•
•

BREAKING NEWS: Appeals Court Decision On Trump's Travel Ban 6:30 PM TTLIVE (youtu.be)

Exile127CA が 投稿 - announcement

上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 202
並べ替え:
新着 (提案されたアイデア)
ベストトップ論争中古い順Q&A

[–]guitarzer0CA 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

can someone let me know on what legal grounds they say they're doing this under or are they not even bothering to cover up their activism from the bench

[–]little_gamieFL 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Trump absolutely has my vote in 2020.

This is just scary. Activist judges should never be allowed to remain in power.

[–]turlockmikeCA 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What is the point of the law if the president isn't allowed to utilize it.

[–]supervillain66 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Does anyone remember Michael Savage after 9-11? He always referred to them as the 9th Circus court of appeals. To further quote him: "THE STENCH FROM THE BENCH IS MAKING ME CLENCH!"

[–]Proton_Pack 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If a Terrorist attack on US soil would happen now they would all be over.

[–]KrakNup 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Those judges will be directly responsible for any illegal act done by any person they've now allowed illegal US entry to. They've just discarded the US Constitution.

[–]roccogillybeanCA 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

9th circuit is a joke and is overturned by the SC well over 50% of the time.

[–]Time4puff 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Trump is off the hook for any future attacks in our country. Blame these stupid judges.

[–]ExplodingWolf_325IN 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

If it does go to the supreme court, how will it fare there if Gorsuch isn't confirmed?

[–]KrakNup 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They should not file until after he is confirmed.

[–]ForgototherpasswordMAGA 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Tie upheld

is what I hear

[–]rossagessausageCA 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The court is split 4/4 but I think you would find a judge impartial enough to rule based on law.

[–]_The_Black_Rabbit_CO 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Jesus Christ. Break the 9th Circuit apart.

This is complete horseshit and when someone dies it's on their head. Fucking cowardice.

[–]HellbloodKEK 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

ALL BLOOD SPILLED BY TERRORISTS IS NOW ON LIBERALS HANDS

Every man, woman, and child killed by terrorists is because of liberals

EVERY BAD THING DONE BY A TERRORIST IN AMERICA IS NOW 100% LIBERALS FAULT

LIBERALS ARE TRAITORS TO AMERICA AND THE FREE WORLD

[–]IDGAFprime 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Now any attack that happens here in the next 3 months gets blamed on the left, and their courts.

[–]BeodenOH 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Let's all pray that nothing happens during this time that Judges now think they can rewrite and write laws from bench. If anything happens they should be tried for treason.

[–]OrielWindows 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

REEEEEEEEEEEEE

[–]conanthekingMO 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is deeply disturbing. A stunning decision. I think that decisions like this will embolden the citizenry. We now see that we have fifth columns embedded within our entire society!

[–]humanhumannukanukaIL 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I fucking voting for Trump because I don't want goddamn rapefugees roaming around. He won against all odds. Why are there still fucking rapefugees coming in. Fuck judicial activism. CONGRESS DO SOMETHING.

[–]Dominus_Vobiscum2112 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Was this ruling surprising to anyone?

[–]cjcivicxARMY 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Cocksuckers need to hang! Justice Kennedy will be ruling on this shortly, you can take that to the bank!

[–]HIGHENERGYBASTARDMS 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

This was not unexpected. The 9th circuit is a cuckfest. It will go on to the SCOTUS and the ban/pause will be upheld. Dont let this get you down Navigators. The battle has just begun.

[–]WinFatigueSuffererRUS 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If Gorsuch is confirmed before the case, it'll be a 5-4 decision in favor of Trump. If not, it'll definitely be 4-4.

[–]DankPeterson 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hopefully any attacks in the meantime are only in Seattle/San Francisco.

[–]coolvalley2299 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (2子コメント)

This ruling is purely a political decision and has no foundation in the law. The critical issue beyond Presidential power is that an immigrant who has not entered the country has no constitutional rights at all. There are other 9th Circuit cases that say this specifically. In order to get around this issue that is fatal to the lawsuit, the opinion refuses to accept that Trump modified the order to exclude lawful permanent residence who do have constitutional rights. They basically ignore what Trump has ordered to get to an opinion that supports their political view point.

