全 152 件のコメント

[–]glowingRadon 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (32子コメント)

1) No. Removals should default to silent and users should be notified only if there's reason to believe letting them know is beneficial. The vast majority of removals are due to spam and abusive content. Letting the spammers know you've caught on just tells them to change tactics and accounts. Same goes for content removed due to abusive users. Most people know the comment they're posting isn't acceptable. so letting them know just causes them to abuse modmail. Spam is a serious problem. I'm guessing the mods are looking at overarching patterns (user posting history, domain posting history, user participation, etc.)

2) A lot of modmail doesn't warrant a reply. Often it's a spammer asking why their content was removed (ignore), an abusive user arguing (ignore), or someone asking why content breaking a rule was removed (short reply to read rules/sidebar). Of course, legitimate questions and concerns should be addressed by the mods and bad faith shouldn't be assumed in ambiguous cases. Mods and normal users aren't on opposing sides.

3) Not gonna happen.

4) Already a limit for default. No point in expanding.

edit: formatting & expand

[–]davidreiss666 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I made a larger comment further down thread, but I'm going to reply here to just point out that /r/Health gets somewhere around 500 spam submissions per day that Automod deals with directly.

There is so much spam, and it needs to be removed. A lot of is really ugly spam about how doctors are evil and trying to murder people, or fake cancer cures, etc. Stuff that can get people killed. Upvotes/downvotes isn't going to deal with the avalanche of spam correctly.

Sadly, this guy didn't understand a lot of this.... and I tried to get it to work out. Then I made the mistake of hoping it would still work out and didn't remove him when I should have. Another mod then stepped forward to fix my mistake.

So, while I would say I made mistakes here..... /r/Health is better off now without him as a mod.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sadly, this guy didn't understand a lot of this

That's ridiculous. That has absolutely nothing to do with any of this. I completely agreed that kind of content should be removed.

You're just making shit up because you don't want to deal with the real issues here. That's really sad that you've stooped to this.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (29子コメント)

Most people know the comment they're posting isn't acceptable

This is just BS. Few subs actually list all the rules/reasons for removal. When I tried to make the removal rules public for /r/health I was countered. The vast majority of removed comments are completely normal.

/r/health did seem to have a major spam problem, but it was easily neutralized with automod, and when I set automod to notify for all removals it changed absolutely nothing for the worse.

Spam is a serious problem.

Where? There is no spam in one small sub that I mod, and I've talked to some other moderators of larger subs and it seems the amount of spam that /r/health gets is unusually high, but is still not a problem at all really since automod easily takes care of it.

A lot of modmail doesn't warrant a reply. Often it's a spammer asking why their content was removed (ignore), an abusive user arguing (ignore), or someone asking why content breaking a rule was removed (short reply to read rules/sidebar. If they keep asking, ignore).

Again, this is just not the case. And many mods don't even give a "short reply to read rules/sidebar".

[–]glowingRadon 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (22子コメント)

Few subs actually list all the rules/reasons for removal.

Read the sidebar. Read the rules. Use common sense. Don't harass other users.

Where? There is no spam in one small sub that I mod

And that just shows how naive you are about how things work. No one spams your sub because it's new and no one knows about it. I'm betting the spam r/health gets is not unusually high. r/HealthInsurance also gets a ton of spam and so do the other subs I have access to. Spam is the norm on Reddit.

Again, this is just not the case.

You've not stated any evidence to the contrary.

[–]thirdegree 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

and when I set automod to notify for all removals it changed absolutely nothing for the worse.

You're joking right? Please tell me you didn't do that for spam removal. Giving automod reasons for those just tells the spammers "Well we remove for x" so that spammers can carefully dance around your automod configuration. There's a reason automod isn't public.

There is no spam in one small sub that I mod,

Oh well in that case.

Spam is a massive problem. I've helped build and maintain several large, widely adopted bots specifically to deal with spam because spam is a massive problem. I see spam that even other mods don't see.

[–]Anomander 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (4子コメント)

This is just BS. Few subs actually list all the rules/reasons for removal. When I tried to make the removal rules public for /r/health I was countered. The vast majority of removed comments are completely normal.

Far from BS. In a sub where our rules are spelled out in excrutiating detail, 99% of people who contact the mod team are expecting us to read the rules to them because they haven't done so. Publishing your rules is handy to enforcing them, but it does not change poster behaviour in terms of more-compliant posts.

Spam is a serious problem.

Where? There is no spam in one small sub that I mod,

Congrats, 44 people is, for the most part, too small for spammers to bother targeting. Though in fairness, one of your core content submitters is an account I've flagged as highly suspect in two different communities, so maybe you're not quite as foolproof as you think.

and I've talked to some other moderators of larger subs and it seems the amount of spam that /r/health gets is unusually high, but is still not a problem at all really since automod easily takes care of it.

