全 2 件のコメント

[–]pnzsaurkrautwerfer 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They were most effective on the defensive. The 88 mm was a quite capable AT gun, and the Russian front presented a lot more long range engagement areas which favored the Tiger.

On the offensive it was a lot weaker. While it was resistant to some AT fire, it still was often disabled in combat. Also it was not especially mechanically reliable.

If you had to pick the best German heavy armor, I'd say the tiger would be a top contender simply because while expensive and difficult to make it did generate some results that can be seen as commiserate with investment.

It's reputation is stupidly inflated by propaganda however.

[–]SowingSalt 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

At least on the American side, they wouldn't be facing one tank. A platoon was 5 tanks, thus the smallest formation that could be ordered around.