[–]shawnbttu 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The judge apppointed by Bush also said no to the request. How does that factor into your logic you retarded piece of shit?

[–]mrsunshine1 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Harder to say purely political when Republican appointed judge voted against it too.

[–]RidlanXPA 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Now more than ever. Split up the 9th circuit.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/09/bill-to-split-nutty-9th-circuit-gains-momentum.html

[–]captaindrano 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

anyone have a link for a cable cutter to fox news please?

[–]KierDiddly69 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

There'll be an avalanche of Islamic immigration coming soon. Unfortunately.

[–]306MAGAnitudeQuakeUSA 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

if they mention "Religion" in their reason I'll riot! No mention of "Muslim" in EO.

[–]rossagessausageCA 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So glad the justice system likes to gamble with American lives over a 90 day travel ban.

[–]ultrakill01USA 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I have a legitimate question, can WH just write up a new EO and sign it which would do something similar but obviously in separate language? This is kinda crazy that Pres cannot protect citizens.

[–]cesarnono13 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Correct me if I'm wrong. Can't they appeal the decision and have it go to the SCOTUS?

[–]HIGHENERGYBASTARDMS 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes. Thats why its important for us to not let this bring us down. The winning will continue in the Supreme Court.

[–]mrsunshine1 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Before Gorsuch gets approved it'll be upheld by a 4-4 court.

[–]cjcivicxARMY 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Justice Kennedy can strike them down, as usually happens with the 9th.

[–]PixelZer0KS 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But with the 4/4 split on the bench it will get stuck there.

[–]Exile127CA[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's correct

[–]_George_Costanza_NY 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So if the Supreme Court takes the case and rules against Trump, it stands at a tie (4-4) or they send the case back to the lower court these asshole judges just re-wrote the constitution. They should all be arrested for treason.

[–]_greymateriaDE 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Politics aside, this is disgusting. The judiciary is taking away powers innate to the Executive. With zero basis and zero precedent. Congress can't even introduce legislation to combat this abuse, since apparently judges can pick and choose what laws to uphold.

[–]Trump_Train_101NC 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I am to the point that if they want to keep this shit up fuck it let aca stay let aliens come and lets see what the fuck happens. I am beyond pissed!!!!!!!!

[–]SaltmineinspectorNE 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

SCOTUS will rule our way the 9th circuit is the most liberal in the country. The left better hope and pray the people that come in in the next 90 days behave themselves or Trump will crucify them.

[–]lurkwellmyfriendsNC 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

We the People will crucify them. This judicial activism must end.

[–]Oh_hamburgers_NY 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Activist judges made it political so that it would have to go to the Supreme Court. They're delaying it purposefully, they know they're in the wrong.

[–]Blu3YetiCO 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

So even though it explicitly states within the Constitution that the President may halt immigration if he so deems so, the 9th Circuit says that doesnt matter?

Absolutely insane.

But its not a surprise. The 9th is Radically Liberal and the single most overturned court in the US. SCOTUS will very likely overturn this once Gorsuch gets approved.

[–]FehTacticool 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

9th circuit court is ultra liberal. They rule against every single 2A case, for example.

[–]humanhumannukanukaIL 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

just shows what would happen to our constitutional rights if we keep electing leftists and globalists

[–]whocaresguy 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

how soon to get the new supreme court judge in?

[–]Jerry_Manderson 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

SO JUST SHUT OFF ALL IMMIGRATION

[–]pigroot1 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Unfortunately this is not surprising. As humans we let our emotions get in the way before facts...

I pray that we don't have any terror attacks. It's a sad day in America

[–]blache13AL 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Liberals are willing to gamble with American lives to protect people outside of America. Fuck anybody that ever votes for another dimocrat.

[–]Comanche_MoonTX 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Any Islamic terror attacks will be on those cuck judges' hands.

[–]RulerOfSlidesNJ 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

SO-CALLED JUDGES!

[–]RisingSunToday 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (3子コメント)

As someone smarter than me mentioned previously, this does essentially inoculate the administration from blame when the next terrorist attack happens on American soil.

