210
211

The Clintons, the Podestas and Alefantis have still not been charged (self.conspiracy)

Tunderbar1 が 投稿

Just saying.

全 161 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]greengrapesx 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (34子コメント)

Yeah it's very frustrating. I think we have to get louder. I'm not going to forget that a cult of satanic paedophiles are running a muck.

[–]Ibespwn 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Amok

Hope this correction is helpful. ☮

[–]greengrapesx 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Haha, well yes, that is a helpful correction!

From now on, my mucks will no longer run amok.

[–]TrowwayFiggenstein [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I liked it as a noun, referring to our situation as a "muck."

[–]lalalola89 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Wow this comment section is worse than CNN... it is frustrating but there's more evidence to shady shit than evidence of it being fake so if people want to bash those who want to look into it, fine. What is the point of that? Who knows.

The truth will come out eventually.

[–]scholarsystem 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

As manipulative as someone may be, the truth and genuine intention, will always prevail.

[–]leftistpatriot 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Unfortunately, you need evidence to charge people with a crime. Too bad, huh?

[–]ruleten 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (8子コメント)

evidence like the perjury Clinton committed in court?

[–]EhrmantrautWetWork 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (4子コメント)

SPEAKING of which, any news on Sessions?

[–]Aetronn -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Yes. He did not perjure himself. The publicly available transcript (unedited by WaPo) proves that beyond any shadow of a doubt. Look it up if you have any inclination besides preserving your bias.

[–]EhrmantrautWetWork [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

why is discussion suppressed?

should sessions still lead the investigation on undue foreign influence if there is any concern that he has contacted the russians and 'forgot' to mention it?

[–]Aetronn [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Yes, because "concern" does not matter. The facts show that he did nothing improper and he is the fucking AG.

[–]EhrmantrautWetWork [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

oh really? clinton should lead the charge on the pizzagate investigation. no hard evidence of her involvement.

and its hilarious how you have such respect for an appointed position. one person showed trust in him! respect the office!

or the idea of respecting authority and allowing authority to investigate itself on THIS sub. You must be a gymnast

[–]mouth_full_of_weenie 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Changing the subject from Pizzagate to Hillary's email scandal makes it look like this subreddit has a hidden agenda and cares nothing about pedophiles hiding in Washington.

[–]Italics_RS [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm assuming you weren't here before the election..

[–]dontkillmehillary -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

pssshhhh perjury. Why would we ever want to charge someone like Hillary with that??? /s

[–]Atheldemic 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I think I speak for the majority of Reddit saying you guys have been loud and annoying enough already lmao

[–]WhereElseButHere 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (4子コメント)

PSTOP PSYOP PSYOP PSYOP

[–]Im_the_expert 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

There's a "T" in the first part. I think he's FBI Anon! Tell us your secrets man!

[–]WhereElseButHere -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (2子コメント)

FBI Anon here, ignore Bill Clinton's dozen trips to convicted pedophile Epstein's pedo sex slave island via the "lolita express". Ignore Bill Clinton waiving secret service protection for several of those trips. Bill just wanted to hang out with his favorite pedophile on an island where kids are enslaved and raped.

Ignore the Podesta brothers' obsession with pedophilic art. A personal collection of art certainly is in no way a reflection of a person's views or beliefs in any way shape or form. It is perfectly normal for any guy to have paintings of tied up near-naked children.

[–]Atheldemic 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

CIA/NSA/MI6/KGB/CSIS/Khmer Rouge anon here,

1) Trump himself has said that Epstein is “a lot of fun to be with,” adding that he admired the sex offender's affinity for beautiful women “on the younger side.”
"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,'' Trump once said about the convicted sex offender. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life."
2) Trump was named in Epstein’s “little black book.”
Epstein’s “little black book” was stolen by a former employee in 2004. The book, nicknamed "The Holy Grail" by the employee, revealed the name of Donald Trump and listed “14 phone numbers including emergency numbers, car numbers, and numbers to Trump's security guard and houseman.”
3) Trump has allegedly flown on Epstein’s private plane — a hot spot for under-age sex orgies.
“Mark Epstein, Jeffrey's brother, testified in 2009 that Trump flew on Jeffrey's private jet at least once,” reports VICE News. “Meanwhile, message pads [see below] from Epstein's Palm Beach mansion that were seized by investigators and obtained by VICE News indicate that Trump called Epstein twice in November of 2004.”
Epstein’s private Boeing 727, according to one of his alleged victims, Virginia Roberts, was nicknamed the “Lolita Express.” Roberts recalled “unsavoury” sex orgies on the private plane when she was just 15 years of age with Epstein and his friends.