But that's a scary naive statement. If auto-mod is 'easily taking care of it' in terms of volume, in all odds there's more of the iceberg lurking underwater. We get tons of spam that a few simple auto-mod rules pick up, but because we're a sales-targeted sub, we also have tons of shady astroturf bullshit in the comments sections. I'd bet /r/health is similar, but with a larger target base and more companies competing for attention.

Again, this is just not the case. And many mods don't even give a "short reply to read rules/sidebar".

Yeah, also a lot of users want to fight you. A lot of mods would prefer to avoid the squabble and just don't pay attention to comments filled with warning signs. Like, I don't sign up for arguments with anyone who doesn't care enough about the community to have read the rules of their own accord. If the message is "what did I dooooo???" and what they did is literally line item two in our rules, this conversation is clearly not going anywhere productive.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'd bet /r/health is similar, but with a larger target base and more companies competing for attention.

It's not. You people seriously refuse to hear the truth. You made these same guesses in the previous thread. Being mod let me see it was not true. The vast majority of removed comments were legitimate from normal users.

There was absolutely nothing overwhelming about being a mod there. I could have easily run the sub myself with 5-10 minutes per day. And this is without all the abusive BS people are suggesting is needed to "counter spam" or w/e.

[–]Anomander 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

You people seriously refuse to hear the truth

Thanks for being clear you're not here for a constructive conversation. Good luck and good day.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Thanks for being clear you're not here for a constructive conversation

ME??!? I'M NOT THE ONE?!?!? You people keep ignoring every issue I bring up, then you use strawmen and lies to circumvent and distract. And now you have the audacity to accuse me of not being here for constructive conversation.......... just incredible. I guess I should have expected this behavior from a sub full of reddit mods.

[–]Anomander 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

ME??!? I'M NOT THE ONE?!?!?

Yup. You are.

You people keep ignoring every issue I bring up,

No one is ignoring your issues, they're telling you why they're not the crisis you would interpret them as.

The fact that you've missed that distinction is very telling: if we're not agreeing with you, you apparently cannot or will not recognize that people are addressing the things you've said.

then you use strawmen and lies to circumvent and distract.

I mean, who's having a temper tantrum about how victimized they are and ranting about "you people"? It's not me. But "you people" is like, The red flag phrase for someone who's not looking for discussion.

And now you have the audacity to accuse me of not being here for constructive conversation.......... just incredible.

You're not. You want us to be all outraged and angry and feel what you feel, and you're making it abundantly clear that anything less than a room full of people agreeing with you is unacceptable to your intent here. You literally have not responded to any critique or discussion constructuvely instead solely attacking people for not agreeing with you (here) or insisting that they're simply wrong without any meaningful support to that claim.

At this point it seems you'll say anything to try and drum up outrage pointed at /health.

I guess I should have expected this behavior from a sub full of reddit mods.

You did come to a room full of people who are far more familiar with the general issues you'd like to make claims about, many of whom are pretty used to spotting idealogues and sorting them from constructive, if rule-breaking, users ... and try and push an anti-mod ideology based on a bunch of bogus claims and unverifiable assertions.

Yeah, some of the /health stuff ... who knows, I'm not on the team. But once you start just making bullshit claims about how the rest of the site is, based on your experience modding a community barely exists and primarily features a highly suspect content source ... well, you're not qualified to make those claims without proof.

Like, if you wanted an echo chamber for your outrage, go hit up /subredditcancer.

[–]Zerosa 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (32子コメント)

Your number 1 on mod rules is just not possible for a lot of subs. So far just since the start of this month we have 2516 mod actions. We do not have the time to explain every single one of those.

[–]jayhawx19 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (2子コメント)

To follow up on this, we had 29,596 actions in January. That's one action every 90 seconds. It's simply out of the question to be able to write explanations for every action while still having lives.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

we

Who's we?

The fact that you're having that many mod actions is what's worrying. It sounds like you're trying to babysit one of the top 10 most popular subs.

Maybe that number includes automod actions, but if so, those can be automated.

Individual mod actions can also be streamlined with RES macros, or the mod tool some people use.

[–]glowingRadon 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Your ignorance is showing... again.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (28子コメント)

Who's we?

The fact that you're having that many mod actions is what's worrying. It sounds like you're trying to babysit one of the top 10 most popular subs.

Maybe that number includes automod actions, but if so, those can be automated.

Individual mod actions can also be streamlined with RES macros, or the mod tool some people use.

[–]Zerosa 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (27子コメント)

We is /r/cfb .

We just had last Wednesday one of our busiest days. We had 160 threads just for a single event called National Signing Day. Those had to be approved and removed to make sure they followed a certain format as specified by our rules. These rules could not be a completely automated check.