[–]RatedRTrump 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

thats nice but im more worried about my fucking safety right now

[–]StJimmy92OH 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Nope, they'll just say it happened because he pissed them off and it's still all his fault.

[–]Crotchrocket1988 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I can't wait to read their rationale.

[–]DIRECTOR_COMEY 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Schools can't run properly in the state.

No joke. (it is)

[–]devCheckingIn 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

More red pills being dispensed today.

[–]vapereasonsUSA 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fucking bullshit. Court's playing politics

[–]RatedRTrump 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

we have no laws in thus country unless its pro left. everyone is bought off from the politicians to the media to hollywood and now we realize to the judges. this is how they were able to get away with shit for so long by legislating from the bench instead of enforcing the law

[–]NorthJersey908NJ 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

so why did we even bother with this court when Federal, non-SCOTUS judges have no power over the President?

[–]tj007s13 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (3子コメント)

A federal appeals court in San Francisco has refused to reinstate President Donald Trump's ban on travelers from seven predominantly Muslim nations.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday wouldn't block a lower-court ruling that suspended the ban and allowed previously barred travelers to enter the U.S. An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is possible.

U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle issued a temporary restraining order halting the ban last week after Washington state and Minnesota sued. The Justice Department appealed to the 9th Circuit.

Government lawyers argued that the ban was a "lawful exercise" of the president's authority and that the seven countries have raised terrorism concerns.

The states said Trump's executive order unconstitutionally blocked entry based on religion.

A federal appeals court says the U.S. government hasn't shown a likelihood it will succeed in appealing to reinstate President Donald Trump's travel ban. It also hasn't shown that failure to reinstate the ban would cause irreparable injury.

[–]turlockmikeCA 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow, what nonsense. If we could prove that there would be injury then we wouldn't need a ban in the first place as we could just arrest people at the border.

This is beyond ridiculous.

[–]devCheckingIn 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The states said Trump's executive order unconstitutionally blocked entry based on religion.

There's a simple solution to that. Don't block based on religion. Block them all.

[–]jiujiujiuUSMC 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Cucked judges gonna cuck. Stay upheld. Terrorists allowed to come. Madness.

[–]skankhunt92MA 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

To the Supreme Court we go. Hopefully Gorsuch is confirmed by then

[–]uaelite 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sons of bitches..

[–]rossagessausageCA 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Don't get your hopes up 'pedes, the 9th circuit is pretty biased.

[–]blache13AL 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's already done. They ruled against the Constitution.

[–]LongDonkeyHonkey 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Word on the street is they are trying to break up that court system. A unconstitutional ruling would clearly favor that

[–]RulerOfSlidesNJ 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They just signed their own dissolution order.

[–]NRSmaga -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes they did....so much for the oaths they take. so sad

[–]rossagessausageCA 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ah, well it was expected. They're cucked.

[–]bigbro2009TN 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Damn. This pisses me off. The law is clear.

[–]skinnytreesOH 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (5子コメント)

The 9th circuit is overturned more than any other United States Federal Court of Appeals

Around 80% of their decisions heard by the Supreme Court are completely overturned. In some years they have almost double the cases overturned than the total amount of cases SCOTUS accepts from any other circuit. Yes the 9th circuit is unable to make correct judicial decisions in more than 3/4ths of cases their bosses rule on. They are a failure of a court.

It is a well known liberal activist court and even the damn SCOTUSblog site says so.

Gorsuch being appointed will overturn this.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/06/scotus-for-law-students-sponsored-by-bloomberg-law-scoring-the-circuits/

[–]favelaGoBOOMTX 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The supreme court reserves a ton of cases from each district according to that, jesus.

Welp looks like we'll see how this goes on in the SCOTUS.

[–]DankPeterson -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So they are a known rogue court and yet we allow them to have any say still on anything.

[–]SpaceUnicorn2016 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Why is the 9th circuit so biased? What is the purpose of this circuit??

[–]lolfail9001 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why is the 9th circuit so biased?

A federal appeals court in San Francisco

San Francisco

[–]derkaderkajihadderka 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Liberal presidents keep managing to shove their worthless liberal lifetime-appointed judges into it.

[–]ncal26MD 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This severely damages our safety and national security. Major holes that terrorists can now take advantage of.

