全 13 件のコメント

[–]IwantUstoEvolve 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You are amazing.

[–]insanepuma[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Consciousness is amazing, and anything that exists within it is eternal and privileged. That includes you and I! But it also includes everyone and everything in their primal state, prior to reaching the stage where proclivity clouds our better judgement and we no longer connect with the greater conscious.

[–]TotesMessenger [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

[–]BananabeanoBreak on through to the other side [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Enjoyed the read, thanks m8 :), I like your writing, very good.

[–]edwardshallow 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

I didn't read all of this, skipped through (may read it later) - but the bits I did read I resonate with.

The whole 'we see the whole in all', a bowl of cereal becomes the epic story of our entire living being - all is metaphor, giving us insight wherever we're prepared to take it. Our cognitive puzzles become instantly solved. Or, as to say, we see how it all fits together, and how we'd take it apart, so the 'mystery' of how to move through the maze is apparent.

"All of a sudden the words of people like Richard Dawkins, Neil DeGrasse Tyson and Brian Cox which I had previously taken as gospel suddenly didn't give me the answers I needed. And more to the point I noticed they didn't give them the answers either." Sincere intellectuals or genuine frauds; whichever, they're not speaking the Truth. What they're saying doesn't ring true with what they're experiencing. I used to see Dawkins as a 'lone fighter' against the TYRANNY OF RELIGIOUS OPPRESSION. Haha, naaah, he might even see himself as that, but he has lost connection to source. I remember him saying he'd consider taking LSD, and that it might give insight or something. It was before I'd taken any psychedelic, but in hearing how powerful they are I was like "Woah! You'd do that in the name science? If all the Greats who did LSD were able to increase their abilities in their own fields, can you imagine what would happen if all these 'smart folk' were to take them?"

Ehhh, after taking psychedelics, listening to some of these scientists talk is like listening to a child explain sex or something - so far from any experience of what they're actually saying that its awkward to listen to, and becomes more awkward to look at their fanbase (which I, as a staunch atheist, was certainly once part of)

No amount of mic dropping or mean quips from Neil d. Tyson is going to make what he says any 'truer', and what he's saying is placating to an audience. He knows there's divine source, but he wants a fanbase of atheists to keep showing up to his events so he can keep a career and ego going.

"But but but..." and the atheists snatch at their Christopher Hitchens quotes and their Cosmos series (aye, its beautiful, and its all a story of fiction, fairytales for those who don't wish to acknowledge their own divinity, that's alright)

[–]insanepuma[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I too would describe myself as an atheist because I don't believe that any of this is here for a purpose or was put here by anybody. I do think that there is a plane of greater consciousness that we are all connected to, no matter how tenuously. And this consciousness is perpetual and two-way, i.e. it is a connection not a funnel. We learn from it and it learns from us and then that collective knowledge becomes almost "in the public domain."

Watching Neil DeGrasse Tyson on "The Great Debate: THE STORYTELLING OF SCIENCE" I was struck and a little saddened by how ego was clouding his intellect and it actually appeared quite ugly to me. When Dawkins said that he wanted science to explain what consciousness was (which it has thus far failed to do so, at the time of writing!) he indicated superior intellect and subjective awareness. The showboating Tyson then preceded to mock the very idea that we do not know what consciousness is, being quite rude to Dawkins in the process.

I have since started watching Cosmos, a fascinating documentary hosted by Neil (and oddly enough, directed by Seth MacFarlene of Family Guy fame). It is tongue-in-cheek theatrical and thoroughly entertaining but at times I must confess it makes for uncomfortable viewing. It plays in points almost like an indoctrination video for some benign cult - ultimately non-harmful but a cult nonetheless.

Since the particular experience described in this post (which actually happened 2 weeks ago - I wrote it down whilst still high) I have simply been unable to view the world in the same way. I feel I can now freely speak about this without being prohibited by my ego - I mean this is what Shamans would perhaps describe as an awakening, and whilst I certainly do not profess to have any answers at all I do believe that I have bore witness to something that I intend to spend the next stage of my life exploring.

[–]edwardshallow [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

The definition of the 'god' I didn't believe in disappeared when I started taking psychedelics. DMT really changed it for me. If it's an awakening, what are we waking from?

Anything with a 're' is a repeat, and nothing in nature repeats, so we end up caught in a cycle.

Neil d. Tyson has this smugness about him, and I don't feel he's being honest about what he's teaching, I think there is truths in it, but he has hidden agendas, and is more interested in getting people to donate money and their time to the concept of space travel (that other people do - not you. ever.)

Whatever is happening now has always been happening, and this consciousness was there when Jesus was about, when the pyramids were built, its all the same thing. No time has passed, only shifts of matter manipulated by 'mind' that doesn't exist inside us, so whenever we're 'mind controlled' it's making us look at the past or future, rather than recognising our divine connection to Source.

"We are the original source, we aren't a systematic resource." unless we choose to be, and 'they' (anyone who benefits from the system) don't want to acknowledge the path.

What do you wish your purpose to be?