4) Transcript from a deposition from an Epstein lawsuit
Q: Have you ever had a personal relationship with Donald Trump?
A. What do you mean by "personal relationship," sir?
Q. Have you socialized with him?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Yes?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18?
A: Though I'd like to answer that question, at least today I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights, sir.

[–]WhereElseButHere [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hello CIA/NSA/MI6/KGB/CSIS/Khmer Rouge anon, did you fail your Mossad anon certification too? I failed the raping kids and letting them get blackmail material portion of my Mossad interview too, they really look for the best of the best foreign pedophiles over there.

Donald "grab em by the pussy" Trump would never do anything sexually inappropriate to anyone. He would never intentionally walk into pageant contestants' dressing rooms to catch them naked, talk about fucking his own daughter on national TV... twice, be accused of rape by his wife, or associate with known pedophiles like Epstein. You're off your rockers if you think this.

[–]BARchitecture [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You sound super legit.

[–]FuckWork79587 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

...Did you expect them to?

[–]AlbanyHockey 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The general hype on this sub was the day after Sessions (lol) became attorney general they'd all be locked up.

[–]Russian_haxor [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

this is a thread meant to discourage us. also its very low effort/content and is questionable for rule 12

[–]andywarhaul 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (13子コメント)

What would you charge them with

[–]IM_NOT_CIA_PROMISE 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Just to start:

18USC§201 Bribery

18USC§208 Acts Effecting A Personal Financial Interest (Includes Recommendations)

18USC§371 Conspiracy

18USC§1001 False Statements

18USC§1341 Frauds And Swindles (Mail Fraud)

18USC§1343 Fraud By Wire

18USC§1349 Attempt And Conspiracy (To Commit Fraud)

18USC§1505 Obstruction Of Justice

18USC§1519 Destruction (Alteration Or Falsification) Of Records In Federal Investigation

18USC§1621 Perjury (Including Documents Signed Under Penalties Of Perjury)

18USC§1905 Disclosure Of Confidential Information

18USC§1924 Unauthorized Removal And Retention Of Classified Documents Or Material

18USC§2071 Concealment (Removal Or Mutilation) Of Government Records

18USC§7201 Attempt To Evade Or Defeat A Tax (Use Of Clinton Foundation Funds For Personal Or Political Purposes)

18USC§7212 Attempts To Interfere With Administration Of Internal Revenue Laws (Call To IRS On Behalf Of UBS Not Turning Over Accounts To IRS)

[–]andywarhaul 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (2子コメント)

It just blows my mind that you have the ability to understand all the specific charges but don't understand that if they were going to be charged with all of that, the investigation leading up to those charges would be huge, very quiet and take a long long long time. My point is that we as civilians don't have access to the evidence that is required to bring these charges into the realm of reality. But the evidence does exist. Just be patient. It's going to take time but it is coming

Edit: up not us*

[–]IM_NOT_CIA_PROMISE 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

the investigation leading up to those charges would be huge, very quiet and take a long long long time.

I never suggested it wouldn't?

[–]andywarhaul 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sorry that's more addressing the question of the OP

[–]andywarhaul 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Okay now provide evidence that would hold up in court to support all those charges. Believe you me I want them all to answer for what they've done but we're being denied the real evidence. Within those 650,000+ emails and any other unknown communications, lay all the smoking guns

[–]IM_NOT_CIA_PROMISE 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Everything I posted we can prove through the emails we've already gotten.

Comey laid out at least 1/3rd of those during the hearing and then said matter-of-factly a "reasonable" prosecutor wouldn't take it. The disclosure of confidential information, the unauthorized removal of material, the concealment, obstruction, conspiracy, attempts to interfere, false statements.

The 650k would just be icing on the cake.

We got them red handed at least a dozen times over. She admitted under oath during Benghazi that she did not delete emails, that she did not have a private server that was kept up by non classified individuals, that she never gave classified information to unclassified individuals. All of which is verifiably untrue.

[–]andywarhaul 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

And this is exactly my point. The FBI released this on their investigation

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

After a tremendous amount of work over the last year, the FBI is completing its investigation and referring the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision. What I would like to do today is tell you three things: what we did; what we found; and what we are recommending to the Department of Justice.

