If there are more boys in your family, than girls, but in other families, for example, there are girls only, then why your children should serve and be cannon fodder, what is their guilty? The fact that they were born the wrong gender? Have you invested in them less effort, money and love, than parents of girls? Think about your children's children, as if they, too, will be boys? If, in some countries, for women quotas are introduced in parliament, then they should have quotas in squads involved in a military combat. Why do men agree to be lower than women, has it been been seen in the history, that the man should have fewer rights and more responsibilities? It used to be quite the opposite, for example,the penalty for killing a woman was twice less than for killing a men. If some men think that women are more important than them, then they should serve in the army in the first place.

 

It is believed, that in the past, women were the property of men. Property can not fight, so in those days women didn't serve in the army. Today, men and women have equal rights - and rightly so, and therefore the man should no longer protect women as their property, and the woman should protect herself as a complete person equal to man. Actively fought women of such nations as the Celts and Sarmatians, the Scythians, the Nordic Valkyries also did not arise out of nowhere. And Cimmerian, from whom came the Slavs, their woman could not marry until they bring the enemy's head. But the women who fought, had the same rights, so in the history there always has been a direct link between the military duty of citizens and civil rights.

 

Of course, not every country has the military conflict, but there are countries where such conflicts may arise. Even in calm countries where forced recruitment is not planned, there are still discriminatory laws, giving privileges to women in recruitment matters. The question arises - why do they exist? Yes, then, that in emergency situations to make man meat. And if you, gentlemans, dont want to become meat, you need to protect your rights today, and not when it is too late, and there will be no time to change something. In the wild nature, for example, in most species, males and females live equally and have equal rights, responsibilities and survival, and the distribution of people like cattle, when most males go for slaughter - is manifestly fascist.

 

Imagine if in an army served only women, do you think they would have suffered, or demanded equal rights and responsibilities with men? The worst thing is not that men are discriminated and are forced to become meat on the basis of sex, but that they do not even require the equal treatment of both sexes. They do not realize that childbirth is just a job, which is much easier and safer than, for example, the work of a miner, and for the work no one should receive an exemption from the military service or any special privileges other than monetary rewards. Yes, childbirth, sometimes is painful, but no one is exempted from military service, from those who have passed, for example, through a painful reception at the dentist. After all, the main burden of child raising are, again, in the men. While women work for childcare is usually not as hard. But most men are working hard, earning money for the children. Do not forget, that women who do not have children, or are infertile, or even those who claim that they did not ever think about childbirth - childfree - also dont have to serve in the army. Is that normal?

 

Even if we imagine, that discrimination on basis of sex may be economically beneficial to the country, as, for example, once, slavery was profitable,it does not mean that such discrimination is permitted. Neither slavery nor conscription of men to the army, in the absence of conscription for women can not be justified by any economic or demographic benefits, because above all this, there are human rights. In addition, conscription of women equally with men, most likely, will improve the country's economic and demographic indicators. Therefore, any rights of men must be greatly expanded, and we are not talking about the benefits of plots or free transport tickets, or women should be deprived of many rights and are endowed with additional responsibilities, or women should be drafted into the army.

 

The scale of the threat to Israel, North Korea or Norway is not as great as for our country, but even there, women are encouraged to join the army. In Georgia, too, there was introduced a bill on compulsory military service for women. In some places such practice has already been applied, that men and women live in the same barracks, and are washed in the same bath, so there is no need for additional infrastructure for a women conscription. Naturally, the appeal of women should not be sham, as it happens in some armies of the world, when they only shift the papers, and then receive military pensions and apartments, and a woman should be fully participating in the military combat.

 

Women are conscripted into the Kurdish militia, where they account for 30% of participants, and after a month's course of study their effectiveness is not inferior to men in battle. According to the latest research and the experience of fitness trainers, muscles of women often grow even faster than that of men, and, as a result of physical activity during pregnancy, childbirth, then, passes even better. The reproductive cycle of women, although it may be suffering from stress, but even women who passed the concentration camps or the Second World War combats, in the majority, then successfully gave birth.It is believed also that psychologically women are more stable and more executive than men.

 

When women are deprived of their duty to marry and have children, then men are not deprived of their duty to serve in the army. Women did very tricky - they have equal rights, but forgot about equal responsibilities. We must understand that equal rights mean equal responsibilities. It is because responsibilities restrict rights, and thus make them unequal. Society should not be considered as two separate gender or sex. Society is one unit, and if some people can give birth, it does not mean that they should have more rights and fewer responsibilities than those who can not. If women take equal part in the elections, so they influence to the policy of the state, then they must carry equal responsibility on the battlefield, if this policy, for example, led to war. Just because of the equal rights and opportunities for women leaving abroad, demographics is suffering, but equal rights is correct, only with equal responsibilities and therefore men and women have on an equal basis to serve in the army.

 

It is unclear why the men are compulsory drafted, but not women. After all, there are enough man volunteers and contract military serving in the army. It means that the male half of the population does so much more to the Army than women. Therefore, primarily woman should be compulsory drafted. Some say that the women compulsory conscription will not make life of men better, and therefore it is not necessary, but it's just not the case. If, for example, all women wold be extempted from taxation, then perhaps it would be positive discrimination? It is quite obvious that it would be a negative discrimination in relation to men, and therefore, regardless of whether this will be better for life of a men, or not, but women should be recruited into the army.

 

Lack of conscription or military draft for women is not positive discrimination, because those men who serve in the place of women are discriminated. If, for example, some citizens are physically stronger or better able to fight, it does not mean that they should forcibly, for free, to work in mines for those citizens, who are physically weaker, or die for them on the battlefield. Stronger citizens are not worse than the weaker, and all citizens are equal under the constitution. Some people say that the conscription of women into an army is hate of woman. So, if some citizens say that only man should be conscripted into an army - isn't it hate of men? Why women do not serve even the alternative community service?

 

To not affect a demography, it is possible to conscript women after 30 years old for active participation in military combat, and the father of their children can stay at home for childcare, and the children can be fed with a special child food. It is sufficient to note that many women do not breastfeed, so their breast doesn't not lose shape. Demographics can be encouraged by the fact, that women who have not given birth to two children under 25 years, can be conscripted to participate in military combat, not at 30 years old, but at 25. By the way, father's right to education of the child should be the same as mother's, because the genetic code of a child is by half father's. And younger woman can be consсrited to protect the safer parts of the front, as well as for logistics and engineering. In case of pregnancy, if women is conscripted for the year, then she would be able to serve the major part of military service before childbirth.

 

To prevent pregnancy, women can set special spiral, use of oral contraceptives. and in case of failure - the woman herself is responsible, and her pregnancy is regarded as a negligent attitude to military service, and shall be punished by imprisonment accordingly. However, if a pregnant woman can continue to perform combat missions, the punishment for her can be canceled. There are examples of women who engaged in kickboxing at nines month of pregnancy, and it didn't not harm the baby. The combat vest can be replaced by larger, because the soldiers who have additional weight and have belly can serve too, and special combat jackets for pregnant women could be bought. In the case of the death of a pregnant soldier, the number of population of the country may suffer a bit, but in the peacetime women use contraception and make millions of abortions, and they do not see any problems with it.