[–]insanepuma[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

What do you want your purpose to be is a huge question - I guess an umbrella summary of what I would like my purpose to be is part of something bigger that is working in perfect synergy. Have you ever seen a murmuraton of swallows? Every now and then large groups of swallows congregate and cut beautiful, dancing, moving shapes and figures across the sky. Nobody really truly understands why they do it or indeed how they do it but I saw it once on a small scale and it moved me profoundly. It felt like a gentle reminder from one being to another, a nudge from nature if you will, to remind me "hey, this is how it's done. Be like us. Be one with others, and move together." We all have a circadian rhythm within us. This internal body clock is affected by environmental cues, such as sunlight and temperature. It tells us what time to wake up and when to go to sleep etc. What if this rhythm isn't just there as a convenient alarm clock system - but can actually also be influenced by the circadian rhythms of others? They could pergaps become in sync with one another and allow us to behave as one entity, just like the birds.

[–]BananabeanoBreak on through to the other side [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Agnostic would suit you better :), hey m8 check this out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFvJOZ51tmc

you seem interested in the subject

[–]edwardshallow 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

"Don't use the words you know," my hand advised me. They limit you to only re-experience old emotions." At this point it seemed that the hand had willingly forgotten language and punctuation and proceeded to scribble undeterred. I finally opened my eyes after what seemed like about 45 minutes and looked at the notebook in front of me .There was a page and a half of unknown and illegible but very deliberate text laid out on the desk in front of me."

Exomecto! Purfecio manto! After a few mushrooms trips, I've been able to start speaking with intention and emotion in a language that holds no meaning to me - I don't know if the language exists already or I'm creating it? It feels as though, if someone would talk to me in the language (or their language of emotional intent) then the conversation would be flowing and fluid, forever.

I've tried this (not on mushrooms, I feel too scared of connecting deeply with other people during the trip) but smoking a little can allow me to get into similar states (and especially with edibles), and I'll start expressing...well, non-sense. But what it sounds like to anyone who doesn't feel what I'm doing is like a false gibberish.

So it'd be:

Me: Esko mana peanosay ranto biasa!

and they'll respond with something like

Them: Wee, diddly dee, pigeon go babby babby

Like, they're trying to say gibberish. They look (and sound) ridiculous. I feel awkward for them. They'll be looking into my eyes as if to say "Am I doing it?" and I know they're not. They're holding so tightly and feel so uncomfortable - I don't feel any emotion or intent in what they're saying, only a noise.

It's hearing someone LAUGH, and hearing someone fake laugh. If you've never properly laughed, and are just joining in, its obvious to those who are sensitive to it. But it's still a noise. There's a truth to the noises we make when truly expressing ourselves. When eating great food and we're all MMMMMM it's real. When we eat awful food and the chef is watching and we're like MMMmmmmm!! Yeeeah super good - and we just don't mean it.

For year I listened to the words people were saying, not how they were saying it (call it aspergers - or the 'symptoms of aspergers', call it a defence mechanism, chronic pain and trying to accept and listen to words that didn't matter to me but I still needed to process).

"Well, you could walk home by yourself..." being said by someone who doesn't want me there, and its easier to ignore the way 'could' is being said because the implications mean I would have to walk, and the chronic pain I experience made me not want to do that - so I'd ignore those pressures of tone. And, when I spoke (rarely) it'd be monotone, expressing Words, not feeling or meaning. We start using hyperbole (and then, I become a 'writer' or whatever, because trying to explain myself with Words to people who only listen to Feeling is difficult)

Them: How are you?

Me: I am in a lot of pain.

and it's nothing, it's monotone and it doesn't connect

Me: Absolute murder, there isn't a vibration in my being that doesn't ache with the shuddering of a 6am alarm on Monday morning.

Melodramatic? YES. Of course it is. We're pushed and pulled, told to do this, that, and for what? So the public school system doesn't call the police on our parents. Whit! What is this thing we call living? Certainly isn't that.

So, children listen to tone, these tones are so important.

[–]insanepuma[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

If you haven't already, research the Voynich manuscript - it is an ancient book written in a language that nobody understands and no cryptographer can yet decipher. Fascinating.

[–]edwardshallow [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It really is, and I've wondered "Is it there simply to confuse?" but I reckon we all have this in us - the ability to write languages that can be felt, but don't need to go through a filtration process to be 'understood'. We aren't understudies, we are not 'stood under' knowledge. We are Knowing. We are Source. So, whatever is happening for my awareness is all's awareness, their focus just isn't necessarily looking.

[–]edwardshallow [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Neither of my two posts really hit at what you're saying, I don't feel, haha, but it made me consider alot of things.

"Fit inside our heads" there is no head to fit in. Our thoughts don't happen in our body. They are awareness, and that isn't localised to our body. This gets me all the time. All we're doing is looking at our avatar, and (like a videogame) we can see where would be a good next move. The thoughts aren't happening in our brain, our brain is just picking up signals. Memories don't exist in our brain. If I stubbed my toe, its the toe that holds the memory in muscle, not a part of my brain that recalls it.