Part of those mod actions also include removing whole chains of comments due to the offending removed comment being the parent comment.

That is just a couple of examples of what we have to deal with. During the regular college football season a lot more mod actions are due to happen due to our game threads.

These are our rules that for the most part can not be automated as you suggest.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (26子コメント)

We had 160 threads just for a single event called National Signing Day. Those had to be approved and removed to make sure they followed a certain format as specified by our rules. These rules could not be a completely automated check.

Part of those mod actions also include removing whole chains of comments due to the offending removed comment being the parent comment.

These could and should be accompanied by reasons/notifications. It's only 1-2 seconds more to click the macro buttons. You could get more mods if it was overwhelming.

[–]StrawberryTea 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

At a certain point, adding more mods just results in more people stepping on each other's toes. We'd rather have a smaller and attentive mod team that can get things done than to add people just for the sake of adding more unneeded actions. Sounds like /r/Health thought similarly.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sounds like /r/Health thought similarly.

Seriously? You seriously pull that out of what I described? Sounds like a lot of mods here with major cognitive dissonance.

[–]StrawberryTea 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, cognitive dissonance would be someone who is uncomfortable holding two contradictory beliefs. I think you just mean I disagree with you.

[–]Zerosa 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (22子コメント)

Replying to each comment with a reason is asking for the users to hate you and to get banned for spam.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (21子コメント)

Replying to each comment with a reason is asking for the users to hate you

The silent removal of content is even worse.

[–]glowingRadon 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Please don't tell me you reply to every spam post and tell the user it's been removed because it's spam...

[–]OOvifteen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If it's a blatant spam account, no. But the /r/health mods made no distinction.

[–]Zerosa 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Yes. A user revolt because they hate us is not nearly as bad as silent removal of content.

If you can't tell, I'm being sarcastic there.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Ha. That's hilarious. A mod openly admits they're worried about an entire user revolt if they actually tell the users what they're doing.

And of course you get upvoted and I get downvoted.

Wow. Just wow. To any sane person this thread would be a perfect example of the problems I'm trying to expose.

[–]Zerosa 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Now I'm worried that the users would get so fucking annoyed with us that they want to not deal with the sub anymore.

The /r/cfb mods have a good relationship with our users and we do not want to throw that away.

[–]orangeslash 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (8子コメント)

The posting of content that deserves removal is worse than both.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Except much/most of the content that gets removed is completely normal and does not deserve to get removed. The users can also moderate via downvotes.

Your argument is similar to "a murderer getting off is worse than accidentally killing an innocent person". IE: the death penalty argument. Which is pretty much well established that killing innocent people is worse.

And nowhere have I even argued for "content that deserves removal" to not be removed. I've only argued for notifying people when and why their content is removed.

[–]orangeslash 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Are we just making blanket statements and hoping they stick? 99% of removed posts we deal with are either rule-breaking, spam, or reposts. Where are you gathering your info from?

To respond to your edit, it's absurd to think that every user who posts something incorrectly should be coddled and told what's wrong. Read the rules of the sub and use the search bar. If you notice your content gets removed, feel free to message us.

[–]glowingRadon 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

From his experience while he was a mod of r/health apparently. A position he was quickly removed from because he kept trying to approve obvious spam posts. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Just how bad of a job do you have to be doing to be removed from an unpaid volunteer position...

[–]OOvifteen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Where are you gathering your info from?

From post I've seen get removed both as a user and as a mod.

To respond to your edit, it's absurd to think that every user who posts something incorrectly should be coddled and told what's wrong. Read the rules of the sub and use the search bar. If you notice your content gets removed, feel free to message us.

It's like every single one of you is purposely ignoring everything I explain. Here it is once more:

  1. Many subs do not post all the rules/reasons they remove content.
  2. One of the main problems with the /r/health mods was that they do not respond to messages.
  3. "Noticing your content is removed" is extremely tedious when no reason/notification is given.

[–]iBleeedorange 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (41子コメント)

Anyone who is familiar with any of those users isn't surprised in the slightest way. I'm glad I can point to a well documented post pointing it all out.

[–]MaximilianKohler 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (40子コメント)

I'm surprised they didn't shadowban him as well... Those guys shadowbanned me either for simply asking for a removal explanation or for posting their response in other subs which monitor mod abuse: https://www.reddit.com/search?q=url%3AGo4Gl2g.png&sort=relevance&t=all

I'm certainly in agreement with OP. Besides the examples OP gave, /r/subredditcancer /r/oppression /r/censorship /r/muted /r/undelete are filled with daily examples of this mod abuse problem. Admins certainly need to take action.

[–]OOvifteen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (39子コメント)

._.

