Lolcow Vordrak / Samuel Collingwood Smith / Sam Smith / BenvolaStar / Matthew HopkinsVexatious litigant, literal terrorist, GamerGate pedophile, stalker (Samuel Collingwood Smith)

Considering his obvious obsession with pedophiles, is there any evidence he was abused as a child or maybe someone in his family or childhood friends?

I've just read a significant portion of this thread and saw no sign of it, sorry if I'm

 

It's hilarious how Vordrak thinks Tor is some kind of immunity shield.

 

His friend and ally Oliver D Smith was already bragging about them getting her fired on ED before this happened, so we don't even have to speculate.

 

There was no evidence of anything in that video other than Luke being a sped.

 

Hope his buddies realise that Vordrak can't actually represent them when criminal charges drop.

 

Criminal charges? Are you fucking kidding. Do have any awareness of the shit on this website.

So let's run through this.

1) Null runs a websites which slanders people in the worst ways possible, celebrates causing suicides among the mentally ill, knowingly publishes false statements attributed to living individuals.
2) Somebody (from another country) points this out to his mom's employer and she gets fired.

Please explain where "criminal charges" fits into that. Are you going to get interpol on the case or something? Lmao.

 

you are a lying kike

 

Nothing we do is actually illegal, no matter how much you wish otherwise.

Sending terror threats which lead to schools being closed down, on the other hand, is seriously illegal - which is why those threats have been under investigation since they first happened. Anyone who throws in with the person behind those threats is a fool.

It has nothing to do with what *we* are going to do. We didn't start the investigation of the terror threats and we couldn't stop it even if we wanted to, but it's not going to just go away.

 

x-posting

 

So did they actually do something or is he just blowing hot air?

 

"There is only a handful of people right now that know in the last few days a bombardment aimed at my mother's realestate company's office (and their executives), in combination with a slew of online attack articles calling her and her realestate company's employees pedophiles, forced them to revoke her license with them.
Those people also apparently hacked my email server and are from /Baphomet/, who hate me very much and are definitely not from Hertfordshire."

 

They got Null's mum fired from her job and they tried to get access to the lolcow email database.

The latter was a spectacularly stupid move as the investigation into the original terror threats is still active. Null has no choice but to report the attempt to gain access as it's possible their plan was to use the accounts of valid users to send more terror threats. Whoever did this has now gotten themselves drawn into an active investigation into *serious shit*, even though the attempt to access the database is something which law enforcement wouldn't give a shit about under different circumstances.

 

UK law enforcement and courts apparently care very much about the internets...

 

"You guys are harassing and cyberbullying me and my friends so I'm going to harass and cyberbully you to stop it, and cross more lines than anything on your site ever has to do it!" - Samuel Collingwood Smith

 

Spoiler: Wall of Text Discussing Hacking and Criminal Penalties in the UK

The Hacking of Computers and the Criminal Law
Hacking of Computers
The hacking of computers is a crime which has occurred much more frequently since the inception of the internet. It is often glamourised in films with individuals portrayed bring down huge companies for the good of the people. In reality it is a serious offence when certain government databases may be hacked or private companies are hacked for the purposes of fraud.

The Computer Misuse Act 1990
The Computer Misuse Act was first introduced in August 1990 following a Law Commission report surrounding computer misuse and pressure being forced on the government from certain large corporations.

One of the main reasons for the pressure to get the act introduced was that the UK was trailing behind many European Union Member States in relation to technological development.

What offences were first introduced by the Computer Misuse Act?
The Computer Misuse Act introduced the following three new offences into UK criminal law:

1. Unauthorised access to computer material
   
   
2. Unauthorised access with intent to commit a further offence
   
   
3. Unauthorised modification
   

Unauthorised access to computer material
The basic notion of hacking whereby an individual causes a computer to perform a function when at the time he possesses an intention to access a program or data held in a computer is covered by the offence of unauthorised access to computer material – Section 1 Computer Misuse Act.

Does an individual have to know that his accessing the computer material is unauthorised?
For the offence to occur the access to the computer material has to be unauthorised and the individual gaining access has to be aware that his access is unauthorised. There however, is not a requirement for the intent to be directed at a specific program or file it is simply enough to prove that the access was unauthorised.

