interested for other source material too

[–]Podesta_lvl_InfoSec -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks for your replies. I am definitely going to check out Jeffrey Grupp and that message board.

[–]HashtagDadJoke 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

What the fuck? Good job, OP, this is why I come to this sub.

[–]BushidoBrowne -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Check out /r/UFOs

[–]bigodiel [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

TBH I've seen more skeptics there than here. Posts by known UFO shillers (iirc CloudGroup55) are immediately downvoted and debunked

[–]joe_jaywalker 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Anything coming from the International Shit Show should be viewed with extreme skepticism. These are the dummies who plaster the women's hairspray into Marge Simpson hairdos to make us think they're in zero gravity.

Visit voat.co/v/NASALies for funny ISS videos documenting their goofy hoaxing.

[–]krom_bom 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Show me one single piece of credible evidence that the ISS isn't actually in orbit around the Earth.

PS- I have literally seen the ISS fly over with my own eyes, so... explain that please.

[–]joe_jaywalker -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

I'm not claiming there's nothing in orbit where ISS is said to be, although I've also seen stories about people looking for it at the predicted location with a telescope and seeing nothing.

Whether there are really people aboard is called into question by the many obvious signs of fakery with the space walks and scenes from inside. For example, you can't have bubbles in space. The multiple bubbles seen in numerous videos is irrefutable and instant proof of fakery.

[–]krom_bom 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

The multiple bubbles seen in numerous videos is irrefutable and instant proof of fakery.

What are you talking about? What bubbles? And are you talking about bubbles outside the station, in near vacuum? If you mean bubbles inside the station, there is nothing impossible about that.

[–]joe_jaywalker -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

There are many cases of this and it's well-documented on many, many Youtube videos. Here is just one example

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DRWuE1ojNI

[–]krom_bom 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

So you think motes of dust are bubbles? lmfao

[–]joe_jaywalker -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They're bubbles. They look and behave exactly like bubbles in water. Probably no one has the authority to say that they're anything but bubbles, which they bear the exact resemblance of.

This is hardly the only sign of fakery on the ISS, by the way, even if it's the most obvious.

[–]AntiBox 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Dude you can see the thing with a pair of binoculars. I bet with a pound shop telescope you could see them fucking waving out of the window.

[–]joe_jaywalker 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

And yet there's not a single decent picture of the thing. Anyway, I'm not claiming there's nothing orbiting up there, just affirming that much of the video is fake.

[–]dirtydanisreal -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Just like the moon landing was faker than an episode of Lost in Space. So fake it's hilarious.

[–]joe_jaywalker 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

faker than an episode of Land of the Lost

[–]agentf90 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Shitty quality, spooky music. Obvious fake.

[–]ddaniels02 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

hope they're here to rid the world of child sex trafficking! but they'd probably strangely side with the globalist elites... :(

[–]KiA423469420 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

If they say, "Take us to your leaders," they're in for some real shocks. What voltage do you think it takes to compartmentalize the memories of an ET?

[–]ddaniels02 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

probably takes 3 ctr specialists. haha

[–]jje5002 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

save us batman

[–]str8upcoffee 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is cool.

[–]Stormkrawl 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

As much as i love the x-files, this is clearly just a meteor entering earths atmosphere.

The "cigar shaped craft" is just the contrail of the meteor as it enters the atmosphere, with the ignition of the object creating a light source, which then bursts creating the "dimming" effect as the light source dissipates.

You can clearly see the meteor burst at 0:41, at the right tip of the trail, and as soon as it does the contrail begins to evaporate and the lighting "dims."

As far as the blinking lights, most likely satellites in low earth orbit.

[–]1-8-1 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's fake, like anything else NASA does

[–]Lord_Newbie -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Ive seen video from the ISS where its moving towards the sun rise and then the sun goes back behind the earth. Makes no sense and that made me believe its fake.

[–]Podesta_lvl_InfoSec 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

never a space agency

[–]siggi4856 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Never A Straight Answer

[–]nondualove 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

No Astronauts Should Apply

[–]joe_jaywalker 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No Actual Scientists Allowed

[–]jje5002 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

it is fake

[–]Bjass 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

So SpaceX multi billion dollar contract with the ISS is fake too?

[–]bern_blue -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's just viral marketing for the "alien" "invasion"

[–]boomtnt46 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If there were aliens in the earth-moon system, amateur astronomers and radio amateurs would have detected them long time ago.

We have to focus on the real thing, that is actively looking for extraterrestial life. Some moons of Jupites could have life, and that is out target, looking for life.

Also, if there were aliens here, they would be so technologically advanced that they wouln't have a problem with being visible.

[–]sweetb3rrywine -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

am I the only one who doesn't know what the fuck they were referring to in the video? I dont see anything

[–]agentf90 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

the spooky music should help make you a believer.

[–]bean0s0rz -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Found the Alien

[–]str8upcoffee -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Look away from the neuralizer.

[–]sweetb3rrywine -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

was it the vaguely blinking light? I don't get it

[–]Karl_Magnus_Verum -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Anybody got a mirror/secondary link?

[–]Reddit_Shadow -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

My top inside sources tell me the object is a HUGE cold storage freight car used to house the millions of human cattle about to be culled from the herd by the alien ranchers who own the planet. Once the Freight car is full it will be sent back to the intergalactic inspection and processing center.