First you have to remember who Justice Dept. they were reporting to. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/01/us/politics/meeting-between-bill-clinton-and-loretta-lynch-provokes-political-furor.html?_r=0

That meeting happened just a week or so before the statement from the FBI. That AG is who the FBI is reporting to.

This happened just a few days after that meeting and a few days before Comey's letter https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/us/politics/loretta-lynch-hillary-clinton-email-server.html

Back to the letter

Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.

I truly believe that Comey meant what he said here. But I think he knew or at least should have known that there were moles within his people that had leaked their conclusions to the Clintons, which then Bill took to Lynch and told her she can wash her hands of this in the eyes of the American people while still appearing to uphold justice by saying they will leave it to the FBI decisions already knowing that the FBI was going to say they didn't have a strong enough case. Now this is where the FBIs conclusions are important.

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.

...

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

As I just pointed out, all the prosecutors who this case would be brought to would have conflicts of interest as the broad scope of these investigations and accusations will encompass that era of the DOJ. No reasonable prosecutor would bring a case against their own based off of the current evidence available. Other people accused of the same crimes, with no connections to the DOJ and with no greater implications against the DOJ, would have been charged is what they are saying in my opinion. WHat if other evidence came to light?

I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our assessment is that, like many e-mail users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted e-mails or e-mails were purged from the system when devices were changed. Because she was not using a government account—or even a commercial account like Gmail—there was no archiving at all of her e-mails, so it is not surprising that we discovered e-mails that were not on Secretary Clinton’s system in 2014, when she produced the 30,000 e-mails to the State Department.

What's important to take away here is that the FBI is implying that there's potentially an unknown number of deleted communications out there that were "periodically deleted" or wiped when devices were changed. Those are the 650,000 emails. Those are the Wiener emails and this letter is from before those emails came to light. Every time Huma and Hillary and crew deleted emails or destroyed/switched devices they thought they were wiping the slate clean but the info was all still being saved on their shared laptop that Wiener took to the NYPD.

My point in asking what you would charge them with, and asking for evidence to back up the charges was to highlight the intensity and the reality of what were dealing with here. This is something bigger than a lot of us really know or understand and its been operating very quietly and very quickly since the new DOJ has taken over. There wasn't sufficient evidence to support the more serious charges in the eyes of the FBI at the time of their last investigation. A lot has changed since then.

[–]Tunderbar1[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

provide evidence

hence the needed investigations.

[–]KiA423469420 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yup. The disinformants keep pretending that investigations only happen based upon having already achieved damning evidence. Unfortunately for them, that isn't true. Justice starts the investigation when there's reason to suspect criminal activity, not when there's reason to have already proved it in hindsight!

[–]RuPaulver 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You want them to charge Alefantis with that?

[–]Edogawa1983 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

not to be a dick, but I feel all of this could also apply to pretty much everyone in congress

I know it applies to Trump .. on many of them.

[–]dontkillmehillary -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

snap!

[–]august_landmesser -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Going up against Donny J, so they need to be made an example of due to Donald's own self-projections that he casts on his "enemies" /s.

[–]tatikios 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (34子コメント)

Charged for what crime exactly?

[–]Tunderbar1[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (25子コメント)

The crimes that will/may/might be discovered during an investigation.

If a thorough and unbiased investigation finds no crime, then no charges.

I'm good with that.

[–]D1Foley 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (8子コメント)

The crimes that will/may/might be discovered during an investigation.

How can anybody deny that pizzagate is pushing a police state with comments like this? Investigate first, find evidence to support it later. Fuck the constitution, there are hypothetical children in danger!

[–]Tunderbar1[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Yeah..... Let's not investigate anything regardless of any suspicious people posting extremely suspicious pedophilic photos and terminology on their social media. Repeatedly. And especially when prominent political people are involved. Heaven forbid we invoke a police state in our search for pedophiles. /s

BTW, the constitution is the pillar of rule of law. Pedophilia is against the law.

[–]D1Foley 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (3子コメント)

So you want to investigate somebody because your find them "creepy" despite the fact that there is no evidence at all of pedophilia? If the answer is yes you support a police state.

BTW the constitution says you have a right to face your accuser, and there is no accusers.

[–]Tunderbar1[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Creepy? No. Rapy? Yes.

