全 4 件のコメント

[–]qwertypoiuytre 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So, woman says:

"oh sorry, I'm only interested in real women"

And guy interprets it as:

I'd have been happy to accept if she'd simply said that she wasn't into pre-op transwomen but she didn't like penises

(First of all, "happy to accept"?!? Oh thank you kind sir, so gracious of your highness to "accept" that explanation!)

But anyway that's kind of a major revision between the two statements.

What if she had said, "oh sorry, I'm not into pre or post-op transwomen"?

They totally contradict themselves by condemning genital preference, then grudgingly excusing a certain amount (not liking "pre-op" males), and thus contradicting their own initial statements on genital preference by reinforcing the idea that pre-op and post-op males are different in any meaningful way. And why would it even matter if post-op male genitalia were the same as female genitalia? Even if it's totally different (which it is) why would lesbians have any right to not like a rearranged penis any more than an au natural one?

Or "genital fetishism" aside, what if she said sorry but she has a "preference" for a certain collective combination of genital shape, function, and tissue type in addition to skull structures like superciliary arch, orbital ridge, or temporal line, angle of forehead, hairline, pelvic structure, etc? Read: preference for female bodies? Would oh gracious lord of the universe be "happy to accept" that? It's just body part preferences just like the pre-op penis thing after all, nothing about rejecting his "identity".

[–]hasgirlbits 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fuck yes gays and lesbians are the most transphobic people imaginable. They fought and died for their rights to love who they wanted and now the trans snowflakes want to pile in and tell them oh no, they're so prejudiced for doing that and sexual orientation isn't even real.

Like if they were even like "are you interested..." or "would you consider..." I wouldn't mind, but no, they have to invalidate the whole idea that attraction is biological and that people are attracted to bodies. Things you will never, ever hear a trans person mention: that body smell is a factor in sexual attraction. Because nobody is really straight or gay, they just hate trans people that much.

Just ugh ugh ugh ugh. Get the fuck out.

[–]astrologiques 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Biologically male" is poorly defined

Not really, no. We have pretty accurate measures about that, and intersex conditions show just how deep into details we go. Beside hormones levels are semi-bullshit since women with PCOS have "male-levels", and organs are bullshit as well since unless you have a health issue, no one knows exactly how they organs look like or what it is exactly they do.

[–]thrwpllwI saw Goody Throwpillow TERFing with the devil! 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't expect too much from the lesbian community, it's crawling with TERFs. (LMAO awesome :3)

I've recently been reading through the blog Terf Means Lesbian, and boy has it been a slap in the face. I knew that lesbians were getting the worst of it from trans activists, but now I'm increasingly convinced that terf is being used as a synonym for d*ke in the most pejorative sense possible.