Anything that happens from here on out is in their hands.

[–]shitsinyoursafespaceMA 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Step 1: Get Gorsuch confirmed

Step 2: Appeal this baseless decision to the Supreme Court

Step 3: Remind the country why the 9th Circuit is the most overturned Circuit in the country.

[–]Match-SticksUSA -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Even then, Kennedy could still rule against TRUMP.

[–]Bender4Prez 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I almost wonder if this is the 9D Chess move they always planned.....thoughts?

[–]Match-SticksUSA 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think so. I wished Trump would have waited till we had Sessions and Gorsuch in place before issuing the EO. Now are enemies know his intentions and will plan accordingly.

Fuck these activist judges!

[–]shitsinyoursafespaceMA 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Unlikely. Gorsuch will take too long to get confirmed for this to be something convenient for us. Still, I dont know if its worth sending it up to the Supreme Court as it currently sits.

[–]blache13AL 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

That will be months from now.

[–]shitsinyoursafespaceMA 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's true, but I wouldn't want to risk sending it up there for a 4-4 judgment. We might not be able to get it back up there after a tie.

[–]uaelite 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

When can we get Gorsuch confirmed?

[–]EX818RUS 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Nuclear option. ASAP

[–]blache13AL 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

There will still be weeks and weeks of hearings and delays. By the time he is on the Court the extreme vetting will already be in place and the Order would be moot.

[–]robottonicPA 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Law says: President has this power.
4 liberal judges say: No.

[–]captaindrano 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (1子コメント)

order still is not posted on the court's page dammit

[–]skankhunt92MA 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They voted to uphold the halt

[–]NorthJersey908NJ 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

they'll cuck out.

[–]joker68NY 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Treasonous mother fuckers!!!!!

[–]Trump_Image_Library 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (1子コメント)

The fucking 9th circuit... if anyone tells you that our judiciary is unbiased and follows the law, point out that the 9th circuit decisions that go to the Supreme Court get overturned like 77% of the time. They're not following the law, they're trying to make their own.

[–]MSMomma71MS 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

88% is the correct number and why it's called the circus court

[–]lehtosaloSWE 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I am so sorry to everyone in the US. This is a ruling that could have set the standard for the rest of the world. But now, we all have to fear islamic terrorists.

[–]CTR_ChallengerCA 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Trust me it will. These judges didn't uphold the oath they took to interpret the constitution. Its going to go to the supreme court and it will get overturned. 77% of the cases that go to the supreme court (from the 9th "circus") get overturned so it will. Our judicial system has been cuckified thanks to Malik's brother.

[–]lehtosaloSWE 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I really hope so, hearing now on fox news that it might take a year before it reaches the supreme court but at least that is something.

[–]blade55555 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's obvious they don't know the laws of the country. The constitution literally states that the President can do stuff like this and go even further than he has.

This is what happens when you got judges full of liberals, jesus christ -_-.

[–]jjjaaammmNY 33 ポイント34 ポイント  (2子コメント)

This is a full blown attack from the left to delegitimize trump. Makes zero sense from legal perspective. Insane. Pure insanity.

SCOTUS better have more self control

[–]StainWagginMAGA 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Something terrible will happen.

[–]WyoTxnWY 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dude, chill. Obama got harangued several times by federal courts. It's politics as usual. We'll get there. Soon.

[–]RandyContractorUSA 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Anyone remember that time during WWII when we let thousands of prime military aged German refugee men into this country? No? That's because it didn't happen! It would have been suicide!!! WTF!?

[–]yummibox 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I guess that means that the Judicial branch now has the power of the Executive branch when it comes to immigration?

They aren’t even privy to national security info? How is this supposed to work?

[–]Top_Secret_NameTX 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's called judicial review, read up on Marbury vs Madison.

[–]Keiichi81 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (1子コメント)

They keep saying how this temporary travel restriction would "irreparably damage" California and Minnesota, but they never say how it's going to do that. The only thing it will "harm" is the ability of the Democrats to import more Democrat voters.