You've been banned from participating in /r/Health

subreddit message via /r/Health[M] sent 8 minutes ago

You have been banned from participating in /r/Health. You can still view and subscribe to /r/Health, but you won't be able to post or comment.

If you have a question regarding your ban, you can contact the moderator team for /r/Health by replying to this message.

Reminder from the Reddit staff: If you use another account to circumvent this subreddit ban, that will be considered a violation of the Content Policy and can result in your account being suspended from the site as a whole.

[–]IranianGenius 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (14子コメント)

I mean are you surprised? If you made a public post about how much you hated how I mod in one of my subreddits, I'd probably ban you too, whether or not I agree with some of the things you've said about some of the moderators you mentioned in this post.

[–]davidreiss666 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Pretty much it. He has been grinding the gears and agitating about the problems at /r/Health for quite a bit now. Since he was removed. Before then too, but we did make a good faith effort to try and work with him then. Now he's just angry he was removed. And I'm sad that we were forced to remove him, but we're better off now without him.

We tried, I should have removed him a few weeks before Anutensil did..... that's on me. Let me clearly state, Anutensil was not wrong about remvoing him.

Anyway, today another mod banned him cause he just kept throwing sand in the gears. We're going to let that stand too. We got here in a slightly bad way, but it is where we need to be now.

[–]iBleeedorange 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (4子コメント)

This is funny. You shit on /r/sports and we didn't ban you.

[–]IranianGenius 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I haven't visited, but being banned from a subreddit with over 6000 shadowbanned users not including the regularly banned users, wouldn't shock me, especially when the mod team follows the guidelines of telling users to kill themselves.

But I like you as a mod so you're the exception to that rule I guess. Every other active mod left /r/sports.

[–]appropriate-username 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

the mod team follows the guidelines of telling users to kill themselves.

If they do that, you can report them for encouraging violence. Nothing will probably change but ya never know.

[–]IranianGenius 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The admins suspended the top mod temporarily because of that. They told us on Slack that they didn't think it was a huge problem or something to that effect. Maybe /u/mannoslimmins can shed more light on it, since the bulk of the drama occurred dealing with topics that the head mod told me not to moderate.

[–]IranianGenius 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also honestly, after spending months defending that mod team, it's really important to me to distance myself from a team that uses that language. I don't want to be associated as a moderator with that kind of behavior.

It's different than complaining about mods who ban spam. Sports mods do that too, and they're honestly really good at it.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

If I were not to expose this problem, who else would do it?

If you made a public post about how much you hated how I mod in one of my subreddits, I'd probably ban you too

The fact that there are mods openly admitting this type of thing gives strong backing to the rules I'm saying are needed.

[–]IranianGenius 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Uh well yeah. Who wants a toxic user who is going to do nothing but bitch about the mods and how awful the subreddit is? If I were to be banned from the subreddits I've stopped moderating in, I would think "well that's expected" since I know that I don't get along well with certain mod teams.

Also, even the biggest subreddit (and one of the fastest growing defaults) has rules similar to what I just said:

Discussing your ban outside of the modmail thread will result in a permanent ban. Mods are volunteers, donating their time and effort to improve the community. When users discuss their ban elsewhere in an effort to rally against the team it causes unnecessary backlash over a simple infraction.

Granted I wouldn't ban you in AskReddit for bitching about what an awful mod I am (because you'd be right, and because AskReddit is pretty chill about not banning people), but every subreddit has different ways to handle users who just want to be negative.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not trying to just be negative, nor bitch about my ban. I'm trying to expose what I see as the biggest problem with reddit to the admins.

On a side note, I think that's a terrible rule.

[–]glowingRadon 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Each sub is a largely independent community. As long as no one's breaking the terms of service, Reddit isn't going to act. Think of subs as private forums (e.g. a private website running phpBB). Mods can ban you for whatever reason on a phpBB forum or on Reddit and there's nothing you can do.

[–]OOvifteen[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Except that's different. Those mods run and pay for their own private forums. Reddit is run by one entity and the admins can and should enforce sitewide rules to prevent abuse.

[–]glowingRadon 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Nope, not really different. Reddit is merely acting as the hosting company and provides free hosting to communities which are independently managed. Provided the communities don't breach the terms set by the hosting provider (Reddit), there's no reason to intervene.

[–]OOvifteen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're just sticking your head in the sand. Reddit admins have already demonstrated many times in the past years that they are willing to implement site-wide rules and police communities on reddit.

All I'm asking is that they extend their influence by making site-wide anti-abuse rules for mods.

[–]yeahmynameisbrian -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What the fuck are you even talking about? It's completely different. Reddit is a website where users can create communities, phpBB is fucking forum software. You don't know what you're talking about. Reddit does have rules and /u/OOvifteen is suggesting that these rules start to take in consideration abusive mods, which is very much needed.

