全 65 件のコメント

[–]Jeyhawker 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

authoritarian warmonger president.

Obama? Sorry :D I haven't gotten to the rest of your comment. But ALL U.S. presidents are 'warmmongerers.' Hell that's the main reason for advocating from a break from establishment/CIA to go to Trump. At worst, he can't be any worse.

[–]TotesMessenger 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (7子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Welp, incoming brigade on the way :/

[–]Mircabre 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Hi boo just dropping in to say hi

[–]phedre -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Well hello, whatever are you doing here?

[–]BudrickBundy 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

defaming Ron Paul

I do not recall having ever "defamed" Ron Paul. Get a grip son!

jcm267 then contacted reddit administrators and falsely claimed that I had doxxed him, and it worked

False. I never did that.

bigoted sockpuppet abuser jcm267

More hilariously false conjecture.

went on to create a subreddit that all redditors are now familiar with whether we want to be or not, /r/The_Donald.

Technically not true. Another user created /r/the_donald and gave it to me because he liked what he saw me do in /r/BernieSandersSucks. /r/the_donald was the only Trump subreddit that was properly moderated early on. Eventually, some great folks came on to help out. And it really wasn't any redditor who started /r/the_donald, all of the credit goes to Donald J Trump!

This "conspiracies do not exist" war-supporter

More lies.

avid supporter of disgusting Israeli extremism

LOL!

strangely changed his mind ... Donald Trump was "not a serious candidate"

It's strange to change your opinion on something? I fell behind Donald Trump very early on.

"after the election things will calm down" but it only got worse as jcm267's 'The_Donald'

By the time the election rolled around I had nothing to do with the place.

defaming Clinton supporters as pedophiles

You really need to stop falsely accusing people of defamation. It's obnoxious. Call them conspiracy nuts if you think their opinions are off-base, and considering that the subreddit's name is literally "conspiracy" there's no reason to be so upset that people started posting about this shit in /r/conspiracy.

Hysterical, breathless witch-hunts

LOL. This coming from the Grand Poohbah of hysterical, breathless witch-hunts.

Sadly, jcm267's original goal on reddit with his hate-group /r/Conspiratard, which was to discredit and ruin /r/conspiracy,

More falsehoods. /r/Conspiratard is not and has never been a "hate group". Further, my goal on reddit was to entertain myself. Until /r/the_donald blew up that's all my reddit activity was ever for. When I was moderating /r/the_donald I was sincerely trying to help to get Mr. Trump elected president. And I really do think there is a chance that /r/the_donald made a decisive difference in the race!

[posting of modmail leaks to trash the subreddit's mods]

You are a TRAITOR to your fellow conspiracy nuts.

A few weeks ago I was quietly and permanently banned

HAHAHAHA!!! After years of your multiple accounts trying to become a mod there you finally became a mod and modded for just a few months, and now you're BANNED. That's hilarious! It couldn't have happened to a more deserving individual.

edit: grammar/spelling

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (42子コメント)

I can't speak for the entire mod team; but you started advocating for a ridiculous amount of censorship, and had no ability to understand the nuances involved in moderating a community that is routinely attacked by outside groups.

You would constantly attempt to undermine the free exchange of ideas, and then when other mods would disagree and argue for non-censorship (I noticed you call the two who stood up to you most often "ring leaders), you would accuse them of bias (in favor of the free flow of information?) and generally just start yelling.

I'm sorry you had to leave the mod team, but censorship of the kind you were advocating has no place on reddit; to the point where even your close friend flytape explained that your ideological censorship was just not a good fit for /r/conspiracy. I noticed that you didn't leak that modmail though :/

Best of luck with everything dusty.

[–]TheGhostOfDusty[S] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (33子コメント)

Prove it.

[–]Flytape 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Seriously dusty? You were removing shit left and right for your personal definition of sensationalizing headlines.

God this is a sad fall for you.

[–]phedre 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

pls post more birdmask videos. kthx.

[–]TheGhostOfDusty[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Not true. My definition was the dictionary definition. Yours was "personal".