[–]sh2003WA 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's hurting Canada too, a lot of refugees are going from Minnesota up to Canada

[–]tiredofmakingaltsCO 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (1子コメント)

i dont understand how they can uphold it. there is literally no law being broken. these scumbags and their politics.

how high does this need to go before someone with some fucking sense and who will just uphold the law gets a hold of it.

[–]Beast_Pot_PieUSA 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

how high does this need to go

SCOTUS

[–]dafudged 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (0子コメント)

God damnit, fucking activist judges.

[–]Pence_PrimeKY 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (0子コメント)

BREAK UP THE 9TH DISTRICT.

FUCK YOU WEST COAST.

[–]OwnRellik 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

POLITICAL BASTARDS

[–]blache13AL 33 ポイント34 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Boom, Judges have just overturned the Constitution.

[–]FutureNactiveAccountMAGA 33 ポイント34 ポイント  (1子コメント)

FUCK YOU 9th DISTRICT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[–]captaindrano 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Maga (a Pede on Twitter) just said

"And the 9coa denies the stay!"

[–]captaindrano 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (4子コメント)

and that it will go on up to SCOTUS

[–]lehtosaloSWE 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

According to fox news it might take well over a year

[–]derkaderkajihadderka 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

SCOTUS can convene on an emergency basis for cases related to national security. I guess we'll see if that actually happens.

[–]captaindrano 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

wait, what? Holy cow

[–]lehtosaloSWE 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Obviously that's just their initial speculation but that is what they are saying for now :S

[–]blache13AL 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why can't a bank robber sue the government for making it illegal to rob banks? Definite harm there. He would spend the money he steals, so the State would also lose tax revenue. The State has standing too. This is all a bunch of BS.

[–]blache13AL 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

A terrorist already here, could sue for keeping other terrorists from joining him for a planned attack. The "travel ban" harms his attack plan so that is his standing.

[–]captaindrano 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

CSPAN sending out a survey on whether or not Tom Price should be confirmed as HHS Sec. Gonna need some backup Pedes! Please vote

https://twitter.com/cspan/status/829809078792777729

[–]blache13AL 90 ポイント91 ポイント  (18子コメント)

So we get to find out if unelected people with no knowledge of classified briefings get to decide our foreign policy, instead of the elected representative of the people that gets those briefings everyday and has the power to set that policy according to the Constitution. Seems like it should take about 1 second to answer that question instead of a few days.

[–]FutureNactiveAccountMAGA 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (17子コメント)

Dubs says Canby pushes this through. check em

[–]cambixx 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

This isn't 4chan.

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Your comment was automatically removed because you used a non-approved image host.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

    [removed]

      [–]AutoModerator[M] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Your comment was automatically removed because you used a non-approved image host.

      I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

      [–]blache13AL 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (11子コメント)

      I have no idea what that sentence means.

      [–]FutureNactiveAccountMAGA 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (10子コメント)

      "Check em" ...it's a /pol/ reference and Canby, the quiet judge from Tuesday, is likely to be the swing vote. Friedland is definitely for upholding the Seattle judges agenda.

      [–]blache13AL 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (9子コメント)

      Still don't get it. Push what through? What does that mean?

      [–]FutureNactiveAccountMAGA 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (8子コメント)

      2 of the 3 judges seem pretty set on their beliefs (completely opinion based on what happened Tuesday). Canby, the quiet 3rd judge and deciding factor will either uphold or withdraw the TRO.

      [–]blache13AL 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (7子コメント)

      Of course, but "pushing it through" means what? Which way are you implying it will be.

      [–]FutureNactiveAccountMAGA 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (6子コメント)

      I'm hoping Canby will not be a biased idiot and side with Trump, the evidence submitted today was pretty amazing for Trump's case.

      [–]blache13AL 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (5子コメント)

      All 3 should rule for Trump. No excuse, not even feels, could overrule the law. Sad day if even 1 of them sides with Judges being able to block Presidential power that is clearly spelled out. If they can rule that way, they can do anything. They could remove all power from the Executive Branch.

      [–]FutureNactiveAccountMAGA 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (4子コメント)

      9th district COA has the most overturned rulings in the Supreme Court. Quote me on that shit, bot. :D

      They're very biased, I think that's the problem we're facing.

