全 2 件のコメント

[–]bloggie2 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The recent article calling it zano wasn't wrong :p

same mistakes, buying tons of useless inventory using parts that were not suitable etc.

[–]danwin 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The KS update is here (which includes comments):

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/tiko3d/tiko-the-unibody-3d-printer/posts/1809879

I think everyone has a different opinion of what a "shittykickstarter" is. For some people, a campaign is "shitty" only when it is an outright scam (Futurefon, Triton) or resale. And on the other side of the spectrum, there are people who think a campaign is shitty because what they promised was inherently shitty. And then there's a wide variety of legit opinions on the shittiness of campaigns that follow KS's original spirit, or even actually deliver -- Pebble, Ouya, Oculus -- but fail some other non-KS-specific metric of success (e.g. having a successful company).

I'm not into 3D printing so I don't know how cool Tiko was compared to the state of the art. But I do respect that they seem to have been a communicative campaign (although some commenters are complaining that Tiko asked for $60 shipping charges when they likely knew that nothing would ever be shipped). And that they have died/burned out in a reasonable timeline that would concur with a company burning through its cashflow while struggling with production problems...as opposed to something like the "gStick" or Zendock, which led their backers on for years instead of just admitting failure.

But I think there's another category of shitiness that Tiko falls into, and that's just being unprepared for the logistics of manufacturing. That is, I think there should be a higher standard than "They have a cool idea" and "they tried hard". Some ideas are "cool" -- like the "Coolest Cooler" -- because they are promised at an unrealistic price. If Tiko had sold printers for $300 to $500 instead of $179, maybe they would have a viable manufacturing process. Or more likely, they might not have had a successful campaign at all, if we assume that many backers chipped in because of the great price point.