And none of you would ever be willing to even discuss removing rule 11 to avoid continuing to be massive hypocrites. That's the sad fall amigo.

[–]Flytape 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why don't you leak the mod mails about it then.

Go on, and leak your most recent ban appeal too.

The simple fact is that we discussed these things as a mod team, you didn't get your way and then you left in protest and started being a little shit in the community then got banned and now this.

The fall is yours alone, And now I don't even want your friendship.

Bye dusty and have a good life,

F

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (28子コメント)

I mean your entire premise in this OP is that the mod team wouldn't acquiesce to your requests for censorship; it's a strange argument from you really, "The mods of /r/conspiracy wouldn't go along with my demands for them to censor the subreddit, so I resigned!"

I also find it interesting that the one mod you call "principled", was also advocating censoring an entire topic on the subreddit.

[–]TheToastIsBlue 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (13子コメント)

You keep saying censor, but it sounds like he just wanted the subreddit's rules to be more objectively applied. Isn't that what mods are for?

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (11子コメント)

He was asking for the rules to be applied in a way which would target certain topics, and was willing to disregard our commitment to the free flow of information in the process; which is why he eventually parted ways with the mod team.

[–]TheToastIsBlue 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Why would you have a rule that was only enforced "sometimes"?

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (3子コメント)

What you're saying is "why would you look at context when applying the rules?" Which completely disregards the nuance of individual users, their behavior, and it's impact on the community.

For example, dusty removed a post that was #1 on our sub for having a single words caps locked in the title (I think it was critical of Hildog or something). That type of censoring, and blatant disregard for the nuance of applying rules is why he left the team and won't be back.

Another issue was that dusty started removing posts that didn't line up with what the msm was saying, calling the titles "sensationalized"...another example of his failure to understand nuance, and the censorship that resulted.

It really put a strain on the mod team to ensure his censorship didn't run rampant, as he would lash out at anyone who questioned him or his motives.

[–]TheToastIsBlue 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Do you guys have a rule about Caps lock?

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yea, large amounts of caps lock in a title or comment are not allowed per our rule 6.

[–]TheToastIsBlue 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So you are arguing for selectivity enforcing the rules?

[–]TheGhostOfDusty[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Prove it.

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Question, did you send this thread to the modmail of any subreddits after you posted it?

[–]TheGhostOfDusty[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

That's what I thought.

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Wait, so is that a yes or a no; because from what I'm hearing you sent this thread around to subs that you knew were antagonistic of conspiracy in the hope they would upvote it...

That's not good dusty.

[–]TheGhostOfDusty[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (13子コメント)

Cool story bro.

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (12子コメント)

I'm not really following here; you're asking undelete to go along with a complaint that you weren't allowed to censor enough by your former co-mods.

It's like I'm in some kind of bizzaro world.

[–]thirdegree 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (11子コメント)

I mean, you're a conspiracy mod. You live almost exclusively in bizzaro world.

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Yea but censorship of specific topics is one thing that is usually held as entirely antithetical to the mission of the sub; as we would then be no better than a curated mainstream outlet.

We do remove things in /r/conspiracy for sure, but it's a nuanced mechanism and we go out of our way to ensure that we respond to things like brigading/outside manipulation rather than the content of whatever topic is being discussed. Dusty wanted to go in a complete different direction and actively begin curating content that he disagreed with, and at that point the mod team made it clear he was no longer a good fit for the ethos of the sub.

[–]thirdegree 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (4子コメント)

To be clear, the topic he wanted removed was pizzagate? Like, I get if y'all don't want to hold yourself to any standard of proof, but if you did, pizzagate would be the first thing to go.

Or maybe just anything Alex Jones says.

title+body+url: 'Alex Jones'
action: remove
action_reason: Actually insane

Would improve the sub a good bit.

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (3子コメント)

So infowars is actually on the site wide spam filter run by the admins (not sure for what reason); we actually use automod to approve that domain, just as we use automod to approve comments from shadowbanned users if we can.