      E* I've been too active in this thread. Fuckin pempkins everywhere.

      [–]captaindrano 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (22子コメント)

      The Court just posted a few more filings/motions: 02/09/2017 Appellees' Notice of filing additional evidence in district court 02/09/2017 Daniel Escamilla Amicus Motion 02/09/2017 Daniel Escamilla Amicus Brief 02/09/2017 Redfin Corporation Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000000860

      [–]FutureNactiveAccountMAGA 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (21子コメント)

      Oh snap. This one is good. http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2017/02/09/17-35105%20-%20Daniel%20Escamilla%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf

      [–]blache13AL 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (4子コメント)

      It's airtight. Ruling against the "ban" is pretty much treason. At best irresponsible and dangerous. Review is not allowed since the person doing the review cannot have access to the information needed to make the decision. Judges should be impeached if they rule against it.

      [–]FutureNactiveAccountMAGA 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

      The impeachment of federal judges is a "muddy" process and I think it's only happened about 15 times in the history of the US(Don't quote me on that but I think it's close). Considering how many federal judges we've had over that period, It's kind of a non thing, because the ones that have been removed, were either accused/convicted of crimes or some sort of sexual misconduct.

      [–]blache13AL 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Of course. They should be, but wouldn't be. The dimocrats that would have to vote for it agree with any Judge that thinks the Constitution is optional.

      [–]QuoteMe-Bot 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      The impeachment of federal judges is a "muddy" process and I think it's only happened about 15 times in the history of the US(Don't quote me on that but I think it's close). Considering how many federal judges we've had over that period, It's kind of a non thing, because the ones that have been removed, were either accused/convicted of crimes or some sort of sexual misconduct.

      ~ /u/FutureNactiveAccount

      [–]justbeyourselfman 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (10子コメント)

      That sets the tone 100% that it is legit by Trump... How are they going to fight that?

      [–]captaindrano 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Have you read all the others? I'm disgusted by these companies that are fighting to stop this pause while so many of us are looking for work.

      Venting! Anyhow, you never know with activist judges, could be any outcome.

      [–]blache13AL 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (8子コメント)

      Would require ruling against US Code and the Constitution. Outrageous.

      [–]captaindrano 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      And now 15 more are going file declarations of their "harm" back in the distrcit court:

      "Dear Ms. Dwyer, On Tuesday, February 7, 2017, the parties presented oral argument to the Court. During the argument, Judge Friedland asked the States whether they would be presenting additional evidence in the district court and the nature of that evidence. I am writing to inform the Court that the States will be filing at least 15 additional declarations in the district court today, regarding harm to the States"

      [–]blache13AL 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Every law ever passed has harmed somebody. Tough shit. Doesn't matter if somebody is harmed. If the President has the power, nothing you can do about it but elect a different President in 4 years.

      [–]justbeyourselfman 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

      ?

      [–]blache13AL 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (4子コメント)

      There is no question that the ban must be upheld. Any Judge that would rule against it would be going against the law and the Constitution.

      [–]captaindrano 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

      IT IS A PAUSE, not a ban. Guy on RSBN keeps saying ban, it is a 90 day pause

      [–]blache13AL 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      Just using the commonly used term.

      [–]captaindrano 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      I know, sorry, someone else urged me to remind as many as possible this is not a ban, as that is what is fanning the flames

      [–]blache13AL 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      It's all good. Doesn't matter what you call it the outrage mobs will be outraged mobs anyway.

      [–]BraveNewFrog 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Trump Time Zone. Wherever God Emperor is atm.

      [–]FutureNactiveAccountMAGA 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      We have the best typos, don't we folks!?

      [–]TrueToPooh 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (18子コメント)

      Does TT = Trump time? So EST?

      [–]tiredofmakingaltsCO 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      i rule that all EST now be refereed to as TT

      [–]Exile127CA[S] 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      Yes

      [–]ScottBluesITL 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      I love you BIGLY

      [–]Exile127CA[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      That statement stands if you are female

      [–]FutureNactiveAccountMAGA 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (13子コメント)

      It's not too late to fix the Tipo

      ;)

      [–]TrueToPooh 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (12子コメント)

      I would run with it :) people here will enjoy the reference.