[–]glowingRadon 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Let me guess what happens next. You're going to reply and ask why and be muted.

Then you'll come to complain that you were muted for asking why you were banned.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (2子コメント)

You don't find that to be abusive? This is the exact behavior I described in the OP. Banning people at will without any reason given and no reply when asked why. The fact that there seems to be numerous mods in this thread defending this behavior is a perfect example of why we need a site-wide fix.

[–]reseph 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You were banned as a mod?

[–]OOvifteen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

anutensil removed me as a mod a few weeks ago. I was just banned.

[–]OOvifteen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (17子コメント)

/u/davidreiss666 tagging you because it seemed like you were the only mod who even slightly gave a shit about properly modding the sub. See above. The fact that one of them banned me now just proves everything I've complained about.

You're evidently the "most head" mod who is also remotely active. It seems you could easily fix all these problems, so why tolerate the behavior of the other mods?

[–]davidreiss666 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (16子コメント)

I tried to explain that we can't allow the spam. You don't seem to understand what spam is and why it's bad. Yeah, I was absent but then I did tell you I was not going to be around a lot.

All that said, when you were removed as a mod..... I let it stand. You clearly were not working out and while it could have all worked out better, you don't understand how to mod /r/Health.

I really do wish we could have parted on better terms. When Antuesnil removed you, it really was well past the point when I should have removed you already myself. Anu and I normally don't get along, but she wasn't wrong about removing you.

Again, I apologize this didn't work out, but now it's a what's done is done situation. I wish you the best of luck going forward.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (15子コメント)

I tried to explain that we can't allow the spam.

What spam? I'm not trying to allow spam... That seems like a complete cop out of a statement... It seems that transparent modding is what's not desired?

I laid out all the changes I thought needed to be made in the original mod post you made. mvea agreed with them all saying they were common sense, the other mods said nothing. You seemed to agree with them as well. Then when I tried to change things the other mods changed them back... None of this has anything to do with spam...

Even from today I messaged the mods about a comment being removed due to it linking to another reddit thread. This is something you previously said was ok, yet Luster now decided was not. This is exactly the type of problem I've been talking about. The mod team just do random things on their own.

Your comment of "you don't understand how to mod /r/Health" only seems to mean you want the abusive, opaque style of moderation to continue... I don't see any reason why. None of the changes I implemented negatively affected spam.

[–]davidreiss666 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (14子コメント)

Dude, you wanted to blank the Automod-user-ban list entirely. 99% of those are spammers. Some are trolls. Maybe the trolls could be given a second chance, but the spammers.... they need to stay banned. I'm sorry that it didn't work out but at the end of the day, you don't seem to understand spam.

[–]OOvifteen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (13子コメント)

Dude, you wanted to blank the Automod-user-ban list entirely. 99% of those are spammers. Some are trolls. Maybe the trolls could be given a second chance, but the spammers.... they need to stay banned.

The way people were getting banned left and right suggests many of them were not spammers. Just look at how frivolously I got banned today. Most of the real spammers would delete their accounts right after being banned. Additionally I volunteered to deal with any spam that came about from removing the bans. And you agreed to let me do it, and now you're using that as an excuse for what happened? Again sounds like a cop out.

It's highly likely that many of those people listed in the automod are people like me.

but at the end of the day, you don't seem to understand spam

Had nothing to do with spam and you know it.

[–]glowingRadon 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Would you call these posts spam posts or not?

Post 1

Post 2

Post 3

Post 4

[–]OOvifteen[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Really depends on the kind of content you're looking for. Your sub has the word "marketing" in it...

  1. Is someone advertising something. If that's against your rules then it can be removed, and a notification of which rule it is breaking. From your sidebar info it seems to be spam.
  2. spam
  3. spam, what's the point of this?

[–]Tymanthius 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (12子コメント)

I do not agree with 1 as a reddit rule, but it is good practice.

Sometimes we remove things quietly to see if it's a real person or not. If they complain, and are decent about it, often it gets restored.

2, no way. SO much modmail is just random ugliness that deserves no response. Just no.

3, I kind of like. I don't see it happening, but it's a neat idea. (shameless plug - there's always /r/ReportTheBadModerator )

4, meh. I don't see a reason. Some subs are easy to mod, some are hard. I can do 20 easy ones, and maybe 3-4 hard ones w/o breaking a sweat.

complaining about the mods and arranging to organize a new sub. So "go make a new sub" is almost never a viable solution.

That's never true. Making a new sub is TOO easy. Advertising it is more difficult. You'd have PM ppl if the mods kill your post in thier sub.