Also, one of the mods who stepped down did so because he felt that we should have banned discussion of pizzagate entirely. That suggestion made me very uncomfortable, as the idea of banning discussion of a topic on a conspiracy sub is really just profane.

[–]thirdegree 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

not sure for what reason

Realllllly now? You're not sure why infowars, these guys, these guys, fucking these guys, are spammed?

I don't necissarily disagree with "the idea of banning discussion of a topic on a conspiracy sub is really just profane", though I would like to hear your opinions on this whole incident.

[–]TheGhostOfDusty[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also, one of the mods who stepped down did so because he felt that we should have banned discussion of pizzagate entirely.

Prove it.

[–]nanonan 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

We are all in bizzaro world, it's just that /r/conspiracy can see that.

[–]thirdegree 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

/r/conspiracy couldn't see its hand in front of its face unless someone shot a grainy youtube video of it first.

[–]phedre 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Four hour long grainy youtube video with a shaky cam and a bird mask hand puppet.

[–]thirdegree 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sounds kinky. Name a time and a place.

[–]Kind_Of_A_Dick -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Which mod was it that tagged the initial Trump Dossier post by calling it a 4chan hoax and then deleting it?

[–]TheGhostOfDusty[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's in the second set of screens.

I think someone tagged it "unverifiable" first according to the comments, so that was (at least) the second tag.

Here it was removed.

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Seems to indicate it was tagged as a raid, and removed as such.

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

It was tagged as "/r/politics raided" I believe, as once we were shown the link to a comment in /r/politics calling for a brigade of the sub (in that particular post) we removed that thread by consensus.

[–]geraldo42 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It was flaired as "4chan hoax". I don't believe for a second that you don't remember that but nice attempt at disinfo.

[–]Kind_Of_A_Dick -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

There was definitely a 4chan hoax tag on it at one point in time. I unfortunately don't have a screenshot because I didn't think to get one at the time. There may have been a change and I've seen a few posts tagged and removed after a brigade since then, except for ones heavily upvoted and commented on by t_d regulars. Then again maybe I missed the ones your mod team has removed for those reasons(brigades by t_d).

Quite frankly, your sub has undergone a definite change in the time since the US election was in full swing. After PG was shut down it got really bad and became the new Pizzagate sub, with most of the posts dedicated to the witch hunt that has become. You even have a sticky showing the archived post that was at the top of PG when it was taken down, for whatever reason. There's talk on the sub of the mods, at least some of the mods, being complicit with pushing an agenda. I won't lie, I've made the claim multiple times because that's how it seems to me and I wouldn't find it surprising if mods of a conspiracy related sub were heavily compromised in order to advance an agenda.

[–]TheGhostOfDusty[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Always vocally misremembering things in your favor...

[–]TwasIWhoShotJR 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

So wondeful of you to post this bizarre rambling wall of garbage. If this had been smeared on a wall in feces I may have been able to make more sense of it.

Thankfully someone as clear headed and not-insane as /u/AssuredlyAThrowaway is here to bring legitimacy to your ramblings.

Precious.

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Not sure if back handed insult or compliment.

I will go with back handed insult.

:/

[–]phedre 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

There's nothing back handed about it - that's straight up shade right there.

[–]AssuredlyAThrowAwayworldnews&conspiracy emeritus 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I was giving him a chance to be polite :/

[–]SnapshillBot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Wow, that's a lot of links! The snapshots can be found here.

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

[–]Canadian_POG 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow, that's a lot of links!

When did this bot get so mouthy?

[–]curiosity36 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've got a lot of reading to do. r/con didn't used to be a bastion of alt-right theatrics though. Duck is right about that.

[–]AnindoorcatBot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Retard spends hours making post no one will read. More at 11.

[–]PantsGrenades -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Hey, I've been trying to publicly address astroturfing since ~ 2013. To be honest I'm not too fond of libertarianism, but if you're earnest in regards to safeguarding the free market of thought I'd like to work with you.

Could you please repost your findings (and perhaps any additional relevant info) to /r/EffortPost?

[–]DeepDickedHillybilly -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's a lot of links my friend!