And people don't eventually get what they deserve. Or well, some people do, some people don't. Some people are getting hurt, other people are getting lucky and there is no rhyme or reason it, nor any justice. History has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, not design, no purpose, not evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference.
Therefore, Islam won't be any God's or "Weltgeist's" tool to make women pay for their sins. This whole idea, that feminism will eventually end and that some group of men will eventually punish women for their sins is based on the idea of historical justice. But there is none.
What happened to Catholicism, Protestantism, Judaism; to white men, to black men in the West and to Jewish men, might as well happen to Islam. And who even says that women would actually dislike being Muslims? Or that the Muslim women of today actually dislike being Muslims?
Women are usually the conservative part in every social setting; they are usually the ones who support the powers that be. If these powers that be (in the West) would eventually support wearing the Hijab and praying five times a day - women might fall for it and support it as fiercely as they support gay marriage and the destruction of the nation state with its borders right now.
Also, the idea of high-status men having harems is pretty much compatible with female hypergamy; and the feminist idea of male disposability is also compatible with the traditional kind of conservatism we can observe in religions such as Islam.
[–]Rescuedbeta 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]BobTheCube [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)