全 19 件のコメント

[–]chorizobisqueState's Rights Libertairan 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

over/under on OP's age is 14 years old. I'm going to take the under.

[–]CrossCheckPandaIndependently Libertarianish 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I voted Johnson but them harmless sjws causing a lot of physical harm to others these days. Also racist seems a little out of the blue

[–]Spooky2000 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Why did you leave out the Nazi part like your past posts say?

[–]yashoza[S] -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (4子コメント)

you mean post-posts

[–]Spooky2000 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Nope, said what I meant. Unless you intend to call them natzis later.

[–]yashoza[S] -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Then your question is invalid. Read my history again.

[–]Spooky2000 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You said this.

considering the disappointingly large overlap between the two, nice.

And the title of the tread was this.

Now It’s Okay to Punch Nazis and White Male Libertarians. That Escalated Quickly

You called libertarians nazis. Now fuck off.

[–]yashoza[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You have no idea how to read a timeline. You're evidence that libertarians are just as dumb as repubs and dems.

[–]AdamSB08classical liberal 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Go fuck yourself.

[–]yashoza[S] -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

faggot.

[–]AdamSB08classical liberal 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Umm... I know you are, but what am I? I graduated middle school many years ago and don't have time to deal with this type of bullshit. Sorry.

[–]2toneDLcultural thinker 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

if you don't know how many, then you don't know there are a lot. also, juvenile epithets are entirely too easy. try again with substance.

[–]yashoza[S] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

That is very simplistic thinking. If I encounter multiple ones on a daily basis, then there are many. If I don't have an exact number to make a prediction, then I don't know how many. There is no contradiction here. Why are so-called libertarians making stupid mistakes like this?

[–]2toneDLcultural thinker 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

you are making serious statistical errors. you may very well encounter multiple people of a given demographic (in this case: Low T, fake libertarian, racists who voted Trump) but that says nothing about the larger population as a whole. it could be you've placed yourself where said demographic has a higher concentration.

how you define any given element of your chosen demographic also plays a role. what criteria did you use to determine Low T? what constitutes a fake libertarian? how does one qualify as a racist? are those who voted for Trump more likely to be some combination of the aforementioned?

all you've managed is to prattle on with pejoratives, provide nothing of substance, offer no evidence and decry detractors as evidence of Trump voters (in your silly edit). if you'd like to participate as an adult, i recommend spending much less time trying to be clever with snark and more time thinking.

also, well-known libertarian Walter Block debated voting in the affirmative for Trump. while i disagree with him, the assumption that one must be a fake libertarian, or any of the other piffle you're peddling if they voted for Trump is of the poorest reasoning.