What is meant by computer material?
There is no definition of computer material within the Computer Misuse Act as at the time it was felt that this was far too complicated to be achieved by a piece of legislation. Consequently this has enabled the act to apply to new pieces of technology as and when they are developed.

However, the accepted definition of computer being any device for storing and processing information can be found in the Civil Evidence Act 1968.

Unauthorised access with intent to commit a further offence
Section 2 of the Computer Misuse Act covers unauthorised access to computer material with the intent to commit or facilitate the commission of further offences. The basis notion is that someone guilty of an offence under Section 1 of the Computer Misuse Act will have further criminal sanctions imposed on him if this is done with the intention to commit or facilitate the commission of further offences.

What is meant by further offences under Section 2?
Further offences for the meaning of Section 2 are offences which have a sentence fixed by law or where an individual found guilty of that offence would be liable for a term of imprisonment of five years or more.

Examples of a further offence may be the following:

• Fraud under the Fraud Act
  
  
• Forgery or counterfeiting under the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981
  
  
• Theft under the Theft Act 1968
  
  
• Criminal damage under the Criminal Damage Act 1971
  

Unauthorised modification
Section 3 of the Computer Misuse Act imposes criminal liability on an individual whereby he has done one of the following three things:

1. Caused an unauthorised modification of the contents of the computer
   
   
2. Has the intention to make such a modification
   
   
3. Has the knowledge that what he intends to do is unauthorised
   

In order for an individual to be guilty of one of the above offences under Section 3 he must also be guilty of one of the other offences contained within either Section 1 or Section 2 of the Computer Misuse Act.

What is meant by modification?
A modification is a change which impairs the operation of a computer or prevents or hinders access to a program or data or the operation of the program or data or affects its reliability. This may also include the removal or erasure of a program or data held in the computer or adding a program or data to the computer – this is to deal specifically with individuals adding a virus to a specific computer or computer system.

If I am found guilty of computer hacking will I be liable for criminal prosecution?
As the offences under the Computer Misuse Act are criminal offences anyone found guilty will be liable for a maximum penalty of six months imprisonment and a £2,000 fine. Furthermore under Section 2 of the Computer Misuse Act an individual will likely be guilty of the intended further offence.

Is there any other legislation which deals with computer hacking?
The Terrorism Act 2000
When the Terrorism Act first came into force it made the threat of or use of computer hacking a potential act of terrorism.

Under the Terrorism Act not all hacking will be considered to be terrorism. Accordingly the use or threat of an action designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system will be a terrorist action only if both of the following conditions are satisfied:

1. It is designed to influence the government or to intimidate the public or a section of the public
   
   
2. It is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause
   

The act does not, however, make for additional penalties for hackers who would be punished under the existing laws of the Computer Misuse Act.

http://www.inbrief.co.uk/offences/hacking-of-computers/

 

It has nothing to do with harassment or cyberbullying and everything to do with his ego. He went to extreme lengths over not being made a mod on the Evanescence forums and still tries to bully people into silence about that, and no-one was "harassing" him there.

Ironically, some of Vordrak's stunts *do* fit the legal definition of "harassment", but that pales into insignificance compared to the terror threats (and UK authorities will absolutely cooperate with US agencies investigating those).

Someone who lives with his mother harassing the mother of someone else over internet shit is exceptional, to say the least. Fortunately, we're not stupid enough to break laws to retaliate in kind - and who would want to make the life of someone who lives with Vordrak even more miserable anyway?

 

Furthermore, the threats that he totally didn't send are a serious enough offense that the Florida authorities might get the DOJ to request extradition for. Jeff Sessions (the new Attorney General) is a national security hawk. Plus sending terrorist threats to schools and hospitals is the kind of thing that pisses people regardless of their political views.

 

/baphomet/ might. It's a good thing he's not stupid enough to do anything to piss them off or draw their attention to him.

 

From what I understand, Null and Vordrak have only ever directly interacted once, and that was after Vordy started his crusade against us. All this is over us making fun of Gamergate which is a truly stupid thing to start an internet slap fight over. But this is a guy who tried to get the UK Parliment to take action on him not getting to mod a generic goth band's forum. Some nights, when I can't sleep (I have severe insomnia), I pass the dark hours by trying to imagine what autistic thing Vordrak will lose his shit over next.