Also, FYI, most mods don't seem to be like this.

[–]hobbitqueen 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

And 1 would never be possible until reddit makes a removal comment system like the one in toolbox inherent and it is supported across multiple mobile platforms.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Sometimes we remove things quietly to see if it's a real person or not. If they complain, and are decent about it, often it gets restored.

How the hell does that check if it's a real person? How is a real person going to know their content was removed?

2, no way. SO much modmail is just random ugliness that deserves no response. Just no.

Absolutely not the case with /r/health. That sounds like the kind of excuse the person in the previous thread made up but really isn't based in reality.

You'd have PM ppl if the mods kill your post in thier sub.

I did that with /r/health to /r/betterhealth and it didn't seem effective.

Also, FYI, most mods don't seem to be like this.

In my experience it seems about 50/50. And the bad ones are often in charge of a ton of subs, so removing a few bad apple power mods would be really helpful.

[–]eric_twinge 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (4子コメント)

In my experience

is your only experience this one with /r/Health? Do you think it is wise and responsible to extrapolate that time to all other subs and moderators?

[–]OOvifteen[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

is your only experience this one with /r/Health

No of course not. And you don't need to be a mod for that kind of experience either.

[–]eric_twinge 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

What other subreddits do you have experience moderating? What other mod teams have you gotten to know 'personally' and to look at their inner workings?

50/50 good/bad moderators seems like a bold claim. What specifics do you have to back that up like you've done with your time at /r/Health?

In my experience as a user across a large variety of subs I'd say I largely never even notice the mods. What are you doing that would bring so much moderator attention to yourself to quantify such a ratio as a normal user?

[–]OOvifteen[S] -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Not me personally, but I've seen a ton of complaints about it all over reddit. Threads like this for example. And I also gave an example about people bringing it up in almost every admin announcement post.

[–]eric_twinge 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Okay, well that just looks like confirmation bias to me. Redditors (internet users in general, really) love to complain about the smallest of perceived slights against them.

Now how many reddit users have voiced no complaints about mods? How many have even voiced gratitude or words of support? And how do those numbers compare to the DAE HATE MODS?!? circlejerk?

I mean, yeah dude, there are shit mods out there. And you went hunting for them in a shit sub. Congrats on finding what you knew you was there waiting for you. But to sit there and start spouting off site-wide assessments and equivalences based on your one experience and other trivial, one-sided complaints strikes me as just being the other face on the coin.

[–]Tymanthius 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (4子コメント)

know their content was removed?

Either they get no replies, or they see it's not listed on the sub's page, or they log out and check.

Super easy.

Absolutely not the case with /r/health.

Could be. Was and I'm sure still is in /r/parenting. You get spates of trolls. If you'd implement that idea, you'd have to have implement a 'it's just a troll' mechanism too. Which could be easily abused.

I did that with /r/health to /r/betterhealth and it didn't seem effective.

Growing a sub is hard. Look at all the ones I've created. Tiny. Granted, I don't put much effort in. But if that's all you did, well, it's going to take a long while. That doesn't mean that creating a new sub is not a viable option.

so removing a few bad apple power mods would be really helpful.

Don't agree w/ your 50/50 statement, but the second part is probably true.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Super easy.

Your definition of "super easy" fits my definition of "something extremely tedious that no user should have to regularly do". The fact that you're suggesting users should have to do this on a regular basis seems absurd.

[–]Tymanthius 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (2子コメント)

So you think users should never look at the front page of sub they are participating in?

Or go back to the post they created?

I mean, you just sound like you want to whine & change reddit to fit YOUR ideals at this point, rather than have a discussion.

[–]OOvifteen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I was referring to the "log out to check every single post & comment you make".

[–]Tymanthius 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Then you should have quoted that. I simply gave several ways you can you check something.

Also, to check all your posts by logging out, just go to your user page while logged out. :)

[–]IranianGenius 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I disagree strongly with your first two points. There's way too much spam on some subs to effectively do that. It would make moderating on mobile impossible.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have no experience with mobile, but if it prevents you from moderating properly then your position should be given up to people who can mod from PC.

[–]GodOfAtheism 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (9子コメント)

qgyh2, maxwellhill, and CG10277 are just completely inactive squatters. They don't reply to modmail or PMs.

Sounds about right. Don't worry, later they'll show up and undo what you did and probably can you too. Good times. Good times.

Anutensil & progress18 are two of the worst people you could ever put in charge of anything.

See above.

DAE remember the /r/technology drama from back in the day BTW?

[–]davidreiss666 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (6子コメント)

This one is more..... how shall we say, he doesn't understand modding and he doesn't understand spam. /r/Health gets as much spam as /r/Technology did when I modded there. I list 100 items on each page, and the spam page filters first page goes back six hours. All of it spam. Most of it shadow banned accounts and their friends spamming the same domain.

