6
7

StatisticsRace Myths (files.catbox.moe)

The-Chronichttps://archive.is/LRe05 が 投稿 - announcement

全 13 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Estalia 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is SO racist....

[–]shifty-whiskers 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

africans are cleanly separated from the rest of mankind and the genetic distance between eurasians and africans is higher than the distance between many subspecies of animals

LOL, tfw the "missing link" was rolling around in their own feces right under our noses the entire time

[–]GeneralSkyKiller 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Actually all the sources given are wrong and whatever written is also wrong. When you say races it means organisms that can reproduce. But different races can't or if they are made to have a child by artificial methods their of springs can't. Although, mixed race children do exist and these children are fertile.

Take the example of a liger. Made of two difference species by artificial method but the liger can't reproduce.

I know this will get down voted sigh

[–]The-Chronichttps://archive.is/LRe05[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Are you just saying the lexicon is wrong, or are you saying the academic sources are wrong?

[–]GeneralSkyKiller 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

yes because a quick google search and wikipedis shows this about lewontin's fallacy which means your "Myth -5" is actually true

quoting from wikipedia:

"Lewontin's argument was that because common genetic variation varies more between individuals than between races, race/ethnicity doesn't really mean anything biologically, and that races/ethnicities aren't real genetic categories. "

and so are other sources. The stanford research also says the opposite proving that respective so called myth also a truth.

Also what I wrote above is what race is defined on! so Black or white are same race but different ethinicities

[–]The-Chronichttps://archive.is/LRe05[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

You should check your reading comprehension skills, because the whole point of Lewontin's Fallacy is that his argument is a fallacy.

[–]GeneralSkyKiller -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (3子コメント)

"Edwards did not refute Lewontin's claim: that there is more genetic variation within populations than between them, especially when it comes to races. (...) Lewontin did not ignore biology to support his social ideology (...). To the contrary, he argued that there is no biological support for the ideological project of race." "The genetic differences that exist among populations are characterized by gradual changes across geographic regions, not sharp, categorical distinctions. Groups of people across the globe have varying frequencies of polymorphic genes, which are genes with any of several differing nucleotide sequences. There is no such thing as a set of genes that belongs exclusively to one group and not to another. The clinal, gradually changing nature of geographic genetic difference is complicated further by the migration and mixing that human groups have engaged in since prehistoric times. Race [however defined] collapses infinite diversity into a few discrete categories that in reality cannot be demarcated genetically."[16]

[–]The-Chronichttps://archive.is/LRe05[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Just so you know who that quote is from,

Dorothy E. Roberts is an American scholar, public intellectual, and social justice advocate. She writes and lectures on gender, race, and class in legal issues. Her concerns include changing thinking and policy on reproductive health, child welfare and bioethics.

She's a civil rights professor and lawyer. She's not a geneticist. What she thinks about genes don't matter.

It's easily observable that there are genetic differences between races. That's a fact.

[–]GeneralSkyKiller 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

In myth 4 you quoted the fact and the graph from the study "Genetic Similarities Within and Between Human Populations by D. J. Witherspoon "

now I went through his paper and the fact that is stated in the image matches nothing that has been written in his study.

"Abstract

The proportion of human genetic variation due to differences between populations is modest, and individuals from different populations can be genetically more similar than individuals from the same population. Yet sufficient genetic data can permit accurate classification of individuals into populations. Both findings can be obtained from the same data set, using the same number of polymorphic loci. This article explains why. Our analysis focuses on the frequency, ω, with which a pair of random individuals from two different populations is genetically more similar than a pair of individuals randomly selected from any single population. "

[–]The-Chronichttps://archive.is/LRe05[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You're taking quotes out of context.

This is what Myth 4 is referring to:

"The power of large numbers of common polymorphisms is most apparent in the microarray data set, comparing the European, East Asian, and sub-Saharan African population groups (Figure 2C). ω̂ approaches zero (median 0.12%) with 1000 polymorphisms. This implies that, when enough loci are considered, individuals from these population groups will always be genetically most similar to members of their own group. In general, CC and CT decrease more rapidly and to lower values than ω̂."

[–][削除されました]  (2子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]The-Chronichttps://archive.is/LRe05[S,M] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Your submissions may include content relating to equality, conservatism, nationalism and all around right wing content. If the original purpose of this subreddit is what you crave, visit /r/pussypassdenied or /r/PussyPassNeutral to see "Pussy Pass" related posts.

    This sub was repurposed due to the wishes of the head mod. We encourage you to stick around and engage in debate if you disagree with anything posted.

    [–]HRCfanficwriter [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    You've been keeping racist company the whole time buddy