[–]KiA423469420 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

These fucking vote totals... Is the forum's userbase really just supposed to pretend we can't see it? Even here in a conspiracy sub?

[–]D1Foley 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Are you really pretending you aren't trying to push a police state? In this sub? And we're supposed to pretend we can't see it?

[–]Edogawa1983 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

the right's wet dream

[–]KiA423469420 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's not partisan. Check out Trance-Formation of America. Many figures on the right are implicated too. The problem is globalists. George Bush was one too! Haven't you seen the attempts at repairing his reputation lately? That's because he's coming under threat of exposure!

[–]KiA423469420 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

THIS IS HOW INVESTIGATIONS WORK.

Reasonable suspicion triggers an investigation. It is not a sign that we have or promote "a police state" but rather that we wish to have police that continue functioning even when rich pedophiles are involved.

GO AWAY.

[–]tatikios 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (3子コメント)

So what's the point of this thread? Do uou have any evidence of a crime?

[–]IM_NOT_CIA_PROMISE 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

She said under oath that she did not give classified information to anyone without proper classification. She claimed that anything she sent that was classified, was classified after the fact. That is verifiably false. She gave information to her lawyers, to her IT people, and to her maid.

Each is a crime. So is the lying under oath that she didn't.

[–]tatikios 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Have you reported her to the police yet?

[–]KiA423469420 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

There is enough evidence strictly on the public record to lock up Hillary Clinton without investigation. There is reason to suspect that there would be evidence of still-further crimes with investigation. The principle of equality under the law demands that Hillary Clinton be held accountable, and not protected on account of her stature.

I'm aware you already agree with me; I'm making sure that the comment thread contains more high-quality info in spite of the disinfo teams.

[–]tehorhay 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Then I assume you'd also be good with providing for me your name, address and social so that I can conduct an investigation into you to see if I can find any crimes that I don't currently have any actual evidence for?

[–]Tunderbar1[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (9子コメント)

If someone sees suspicious behavior on my part, and the proper authorities investigate, and I get charged, then maybe I shouldn't be involved in suspicious or illegal behavior.

I have no fear of police or other investigative agencies.

[–]tehorhay 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hey its me, the police.

Based on you post history, I've found many instances of the word pizza. This is a well known pedo codeword. Please provide me with your name and address. so I can prove you fuck kids.

[–]Nine_Iron 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Who cares if you fear them, you're telling us you support a police state. There has to be evidence, not just suspicion. I don't know what's going on with this pizza pedophile hunt, I'm all for it if there is something to find, but you're not helping the case any with your comments.

[–]Tunderbar1[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (6子コメント)

you're telling us you support a police state

No. Rule of Law is what I support.

[–]Nine_Iron 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Not according to your comments in this thread.

[–]Tunderbar1[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

What have I said that shows that?

[–]D1Foley 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

The crimes that will/may/might be discovered during an investigation.

You want an investigation to find evidence rather than evidence leading to an investigation. The exact opposite of how our judicial system is set up.

[–]Tunderbar1[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No. Valid suspicions lead to investigations which leads to evidence or not, which leads to charges or not. It's called rule of law.

https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com/

[–]KiA423469420 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You lie. That is not what Tunderbar1's comments support.

[–]Nine_Iron 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Letting the police do their thing just because they deem your actions "suspicious" does support a police state.

[–]RuPaulver 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

There needs to be evidence of a crime for an investigation

So far there have been zero reports of children being abused at Comet or elsewhere. You can't just investigate everybody you think has weird taste or a dark sense of humor. I don't see how they could even get a search warrant

[–]FORKinmyDICK 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5x3umy/the_clintons_the_podestas_and_alefantis_have/def2t17/

wrong link

[–]tatikios -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (4子コメント)

So you don't even know if they comitted a crime.

[–]FORKinmyDICK 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Not going to engage in your attempt to derail the thread. You're either being thick on purpose or just not very intelligent.

[–]tatikios 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

You just admitted that you don't know if they comitted a crime. How is that derailing the thread?

[–]FORKinmyDICK 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You just admitted that you don't know if they comitted a crime.

Except I didn't.

How is that derailing the thread?

Looking at your post history you seem to be dedicated to doing so, so i don't need to explain it to you.

Have a good one.

[–]tatikios [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

So which crime did they commit?

Do yoh or don't you know?