So the automod config deals with spam in large measure. Not that it doesn't also deal with some other assorted odds and ends like trolls and people who turn Health upside down to push fake cures for everything from cancer and AIDS to heart disease and acne. The last also includes people who claim your doctor is trying to slowly murder you and stuff too.

Anyway, he OOvifteen does seem to understand that these people are spammers, and/or worse. And/or as the worse also includes people who are spamming their "your doctor is murdering you" message to the world.

Anyway, I modded three people and decided to include OOvifteen because he seemed genuinely interested. I included the other two cause I mod with with progress18 elsewhere. And mvea mods /r/science and I wanted somebody along for the ride to help deal with the fake-health trolls and spammers.

I do want everyone to work together. I don't have a lot of time to mod right now, working a newish job and all. I'm waiting to get picked up for something right now..... the guy is running late so I'm typing this comment.

Long story short, OOvifteen doesn't understand modding and doesn't get what spam is and that we can't allow it. He thinks upvotes/downvotes are the answer to everything. I didn't post the screen shot of an admin once telling Qgyh2 that he must remove spam from /r/Technology.....but then, I'm not debating Q here.

Anyway, it came to a point that Anutensil removed him as a mod. And while I think she did it abruptly and rudely..... I let it stand. To be honest, I should have removed him a week or two previously. So, Anu did the right thing. I kept hoping that people would talk, Oovif would come around and everything would work out.

Sadly, I was wrong.

Then OOvifteen kept posting at /r/Health and making comments about the mod team being evil and stuff. Another mod banned him today, thus he created this post here.

A lot of this is on me. I should have remained more involved and provided more guidance. And when it came to it, I should have done my own dirty work and not forced Anutensil to do it for me.

So, from that point of view..... this was my little creation. That said, he's removed as a mod now and it's going to stay that way. No matter how we got here, OOvifteen just shouldn't mod /r/Health.

[–]GodOfAtheism 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Lots of folks like sausage, but they get real shocked when they tour the factory.

[–]davidreiss666 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

We aren't making porn at /r/Health. Not yet anyway. :-)

[–]GodOfAtheism 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

[–]davidreiss666 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I know, but sausage has another meaning too. And I was riffing off of that one. :-)

[–]autourbanbot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Here's the Urban Dictionary definition of sausage factory :


An unpleasant process, especially one that is hidden from public view, that is used to produce a widely consumed product: lots of people like sausage, but few would enjoy watching leftover animal parts ground up to make it.


Some college football teams have an easier time getting to BCS games than others, but it's all a big sausage factory anyway.


about | flag for glitch | Summon: urbanbot, what is something?

[–]IranianGenius 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I remember.

[–]davidreiss666 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This one isn't really on Antunsil in anyway. She did what needed to be done. What I should have did a week or two previously.

[–]armchairepicure 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Is this high school? What is this? It is the head mod's duty is to (a) train the mod team and (b) remove non-compliant moderators. That is what /u/maxxters did for /r/sex and then, when she stepped down, what /u/asalwaysitdepends does now. We had similar discussions in /r/mycology, which did have a personality dust up right around when I was invited to moderate there that was solved civilly by demoting the mod that caused the dust up (kicking him out and reinviting him so he had lower permissions over other mods). It is up to each sub's mod team to act like professionals when moderating.

Your head mod is your quality control officer, whose duties include keeping a responsive and active subreddit within the spirit of whatever the sub was founded to do. That is what makes Reddit great: that, aside from the site rules (which all mods should uphold vigorously, or else have the subreddit banned for site violations), subreddits get to define their own terms.

[–]OOvifteen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (10子コメント)

I don't know why this is getting upvoted... it has nothing to do with the OP.

There's not even really a "head mod" in /r/health, and that seems to be one of the problems. You have a bunch of people just doing whatever they want, and any attempt at reforming gets rebutted.

[–]Tymanthius 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

There's always a head mod. S/he's the one at the top of the mod list. Weather they DO anything or not, is a different story.

[–]armchairepicure 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

And this point is perhaps the only point that I could see codified by Admin, which is a petition process to have the head mod removed for inactivity or other problematic behaviors.

[–]OOvifteen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Does the amount of power one has always correspond to one's place on the mod list? Or does that only apply to the very top person?

[–]Tymanthius 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Anyone above you can demod you (unless they have limited permissions).

You REALLY need to learn about modding if you're going to come in here and complain about it and claim to have 'experience'. You're not even a neophyte and you're trying tell all of these more experienced mods how to run their subs, and reddit.

[–]armchairepicure 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

You are complaining about a mod team that is at odds with itself because the team lacks leadership. That is causing issues in a sub that you deem important.

Why is that an Admin issue? Why is a sitewide fix necessary? My subreddits are professional and our tasks as mods are clearly delineated. We do not need, nor do we want the intervention you seek.

Which is why your whole post reads a interpersonal drama.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (3子コメント)

My subreddits are professional and our tasks as mods are clearly delineated. We do not need, nor do we want the intervention you seek.

Then it shouldn't affect you, so why argue against it?

Why is a sitewide fix necessary?

This is only one example. This thing exists all over reddit. Others in the comments have given more examples.

interpersonal drama

You've misinterpreted it.

Why is that an Admin issue?

They're the only ones with the power to fix mod issues.

[–]armchairepicure 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Then it shouldn't affect you, so why argue against it?

Because a sitewide system of rules WOULD affect our rules. In theory, we would be allowed to contribute to any rule formation that would affect how we moderate, but a consensus rule making would likely negatively impact or even just change in an annoying way, some of the things we do.

They're the only ones with the power to fix mod issues.

By booting mods after constructing some sort of regulatory doctrine to mod mod behavior. Like they have time or inclination for that.

Finally:

You've misinterpreted it.

Read what you wrote. You got invited to mod a sub. You tried to help design rules for the sub. The mod team did not come to consensus. The mod team did not promulgate all the rules that all vocal or active mods had agreed upon. Then an inactive or otherwise uncollaborative mod punted you from moderation. Honestly? It sounds like you are crying over spilt milk. You were invited to and subsequently tried to help a sub sort out some governance issues. It didn't work due to moderator personalities and the head mod not punting or otherwise wrangling those mods who refused to fall in line with the agenda of change. This is an interpersonal problem.

It also highlights a fundamental flaw in the reddit universe, which is that neither the subreddits users nor subreddits mods are best suited to decide the fate of a sub when the head mod retires. In /r/sex, for example, we are petitioned regularly to go fuck our selves for our "cuck libtard" safe space policy and the bans that result from it. Our community is swarmed by sex negative users who, if given the option to remove us, would. If our head mod retired, it is possible that a power vacuum could emerge or that the premise of the sub (sex positive safe space) could be compromised. But because the user base doesn't believe that to be as important as the first head mod of our sub did and the new mods aren't upholding, how do you fix the sub? AND why do you think that the admins have any more or any less authority to decide the content and sub rules of a subreddit?

You have identified a paradox. Yes, it sucks that you care about /r/health and believe it is being mismanaged. But short of deleting the whole sub and letting something new spring up in its place, what should be the Admin role in determining a sub's rules and content? What role should the mods? What role should the subscribers? And what subscribers best embody the purpose of the sub?

In other words, this world is an imaginary house of cards. Your criticism, while totally understandable, is absurd in light of this paradox.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Now that you've expounded on the main issues your sub deals with, to me it seems that none of the rules I suggested would hurt your sub.

[–]armchairepicure 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

We have comprehensive sub rules and moderation documents, none of which I discussed. You are more than welcome to read through the sidebar and linked additional discussions of our rules and how we implement them for an actual idea of what we do in /r/sex.

That we are a safe space is the thesis of the sub, not the implementing rules.

[–]appropriate-username 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't know why this is getting upvoted... it has nothing to do with the OP.

The sentence after that seems like a specific example of armchair's general opinion...?

[–]reseph 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Overall the reddit admins desperately need to make some basic rules for moderators, and do more to prevent problematic mods from modding major subs & multiple subs.

Here you go: https://www.reddit.com/r/CommunityDialogue/comments/5ir2wq/so_heres_whats_really_really_really_going_on/

[–]OOvifteen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You must be invited to visit this community

[–]reseph 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes. If you didn't sign up for this mod discussion with the admins, you won't have access to it. It's a post by /u/AchievementUnlockd.

[–]yeahmynameisbrian 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I hate how people commenting are getting so stupidly caught up in the rules you've suggested rather than focusing on the main problem: Something needs to be done about abusive and shitty mods. Anyone who disagrees is lucky and hasn't come across an abusive/unreasonable mod. They ruin communities. People who say "Go make your own sub" don't realize how fucking long it takes for a sub to gain subscribers with hard, daily work. That is not a solution at all and completely avoids what really needs to be done.

Whilst I don't really agree with the things you have proposed as a solution, I think something definitely needs to happen. Mods need some kind of accountability for their actions.

[–]OOvifteen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It looks like many of the abusive mods on reddit who want to continue the zero accountability status quo have congregated here.

[–]yeahmynameisbrian -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It looks like it. I don't get how people can disagree that abusive mods shouldn't be taken care of. "Ya know what, I love when mods are unreasonable and ban innocent users, including me... Reddit should do nothing about it!"