[–]FORKinmyDICK 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5x3umy/the_clintons_the_podestas_and_alefantis_have/def2t17/

[–]ganooosh 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

None of them will be charged.

Look at anthony weiner. I still haven't seen news of his arrest and everybody pretty much knows they've got evidence of him possessing child porn as well as classified documents he was not supposed to have.

[–]Chimp444 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This is being downvoted but is big:

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2017/03/obama-prodded-abuse-of-intelligence-to-sabotage-trump-policies.html

[–]buzzlite 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Fuck off with this sort of trolling. It's not like these people are heavily connected or anything involving lawyers and government. It's going to take some very damning evidence to get these people to trial and even then their corrupted buddies in the system will try every trick in the book to get keep them getting the justice they deserve. We have seen in this very sub that everyday that goes by more things are exposed on these crooks and the more people this information reaches. They can no longer hide but only wait for the inevitable.

[–]KiA423469420 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

You're spreading a "don't bother" lullaby. The exposures haven't gone far enough. Look at how much disinfo there is. Don't pretend that everything is fully exposed, get out there and keep distributing information! Be an obsessed citizen! Demand justice for all!

[–]buzzlite -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Not at all, I said new information is being dug up and new people exposed to it everyday. I was calling out ops trolling that just because justice hasn't been served weeks into a new administration that it will never happen. Bringing a regime to justice takes extreme vigilance not impatient heckling.

[–]CalcioMilan [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Why do you believe that only the left elites are pedophiles? You don't think the current POTUS and those who control him are also in on it. Jesus no wonder Pizzagate seems like a giant red herring.

[–]Tunderbar1[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fuck off with this sort of trolling.

If you don't like it go elsewhere. You're not the boss of reddit.

[–]Spookypanda 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Tunderbar1 is a pedophile. There's lots of evidence for it. Tunderbar1 diddles kids, drinks mixtures of blood semen and breast milk, and is in a satanic cult. We NEED an investigation into this. If an investigation is brought up and he is proven innocent then so be it. BUT I STRESS! THERE HAS BEEN NO INVESTIGATION INTO TUNDERBAR1s PEDOPHILIA AND CRIMINAL ACTIVITY INVOLVING SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN.

[–]Edogawa1983 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (10子コメント)

i don't get how shit post like this get this high.

[–]Tunderbar1[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Because some people care enough about putting pedophiles in jail.

[–]Edogawa1983 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (6子コメント)

provide some real evidence instead of fan fiction then.

[–]Tunderbar1[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Not my job to provide "real evidence", whatever you think that means.

The suspicious activity, on the other hand, is documented here to some extent:

https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com/

Any reasonable people would think that the kids involved would be identified and tracked down and their situations investigated by child services, at the very least.

Don;t you think that some due diligence investigation to ensure the safety of these kids is in order?

[–]Edogawa1983 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

is there actually real kids involved or are they just the imaginary kids?

[–]Tunderbar1[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com/

You unable to click? You unable to see photos? You fucking retarded?

[–]devil_9 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Of course they're not real kids. They're crisis actors.

Right guys?

[–]Villainary [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It's not your job to provide actual evidence, but it's your job to advocate for them being locked up?

What?

[–]Tunderbar1[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm actually advocating for an investigation. If it leads to them being locked up, then so be it.

[–]Spookypanda 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you really cared perhaps you would actually do something about it. It's clear you do not care about the children as you say. If it was all about the children this post would be about the children. Notice how your post calls for political opponents to be jailed, but NOT for children stuck in sex trafficking rings to be freed. This is a partisan issue for you, this is not about children, if it was this post would have mentioned them. As of now, this post shouldn't even be allowed on this subreddit.

[–]KiA423469420 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lies may be faster, but truth stands more firm.

[–]DoYouEvenBrewBro 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (9子コメント)

you have to have a witness or concrete evidence, which there is neither. Are they going to issue a warrant on some weird internet pictures? No. Until a witness comes forward or there is hard verifiable evidence, they are scott free

[–]Tunderbar1[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (8子コメント)

hard verifiable evidence

Hence an investigation. To see if there is any.

[–]Spookypanda 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Innocent until proven guilty? It's disgusting that you want guilty until proven innocent to be the standard for this situation.

[–]Aetronn 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Are you retarded? An investigation is not a decree of guilt. Wow.

[–]DoYouEvenBrewBro 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

you have to have some sort of evidence to start bro, otherwise we are a police state.

[–]Tunderbar1[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (3子コメント)

https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com/

[–]DoYouEvenBrewBro 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

completely circumstantial, it has to outright admit to the crime. And unless those people are willing to give sworn statements under oath, this doesnt mean anything, you are not getting it.

[–]Tunderbar1[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

LOL. Okay then. I'm glad you're not representing me in court.

[–]DoYouEvenBrewBro [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

actually that sort of thing is a good thing. If someone who doesn't like you accuses you of something, i would hope you would have an attorney that would make sure its not just anger and resentment driving the justice system. you clearly have a distorted perspective of the justice system

[–]RuPaulver 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I really don't think you understand how investigations work. Let me give you an example.

Murder investigation - Person X's body is found, Person Y leaves physical evidence on the crime scene. Person Y gets investigated. OR - Person X goes missing, Person X is last seen with Person Y. Person Y gets investigated, body may or may not be found. NOT Person X/Y/Z jokes about killing and you find a way to code statements from him to make it look like he's talking about hiding bodies.

You need evidence of (at least a connection with) a specific crime BEFORE you launch an investigation into somebody. That's why investigators have to get warrants. Even when you get pulled over, an officer can't just be like "you look like a stoner, get out of the car I bet you have drugs". He has to smell something, observe inebriating effects, or see drugs/paraphernalia to establish probable cause for a search. There are both legal and ethical reasons for this.

The fact remains that you can build a pizzagate-like case against virtually anyone for virtually anything. The precedent it sets is a little scary. Unless there are actual allegations, witnesses, incriminating statements (beyond normal statements twisted to seem like something else), or physical evidence, there is no reason for a police investigation whether you believe in it or not.

[–]chickyrogue 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

they collectivey have no shame

[–]august_landmesser -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

CLEARLY WE HAVE TO TYPE IN ALL CAPS AND BOLD ALL OUR #PIZZAGATE AND #PEDOGATE RELATED POSTS, THAT WILL DO SOMETHING....

[–]chickyrogue 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

i would suggest clearly dark bold but not caps mods dont like dark blds caps

[–]ASCAdmin 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Unlikely to be investigated, much less charged.

[–]Kevin1985 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (17子コメント)

Because there's no evidence and it's a bullshit story

[–]chickyrogue 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (16子コメント)

suggestion ... dont have children

[–]august_landmesser 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (15子コメント)

Judging by your grammar, I would suggest the same thing.

[–]chickyrogue -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (14子コメント)

dont be judgemental

even if your mommy told you you were really special

[–]august_landmesser 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

dont be judgemental

He who casts the first stone... And it was only a "suggestion."

[–]chickyrogue -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

no you were being judgemental

dont try to chris hayes out of it now

[–]august_landmesser 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

suggestion ... dont have children

By that logic, so were you then, but I am going to keep my suggestion, but I am going to make it a request too, please don't have any fucking children, idk if our public education system could handle it.

[–]KiA423469420 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

My judgement is that you both suck.

Instead of sniping at each other, next time hit the report button if you think someone's made a post that is nothing but a personal attack.

[–]onelasttimeoh 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (9子コメント)

The dissonance here makes my head hurt.

[–]chickyrogue 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (8子コメント)

they tryin just remember most of them are paid to be stoopid and annoying

[–]onelasttimeoh 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Talking about you my friend, and you continue to prove my point.

[–][削除されました]  (3子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]Known_and_Forgotten [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Yep, Trump is utterly complicit in their crimes and should be considered as an accomplice.

    [–]yaosio [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Because they committed no crime. Sessions on the other hand lied under oath and the GOP is demanding perjury laws be abolished just for him.

    [–]CalcioMilan [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Almost like both sides are on the same team. Elites are pedophiles, but move away from the political bullshit that only the left has them.

    [–]NectarCollecting -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    There is nothing to charge them with.

    [–]bearhat808 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Good. Any investigation that was cobbled together in a month's time is likely to fall apart in the first courtroom it hits.

    Proper investigations can take years. I'd rather law enforcement build an airtight case over time than desperately rush in and arrest everyone like a scene out of Hollywood. The people being charged have excellent lawyers and connections--the case must be handled carefully.

    [–]BiglyMAGA -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Because Jeff Sessions was just sworn in after weeks of Democratic Grandstanding?